Say I need to check some URI before I serve some result. I can do something like this:
sub type-routes {
route {
get -> Str $type where $type ∈ #food-types {
my %ingredients-table = $rrr.calories-table;
my #result = %ingredients-table.keys.grep: {
%ingredients-table{$_}{$type} };
content 'application/json', #result;
}
get -> Str $type where $type ∉ #food-types {
not-found;
}
}
}
Basically, different signature for existing and non-existing products in this case. However, that same URI is going to be used all across routes. It would be interesting to be able to check it before any route gets matched, so that when it arrives to the route block, we know that it's OK. That way it could also be reused across different routes.
I have checked before and before-match, and apparently you can do it, but you need to analyze the request object to get to that, there's no simple way of doing it.
Alternatively, would there be any way of defining a "fallback-route" so that if an URI is not found, not-found is returned?
Before giving the middleware answer, my first resort in situations like this is usually a subset type:
sub type-routes {
route {
my constant #food-types = <burgers pizzas beer>;
my subset Food of Str where { $^type ∈ #food-types }
get -> Food $type {
my %ingredients-table = $rrr.calories-table;
my #result = %ingredients-table.keys.grep: {
%ingredients-table{$_}{$type} };
content 'application/json', #result;
}
}
}
This way, Food can be used across as many routes as you wish. There's no need for a fallback route (either in this solution or that in the original question) to produce not-found, because the router automatically produces that when no route matches the path segments anyway.
If wanting to go the middleware way, however, then the easiest approach is to obtain the path-segments of the request and check against the appropriate part:
sub type-routes {
route {
my constant #food-types = <burgers pizzas beer>;
before {
not-found unless request.path-segments[0] ∈ #food-types;
}
get -> Str $type {
content 'application/json', <123 456>;
}
}
}
Related
I have a list view that can be sorted, searched and filtered. From that list view the user can edit items in multiple steps. Finally after editing and reviewing the changes the user goes back to the list. Now I want the list to use the same sorting, search term and filters that the user set before and show the correct results.
How can multiple paramters (sorting, search, filter) be stored and reused when showing the list action?
Possible unsatisfactory ways that I thought of:
pass through all the needed parameters. Does work hardly if there are multiple actions involved between the two list action calls
save the parameters in the session object. This seems to require a lot of code to handle multiple parameters (check if parameter was passed to action, store new value, if parameter was not passed, get old parameter from session, handle empty string parameters):
Long longParameter
if(params.containsKey('longParameter')) {
longParameter = params.getLong('longParameter')
session.setAttribute('longParameter', longParameter)
} else {
longParameter = session.getAttribute('longParameter') as Long
params['longParameter'] = longParameter
}
If you want to make it more generic you could use an Interceptor instead.
This could perhaps be generalized like this:
class SessionParamInterceptor {
SessionParamInterceptor() {
matchAll() // You could match only controllers that are relevant.
}
static final List<String> sessionParams = ['myParam','otherParam','coolParam']
boolean before() {
sessionParams.each {
// If the request contains param, then set it in session
if (params.containsKey(it)) {
session[it] = params[it]
} else {
// Else, get the value from session (it will be null, if not present)
params[it] = session[it]
}
}
true
}
}
The static sessionParams holds the parameters you want to store/retrieve from session.
If the params contains an element from the list, it is stored in session under the same name. If not, it is taken from session (given that it exists).
In your controller, you can now just access params.getLong('theParam') like you always would. You could also use Grails parameter conversion:
def myAction(Long theParam) {
}
Lots of LOC saved.
I use the session as well. Here is a sample that you may adapt to your needs:
def list() {
if (request.method == 'GET' && !request.queryString) {
if (session[controllerName]) {
// Recall params from memory
params.putAll(session[controllerName])
}
} else {
// Save params to memory and redirect to get clean URL
session[controllerName] = extractParams(params)
redirect(action: actionName)
return
}
// Do your actions here...
}
def extractParams(params) {
def ret = [:]
params.each { entry ->
if (entry.key.startsWith("filter_") || entry.key == "max" || entry.key == "offset" || entry.key == "sort" || entry.key == "order") {
ret[entry.key] = entry.value
}
}
return ret
}
Using session is your best bet. Just save the preference when preferred. I mean, when user sorts, or filter, just save that information in the session, for that particular <controller>.<action>, before returning the page. Next time, check the session, if it has anything related to that <controller>.<action>, apply those; otherwise render the default page.
You might like to use some Interceptor for this, as suggested by sbglasius, here.
I hope you're getting my point.
Well the title says it all, details following.
I have two related models, User & Role.
User has roles defined as:
Ext.define('App.model.security.User', {
extend: 'App.model.Base',
entityName: 'User',
fields: [
{ name: 'id' },
{ name: 'email'},
{ name: 'name'},
{ name: 'enabled', type: 'bool'}
],
manyToMany: 'Role'
});
Then I have a grid of users and a form to edit user's data including his roles.
The thing is, when I try to add or delete a role from the user a later call to session.getSaveBatch() returns undefined and then I cannot start the batch to send the modifications to the server.
How can I solve this?
Well after reading a lot I found that Ext won't save the changed relationships between two models at least on 5.1.1.
I've had to workaround this by placing an aditional field on the left model (I named it isDirty) with a default value of false and set it true to force the session to send the update to the server with getSaveBatch.
Later I'll dig into the code to write an override to BatchVisitor or a custom BatchVisitor class that allow to save just associations automatically.
Note that this only occurs when you want to save just the association between the two models and if you also modify one of the involved entities then the association will be sent on the save batch.
Well this was interesting, I've learned a lot about Ext by solving this simple problem.
The solution I came across is to override the BatchVisitor class to make use of an event handler for the event onCleanRecord raised from the private method visitData of the Session class.
So for each record I look for left side entities in the matrix and if there is a change then I call the handler for onDirtyRecord which is defined on the BatchVisitor original class.
The code:
Ext.define('Ext.overrides.data.session.BatchVisitor', {
override: 'Ext.data.session.BatchVisitor',
onCleanRecord: function (record) {
var matrices = record.session.matrices
bucket = null,
ops = [],
recordId = record.id,
className = record.$className;
// Before anything I check that the record does not exists in the bucket
// If it exists then any change on matrices will be considered (so leave)
try {
bucket = this.map[record.$className];
ops.concat(bucket.create || [], bucket.destroy || [], bucket.update || []);
var found = ops.findIndex(function (element, index, array) {
if (element.id === recordId) {
return true;
}
});
if (found != -1) {
return;
}
}
catch (e) {
// Do nothing
}
// Now I look for changes on matrices
for (name in matrices) {
matrix = matrices[name].left;
if (className === matrix.role.cls.$className) {
slices = matrix.slices;
for (id in slices) {
slice = slices[id];
members = slice.members;
for (id2 in members) {
id1 = members[id2][0]; // This is left side id, right side is index 1
state = members[id2][2];
if (id1 !== recordId) { // Not left side => leave
break;
}
if (state) { // Association changed
this.onDirtyRecord(record);
// Same case as above now it exists in the bucket (so leave)
return;
}
}
}
}
}
}
});
It works very well for my needs, probably it wont be the best solution for others but can be a starting point anyways.
Finally, if it's not clear yet, what this does is give the method getSaveBatch the ability to detect changes on relationships.
I am working with Angular Meteor and am having an issue with my objects/arrays. I have this code:
angular.module("learn").controller("CurriculumDetailController", ['$scope', '$stateParams', '$meteor',
function($scope, $stateParams, $meteor){
$scope.curriculum = $meteor.object(CurriculumList, $stateParams.curriculumId);
$scope.resources = _.map($scope.curriculum.resources, function(obj) {
return ResourceList.findOne({_id:obj._id})
});
console.log($scope.resources)
}]);
I am attempting to iterate over 'resources', which is a nested array in the curriculum object, look up each value in the 'ResourceList' collection, and return the new array in the scope.
Problem is, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesnt. When I load up the page and access it through a UI-router link. I get the array as expected. But if the page is refreshed, $scope.resources is an empty array.
My thought is there is something going on with asynchronous calls but have not been able for find a solution. I still have the autopublish package installed. Any help would be appreciated.
What you're going to do is return a cursor containing all the information you want, then you can work with $meteor.object on the client side if you like. Normally, publishComposite would look something like this: (I don't know what your curriculum.resources looks like)
Use this method if the curriculum.resources has only ONE id:
// this takes the place of the publish method
Meteor.publishComposite('curriculum', function(id) {
return {
find: function() {
// Here you are getting the CurriculumList based on the id, or whatever you want
return CurriculumList.find({_id: id});
},
children: [
{
find: function(curr) {
// (curr) will be each of the CurriculumList's found from the parent query
// Normally you would do something like this:
return ResourceList.find(_id: curr.resources[0]._id);
}
}
]
}
})
This method if you have multiple resources:
However, since it looks like your curriculum is going to have a resources list with one or many objects with id's then we need to build the query before returning anything. Try something like:
// well use a function so we can send in an _id
Meteor.publishComposite('curriculum', function(id){
// we'll build our query before returning it.
var query = {
find: function() {
return CurriculumList.find({_id: id});
}
};
// now we'll fetch the curriculum so we can access the resources list
var curr = CurriculumList.find({_id: id}).fetch();
// this will pluck the ids from the resources and place them into an array
var rList = _.pluck(curr.resources, '_id');
// here we'll iterate over the resource ids and place a "find" object into the query.children array.
query.children = [];
_.each(rList, function(id) {
var childObj = {
find: function() {
return ResourceList.find({_id: id});
}
};
query.children.push(childObj)
})
return query;
});
So what should happen here (I didn't test) is with one publish function you will be getting the Curriculum you want, plus all of it's resourceslist children.
Now you will have access to these on the client side.
$scope.curriculum = $meteor.object(CurriculumList, $stateParams.curriculumId);
// collection if more than one, object if only one.
$scope.resources = $meteor.collection(ResoursesList, false);
This was thrown together somewhat quickly so I apologize if it doesn't work straight off, any trouble I'll help you fix.
I was trying to define one sort of global variable which value will be reflecting in 2/3 different templates (directives). For that I used angular factory as follows:
app.factory('MyService', function ($http) {
return {
firstNumber: function (){
//return selectedNumber = "200";
var selectedNumber = "";
var selectedNumber = $http.get("/count.do").success(function (data) {
console.log('First Number: ', data[0].count)
});
return selectedNumber;
}
};
});
As you can see 'selectedNumber' is that common variable. Problem is when I am hard coding the value as "200" and from controller calling as follows:
//Init Number
$scope.selectedNumber= MyService.firstNumber();
This whole process is working fine. But as soon as I am trying to get the value from back end (which you can see above) getting {} object.
I did some research on this and understanding that my concept on Angular object and String manipulation is not clear...can anyone please help me to understand the mistake I am doing and to resolve this situation.
Well, i got my expected outcome by using 'callback' service as follows:
In my factory i just called the '$http.get':
app.factory('MyService', function ($http) {
return {
firstNumber: function (){
$http.get("/count.do").success(callback);
}
};
});
And then from controller i received the data and assigned as follows:
//Init Number
MyService.firstNumber(function(data) {
$scope.selectedNumber = data[0].count;
});
I don't know whether it is a good solution or what, will really appreciate for any comment on this solution plz.
Thanks
I have a multidim array from my $_POST but I have to serialize() then save to the database...
Normally, I can serialize but I got some problem with slashes (apostrophe and double quote).
My array seems like this: $array["hu"]["category"]["food"] = "string";
But when the "string" contains "" or '' theres's shit...
I need some short code for add slashes, but thres a lots of wrong solutions out there.
p.s.: I'm a CodeIgniter user.
// update:
function addslashesextended(&$arr_r) {
if (is_array($arr_r)) {
foreach ($arr_r as &$val){
if( is_array($val) ){
addslashesextended($val);
}else{
$val = addslashes($val);
}
}
unset($val);
} else {
$arr_r = addslashes($arr_r);
}
}
Thx!
I think the best solution would be to use the codeigniter input class and active record class . Addslasches/escapes, and most general sanitization will be taken care of for you.
http://codeigniter.com/user_guide/libraries/input.html
http://codeigniter.com/user_guide/database/active_record.html