After updating to Xcode 12.2, my project started failing to compile because of Apple Silicon-related linking errors. I seem to have most of them fixed, but one sub-project that builds a statically-linked framework is giving me problems. And yet a sibling sub-project with apparently identical build settings doesn't.
During linking, I get this warning about the one framework:
ld: warning: ignoring file ...Build/Products/Debug-maccatalyst/TCSiOSC.framework/TCSiOSC, building for Mac Catalyst-x86_64 but attempting to link with file built for Mac Catalyst-arm64
I'm building on an Intel Mac, to boot (so "build active architecture only" is not a factor). I can't find any build setting that would address this problem, and a Web search turns up no hits on this exact error. Any ideas appreciated!
I consulted Apple for this one, and their engineer recommended some things:
Turn any Swift sub-projects into Swift packages, not embedded Xcode projects. So, I deleted one library's Xcode project from the parent project, and dragged its top-level directory into the parent project to include it as a Swift package. Now... this particular sub-project (SQLite.swift) already had a Swift package defined. I haven't generated a Swift package myself before, so I can't help with that. Also, don’t forget to add it to the Frameworks, Libraries, and Embedded Content list on the app’s target.
Go into your project's build settings and delete the "Supported platforms" setting. If you click on the "levels" button above the build-settings list, you can see where each setting is coming from. "Supported platforms" should be non-bold. Highlight the line and press Delete if it's bold. Then go into your target and do the same thing: delete "Supported platforms."
Set the Base SDK at your project (top) level to iOS; this is a must. Delete it from the target level, so it inherits from the project; I don't know if this holds true for multiple kinds of targets or all projects, but it's working for me.
Remove the VALID_ARCHS build setting from all targets, if it's present. That setting is deprecated.
The "build active architecture" setting doesn't make any difference after these changes in my case. The project now builds and runs under Catalyst just fine.
I have the same issue and found this question. In my case, building on Debug succeeds but on Release fails. The reason is exactly the "build active architecture only" option. It is an option can be found in your PROJECT - "Build Setting" Tab then "Architectures" section. There is a setting for "Build active architecture only". By default, the Debug mode it is Yes while Release mode it is no. That caused my build to fail in release.
My coworker set up the Xcode+Fabric environment before he left, and we have several old build shown in Fabric, which we were able to distribute to team members.
Now I did a new build (say build 21) within Xcode and I'm able to run with iPhone simulator and it indeed shows build 21 there. But when I open fabric from the menu bar I still only see the old build 20.
Is there an additional step I need to do to make build 21 show up within Fabric thus we can distribute this new version?
Many Thanks in advance.
Today I checked out a new copy of stable project from gitHub to my home computer using Xcode 6.1. After doing so, I see that many of the frameworks and libraries, including XCTest, are missing (shown in red). I have added Framework and Header Search Paths, but they are still not found.
To make things stranger, I can build the project to a simulator or device, but when I try to run an individual test, I get clang or missing file error for the libraries/frameworks shown in red.
As it turns out, the reason for my errors was that I had not run "Build for Testing" before trying to run the individual Unit Tests. As such, the proper library dependencies had not been generated.
It seems that XCode always builds both Debug anв Release configurations (see screenshot attached). I can't untoggle "Profile" option. I need to build Debug version only in 95% of my time. How can I save time by not building Release version every time I press "Build"?
By default, XCode practically always build for Debug, in Release XCode build only when you select from menu Archive or to Profile (shortcut cmd+I) and you see this because when selected you see XCode build your project.
The tab you selected just shows the target(s) (MagicCards1 here) that will be built for each action (Run, Profile, Archive...).
Only one build will be made with the appropriate build configuration (Debug, Release, ...) for any given action: your screenshot shows that the 'Debug' configuration will be used to build your target when you run your project, leading me to think that Xcode already does what you're expecting (and that it'll only compile the source files that changed since the last build).
You can try to compare Debug and Release builds made from scratch by cleaning (Shift+Cmd+K) and building (Cmd+R) with different build configurations in the scheme's Run settings.
You should also check if 'Build Active Architecture Only' is set to Yes and if 'Analyze during Build' is set to No in your Build Settings:
You may also want to watch this WWDC 2013 video: Xcode Core Concepts 401. Schemes are covered around the 44'-mark.
https://developer.apple.com/videos/wwdc/2013/?include=401#401
I'm working on an iOS app project, and add the json-framework project to the workspace. The project navigator on the left shows both projects, and the build scheme selector shows the schemes from both projects too. Now I want to add the libjson.a target from the json-framework project as a dependency on the iOS app target in the other project. The expected result is that whenever the app target is built, it builds (if necessary) the library target and links the app target against it. Here are the ways I've tried to do this:
Build both as part of the same scheme. The way I try this is to edit the scheme for my app, adding 'libjson.a' to the 'Build' portion of the scheme, and by the way "Find Implicit Dependencies" is checked. Then I go to the target editor for my app target, and in "Build Phases"->"Link Binary With Libraries", I choose 'libjson.a' from the list of workspace libraries.
When I subsequently try to build the scheme, I see it build the library target, but building the app target fails with linker error "Library not found for -ljson" - suggesting that it hasn't actually discovered that the library has been built. Indeed in the project navigator, the entry under the app project for the library is still red indicating that the file doesn't exist.
Add the json target as an explicit dependency. To try this, I don't modify the build scheme, but go to the target editor for my app target and click the add button under 'Target Dependencies'. No targets from other projects in the workspace show up, so this is a non-starter.
Drag the JSON project into the other project, then add the target as a dependency. This is what I would have done in Xcode 3. In the project navigator, I grab the library project and drag it over the app project. This brings up the usual 'add files' pane, which I just dismiss by clicking 'Finish'.
There are now two entries for the library project in the project navigator: one at the top level, and one under the app project. I can now add the library target as a dependency of the app target using the target editor, and can link against it without error in the link libraries phase. But it looks broken: there are multiple entries for the same project in the navigator. Is there a different way to do this?
What should be considered the "Xcode 4-ish" way of connecting these targets in different projects in the same workspace? It would seem lacking if multiple projects in the same workspace can't actually interact with each other.
Thanks,
Graham.
I’ve just set a test project up, pretty much as you describe in version 3, by creating a new workspace and dragging the two Xcode project into it, nested as shown.
You can delete the sibling project if you have it already.
Hitting build on this and it just works, as far as I can see.
I imagine there is internal path-confusion if you have two projects, and I’d be inclined to fiddle with location settings in "View"->"Utilities"->"File Inspector" and see what effect that has.
Another thing to try is to set your paths up in Xcode "Preferences…"->"Source Trees" and refer to them that way, as described here: Easy, Modular Code Sharing Across iPhone Apps: Static Libraries and Cross-Project References
HTH. Andy W.
I managed to get dependencies between projects in a workspace to work as I described here: http://blog.carbonfive.com/2011/04/04/using-open-source-static-libraries-in-xcode-4/.
Unfortunately I can't find a way to get Xcode to discover implicit dependencies or index everything in the build as advertised. I found workaround to both but I'm hoping that less manual configuration will be needed as Xcode 4 matures.
I was going to ask the same question, thinking that my own solution couldn't be right. But I don't see it mentioned here, and it does seem to work. Clearly XCode 4 is a work in progress. :)
I have a workspace with two projects: a static library and an app which uses the library. The projects are siblings. Each project has its own scheme, and each scheme is set to only build one target. In other words, I added two projects to the workspace and that's it.
To add the static library as a dependency of the app, I just drag the libsomething.a product from the library project (Project Navigator) into the "Link Binary with Libraries" list for the app target. That's it. Now when I build the app the library project is built first and then linked. Interestingly, when I modify the app's scheme to use a different configuration (eg, Release instead of Debug), the library is built using the same configuration.
So it works, and there is clearly some automatic dependency checking going on here. But it feels wrong. Then again, so does the modal scheme editor/manager and lack of a workspace object in the project navigator... I never thought I'd say it, but the Visual Studio UI (bleh) is a lot clearer.
My bullet-proof solution to do this :
Create "Per Debug-Release / Per Architecture" settings in Build Settings in the Main project (not the lib), to include either
../MyLibProject/build/Debug-iphoneos
or
../MyLibProject/build/Release-iphonesimulator
or
etc..
depending on the configuration (you can create those kind of configuration by clicking on the + next to Debug or Release and choose either "Any iOS Simulator SDK" or "any iOS SDK".
You need to do that for both "Header Search Path" (in case your library copy some headers files, which is more than likely) AND for "Library Search Paths". Which means that for each setting, you'll probably end-up with 4 different paths (debug sim , debug ios, release sim, release ios).
That would make sure the configuration of both projects match.
Now, to auto-compile the lib, that is to create the dependency, you can use the "Build Phase -> Link to Binary With Libraries -> + -> select the .a file" advice given above.
That's the only way I managed to have something that builds and link correctly for every environment on xcode 4.5
Note : I even added the -lmyLib flag in "other linker flags", but i'm not sure that's really necessary
I've had some success with creating framework-like static libraries, though it's not a perfect solution.
I see the next variants:
Explicit dependency in a project[About]
Implicit dependency in a workspace[About]
See the Xcode user guide: Xcode Concepts -> Xcode workspace under 'Projects in a Workspace Share a Build Directory'.
All projects in a single workspace share a build directory. Dependencies are discovered automatically and build if needed:
"Xcode examines the files in the build directory to discover implicit dependencies. For example, if one project included in a workspace builds a library that is linked against by another project in the same workspace, Xcode automatically builds the library before building the other project, even if the build configuration does not make this dependency explicit. You can override such implicit dependencies with explicit build settings if necessary. For explicit dependencies, you must create project references."