Using .NET Framework MVC, one would register a custom model binder like so:
ModelBinders.Binders.Add(typeof(MyModel), new MyModelBinder());
Then any controller action that had a parameter of type MyModel would automatically use MyModelBinder to bind its value.
public ActionResult Test(MyModel o){
// dunski!
...
}
It seems like in .NET Core MVC, one must specify the use of MyModelBinder each time rather than registering it once only - or am I mistaken?
public IActionResult Test([ModelBinder(BinderType = typeof(MyModelBinder))] MyModel o){
...
}
Decorating the type that is being model-bound with the [ModelBinder] attribute will cause any parameter of the same type (in your controller actions) to be automatically bound using the model binder specified in the [ModelBinder] attribute.
Example:
[ModelBinder(BinderType = typeof(MyModelBinder))]
public class MyModel{
public string Name{ get; set; }
public string Age{ get; set; }
}
public class MyModelBinder : IModelBinder{
public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
// whatever model binding you need to do
bindingContext.Result = ModelBindingResult.Success(new MyModel());
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
}
More on this at official documentation
Related
The front-end of my application can send unknown number of POST values inside a form. Fro example in some cases there will be 3 values coming from certain textboxes, in some cases there will be 6 values coming from textboxes, dropdowns etc. The backend is ASP.NET Web API. I know that a simple .NET value can be passed in URI parameter to a "POST Action" using FromURI attribute and a complex type can be passed in body and fetched using FromBody attribute, in any POST Action. But in my case the number of form data values will NOT be constant rather variable and I can't use a pre-defined class to hold values using 'FromBody' attribute.
How can I tackle this situation?
You can use the FormDataCollection from the System.Net.Http.Formatting namespace.
public class ApiFormsController : ApiController
{
[HttpPost]
public IHttpActionResult PostForm(FormDataCollection form)
{
NameValueCollection items = form.ReadAsNameValueCollection();
foreach (string key in items.AllKeys)
{
string name = key;
string val = items[key];
}
return Ok();
}
}
Try to send this properties as list of properties. Make model something like this:
public class PostModel
{
public IEnumerable<PropertyModel> Properties { get; set; }
}
public class PropertyModel
{
public string Value { get; set; }
public string Source { get; set; }
// etc.
}
And action:
public IHttpActionResult Post(PostModel model)
{
//Omited
return Ok();
}
From what I can tell, ASP.Net Core performs model state validation before calling the relevant controller action method. This means that code in the action method isn't given an opportunity to add data to the model before it is validated.
What is the ASP.Net Core way of giving a view model access to additional, non-user-submitted data prior to validation?
Example
What I'm trying to do (doesn't work).
The view model's Validate method expects data to be in ValidOptions. However, since validation occurs before the controller can set this property, validation causes the view model to throw an ArgumentNullException.
// From the Controller
[HttpPost]
[ValidateAntiForgeryToken]
public async Task<IActionResult> Process([Bind("SelectedId")]ViewModels.Import details)
{
// data needed for validation
details.ValidOptions = await service.ImportTypes.ToListAsync();
if (ModelState.ValidationState != ModelValidationState.Valid) {
// ...
}
}
// From ViewModels.Import
public IEnumerable<Option> ValidOptions { get; set; }
public int SelectdId {get; set; }
public IEnumerable<ValidationResult> Validate(ValidationContext validationContext)
{
// throws ArgumentNullException because ValidOptions hasn't been set when this is executed
var option = ValidOptions.Single(t => t.Id == SelectdId);
//...
}
Probably many ways to skin a cat here. But the easiest for you is probably custom model binders. It's a way to "supplement" or change the binding of your model before it hits the controller. I will say that some see it as extremely bad practice to call an external service/repository at the point of model binding, but it does work and can come in handy.
You need to implement a class that inherits from IModelBinder.
public class MyViewModelBinder : IModelBinder
{
public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
//Bind here. Including calling external services if you want.
}
}
Then you need to implement a provider, this essentially says "when" to bind.
public class MyViewModelBinderProvider : IModelBinderProvider
{
public IModelBinder GetBinder(ModelBinderProviderContext context)
{
if (context.Metadata.ModelType == typeof(MyViewModel))
return new MyViewModelBinder();
return null;
}
}
In your configure method of your startup.cs, you need to add the provider to the ModelBinderProviders list.
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
// Add framework services.
services.AddMvc(config =>
config.ModelBinderProviders.Add(new MyViewModelBinderProvider())
);
}
Further Documentation :
http://dotnetcoretutorials.com/2016/12/28/custom-model-binders-asp-net-core/
http://intellitect.com/custom-model-binding-in-asp-net-core-1-0/
I don't think the official documentation has an article on custom model binders yet unfortunately.
I'm trying to write a custom model binder that can bind a property decorated with an attribute to a differently-named request property e.g.
JSON request
{
"app": "acme"
}
Request model (excerpt)
[Alias("app")]
public string ApplicationName { get; set; }
... should result in ApplicationName being populated with the value 'acme'. I'm getting stuck writing the custom model binder for this:
Model binder
public BindToAliasModelBinder : IModelBinder {
public bool BindModel(HttpActionContext actionContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext) {
...
}
}
Model binder provider
public class BindFromAliasModelBinderProvider : ModelBinderProvider {
public override IModelBinder GetBinder(HttpConfiguration configuration, Type modelType) {
return new BindFromAliasModelBinder();
}
}
I've registered the provider globally and the binder is being hit as expected. I'm at a loss for what to do next - how do I iterate through the request values and conditionally bind based on the presence of the attribute?
If all you want to do is aliasing, you can use JsonPropertyAttribute, something like [JsonProperty(PropertyName = "app")] on the property.
Is it possible to pass an ViewModel object to WebApi controller action instead of separate params?
Instead of using:
public class ContactsController : ApiController
{
public IEnumerable<Contact> GetContacts(string p1, string p2)
{
// some logic
}
}
I would like to use:
public class ContactsController : ApiController
{
public IEnumerable<Contact> GetContacts(TestVM testVM)
{
// some logic
}
}
public class TestVM
{
public string P1 { get; set; }
public string P2 { get; set; }
}
This doesn't seem to work for me. When I call /api/contacts/?P1=aaa&P2=bbb the testVM object doesn't get populated (null).
Also, I would like the TestVM to have valdiation attribtues defined and use ModelState.IsValid in my API controller.
Unless told otherwise WebApi will deserialise complex models using the content/body of the request. To tell WebApi to use the Url to construct the model you need to specify the [FromUri] attribute:
public IEnumerable<Contact> GetContacts([FromUri]TestVM testVM)
{
// some logic
}
I know it's kind of late to post another answer but I thought it could be useful for anyone who uses .net core as a web API service
public IEnumerable<Contact> GetContacts([FromQuery]TestVM testVM)
Since now I've used the excellent FluentValidation
library to validate my model classes. In web applications I use it in conjunction with the jquery.validate plugin to perform client side validation as well.
One drawback is that much of the validation logic is repeated on the client side and is no longer centralized at a single place.
For this reason I'm looking for an alternative. There are many examples out there showing the usage of data annotations to perform model validation. It looks very promising.
One thing I couldn't find out is how to validate a property that depends on another property value.
Let's take for example the following model:
public class Event
{
[Required]
public DateTime? StartDate { get; set; }
[Required]
public DateTime? EndDate { get; set; }
}
I would like to ensure that EndDate is greater than StartDate. I could write a custom
validation attribute extending ValidationAttribute in order to perform custom validation logic. Unfortunately I couldn't find a way to obtain the
model instance:
public class CustomValidationAttribute : ValidationAttribute
{
public override bool IsValid(object value)
{
// value represents the property value on which this attribute is applied
// but how to obtain the object instance to which this property belongs?
return true;
}
}
I found that the CustomValidationAttribute seems to do the job because it has this ValidationContext property that contains the object instance being validated. Unfortunately this attribute has been added only in .NET 4.0. So my question is: can I achieve the same functionality in .NET 3.5 SP1?
UPDATE:
It seems that FluentValidation already supports clientside validation and metadata in ASP.NET MVC 2.
Still it would be good to know though if data annotations could be used to validate dependent properties.
MVC2 comes with a sample "PropertiesMustMatchAttribute" that shows how to get DataAnnotations to work for you and it should work in both .NET 3.5 and .NET 4.0. That sample code looks like this:
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class, AllowMultiple = true, Inherited = true)]
public sealed class PropertiesMustMatchAttribute : ValidationAttribute
{
private const string _defaultErrorMessage = "'{0}' and '{1}' do not match.";
private readonly object _typeId = new object();
public PropertiesMustMatchAttribute(string originalProperty, string confirmProperty)
: base(_defaultErrorMessage)
{
OriginalProperty = originalProperty;
ConfirmProperty = confirmProperty;
}
public string ConfirmProperty
{
get;
private set;
}
public string OriginalProperty
{
get;
private set;
}
public override object TypeId
{
get
{
return _typeId;
}
}
public override string FormatErrorMessage(string name)
{
return String.Format(CultureInfo.CurrentUICulture, ErrorMessageString,
OriginalProperty, ConfirmProperty);
}
public override bool IsValid(object value)
{
PropertyDescriptorCollection properties = TypeDescriptor.GetProperties(value);
object originalValue = properties.Find(OriginalProperty, true /* ignoreCase */).GetValue(value);
object confirmValue = properties.Find(ConfirmProperty, true /* ignoreCase */).GetValue(value);
return Object.Equals(originalValue, confirmValue);
}
}
When you use that attribute, rather than put it on a property of your model class, you put it on the class itself:
[PropertiesMustMatch("NewPassword", "ConfirmPassword", ErrorMessage = "The new password and confirmation password do not match.")]
public class ChangePasswordModel
{
public string NewPassword { get; set; }
public string ConfirmPassword { get; set; }
}
When "IsValid" gets called on your custom attribute, the whole model instance is passed to it so you can get the dependent property values that way. You could easily follow this pattern to create a date comparison attribute, or even a more general comparison attribute.
Brad Wilson has a good example on his blog showing how to add the client-side portion of the validation as well, though I'm not sure if that example will work in both .NET 3.5 and .NET 4.0.
I had this very problem and recently open sourced my solution:
http://foolproof.codeplex.com/
Foolproof's solution to the example above would be:
public class Event
{
[Required]
public DateTime? StartDate { get; set; }
[Required]
[GreaterThan("StartDate")]
public DateTime? EndDate { get; set; }
}
Instead of the PropertiesMustMatch the CompareAttribute that can be used in MVC3. According to this link http://devtrends.co.uk/blog/the-complete-guide-to-validation-in-asp.net-mvc-3-part-1:
public class RegisterModel
{
// skipped
[Required]
[ValidatePasswordLength]
[DataType(DataType.Password)]
[Display(Name = "Password")]
public string Password { get; set; }
[DataType(DataType.Password)]
[Display(Name = "Confirm password")]
[Compare("Password", ErrorMessage = "The password and confirmation do not match.")]
public string ConfirmPassword { get; set; }
}
CompareAttribute is a new, very useful validator that is not actually
part of
System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations,
but has been added to the
System.Web.Mvc DLL by the team. Whilst
not particularly well named (the only
comparison it makes is to check for
equality, so perhaps EqualTo would be
more obvious), it is easy to see from
the usage that this validator checks
that the value of one property equals
the value of another property. You can
see from the code, that the attribute
takes in a string property which is
the name of the other property that
you are comparing. The classic usage
of this type of validator is what we
are using it for here: password
confirmation.
It took a little while since your question was asked, but if you still like metadata (at least sometimes), below there is yet another alternative solution, which allows you provide various logical expressions to the attributes:
[Required]
public DateTime? StartDate { get; set; }
[Required]
[AssertThat("StartDate != null && EndDate > StartDate")]
public DateTime? EndDate { get; set; }
It works for server as well as for client side. More details can be found here.
Because the methods of the DataAnnotations of .NET 3.5 don't allow you to supply the actual object validated or a validation context, you will have to do a bit of trickery to accomplish this. I must admit I'm not familiar with ASP.NET MVC, so I can't say how to do this exactly in conjunction with MCV, but you can try using a thread-static value to pass the argument itself. Here is an example with something that might work.
First create some sort of 'object scope' that allows you to pass objects around without having to pass them through the call stack:
public sealed class ContextScope : IDisposable
{
[ThreadStatic]
private static object currentContext;
public ContextScope(object context)
{
currentContext = context;
}
public static object CurrentContext
{
get { return context; }
}
public void Dispose()
{
currentContext = null;
}
}
Next, create your validator to use the ContextScope:
public class CustomValidationAttribute : ValidationAttribute
{
public override bool IsValid(object value)
{
Event e = (Event)ObjectContext.CurrentContext;
// validate event here.
}
}
And last but not least, ensure that the object is past around through the ContextScope:
Event eventToValidate = [....];
using (var scope new ContextScope(eventToValidate))
{
DataAnnotations.Validator.Validate(eventToValidate);
}
Is this useful?