Assuming the following metric:
cpu_count{machine="srv1", owner="Alice", department="ops"} 8
cpu_count{machine="srv1", owner="Bob", department="ops"} 8
I'd like to be able to prevent starting a new time series on owner change. It should still be considered the same instance, but I would like to be able to look up by owner.
I don't particularly care if it matches only on my_metric{owner=~"Box"} or on both my_metric{owner=~"Box"} and my_metric{owner=~"Alice"}, I just need to make sure it does not count twice on my_metric{machine=~"srv1"} or my_metric{department=~"ops"}.
I'm willing to accept that using labels to group instances in this manner is not the correct approach, but what is?
When you add the label "owner" to this kind of metric I think you're trying to accomplish a kind of "asset management" which could be done better with some other tool developed specific to this goal. Prometheus isn't a suitable tool to keep the information of who is using each machine in your company.
Said that, every time the owner of a machine changes you could workaround this issue deleting the old data series using the REST API executing something like this:
curl --silent --user USER:PASS --globoff --request POST "https://PROMETHEUS-SERVER/api/v1/admin/tsdb/delete_series?match[]={machine='srv1',owner='Bob'}"
If you can change the code, it would be better to have a metric dedicated to the ownership:
# all metrics are identified a usual
cpu_count{machine="srv1", department="ops"} 8
# use an info metrics to give details about owner
machine_info{machine="srv1", owner="Alice", department="ops"} 1
You can still aggregate the information id you need it:
cpu_count * ON(machine,department) machine_info
That way, the owner is not polluting all your metrics. Still, you will have issues when changing the owner of a machine while waiting for the older metric to disappear (5 minutes before staleness).
I have not tried it but a solution could be to use the time at which the ownership changed (if you can provide it) as a metric value - epoch time in seconds.
# owner changed at Sun, 08 Mar 2020 22:05:53 GMT
machine_info{machine="srv1", owner="Alice", department="ops"} 1583705153
# Previous owner Sat, 01 Feb 2020 00:00:00 GMT
machine_info{machine="srv1", owner="Alice", department="ops"} 1580515200
And then use the following expression to get the latest owner whenever you need the current owner - only useful when owner has changed within the last 5 minutes:
machine_info == ON(machine,department) BOOL (max(machine_info) BY(machine,department) )
Quite a mouthful but it would approach what you want.
Related
does anybody know why the code below does not bring data after 16:55hr? The market actually closes at 18:00 in Brazil. This happens for all tickers ending in ".SA" in Yahoo Finance.
import yfinance as yf
data = yf.download("PETR4.SA", group_by="Ticker", period='1mo', interval='5m',prepost = True)
data['ticker'] = "PETR4.SA"
data
Thanks!
This is kind of an interesting question. I checked the code. I've been working with several providers, including Yahoo Finance, and I believe it could be more a "pre definition" on the API than a programming/requisition mistake.
As the stock negotiations at B3 normally take place until 17:00 pm (-3 UTC, São Paulo Timezone), the function is returning the last valid computed value i.e. 16:55 pm.
As an exercise I tried to change the time in-between the data from "5m" to "2m" and I spotted the last value at 16:58 pm (same logic). I don't know how to bypass that.
It appears to be the way it works.
I am wondering about power automate flow and I issues I had.
I am trying to set up initialize variables for checking time (european standard time) in my rules.
Expression looks like this -
startOfHour(convertFromUtc(triggerOutputs()?['body/receivedDateTime'],'Central European Standard Time','t'), 't')
Under variables I have condition which (True/Not) like this -
YES - time is greater than 22:30 PM
NO - time is less than 8:00 AM
If condition is true, my e-mail is forwarded to another outlook mailbox.
If not, nothing happened.
But this flow doesn't work :D
Can you help me resolve it ?
Thanks a lot !
First part prtscrn
Second part prtscrn
Given the information provided, I suggest the following:
Get the current time.
Convert it to the desired time zone. You can use the built in function to avoid calculation errors.
Convert only hour and minute to Integer. For example, 14:33 would be 1433.
Compare integers. This is: if time is greater than 2230 and less than 830, then forward email.
The flow might look like this:
I am laying bets through the Betfair API and noticed something very strange. For some events the time is off on both market and event results.
My account date and time are set to Europe/London. Not that it matters, the API outputs whatever zone it wants anyway, apparently at random (sometimes GMT other times London or whatever other timezone, but the ISO timestamp does not include +0100 or whatever GMT offset), all this despite the fact that my account is set to EU/London.
For example let's take this event Superettan / Jonkopings Sodra v Varnamo
The API output is:
{"event"=>{"id"=>"28836884",
"name"=>"Jonkopings Sodra v Varnamo", "countryCode"=>"SE",
"timezone"=>"GMT", "openDate"=>"2018-08-13T18:00:00.000Z"
}, "marketCount"=>2}
Their website however says the event starts at 17:00 GMT / 18:00 London (now GMT+1).
There are hundreds examples like this. Cannot get anything out of Betfair support, they take days/weeks to reply and when they do they just send some canned message.
Has someone seen this issue before? Or perhaps I am missing something?
Later edit: I had to dump all their market data to reach this conclusion: it appears that when their API says the timezone is GMT the event is actually on London, so GMT+1 right now, and for every other timezone (Eu/London, Perth, US...) the time is actually on GMT. Not sure what's up with that. Still investigating.
All times returned by Betfair are in UTC - that's just the way the API works. They also supply time zones which may or may not be correct. Use the time zones as an indication of the local time of the event. However, the time zones are very "hit and miss", so don't rely on them to be correct. In fact, over time you will notice lots of "data errors" for non-pricing info on Betfair markets. This is just the way it goes. so don't expect them to fix the errors
Event.openDate is documented as "The scheduled start date and time of the event. This is Europe/London (GMT) by default" while Event.timezone is defined as "[the] timezone in which the event is taking place."
So, in one sense, the openDate in your API output is correct because it says 18:00. However, it's incorrect because it includes the Zulu 'Z' suffix indicating GMT / UTC. The inclusion of 'GMT' in the timezone field: a) is wrong; and b) just serves to confuse matters, IMHO.
Instead, I've started to use MarketCatalogue.marketStartTime which is defined as "The time this market starts at..." which isn't quite the same as openDate but, if they're going to be different, usually on Betfair you're more interested in when the market goes in-play than when the actual match / race / game begins.
The Events I'm using to validate this approach seem to work better this way. Bearing in mind that the UK moves from BST on 27 October to GMT on 28 October, from the API I'm receiving these as MarketCatalogue.marketStartTime:
Liverpool v Cardiff: "2018-10-27T14:00:00.000Z" [Correct: 14:00 GMT is 15:00 BST]
F1 Mexico Grand Prix [qualifying]: "2018-10-27T18:00:00.000Z" [Correct: 18:00 BST is 19:00 GMT]
Burnley v Chelsea: "2018-10-28T13:30:00.000Z" [Correct: 13:30 GMT is 13:30 GMT]
I want to fetch record from the sys_user table which is updated at or after certain time stamp.
for that I have created rest request as
https:/service-now.com/api/now/v1//table/sys_user?sysparm_query=sys_updated_on>=javascript:gs.dateGenerate('2017-10-30','01:25:00')
I had converted current time which is in IST format into GMT and pass it to dateGenerate() function.
Problem statement -
I don't want to convert the IST to GMT, is there any way by which i can identify ServiceNow instance time zone at runtime and convert given time into that time stamp and get the users.
If i can pass this date and time in UTC format.
Ahoy!
This is a great question, and something that's quite difficult in ServiceNow (dealing with time-zones).
As such, I've written a tool to manage this for you. It's totally free!
The tool is called TimeZoneUtil, and can be found here:
https://snprotips.com/blog/2017/9/12/handling-timezones-in-servicenow-timezoneutil
You simply need to initialize a GlideDateTime object, set its' time-zone to IST, use setDisplayValue() to set its' time based on IST current time, then use .getValue() to get that same time in system time.
This is because getDisplayValue()/setDisplayValue() work based on time-zone, whereas setValue()/getValue() always return the corresponding system time.
EDIT: In order to make this a little more clear, I'll provide some example usage below.
var tz = new TimeZoneUtils(); //initialize with current time
gs.print(tz.getOffsetHours()); //prints out "-7" in my instance, as the system time is in Pacific.
tz.setTimeZone('Asia/Kolkata'); //sets the time-zone to IST/UTC+5.5
gs.print(tz.getOffsetHours()); //prints "5.5".
gs.print(tz.getGDT().getDisplayValue()); //Prints the current time in IST (2017-11-01 20:52:31 at the moment).
gs.print(tz.getGDT().getValue()); //Prints the current time in system time (2017-11-01 15:23:12 at present).
gs.print(new TimeZoneUtils().setTimeZone('Asia/Kolkata').getDisplayValue()); //Single line, also prints current time in IST: 2017-11-01 20:52:31
The first 6 lines there, demonstrate basic usage and explain how it works.
The eighth line however, demonstrates usage on a single line, which you can use inside a query string. For example:
sysparm_query=sys_updated_on>=javascript:new TimeZoneUtils().setTimeZone('Asia/Kolkata').getDisplayValue()
Hope this helps!
Tim Woodruff
Author, Learning ServiceNow & Building Powerful Workflows
Owner/Founder, SN Pro Tips
Context
I have multiple servers listening to a specific collection (/items). Each of them use NTS for time calibration and the ".info/serverTimeOffset" to measure the expected time difference with Firebase. It is consistently around 20ms.
I have many clients pushing items to the collection with the specific field:
{
...
created: Firebase.database.ServerValue.TIMESTAMP
}
What is expected:
When the server receives the item from Firebase and subtracts the item.created with the Firebase expected time (Date.now() + offset), this value should be positive and probably around 10ms (time for the item to be sent from Firebase to the server).
What is happening:
When the server receives the items, the item.created field is superior to the Firebase expected time. Like it was created in the future. Usually the difference is around -5ms
Question:
What is the Firebase.database.ServerValue.TIMESTAMP set to ? and how is it related to the ".info/serverTimeOffset" ?
The 27th September 2016 at 1am UTC, that difference jumped from -5ms to around -5000ms like a kind of re-calibration happened (it lasted until I reset the .info/serverTimeOffset) Did someone experienced something similar?