How do I pass the selected value from the first dropdown to the second drop down ?
this is the link I am following [link][1]
// Import the JsonSlurper class to parse Dockerhub API response
import groovy.json.JsonSlurper
// Set the URL we want to read from, it is MySQL from official Library for this example, limited to 20 results only.
docker_image_tags_url = "https://hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/library/mysql/tags/?page_size=20"
try {
// Set requirements for the HTTP GET request, you can add Content-Type headers and so on...
def http_client = new URL(docker_image_tags_url).openConnection() as HttpURLConnection
http_client.setRequestMethod('GET')
// Run the HTTP request
http_client.connect()
// Prepare a variable where we save parsed JSON as a HashMap, it's good for our use case, as we just need the 'name' of each tag.
def dockerhub_response = [:]
// Check if we got HTTP 200, otherwise exit
if (http_client.responseCode == 200) {
dockerhub_response = new JsonSlurper().parseText(http_client.inputStream.getText('UTF-8'))
} else {
println("HTTP response error")
System.exit(0)
}
// Prepare a List to collect the tag names into
def image_tag_list = []
// Iterate the HashMap of all Tags and grab only their "names" into our List
dockerhub_response.results.each { tag_metadata ->
image_tag_list.add(tag_metadata.name)
}
// The returned value MUST be a Groovy type of List or a related type (inherited from List)
// It is necessary for the Active Choice plugin to display results in a combo-box
return image_tag_list.sort()
} catch (Exception e) {
// handle exceptions like timeout, connection errors, etc.
println(e)
}
I have another active choice box groovy script,expecting a value from the above dropdown
box. I have tried
env = params.mysql_image_version
// def env="dev" // this works but I am hard coding the value ,instead of getting it dynamically from the above dropdown box
env_list.each { env ->
stack_list.add(github_response.get("dev"))
}
print stack_list
Related
I have a url:
https://cn.company.com/appv2/search
and want to have a different map local depending on the request coming with a different parameter in the body (i.e. it is NOT attached to the url like https://cn.company.com/appv2/search?cursor=abc. Instead it is in the body of the request { cursor: abc }.
Any idea on if this can be done in proxyman?
I basically want to be able to stub pagination through the proxy without waiting on a server implementation. So I'd have no cursor on the first request, server would return a cursor and then use that on the next request and get a different response from server on the request so that I can test out the full pagination flow.
Yes, it can be solved with the Scripting from Proxyman app.
Use Scripting to get the value of the request body
If it's matched, use Scripting to mimic the Map Local (Mock API also supports)
Here is the sample code and how to do it:
Firstly, call your request and make sure you can see the HTTPS Response
Right-Click on the request -> Tools -> Scripting
Select the Mock API checkbox if you'd like a Mock API
Use this code
/// This func is called if the Response Checkbox is Enabled. You can modify the Response Data here before it goes to the client
/// e.g. Add/Update/Remove: headers, statusCode, comment, color and body (json, plain-text, base64 encoded string)
///
async function onResponse(context, url, request, response) {
// get the value from the body request
var cursorValue = request.body["cursor"];
// Use if to provide a map local file
if (cursorValue === "abc") {
// Set Content Type as a JSON
response.headers["Content-Type"] = "application/json";
// Set a Map Local File
response.bodyFilePath = "~/Desktop/my_response_A.json";
} else if (cursorValue === "def") {
// Set Content Type as a JSON
response.headers["Content-Type"] = "application/json";
// Set a Map Local File
response.bodyFilePath = "~/Desktop/my_response_B.json";
}
// Done
return response;
}
Reference
Map Local with Scripting: https://docs.proxyman.io/scripting/snippet-code#map-a-local-file-to-responses-body-like-map-local-tool-proxyman-2.25.0+
I have a question regarding a small issue that I'm having. I've created a widget that will live on the Service Portal to allow an admin to Accept or Reject requests.
The data for the widget is pulling from the Approvals (approval_approver) table. Under my GlideRecord, I have a query that checks for the state as requested. (Ex. addQuery('state', 'requested'))
To narrow down the search, I tried entering addQuery('sys_id', current.sys_id). When I use this query, my script breaks and I get an error on the Service Portal end.
Here's a sample of the GlideRecord script I've written to Accept.
[//Accept Request
if(input && input.action=="acceptApproval") {
var inRec1 = new GlideRecord('sysapproval_approver');
inRec1.addQuery('state', 'requested');
//inRec1.get('sys_id', current.sys_id);
inRec1.query();
if(inRec1.next()) {
inRec1.setValue('state', 'Approved');
inRec1.setValue('approver', gs.getUserID());
gs.addInfoMessage("Accept Approval Processed");
inRec1.update();
}
}][1]
I've research the web, tried using $sp.getParameter() as a work-around and no change.
I would really appreciate any help or insight on what I can do different to get script to work and filter the right records.
If I understand your question correctly, you are asking how to get the sysId of the sysapproval_approver record from the client-side in a widget.
Unless you have defined current elsewhere in your server script, current is undefined. Secondly, $sp.getParameter() is used to retrieve URL parameters. So unless you've included the sysId as a URL parameter, that will not get you what you are looking for.
One pattern that I've used is to pass an object to the client after the initial query that gets the list of requests.
When you're ready to send input to the server from the client, you can add relevant information to the input object. See the simplified example below. For the sake of brevity, the code below does not include error handling.
// Client-side function
approveRequest = function(sysId) {
$scope.server.get({
action: "requestApproval",
sysId: sysId
})
.then(function(response) {
console.log("Request approved");
});
};
// Server-side
var requestGr = new GlideRecord();
requestGr.addQuery("SOME_QUERY");
requestGr.query(); // Retrieve initial list of requests to display in the template
data.requests = []; // Add array of requests to data object to be passed to the client via the controller
while(requestsGr.next()) {
data.requests.push({
"number": requestsGr.getValue("number");
"state" : requestsGr.getValue("state");
"sysId" : requestsGr.getValue("sys_id");
});
}
if(input && input.action=="acceptApproval") {
var sysapprovalGr = new GlideRecord('sysapproval_approver');
if(sysapprovalGr.get(input.sysId)) {
sysapprovalGr.setValue('state', 'Approved');
sysapprovalGr.setValue('approver', gs.getUserID());
sysapprovalGr.update();
gs.addInfoMessage("Accept Approval Processed");
}
...
Background: I have a List of strings which contains the different place IDs. Once a user has selected his location, I have a loop that executes and determines if each place in the list (I obtain the location from the place ID) is near his selected location. I was able to implement this with the old Places SDK but could not migrate it to the new SDK because it seems that the new SDK has no await() equivalent.
Here is my old code:
// contains a list of Offices. Has method getId() which contains the Place ID from Google.
List<Office> results = obtained from the database...
// go thru each Location and find those near the user's location
for (int i = 0; i < results.size(); i++) {
// Get the place from the placeID
PendingResult<PlaceBuffer> placeResult = Places.GeoDataApi.
getPlaceById(mGoogleApiClient, results.get(i).getId());
// wait for the result to come out (NEED EQUIVALENT IN NEW PLACES SDK)
PlaceBuffer places = placeResult.await();
// Get the latitude and longitude for the specific Location
LatLng latLng = places.get(0).getLatLng();
// Set the location object for the specific business
Location A = new Location("Business");
A.setLatitude(latLng.latitude);
A.setLongitude(latLng.longitude);
// get the distance of the business from the user's selected location
float distance = A.distanceTo(mSelectedLocation);
// if the distance is less than 50m away
if (distance < 50) { ... do something in code}
As you can see in the code above, the old PLACES SDK API has a PendingResult class with await() as one of the methods. This await() as per documentation Blocks until the task is completed.. IN SUMMARY, the code will not proceed till a result is obtained from getPlaceById.
I migrated to the new Places SDK as per documentation and I have issues. Here is my new migrated code based on the Google documentation: https://developers.google.com/places/android-sdk/client-migration#fetch_a_place_by_id
for (int i = 0; i < results.size(); i++) {
// Get the place Id
String placeId = results.get(position).getId();
// Specify the fields to return.
List<Place.Field> placeFields = Arrays.asList(Place.Field.ID, Place.Field.NAME,
Place.Field.LAT_LNG, Place.Field.ADDRESS);
// Construct a request object, passing the place ID and fields array.
FetchPlaceRequest request = FetchPlaceRequest.builder(placeId, placeFields)
.build();
// Add a listener to handle the response.
placesClient.fetchPlace(request).addOnSuccessListener((response) -> {
Place place = response.getPlace();
// Get the latitude and longitude for the specific location
LatLng latLng = place.getLatLng();
// Set the location object for the specific business
Location A = new Location("Business");
A.setLatitude(latLng.latitude);
A.setLongitude(latLng.longitude);
// get the distance of the business from the selected location
float distance = A.distanceTo(mSelectedLocation);
// if the distance is less than 50m away
if (distance < 50) { ... do something in code}
It seems that key issue here is that in the old code await() blocks the code till its successful hence the for loop does not process. However this is not the case with OnSuccessListener. As a result, with the new migrated code, the for loop proceeds and completes the loop even when fetchPlace is not yet complete getting its results for each iteration. Thus, the code is broken and is unable to get the results needed.
Is there a way to block the code to move till fetchPlace is completed?!
Any Google API task can be waited on by Google's Task API as far as I'm aware.
For example, findAutocompletePredictions returns a Task<> object. Instead of adding an onCompleteListener, you can pass that task to Tasks.await.
Instead of this non-blocking way:
OnCompleteListener<T> onCompleteListener=
new OnCompleteListener<T> {...}
placesClient.findAutocompletePredictions(f)
.addOnCompleteListener(onCompleteListener);
You could pass it on to Tasks.await() and make the API call blocking:
T results = null;
try {
// No timeout
results = Tasks.await(placesClient.findAutocompletePredictions(f));
// Optionally, with a 30 second timeout:
results = Tasks.await(
placesClient.findAutocompletePredictions(f), 30, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
} catch (ExecutionException e) {
// Catch me
} catch (TimeoutException e) {
// Catch me, only needed when a timeout is set
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// Catch me
}
if (results != null) {
// Do something
} else {
// Do another thing
}
Basically, instead of getting a PendingResult by default, you're now given a Task<T> that you can use however.
I solved the issue by using the Task Class. See below:
for (int position = 0; position < results.size(); position++) {
// Get the placeID
String placeId = results.get(position).getAddress();
// Specify the fields to return.
List<Place.Field> placeFields = Arrays.asList(Place.Field.ID, Place.Field.NAME,
Place.Field.LAT_LNG, Place.Field.ADDRESS);
// Construct a request object, passing the place ID and fields array.
FetchPlaceRequest request = FetchPlaceRequest.builder(placeId, placeFields)
.build();
// create a FetchPlaceResponse task
Task<FetchPlaceResponse> task = placesClient.fetchPlace(request);
try {
FetchPlaceResponse response = Tasks.await(task);
Place place = response.getPlace();
// Get the latitude and longitude for the specific place
LatLng latLng = place.getLatLng();
// Set the location object for the specific business
Location A = new Location("Business");
A.setLatitude(latLng.latitude);
A.setLongitude(latLng.longitude);
// get the distance of the business from the selected location
float distance = A.distanceTo(mSelectedLocation);
These two codes will ask the system to wait for the response..
Task task = placesClient.fetchPlace(request);
FetchPlaceResponse response = Tasks.await(task);
I am created a onBefore transform script.
(function runTransformScript(source, map, log, target /*undefined onStart*/ ) {
if(source.u_incident.nil()){
status_message="The Record is not inerted";
error_message="ERR001 Cell number can't be empty!";
ignore = true;
}
})(source, map, log, target);
I am sending the request from SOAP UI, if the u_incident value is empty it is not creating the new one as we mentioned ignore=true, but in the SOAP response body I am not getting status_message and error_message as expected the default messages are coming.
try
(function runTransformScript(source, map, log, target /*undefined onStart*/ ) {
if(source.u_incident.nil()){
response.status_message="The Record is not inerted";
response.error_message="ERR001 Cell number can't be empty!";
ignore = true;
}
})(source, map, log, target);
Below is a script that helps me build an extentreport for jmeter. It is a JSR223 PostProcessor element. It's working nicely however, the problem is that I have it duplicated after every HTTP Request in the script. I have several scripts with 100's of HTTP requests that would need essentially a copy of the same PostProcessor groovy script. This = hard to maintain!
I have tried splitting common parts into an external groovy script that I tried calling on the JSR223 PostProcessor. I also tried chunking up the bits of the script and putting the values into a csv so that I could just update the csv values if anything changed.
I'm sure there's a cleaner/better way to do this but I'm still learning so I'm not sure of the best way to make this easier to maintain. Here's the JSR223 PostProcessor. The only bit that changes with each http request is the "//test result" section
import com.relevantcodes.extentreports.ExtentReports;
import com.relevantcodes.extentreports.ExtentTest;
import com.relevantcodes.extentreports.LogStatus;
import java.io.File;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Properties;
//configure object for response data
def response = prev.getResponseDataAsString();
//configure extentreports objects
ExtentReports report;
ExtentTest testLogger;
//set location for file and report config
String resultsPath = "C:/portalQA/Automation/Results/";
String configPath = "C:/portalQA/Automation/JMeter/TestReportConfig/";
String reportPath =
resultsPath+"Login_Results_${reportDate}_${currentTime}_${testenv}.html";
File file = new File(reportPath);
if (!file.exists()) {
//if file does not exist, create it
report = new ExtentReports(reportPath, true);
report.loadConfig( new File(configPath+"extent-config.xml"));
} else {
//else append to existing report
report = new ExtentReports(reportPath, false);
report.loadConfig( new File(configPath+"extent-config.xml"));
}
//test result
testLogger = report.startTest("Authenticate");
testLogger.assignCategory("Initialize Session");
if (response.contains("com.blah.portal.model.User")) {
testLogger.log(LogStatus.PASS, "Logged in with: ${username}");
testLogger.log(LogStatus.INFO, response);
} else {
testLogger.log(LogStatus.FAIL, "Could not authenticate session");
testLogger.log(LogStatus.INFO, response);
}
log.info("Authenticate");
print("Authenticate print");
report.endTest(testLogger);
report.flush();
I see two options:
I suggest using JSR223 Listener instead. First of all, that way you will only have 1 listener in your script, which resolves your original problem, but it is a better option for writing into file in general, since listener has only one instance for all running threads, so you won't be creating a race condition when writing to file.
If you rather have a post-processor, you can put it on higher level (not under any particular sampler) which will cause it to run after each request within the same scope or below.
For example, configuration like
Thread Group
Post-processor
Sampler 1
...
Sampler N
Will cause Post-processor to run after each Sampler 1...Sampler N
In both cases you may need to check which sampler you are processing, and skip those you don't want to add to your report (easiest way to do it, is to come up with some name convention for excluded samplers)
I also faced the same challenge. In my case I need to check if JSON response from REST service was correct. I solved it in the following way.
I've created a JSR223 PreProcessor under the script root. It contains my custom class to handle JSON parsing and asserts.
import groovy.json.JsonSlurper
import org.apache.jmeter.assertions.AssertionResult
class CustomAssert {
def parseResponse(json) {
def jsonSlurper = new JsonSlurper()
return jsonSlurper.parseText(json)
}
def assertResult(assertionResult, expectedResult, actualResult) {
if (!expectedResult.equals(actualResult)) {
assertionResult.setFailure(true);
assertionResult.setFailureMessage("Expected ${expectedResult} but was ${actualResult}");
}
}
}
vars.putObject('customAssert', new CustomAssert())
Note the last line:
vars.putObject('customAssert', new CustomAssert())
I put an instance of my CustomAssert to vars.
Then under my HTTP Requests I've added JSR233 Assertion
def a = vars.getObject('customAssert')
def response = a.parseResponse(prev.getResponseDataAsString())
a.assertResult(AssertionResult, 'DRY', response.sensorResultHolderUIs[0].result.toString())
a.assertResult(AssertionResult, 'DRY', response.sensorResultHolderUIs[1].result.toString())
a.assertResult(AssertionResult, 'DRY', response.sensorResultHolderUIs[2].result.toString())
It basically retrieves the instance of CustomAssert from vars and calls its methods. I can put as many JSR233 Assertions as I want. The only code that is copied is those two lines on top:
def a = vars.getObject('customAssert')
def response = a.parseResponse(prev.getResponseDataAsString())
To sum up:
Take the common part of your code (that doesn't have to be copied).
Wrap it in a class.
Put the class in JSR233 PreProcessor under the root and export its instance via vars
Take the rest of your code and adjust it to use class defined in 2.
Put that code in as many JSR233 Assertions as you want remembering to retrieve the instance created in 3. from vars
Thank you user1053510. Your advice lead me to build my own JSR223 Listener that renders the report. Below is the code in my JSR223 Listener:
import com.aventstack.extentreports.*;
import com.aventstack.extentreports.reporter.*;
import com.aventstack.extentreports.markuputils.*;
ExtentHtmlReporter htmlReporter;
ExtentReports extent;
ExtentTest test;
// create the HtmlReporter
htmlReporter = new ExtentHtmlReporter("C:/AUTO_Results/Results_${testApp}_${reportDate}_${currentTime}_${testenv}.html");
//configure report
htmlReporter.config().setCreateOfflineReport(true);
htmlReporter.config().setChartVisibilityOnOpen(true);
htmlReporter.config().setDocumentTitle("${testApp} Results");
htmlReporter.config().setEncoding("utf-8");
htmlReporter.config().setReportName("${testApp} Results ${reportDate}_${currentTime}_${testenv}");
htmlReporter.setAppendExisting(true);
// create ExtentReports
extent = new ExtentReports();
// attach reporter to ExtentReports
extent.attachReporter(htmlReporter);
extent.setReportUsesManualConfiguration(true);
// Show Env section and set data on dashboard
extent.setSystemInfo("Tool","JMeter");
extent.setSystemInfo("Test Env","${testenv}");
extent.setSystemInfo("Test Date","${reportDate}");
extent.setSystemInfo("Test Time","${currentTime}");
//stringify test info
String threadName = sampler.getThreadName();
String samplerName = sampler.getName();
String requestData = props.get("propRequestData");
String respCode = props.get("propRespCode");
String respMessage = props.get("propRespMessage");
String responseData = props.get("propResponse");
// create test
test = extent.createTest(threadName+" - "+samplerName);
//test.assignCategory("API Testing");
// analyze sampler result
if (vars.get("JMeterThread.last_sample_ok") == "false") {
log.error("FAILED: "+samplerName);
print("FAILED: "+samplerName);
test.fail(MarkupHelper.createLabel("FAILED: "+sampler.getName(),ExtentColor.RED));
} else if (vars.get("JMeterThread.last_sample_ok") == "true") {
if(responseData.contains("#error")) {
log.info("FAILED: "+sampler.getName());
print("FAILED: "+sampler.getName());
test.fail(MarkupHelper.createLabel("FAILED: "+sampler.getName(),ExtentColor.RED));
} else if (responseData.contains("{")) {
log.info("Passed: "+sampler.getName());
print("Passed: "+sampler.getName());
test.pass(MarkupHelper.createLabel("Passed: "+sampler.getName(),ExtentColor.GREEN));
}
} else {
log.error("Something is really wonky");
print("Something is really wonky");
test.fatal("Something is really wonky");
}
//info messages
test.info("RequestData: "+requestData);
test.info("Response Code and Message: "+respCode+" "+respMessage);
test.info("ResponseData: "+responseData);
//playing around
//markupify json into code blocks
//Markup m = MarkupHelper.createCodeBlock(requestData);
//test.info(MarkupHelper.createModal("Modal text"));
//Markup mCard = MarkupHelper.createCard(requestData, ExtentColor.CYAN);
// test.info("Request "+m);
// test.info(mCard);
// test.info("Response Data: "+MarkupHelper.createCodeBlock(props.get("propResponse")));
// test.info("ASSERTION MESSAGE: "+props.get("propAssertion"));
// end the reporting and save the file
extent.flush();
Then in each threadgroup I have a BeanShell Assertion with these lines:
//request data
String requestData = new String(prev.SamplerData);
//String requestData = new String(requestData);
props.put("propRequestData", requestData);
//response data
String respData = new String(prev.ResponseData);
//String respData = new String(prev.getResponseDataAsString());
props.put("propResponse", respData);
//response code
String respCode = new String(prev.ResponseCode);
props.put("propRespCode",respCode);
//response message
String respMessage = new String(prev.ResponseMessage);
props.put("propRespMessage",respMessage);