I am working on migration of scripts from performance center to Jmeter5.2.1.
As part of this migration , we are using same functional flow which we did in performance center.
My scenario consists of users logging in to the web application perform 10-15 iterations and then logout.
This is my Testplan.
TestPlan
--ThreadGroup1
--Once Only Controller (login of users)
--Loop Controller (10 Iterations)
HTTP1
HTTP2
HTTP3
.
.
--Once only Controller (logout of users)
--csv Config data ( username/password)
--csv config data( unique data for the loop controller)
With this approach I am noticing that the time taken to complete the test in Jmeter is much more than what we have in performance center ( I took care of think times and added the similar values)
Why is my test run slow in Jmeter?
Is loop controller sequential? Meaning at a given time it can run only one request?
If not loop controller what other options we have to satisfy my scenario.
If I include different thread groups , carrying JSESSIONIDs needs to be done across thread groups which is not a best practice to do so.
Update:
Comparison between performance center and Jmeter settings
Below are the settings in Jmeter.
Thread Group settings:
TestPlan :
HTTP Cookie manager in Thread Group
CSV data files in Test plan
Once Only counters for Login and Logout
Loop Controller for Iterations.
HTTP request Defaults: ( Even with out checking retrieve all embedded and parallel downloads its taking more than an hour for 3 users)
TestPlan
Performance Center results :
Every Sampler has HTTP Header manager
Entire Test Plan
Given you send the same requests you should have the same response times, no matter which tool is being used under the hood.
It's hard to say what the differences are without seeing the full scripts from the both tools so generic advice is to use a third-party sniffer tool like Wireshark or Fiddler in order to identify the differences and configure JMeter to behave exactly like the "performance center" (whatever it is)
For example I fail to see HTTP Cache Manager and it will cause JMeter to download embedded resources (images, scripts, styles, sounds, fonts) for each and every HTTP request while real browser does it only once.
I also don't see HTTP Header Manager which might be very important, for example if you send Accept header the server will be aware that the client can understand gzipped responses which will greatly reduce network traffic.
More information: How to make JMeter behave more like a real browser
Related
I recorded a jmeter script, it has all the resources urls in the script. so if I put Parallel Controller with 6 connection and run the script, the script reports higher response time THAN if I put only main html URL and check download embedded resouces with 6 parallel connection. ..so why it reports higher response time with Parallel Controller?
Given both approaches execute the same requests you should be getting the same or at least similar results. If you see differences - capture the traffic from both runs using a 3rd-party tool like Fiddler or Wireshark and compare the network footprint for both cases.
I can only think of one possible reason for difference: cache. If you have HTTP Cache Manager in your test plan then JMeter respects Cache-Control headers and doesn't re-request the content on subsequent calls/iterations.
I am using jMeter to load test logging in and logging out of my application. I have a CSV with 500 uname and pwords, and I have also set the active threads to 500.
Is this the correct way to stimulate a load of 500 users?
From technical perspective - yes, JMeter will pick up credentials from CSV and send them along with the request.
However if you think about what happens in reality logging in and immediately logging out doesn't seem a realistic use case for me. The whole idea of load testing a web application is simulating real users as close as possible, it includes:
Application usage scenario(s): how many users will be accessing your application at the same time and what users will be doing what things? For example given Stack OverFlow the vast majority of users are searching for answers by given criteria, some users are typing questions, some of them providing answers, and some of them are commenting. These all are different behavioral patterns which need to be accurately simulated by your load test
Each user should have a "user session" which identifies him so application would distinguish different users so make sure you have HTTP Cookie Manager in your Test Plan
Real users use real browsers which are downloading images, CSS and JavaScript files using parallel thread pool (around 5 concurrent threads) to speed up page loading process. In order to mimic this behavior you need to configure HTTP Request samplers to download embedded resources and do it in parallel. You can apply this configuration to all the HTTP Request samplers via HTTP Request Defaults.
Don't forget to add HTTP Cache Manager to mimic browser cache as real browsers normally cache embedded resources to disk and don't re-request them on subsequent calls.
So I would recommend reviewing your test scenario and/or load pattern and get familiarized with How to make JMeter behave more like a real browser article
There is Jmeter response time difference between Jmeter run results and manually captured the response time from the local system using stop watch on the web application.
Browse the web app from local windows system and use stop watch to see the response time to load the page.
Run the Jmeter in non-gui/gui mode and observe the response time (used Listeners only to debug, when run the script no listener was added)
Can see there is a difference in both. Please suggest how to know if Jmeter has captured the correct response time.
Given you properly configure JMeter you should get the same or similar response time for the same request. "Proper" configuration stands for:
You should configure JMeter to retrieve embedded resources and use parallel thread pool of ~5 threads for this
This options "tells" JMeter to fetch images, styles and scripts referenced in the main HTML page and do it in parallel like real browsers do
Add HTTP Cache Manager to your Test Plan. Real browsers download embedded resources but do it only once, on subsequent requests the resources are being returned from disk cache, no actual request is being made. HTTP Cache Manager enables cache simulation and cache-control headers handling.
Add HTTP Cookie Manager to represent cookies/sessions and deal with cookie-based authentication
Add HTTP Header Manager to your test plan to represent browser headers. It might be important as i.e. missing Accept-Encoding header may disable server-side compression therefore client will receive much more data and it will take more time.
Assuming "good" JMeter configuration you should see more or less same behavior
If there are still differences - capture the requests sent by JMeter and the browser using a sniffer tool like Wireshark and amend JMeter configuration to eliminate the differences
JMeter have three basic measurements it captures per request:
Elapsed Time (which is overall timespan from the point when it just starts sending request to the last bit received)
Latency (which starts the same point in time and ends when server starts responding)
And Connect time (which is included in latency and is basically the time for handshakes with server, including SSL/TLS negotiations)
So if you set a data writer among your listeners (e.g SimpleDataWriter, although AggregateReport & SummaryReport can do it as well), you'll see these metrics in your data file (while standard listeners/visualisers/aggregators stuck to elapsed time only).
But mind that these metrics doesn't include response rendering, and especially any code to be executed by browser.
JMeter just doesn't do it at all: obviously, it measures just the combined performance of Server + Network, skipping everything on the client side (except for bare necessities, like protocol negotiations).
That might explain the difference you've experienced.
As well as the difference between logged server processing times & the response times measured by JMeter: server just doesn't count what the network brings in.
PS And you don't have to sit and click on stopwatch with your browser: modern ones have a Dev Tools capable of showing you the precision timings divided by stages. E.g., just call Ctrl+Shift+I in Chrome, switch to network tab & behold the timings right there as you doing your requests.
I am trying to setup a JMeter load test, using the Recording Controller.
This results in duplication of all the calls the web browser would make - including css files, js files and images.
Given that a web browser would get these concurrently (performing approximately 10 web requests concurrently). The jmeter documentation tends to equate 1 user to 1 thread - but this does not line up with the way in which modern web browsers work.
Do I need to use 10 threads for each user when setting up my load test?
Strictly Speaking, JMeter can't simulate a browser. JMeter has its own limitations, like not parsing .js files (as per 3.0 version), sending ajax requests from events etc.
But, for your question, there is support in JMeter.
So, you can specify the concurrent pool size as per your requirements, say concurrent pool size value set to 10, which would solve your issue.
Today browser normally sends requests concurrently and each browser has its own max value for maximum connections that can be made concurrently.
Refer following links:
Max parallel http connections in a browser?
and How to solve Chrome's 6 connection limit when using xhr polling.
When you use "Retrieve Embedded Resources" and set Concurrent Pool Size, you ONLY need to add parent sampler, which triggers resource requests like .css, .js files by Jmeter itself. (Eg: add only stackoverflow.com and it will load all the resources like .css, .js automatically). During recording , all these requests are seperately recorded, so you need to remove all of them or create a new plan/thread group containing only parent sampler.
Note: As I mentioned, requests triggered from .js, .csv won't be sent as Jmeter won't parse them like Browser. You need to add ONLY these requests as samplers explicitly. Add View Results Tree and compare the requests triggered by Jmeter and Browser (F12 -> Network tab) to know which request are missing by Jmeter.
First of all, don't record requests to embedded resources. If you click Add Suggested Excludes button the HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder will automatically populate a regular expression to filter images, scripts and styles.
Second. To simulate browser behaviour: 1 main request to the page and several parallel requests to retrieve content you can use "Advanced" tab of the HTTP Request Sampler (or even better HTTP Request Defaults). You can also limit embedded resources to your application under test domain there
Real browsers download images, styles and scripts. However well-behaved browsers do it only once, on subsequent requests these entities are being returned from cache. So make sure you add HTTP Cache Manager to your Test Plan to represent browser cache so you could avoid overwhelming your server with extra requests which don't happen in the reality.
See How To Make JMeter Behave More Like A Real Browser for more detailed explanation and instructions on using aforementioned Test Elements
When I have given 500 concurrent users load via jmeter my server throwing error message but the same time I have called same request via browser showing proper response. How it is possible? Is there any settings in jmeter for avoiding same.
It is hard to say what can go wrong without seeing your JMeter configuration, full server response, JMeter and application under test logs and network dump for browser and JMeter.
The whole idea of performance testing is mimicking real user as close as possible, so you need at least
Add HTTP Request Defaults and set JMeter to:
Download embedded resources
Use concurrent pool of 2-5 threads
Add HTTP Cookie Manager
Add HTTP Cache Manager
Add HTTP Header Manager
Correlate any dynamic parameters
Simulate any specific application behaviour (i.e. AJAX calls)
etc.
In addition to above recommendations: ideally given "good" JMeter you shouldn't see any "response messages", you should see a number of errors in final report so double check you:
Run JMeter in non-GUI mode
Storing only those metrics which are absolutely required
Follow other recommendations from 9 Easy Solutions for a JMeter Load Test “Out of Memory” Failure
beside, what Dmitri described above, I would also check the actual throughput the server returns in either cases.
Throughput depends a lot on the timers you configured in Jmeter to simulate think time.
Jmeter has no rendering and no javascript engine, so each thread is much much faster than a real browser.