Is there a function line 'pthread_cleanup_push' in Windows API? - winapi

In unix, there is functions named as 'pthread_cleanup_push' and 'pthread_cleanup_pop' to execute cleanup routine for resources or heap memory.
Is there such functions like them in Window API in this situation?
result = doSomething();
if (result = error) {
CloseHandle(hSomething1);
CloseHandle(hSomething2);
ExitThread(GetLastError());
}
result = doNextStep();
if (result == anotherError) {
// Redundant
CloseHandle(hSomething1);
CloseHandle(hSomething2);
ExitThread(GetLastError());
}
result = doNextStep2();
if (result == anotherError) {
// Redundant
CloseHandle(hSomething1);
CloseHandle(hSomething2);
ExitThread(GetLastError());
}

Related

How can I run useEffect on state change only and not on mount? [duplicate]

This question's answers are a community effort. Edit existing answers to improve this post. It is not currently accepting new answers or interactions.
After an AJAX request, sometimes my application may return an empty object, like:
var a = {};
How can I check whether that's the case?
ECMA 5+:
// because Object.keys(new Date()).length === 0;
// we have to do some additional check
obj // 👈 null and undefined check
&& Object.keys(obj).length === 0
&& Object.getPrototypeOf(obj) === Object.prototype
Note, though, that this creates an unnecessary array (the return value of keys).
Pre-ECMA 5:
function isEmpty(obj) {
for(var prop in obj) {
if(Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, prop)) {
return false;
}
}
return JSON.stringify(obj) === JSON.stringify({});
}
jQuery:
jQuery.isEmptyObject({}); // true
lodash:
_.isEmpty({}); // true
Underscore:
_.isEmpty({}); // true
Hoek
Hoek.deepEqual({}, {}); // true
ExtJS
Ext.Object.isEmpty({}); // true
AngularJS (version 1)
angular.equals({}, {}); // true
Ramda
R.isEmpty({}); // true
If ECMAScript 5 support is available, you can use Object.keys():
function isEmpty(obj) {
return Object.keys(obj).length === 0;
}
For ES3 and older, there's no easy way to do this. You'll have to loop over the properties explicitly:
function isEmpty(obj) {
for(var prop in obj) {
if(obj.hasOwnProperty(prop))
return false;
}
return true;
}
For those of you who have the same problem but use jQuery, you can use jQuery.isEmptyObject.
Performance
Today 2020.01.17, I performed tests on macOS High Sierra 10.13.6 on Chrome v79.0, Safari v13.0.4, and Firefox v72.0; for the chosen solutions.
Conclusions
Solutions based on for-in (A, J, L, M) are fastest
Solutions based on JSON.stringify (B, K) are slow
Surprisingly, the solution based on Object (N) is also slow
NOTE: This table does not match the photo below.
Details
There are 15 solutions presented in the snippet below.
If you want to run a performance test on your machine, click HERE.
This link was updated 2021.07.08, but tests originally were performed here - and results in the table above came from there (but now it looks like that service no longer works).
var log = (s, f) => console.log(`${s} --> {}:${f({})} {k:2}:${f({ k: 2 })}`);
function A(obj) {
for (var i in obj) return false;
return true;
}
function B(obj) {
return JSON.stringify(obj) === "{}";
}
function C(obj) {
return Object.keys(obj).length === 0;
}
function D(obj) {
return Object.entries(obj).length === 0;
}
function E(obj) {
return Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0;
}
function F(obj) {
return Object.keys(obj).length === 0 && obj.constructor === Object;
}
function G(obj) {
return typeof obj === "undefined" || !Boolean(Object.keys(obj)[0]);
}
function H(obj) {
return Object.entries(obj).length === 0 && obj.constructor === Object;
}
function I(obj) {
return Object.values(obj).every((val) => typeof val === "undefined");
}
function J(obj) {
for (const key in obj) {
if (hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key)) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
function K(obj) {
for (var prop in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
return false;
}
}
return JSON.stringify(obj) === JSON.stringify({});
}
function L(obj) {
for (var prop in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) return false;
}
return true;
}
function M(obj) {
for (var k in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(k)) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
function N(obj) {
return (
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0 &&
Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(obj).length === 0 &&
Object.getPrototypeOf(obj) === Object.prototype
);
}
function O(obj) {
return !(Object.getOwnPropertyNames !== undefined
? Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length !== 0
: (function () {
for (var key in obj) break;
return key !== null && key !== undefined;
})());
}
log("A", A);
log("B", B);
log("C", C);
log("D", D);
log("E", E);
log("F", F);
log("G", G);
log("H", H);
log("I", I);
log("J", J);
log("K", K);
log("L", L);
log("M", M);
log("N", N);
log("O", O);
You can use Underscore.js.
_.isEmpty({}); // true
if(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0){
//is empty
}
see http://bencollier.net/2011/04/javascript-is-an-object-empty/
How about using JSON.stringify? It is almost available in all modern browsers.
function isEmptyObject(obj){
return JSON.stringify(obj) === '{}';
}
There is a simple way if you are on a newer browser.
Object.keys(obj).length === 0
Old question, but just had the issue. Including JQuery is not really a good idea if your only purpose is to check if the object is not empty. Instead, just deep into JQuery's code, and you will get the answer:
function isEmptyObject(obj) {
var name;
for (name in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(name)) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
Using Object.keys(obj).length (as suggested above for ECMA 5+) is 10 times slower for empty objects! keep with the old school (for...in) option.
Tested under Node, Chrome, Firefox and IE 9, it becomes evident that for most use cases:
(for...in...) is the fastest option to use!
Object.keys(obj).length is 10 times slower for empty objects
JSON.stringify(obj).length is always the slowest (not suprising)
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length takes longer than Object.keys(obj).length can be much longer on some systems.
Bottom line performance wise, use:
function isEmpty(obj) {
for (var x in obj) { return false; }
return true;
}
or
function isEmpty(obj) {
for (var x in obj) { if (obj.hasOwnProperty(x)) return false; }
return true;
}
See detailed testing results and test code at Is object empty?
My take:
function isEmpty(obj) {
return Object.keys(obj).length === 0;
}
var a = {
a: 1,
b: 2
}
var b = {}
console.log(isEmpty(a)); // false
console.log(isEmpty(b)); // true
Just, I don't think all browsers implement Object.keys() currently.
I am using this.
function isObjectEmpty(object) {
var isEmpty = true;
for (keys in object) {
isEmpty = false;
break; // exiting since we found that the object is not empty
}
return isEmpty;
}
Eg:
var myObject = {}; // Object is empty
var isEmpty = isObjectEmpty(myObject); // will return true;
// populating the object
myObject = {"name":"John Smith","Address":"Kochi, Kerala"};
// check if the object is empty
isEmpty = isObjectEmpty(myObject); // will return false;
from here
Update
OR
you can use the jQuery implementation of isEmptyObject
function isEmptyObject(obj) {
var name;
for (name in obj) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
Just a workaround. Can your server generate some special property in case of no data?
For example:
var a = {empty:true};
Then you can easily check it in your AJAX callback code.
Another way to check it:
if (a.toSource() === "({})") // then 'a' is empty
EDIT:
If you use any JSON library (f.e. JSON.js) then you may try JSON.encode() function and test the result against empty value string.
1. Using Object.keys
Object.keys will return an Array, which contains the property names of the object. If the length of the array is 0, then we know that the object is empty.
function isEmpty(obj) {
return Object.keys(obj).length === 0 && obj.constructor === Object;
}
We can also check this using Object.values and Object.entries.
This is typically the easiest way to determine if an object is empty.
2. Looping over object properties with for…in
The for…in statement will loop through the enumerable property of object.
function isEmpty(obj) {
for(var prop in obj) {
if(obj.hasOwnProperty(prop))
return false;
}
return true;
}
In the above code, we will loop through object properties and if an object has at least one property, then it will enter the loop and return false. If the object doesn’t have any properties then it will return true.
#3. Using JSON.stringify
If we stringify the object and the result is simply an opening and closing bracket, we know the object is empty.
function isEmptyObject(obj){
return JSON.stringify(obj) === '{}';
}
4. Using jQuery
jQuery.isEmptyObject(obj);
5. Using Underscore and Lodash
_.isEmpty(obj);
Resource
function isEmpty(obj) {
for(var i in obj) { return false; }
return true;
}
The following example show how to test if a JavaScript object is empty, if by empty we means has no own properties to it.
The script works on ES6.
const isEmpty = (obj) => {
if (obj === null ||
obj === undefined ||
Array.isArray(obj) ||
typeof obj !== 'object'
) {
return true;
}
return Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0;
};
console.clear();
console.log('-----');
console.log(isEmpty('')); // true
console.log(isEmpty(33)); // true
console.log(isEmpty([])); // true
console.log(isEmpty({})); // true
console.log(isEmpty({ length: 0, custom_property: [] })); // false
console.log('-----');
console.log(isEmpty('Hello')); // true
console.log(isEmpty([1, 2, 3])); // true
console.log(isEmpty({ test: 1 })); // false
console.log(isEmpty({ length: 3, custom_property: [1, 2, 3] })); // false
console.log('-----');
console.log(isEmpty(new Date())); // true
console.log(isEmpty(Infinity)); // true
console.log(isEmpty(null)); // true
console.log(isEmpty(undefined)); // true
The correct answer is:
function isEmptyObject(obj) {
return (
Object.getPrototypeOf(obj) === Object.prototype &&
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0 &&
Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(obj).length === 0
);
}
This checks that:
The object's prototype is exactly Object.prototype.
The object has no own properties (regardless of enumerability).
The object has no own property symbols.
In other words, the object is indistinguishable from one created with {}.
jQuery have special function isEmptyObject() for this case:
jQuery.isEmptyObject({}) // true
jQuery.isEmptyObject({ foo: "bar" }) // false
Read more on http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.isEmptyObject/
Caveat! Beware of JSON's limitiations.
javascript:
obj={ f:function(){} };
alert( "Beware!! obj is NOT empty!\n\nobj = { f:function(){} }" +
"\n\nJSON.stringify( obj )\n\nreturns\n\n" +
JSON.stringify( obj ) );
displays
Beware!! obj is NOT empty!
obj = { f:function(){} }
JSON.stringify( obj )
returns
{}
To really accept ONLY {}, the best way to do it in Javascript using Lodash is:
_.isEmpty(value) && _.isPlainObject(value)
In addition to Thevs answer:
var o = {};
alert($.toJSON(o)=='{}'); // true
var o = {a:1};
alert($.toJSON(o)=='{}'); // false
it's jquery + jquery.json
Sugar.JS provides extended objects for this purpose. The code is clean and simple:
Make an extended object:
a = Object.extended({})
Check it's size:
a.size()
Pure Vanilla Javascript, and full backward compatibility
function isObjectDefined (Obj) {
if (Obj === null || typeof Obj !== 'object' ||
Object.prototype.toString.call(Obj) === '[object Array]') {
return false
} else {
for (var prop in Obj) {
if (Obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
return true
}
}
return JSON.stringify(Obj) !== JSON.stringify({})
}
}
console.log(isObjectDefined()) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined('')) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined(1)) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined('string')) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined(NaN)) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined(null)) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined({})) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined([])) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined({a: ''})) // true
IsEmpty Object, unexpectedly lost its meaning i.e.: it's programming semantics, when our famous guru from Yahoo introduced the customized non-enumerable Object properties to ECMA and they got accepted.
[ If you don't like history - feel free to skip right to the working code ]
I'm seeing lots of good answers \ solutions to this question \ problem.
However, grabbing the most recent extensions to ECMA Script is not the honest way to go. We used to hold back the Web back in the day to keep Netscape 4.x, and Netscape based pages work and projects alive, which (by the way) were extremely primitive backwards and idiosyncratic, refusing to use new W3C standards and propositions [ which were quite revolutionary for that time and coder friendly ] while now being brutal against our own legacy.
Killing Internet Explorer 11 is plain wrong! Yes, some old warriors that infiltrated Microsoft remaining dormant since the "Cold War" era, agreed to it - for all the wrong reasons. - But that doesn't make it right!
Making use, of a newly introduced method\property in your answers and handing it over as a discovery ("that was always there but we didn't notice it"), rather than a new invention (for what it really is), is somewhat 'green' and harmful. I used to make such mistakes some 20 years ago when I still couldn't tell what's already in there and treated everything I could find a reference for, as a common working solution...
Backward compatibility is important !
We just don't know it yet. That's the reason I got the need to share my 'centuries old' generic solution which remains backward and forward compatible to the unforeseen future.
There were lots of attacks on the in operator but I think the guys doing that have finally come to senses and really started to understand and appreciate a true Dynamic Type Language such as JavaScript and its beautiful nature.
My methods aim to be simple and nuclear and for reasons mentioned above, I don't call it "empty" because the meaning of that word is no longer accurate. Is Enumerable, seems to be the word with the exact meaning.
function isEnum( x ) { for( var p in x )return!0; return!1 };
Some use cases:
isEnum({1:0})
true
isEnum({})
false
isEnum(null)
false
Thanks for reading!
Best one-liner solution I could find (updated):
isEmpty = obj => !Object.values(obj).filter(e => typeof e !== 'undefined').length;
console.log(isEmpty({})) // true
console.log(isEmpty({a: undefined, b: undefined})) // true
console.log(isEmpty({a: undefined, b: void 1024, c: void 0})) // true
console.log(isEmpty({a: [undefined, undefined]})) // false
console.log(isEmpty({a: 1})) // false
console.log(isEmpty({a: ''})) // false
console.log(isEmpty({a: null, b: undefined})) // false
Another alternative is to use is.js (14kB) as opposed to jquery (32kB), lodash (50kB), or underscore (16.4kB). is.js proved to be the fastest library among aforementioned libraries that could be used to determine whether an object is empty.
http://jsperf.com/check-empty-object-using-libraries
Obviously all these libraries are not exactly the same so if you need to easily manipulate the DOM then jquery might still be a good choice or if you need more than just type checking then lodash or underscore might be good. As for is.js, here is the syntax:
var a = {};
is.empty(a); // true
is.empty({"hello": "world"}) // false
Like underscore's and lodash's _.isObject(), this is not exclusively for objects but also applies to arrays and strings.
Under the hood this library is using Object.getOwnPropertyNames which is similar to Object.keys but Object.getOwnPropertyNames is a more thorough since it will return enumerable and non-enumerable properties as described here.
is.empty = function(value) {
if(is.object(value)){
var num = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(value).length;
if(num === 0 || (num === 1 && is.array(value)) || (num === 2 && is.arguments(value))){
return true;
}
return false;
} else {
return value === '';
}
};
If you don't want to bring in a library (which is understandable) and you know that you are only checking objects (not arrays or strings) then the following function should suit your needs.
function isEmptyObject( obj ) {
return Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0;
}
This is only a bit faster than is.js though just because you aren't checking whether it is an object.
I know this doesn't answer 100% your question, but I have faced similar issues before and here's how I use to solve them:
I have an API that may return an empty object. Because I know what fields to expect from the API, I only check if any of the required fields are present or not.
For example:
API returns {} or {agentID: '1234' (required), address: '1234 lane' (opt),...}.
In my calling function, I'll only check
if(response.data && response.data.agentID) {
do something with my agentID
} else {
is empty response
}
This way I don't need to use those expensive methods to check if an object is empty. The object will be empty for my calling function if it doesn't have the agentID field.
We can check with vanilla js with handling null or undefined check also as follows,
function isEmptyObject(obj) {
return !!obj && Object.keys(obj).length === 0 && obj.constructor === Object;
}
//tests
isEmptyObject(new Boolean()); // false
isEmptyObject(new Array()); // false
isEmptyObject(new RegExp()); // false
isEmptyObject(new String()); // false
isEmptyObject(new Number()); // false
isEmptyObject(new Function()); // false
isEmptyObject(new Date()); // false
isEmptyObject(null); // false
isEmptyObject(undefined); // false
isEmptyObject({}); // true
I liked this one I came up with, with the help of some other answers here. Thought I'd share it.
Object.defineProperty(Object.prototype, 'isEmpty', {
get() {
for(var p in this) {
if (this.hasOwnProperty(p)) {return false}
}
return true;
}
});
let users = {};
let colors = {primary: 'red'};
let sizes = {sm: 100, md: 200, lg: 300};
console.log(
'\nusers =', users,
'\nusers.isEmpty ==> ' + users.isEmpty,
'\n\n-------------\n',
'\ncolors =', colors,
'\ncolors.isEmpty ==> ' + colors.isEmpty,
'\n\n-------------\n',
'\nsizes =', sizes,
'\nsizes.isEmpty ==> ' + sizes.isEmpty,
'\n',
''
);
It's weird that I haven't encountered a solution that compares the object's values as opposed to the existence of any entry (maybe I missed it among the many given solutions).
I would like to cover the case where an object is considered empty if all its values are undefined:
const isObjectEmpty = obj => Object.values(obj).every(val => typeof val === "undefined")
console.log(isObjectEmpty({})) // true
console.log(isObjectEmpty({ foo: undefined, bar: undefined })) // true
console.log(isObjectEmpty({ foo: false, bar: null })) // false
Example usage
Let's say, for the sake of example, you have a function (paintOnCanvas) that destructs values from its argument (x, y and size). If all of them are undefined, they are to be left out of the resulting set of options. If not they are not, all of them are included.
function paintOnCanvas ({ brush, x, y, size }) {
const baseOptions = { brush }
const areaOptions = { x, y, size }
const options = isObjectEmpty(areaOptions) ? baseOptions : { ...baseOptions, areaOptions }
// ...
}

ON_CONTROL_RANGE C++ error invalid type conversion

I am programming the windows base application using MFC. when I was trying to use ON_CONTROL_RANGE function there is an error message popped up.
Visual Studio was used to build the app.
error
E0171 invalid type conversion
why is this error comes up,
give me a hint
Code
#define IDC_USR_MANUAL_TUNING_CH1_CHECK 1134
#define IDC_USR_MANUAL_TUNING_CH7_CHECK 1140
ON_CONTROL_RANGE(BN_CLICKED, IDC_USR_MANUAL_TUNING_CH1_CHECK, IDC_USR_MANUAL_TUNING_CH8_CHECK, OnUsrManualTuningChCheck)
void CMainteManualTuningDialog::OnUsrManualTuningChCheck(int nId)
{
if (FALSE == m_bInitFlag) // Initialization flag TRUE: Initialized / FALSE: Uninitialized
{
return;
}
UpdateData(TRUE);
int nChCnt = nId - IDC_USR_MANUAL_TUNING_CH1_CHECK;
if ((CH1 > nChCnt) || (CH8 < nChCnt))
{
return;
}
// unused
if (FALSE == m_bUseCheck[nChCnt])
{
if (nChCnt == m_rbutCh)
{
MessageBox("While selecting a channel, it cannot be invalidated.");
m_bUseCheck[nChCnt] = TRUE; // invalid
}
else
{
m_butUseCheck[nChCnt].SetWindowText(MSG_IGNORE); // Ignore
m_butChSel[nChCnt].EnableWindow(FALSE); // invalid
g_eTuningStat[nChCnt] = E_TUNING_STAT_NONE; // unused
m_strStatCh[nChCnt] = MSG_NONE; // unused
if (FALSE == m_clp->ZeroSetSend(nChCnt, m_pcTuningData))
{
((CMicroDetectorView*)m_hpView)->PostMessage(WM_USR_ALARM, eAPP_T);
}
}
}
// use
else
{
m_butUseCheck[nChCnt].SetWindowText(MSG_USE); // Use
m_butChSel[nChCnt].EnableWindow(TRUE); // Effectiveness
// Unadjusted the adjustment status
SetStatStill(nChCnt);
}
UpdateData(FALSE);
}
when we use the ON_CONTROL_RANGE(wNotifyCode, id, idLast, memberFxn)
memberFxn Fn has to use UINT variables

Correct way of synchronization between a method and a stop functionality

I have a function (lets call it function A) that 0 to many threads can access it (at the same time, no shared resources). At any given time, the user can use to stop the process. The stop functionality needs to make sure that there are threads accessing function A, so that a graceful shutdown can be performed. Is there a native procedure to do so?
What I was going to do is have an InterlockedIncrement an integer everytime function A is called (and a corresponding InterlockedDecrement on said integer when function A exists). When an InterlockedDecrement takes place, it checks the value of the integer, if it's set to zero, a event is set to signalled. If the value is not zero, the event is set to nonsignalled.
This makes sense in my mind, but I'm curious whether there is a more native structure / functionality adapted to do so.
I still have to thing about the fact the "stop" function may get starved (in the sense, the said integer may never be set to zero). A sidenote: when the stop event takes place, the InterlockedIncrement process shall be stopped, to reduce said starvation.
what you need and want implement is called Run-Down Protection. unfortunately it supported only in kernel mode, but not hard implement it yourself in user mode too.
the simplest implementation is next:
HANDLE ghStopEvent;
LONG gLockCount = 1;
BOOLEAN bStop = FALSE;
void unlock()
{
if (!InterlockedDecrement(&gLockCount)) SetEvent(ghStopEvent);
}
BOOL lock()
{
LONG Value = gLockCount, NewValue;
for ( ; !bStop && Value; Value = NewValue)
{
NewValue = InterlockedCompareExchange(&gLockCount, Value + 1, Value);
if (NewValue == Value) return TRUE;
}
return FALSE;
}
void funcA();
void UseA()
{
if (lock())
{
funcA();
unlock();
}
}
and when you want begin rundown - once call
bStop = TRUE; unlock();
how you can see lock function is interlocked increment gLockCount on 1 but only if it not 0.
in kernel mode you can call instead
EX_RUNDOWN_REF gRunRef;
void UseA()
{
if (ExAcquireRundownProtection(&gRunRef))
{
funcA();
ExReleaseRundownProtection(&gRunRef)
}
}
and on place final unlock - ExWaitForRundownProtectionRelease
some more complex and scalable implementation of rundown-protection:
#define RUNDOWN_INIT_VALUE 0x80000000
#define RUNDOWN_COMPLETE_VALUE 0
class __declspec(novtable) RUNDOWN_REF
{
LONG _LockCount;
protected:
virtual void RundownCompleted() = 0;
public:
BOOL IsRundownBegin()
{
return 0 <= _LockCount;
}
void Reinit()
{
if (InterlockedCompareExchange(&_LockCount, RUNDOWN_INIT_VALUE, RUNDOWN_COMPLETE_VALUE) != RUNDOWN_COMPLETE_VALUE)
{
__debugbreak();
}
}
RUNDOWN_REF()
{
_LockCount = RUNDOWN_INIT_VALUE;
}
BOOL AcquireRundownProtection()
{
LONG Value = _LockCount, NewValue;
for ( ; Value < 0; Value = NewValue)
{
NewValue = InterlockedCompareExchange(&_LockCount, Value + 1, Value);
if (NewValue == Value) return TRUE;
}
return FALSE;
}
void ReleaseRundownProtection()
{
if (RUNDOWN_COMPLETE_VALUE == InterlockedDecrement(&_LockCount))
{
RundownCompleted();
}
}
void BeginRundown()
{
if (AcquireRundownProtection())
{
_interlockedbittestandreset(&_LockCount, 31);
ReleaseRundownProtection();
}
}
};
and use it like:
class MY_RUNDOWN_REF : public RUNDOWN_REF
{
HANDLE _hEvent;
virtual void RundownCompleted()
{
SetEvent(_hEvent);
}
// ...
} gRunRef;
void UseA()
{
if (gRunRef.AcquireRundownProtection())
{
funcA();
gRunRef.ReleaseRundownProtection();
}
}
and when you want stop:
gRunRef.BeginRundown();// can be safe called multiple times
// wait on gRunRef._hEvent here
interesting that in kernel exist else one (more old - from win2000, when rundown protection from xp) api Remove Locks. it do almost the same. different only in internal implementation and usage. with remove locks code will be look like this:
IO_REMOVE_LOCK gLock;
void UseA()
{
if (0 <= IoAcquireRemoveLock(&gLock, 0))
{
funcA();
IoReleaseRemoveLock(&gLock, 0);
}
}
and when we want stop - call
IoAcquireRemoveLock(&gLock, 0);
IoReleaseRemoveLockAndWait(&gLock, 0);
my first code spinet by implementation near remove locks implementation, when second near rundown-protection implementation. but by sense both do the same

alBufferData() sets AL_INVALID_OPERATION when using buffer ID obtained from alSourceUnqueueBuffers()

I am trying to stream audio data from disk using OpenAL's buffer queueing mechanism. I load and enqueue 4 buffers, start the source playing, and check in a regular intervals to refresh the queue. Everything looks like it's going splendidly, up until the first time I try to load data into a recycled buffer I got from alSourceUnqueueBuffers(). In this situation, alBufferData() always sets AL_INVALID_OPERATION, which according to the official v1.1 spec, it doesn't seem like it should be able to do.
I have searched extensively on Google and StackOverflow, and can't seem to find any reason why this would happen. The closest thing I found was someone with a possibly-related issue in an archived forum post, but details are few and responses are null. There was also this SO question with slightly different circumstances, but the only answer's suggestion does not help.
Possibly helpful: I know my context and device are configured correctly, because loading small wav files completely into a single buffer and playing them works fine. Through experimentation, I've also found that queueing 2 buffers, starting the source playing, and immediately loading and enqueueing the other two buffers throws no errors; it's only when I've unqueued a processed buffer that I run into trouble.
The relevant code:
static constexpr int MAX_BUFFER_COUNT = 4;
#define alCall(funcCall) {funcCall; SoundyOutport::CheckError(__FILE__, __LINE__, #funcCall) ? abort() : ((void)0); }
bool SoundyOutport::CheckError(const string &pFile, int pLine, const string &pfunc)
{
ALenum tErrCode = alGetError();
if(tErrCode != 0)
{
auto tMsg = alGetString(tErrCode);
Log::e(ro::TAG) << tMsg << " at " << pFile << "(" << pLine << "):\n"
<< "\tAL call " << pfunc << " failed." << end;
return true;
}
return false;
}
void SoundyOutport::EnqueueBuffer(const float* pData, int pFrames)
{
static int called = 0;
++called;
ALint tState;
alCall(alGetSourcei(mSourceId, AL_SOURCE_TYPE, &tState));
if(tState == AL_STATIC)
{
Stop();
// alCall(alSourcei(mSourceId, AL_BUFFER, NULL));
}
ALuint tBufId = AL_NONE;
int tQueuedBuffers = QueuedUpBuffers();
int tReady = ProcessedBuffers();
if(tQueuedBuffers < MAX_BUFFER_COUNT)
{
tBufId = mBufferIds[tQueuedBuffers];
}
else if(tReady > 0)
{
// the fifth time through, this code gets hit
alCall(alSourceUnqueueBuffers(mSourceId, 1, &tBufId));
// debug code: make sure these values go down by one
tQueuedBuffers = QueuedUpBuffers();
tReady = ProcessedBuffers();
}
else
{
return; // no update needed yet.
}
void* tConverted = convert(pData, pFrames);
// the fifth time through, we get AL_INVALID_OPERATION, and call abort()
alCall(alBufferData(tBufId, mFormat, tConverted, pFrames * mBitdepth/8, mSampleRate));
alCall(alSourceQueueBuffers(mSourceId, 1, &mBufferId));
if(mBitdepth == BITDEPTH_8)
{
delete (uint8_t*)tConverted;
}
else // if(mBitdepth == BITDEPTH_16)
{
delete (uint16_t*)tConverted;
}
}
void SoundyOutport::PlayBufferedStream()
{
if(!StreamingMode() || !QueuedUpBuffers())
{
Log::w(ro::TAG) << "Attempted to play an unbuffered stream" << end;
return;
}
alCall(alSourcei(mSourceId, AL_LOOPING, AL_FALSE)); // never loop streams
alCall(alSourcePlay(mSourceId));
}
int SoundyOutport::QueuedUpBuffers()
{
int tCount = 0;
alCall(alGetSourcei(mSourceId, AL_BUFFERS_QUEUED, &tCount));
return tCount;
}
int SoundyOutport::ProcessedBuffers()
{
int tCount = 0;
alCall(alGetSourcei(mSourceId, AL_BUFFERS_PROCESSED, &tCount));
return tCount;
}
void SoundyOutport::Stop()
{
if(Playing())
{
alCall(alSourceStop(mSourceId));
}
int tBuffers;
alCall(alGetSourcei(mSourceId, AL_BUFFERS_QUEUED, &tBuffers));
if(tBuffers)
{
ALuint tDummy[tBuffers];
alCall(alSourceUnqueueBuffers(mSourceId, tBuffers, tDummy));
}
alCall(alSourcei(mSourceId, AL_BUFFER, AL_NONE));
}
bool SoundyOutport::Playing()
{
ALint tPlaying;
alCall(alGetSourcei(mSourceId, AL_SOURCE_STATE, &tPlaying));
return tPlaying == AL_PLAYING;
}
bool SoundyOutport::StreamingMode()
{
ALint tState;
alCall(alGetSourcei(mSourceId, AL_SOURCE_TYPE, &tState));
return tState == AL_STREAMING;
}
bool SoundyOutport::StaticMode()
{
ALint tState;
alCall(alGetSourcei(mSourceId, AL_SOURCE_TYPE, &tState));
return tState == AL_STATIC;
}
And here's an annotated screen cap of what I see in my debugger when I hit the error:
I've tried a bunch of little tweaks and variations, and the result is always the same. I've wasted too many days trying to fix this. Please help :)
This error occurs when you trying to fill buffer with data, when the buffer is still queued to the source.
Also this code is wrong.
if(tQueuedBuffers < MAX_BUFFER_COUNT)
{
tBufId = mBufferIds[tQueuedBuffers];
}
else if(tReady > 0)
{
// the fifth time through, this code gets hit
alCall(alSourceUnqueueBuffers(mSourceId, 1, &tBufId));
// debug code: make sure these values go down by one
tQueuedBuffers = QueuedUpBuffers();
tReady = ProcessedBuffers();
}
else
{
return; // no update needed yet.
}
You can fill buffer with data only if it unqueued from source. But your first if block gets tBufId that queued to the source. Rewrite code like so
if(tReady > 0)
{
// the fifth time through, this code gets hit
alCall(alSourceUnqueueBuffers(mSourceId, 1, &tBufId));
// debug code: make sure these values go down by one
tQueuedBuffers = QueuedUpBuffers();
tReady = ProcessedBuffers();
}
else
{
return; // no update needed yet.
}

Tracking with Java Script if Ajax request is going on in a webpage or Intercept XMLHttpRequest through Selenium Web driver

I am using Selenium WebDriver for crawling a web site(only for example, I will be crawling other web sites too!) which has infinite scroll.
Problem statement:
Scroll down the infinite scroll page till the content stops loading using Selenium web driver.
My Approach:
Currently I am doing this-
Step 1: Scroll to the page bottom
JavascriptExecutor js = (JavascriptExecutor) driver;
js.executeScript("javascript:window.onload=toBottom();"+
"function toBottom(){" +
"window.scrollTo(0,Math.max(document.documentElement.scrollHeight," +
"document.body.scrollHeight,document.documentElement.clientHeight));" +
"}");
Then I wait for some time to let the Ajax Request complete like this-
Step 2: Explicitly wait for Ajax request to be over
Thread.sleep(1000);
Then I give another java script to check if the page is scrollable
Step 3:Check if the page is scrollable
//Alternative to document.height is to be used which is document.body.clientHeight
//refer to https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/DOM/document.height
if((Long)js.executeScript("return " +
"(document.body.clientHeight-(window.pageYOffset + window.innerHeight))")>0)
If the above condition is true then I repeat the from Step 1 - 3, till condition in Step 3 is false.
The Problem:
I do not want to give the Thread.sleep(1000); in step 2, rather I would like to check using Java Script if the background Ajax request is over and then scroll down further if the condition in Step 3 is true .
PS: I am not the developer of the page so I do not have access to the code running the page, I can just inject java scripts(as in Step 1 and 3) in the web page. And, I have to write a generic logic for any web site with Ajax requests during infinite scroll.
I will be grateful to some one could spare some time here!
EDIT : Ok, after struggling for 2 days, I have figured out that the pages which I am crawling through the Selenium WebDriver can have any of these JavaScript libraries and I will have to pool according to the different Library, for example, In case of the web application using jQuery api, I may be waiting for
(Long)((JavascriptExecutor)driver).executeScript("return jQuery.active")
to return a zero.
Likewise if the web application is using the Prototype JavaScript library I will have to wait for
(Long)((JavascriptExecutor)driver).executeScript("return Ajax.activeRequestCount")
to return a zero.
Now, the problem is how do I write a generic code which could handle most the JavaScript libraries available?
Problem I am facing in implementing this-
1. How do I find which JavaScript Library is being used in the Web Application(using Selenium WebDriver in Java), such that I can then write the corresponding wait methods?
Currently, I am using this
Code
2. This way I will have to write as many as 77 methods for separate JavaScript library so, I need a better way to handle this scenario as well.
In short, I need to figure out if the browser is making any call(Ajax or simple) with or without any JavaScript library through Selenium Web Driver's java implementation
PS: there are Add ons for Chorme's JavaScript Lib detector and Firefox's JavaScript Library detector which detect the JavaScript library being used.
For web pages with Ajax Response during the infinite scroll and using jQuery API(or other actions), before starting to opening the web page.
//Inject the pooling status variable
js.executeScript("window.status = 'fail';");
//Attach the Ajax call back method
js.executeScript( "$(document).ajaxComplete(function() {" +
"status = 'success';});");
Step 1: will remain the same as in the original question
Step 2 Pooling the following script(This is the one which removes the need of Thread.Sleep() and makes the logic more dynamic)
String aStatus = (String)js.executeScript("return status;");
if(aStatus!=null && aStatus.equalsIgnoreCase("success")){
js.executeScript("status = 'fail';");
break poolingLoop;
}
Step 3: No need now!
Conclusion: No need to give blunt Thread.sleep(); again and again while using Selenium WebDriver!!
This approach works good only if there's jQuery api being used in the web application.
EDIT:
As per the the link given by #jayati i injected the javascript-
Javascript one:
//XMLHttpRequest instrumentation/wrapping
var startTracing = function (onnew) {
var OldXHR = window.XMLHttpRequest;
// create a wrapper object that has the same interfaces as a regular XMLHttpRequest object
// see http://www.xulplanet.com/references/objref/XMLHttpRequest.html for reference on XHR object
var NewXHR = function() {
var self = this;
var actualXHR = new OldXHR();
// private callbacks (for UI):
// onopen, onsend, onsetrequestheader, onupdate, ...
this.requestHeaders = "";
this.requestBody = "";
// emulate methods from regular XMLHttpRequest object
this.open = function(a, b, c, d, e) {
self.openMethod = a.toUpperCase();
self.openURL = b;
ajaxRequestStarted = 'open';
if (self.onopen != null && typeof(self.onopen) == "function") {
self.onopen(a,b,c,d,e); }
return actualXHR.open(a,b,c,d,e);
}
this.send = function(a) {
ajaxRequestStarted = 'send';
if (self.onsend != null && typeof(this.onsend) == "function") {
self.onsend(a); }
self.requestBody += a;
return actualXHR.send(a);
}
this.setRequestHeader = function(a, b) {
if (self.onsetrequestheader != null && typeof(self.onsetrequestheader) == "function") { self.onsetrequestheader(a, b); }
self.requestHeaders += a + ":" + b + "\r\n";
return actualXHR.setRequestHeader(a, b);
}
this.getRequestHeader = function() {
return actualXHR.getRequestHeader();
}
this.getResponseHeader = function(a) { return actualXHR.getResponseHeader(a); }
this.getAllResponseHeaders = function() { return actualXHR.getAllResponseHeaders(); }
this.abort = function() { return actualXHR.abort(); }
this.addEventListener = function(a, b, c) { return actualXHR.addEventListener(a, b, c); }
this.dispatchEvent = function(e) { return actualXHR.dispatchEvent(e); }
this.openRequest = function(a, b, c, d, e) { return actualXHR.openRequest(a, b, c, d, e); }
this.overrideMimeType = function(e) { return actualXHR.overrideMimeType(e); }
this.removeEventListener = function(a, b, c) { return actualXHR.removeEventListener(a, b, c); }
// copy the values from actualXHR back onto self
function copyState() {
// copy properties back from the actual XHR to the wrapper
try {
self.readyState = actualXHR.readyState;
} catch (e) {}
try {
self.status = actualXHR.status;
} catch (e) {}
try {
self.responseText = actualXHR.responseText;
} catch (e) {}
try {
self.statusText = actualXHR.statusText;
} catch (e) {}
try {
self.responseXML = actualXHR.responseXML;
} catch (e) {}
}
// emulate callbacks from regular XMLHttpRequest object
actualXHR.onreadystatechange = function() {
copyState();
try {
if (self.onupdate != null && typeof(self.onupdate) == "function") { self.onupdate(); }
} catch (e) {}
// onreadystatechange callback
if (self.onreadystatechange != null && typeof(self.onreadystatechange) == "function") { return self.onreadystatechange(); }
}
actualXHR.onerror = function(e) {
ajaxRequestComplete = 'err';
copyState();
try {
if (self.onupdate != null && typeof(self.onupdate) == "function") { self.onupdate(); }
} catch (e) {}
if (self.onerror != null && typeof(self.onerror) == "function") {
return self.onerror(e);
} else if (self.onreadystatechange != null && typeof(self.onreadystatechange) == "function") {
return self.onreadystatechange();
}
}
actualXHR.onload = function(e) {
ajaxRequestComplete = 'loaded';
copyState();
try {
if (self.onupdate != null && typeof(self.onupdate) == "function") { self.onupdate(); }
} catch (e) {}
if (self.onload != null && typeof(self.onload) == "function") {
return self.onload(e);
} else if (self.onreadystatechange != null && typeof(self.onreadystatechange) == "function") {
return self.onreadystatechange();
}
}
actualXHR.onprogress = function(e) {
copyState();
try {
if (self.onupdate != null && typeof(self.onupdate) == "function") { self.onupdate(); }
} catch (e) {}
if (self.onprogress != null && typeof(self.onprogress) == "function") {
return self.onprogress(e);
} else if (self.onreadystatechange != null && typeof(self.onreadystatechange) == "function") {
return self.onreadystatechange();
}
}
if (onnew && typeof(onnew) == "function") { onnew(this); }
}
window.XMLHttpRequest = NewXHR;
}
window.ajaxRequestComplete = 'no';//Make as a global javascript variable
window.ajaxRequestStarted = 'no';
startTracing();
Or Javascript Two:
var startTracing = function (onnew) {
window.ajaxRequestComplete = 'no';//Make as a global javascript variable
window.ajaxRequestStarted = 'no';
XMLHttpRequest.prototype.uniqueID = function() {
if (!this.uniqueIDMemo) {
this.uniqueIDMemo = Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000);
}
return this.uniqueIDMemo;
}
XMLHttpRequest.prototype.oldOpen = XMLHttpRequest.prototype.open;
var newOpen = function(method, url, async, user, password) {
ajaxRequestStarted = 'open';
/*alert(ajaxRequestStarted);*/
this.oldOpen(method, url, async, user, password);
}
XMLHttpRequest.prototype.open = newOpen;
XMLHttpRequest.prototype.oldSend = XMLHttpRequest.prototype.send;
var newSend = function(a) {
var xhr = this;
var onload = function() {
ajaxRequestComplete = 'loaded';
/*alert(ajaxRequestComplete);*/
};
var onerror = function( ) {
ajaxRequestComplete = 'Err';
/*alert(ajaxRequestComplete);*/
};
xhr.addEventListener("load", onload, false);
xhr.addEventListener("error", onerror, false);
xhr.oldSend(a);
}
XMLHttpRequest.prototype.send = newSend;
}
startTracing();
And checking the status of the status vars ajaxRequestStarted, ajaxRequestComplete in the java code, one can determine if the ajax was started or completed.
Now I have a way to wait till an Ajax is complete, I can also find if the Ajax was triggered on some action
Approach 1:
Your approach is good, just a few changes would do the trick:
Step 1: Improve this step to call the toBottom function at regular interval using window.setInterval. At (c >= totalcount) call window.clearInterval
Setp 2: Instead of checking the page is yet scrollable, check if (c >= totalcount). And this condition every 200ms until (c >= totalcount) returns true.
FYI: If the Step 1 doesn't work in all the browsers then probably, you can refer to line 5210 of Tata-Nano-Reviews-925076578.js and call this with cvariable checking.
Approach 2:
Go to jQuery API and type "ajax". You can find some callback handlers which could be used for ajax requests.
Probably, set a variable before the request is been sent and after it is been received appropriately.
And in between use your original method of scrolling to bottom at regular interval, unless you can no more scroll. At this point clear the interval variable.
Now, regularly check if that interval variable is null or not. Null would mean that you have reached the bottom.
We had to solve the same problem, and managed using a long Javascript function. Just need to add checks to see which library is not undefined.
PS Thanks for giving me an easy answer for how to check for in progress Prototype requests!
eg. Handle JQuery and XHR/Prototype
var jsExecutor = /*Get your WebDriverInstance*/ as IJavaScriptExecutor;
while(/*your required timeout here*/)
{
var ajaxComplete =
jsExecutor.ExecuteScript("return ((typeof Ajax === 'undefined') ||
Ajax.activeRequestCount == 0) && ((typeof jQuery === 'undefined') || $.active == 0)");
if (ajaxIsComplete)
return
}

Resources