In quite a lot of Apache project there is a file called DEPENDENCIES which is generated from the POM and all POMs of transitive dependencies. However I couldn't find any information about how these files are generated. I suspect there is a Maven plugin for this...
Here is an example:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sonatype/maven-demo/master/DEPENDENCIES
How can I generate such a file?
I have made an example to show how this works:
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-remote-resources-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>process</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<resourceBundles>
<resourceBundle>org.apache:apache-jar-resource-bundle:1.4</resourceBundle>
</resourceBundles>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
The tricky plugin is the maven-remote-resouces-plugin which can handle velocity templates which will to the trick here.
When we say mvn test, usual way is that maven will look for the tests present in src/test/java folder. But I have my tests in some different folder, namely src/integration-test/java. How do I run the tests present in this folder through command line?
Thanks in advance,
Manoj.
First you shouldn't run those integration test via the test life cycle, cause
pre-integration-test, integration-test and post-integration-test life cycle phase exist. Apart from that for integration tests the maven-failsafe-plugin is responsible.
There are several options to handle your situations. First you should follow the naming conventions for integration tests
<includes>
<include>**/IT*.java</include>
<include>**/*IT.java</include>
<include>**/*ITCase.java</include>
</includes>
which means to put the integration tests into the default folder src/test/java. If you have a multi-module build it would be the best having a separate module which contains the integration-tests only or you can go the path you decided to use a separate folder (which is not the best):
First you need to add the folder using the buildhelper-maven-plugin to get those integration tests being compiled like this:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>build-helper-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.9.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>add-test-source</id>
<phase>process-resources</phase>
<goals>
<goal>add-test-source</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<sources>
<source>src/integration-test/java</source>
</sources>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
and you have to configure the maven-failsafe-plugin like this:
<project>
[...]
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.14.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
[...]
</project>
After you have configured you can run your integration tests via:
mvn verify
#khmarbaise is right with his recommendation (so +1 for that) but I want to answer your question without speculating about the reasons why the test source are located somewhere else.
If your tests are located in another directory than the standard src/test/java directory, the most simple solution is to change the default value of the testSourceDirectory configuration parameter which is defined in the Super POM.
e.g. for src/foobar/java use
<build>
<testSourceDirectory>src/foobar/java</testSourceDirectory>
</build>
then you can simply run mvn test to execute the tests.
More complex solution...
If you do not want to change the pom.xml configuration you can specifiy the testSourceDirectory parameter on the command line like this:
mvn -DtestSourceDirectory=src/foobar/java clean test
But be sure that your sources are compiled. Otherwise they will not be found and executed. In the above example the test sources are not placed at a location that gets compiled by default, so we nevertheless have to change the pom and add the directory to the list of test sources by using the buildhelper plugin:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>build-helper-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.8</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>add-test-source</id>
<phase>generate-sources</phase>
<goals>
<goal>add-test-source</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<sources>
<source>src/foobar/java</source>
</sources>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
If you do not want to change the configuration of the default value in the pom and not want to pass the new directory at the commandline you have to configure the path in the maven-buildhelper-plugin and the maven-surefire-plugin in your pom.xml like this:
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>build-helper-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.8</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>add-test-source</id>
<phase>generate-sources</phase>
<goals>
<goal>add-test-source</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<sources>
<source>src/foobar/java</source>
</sources>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.14.1</version>
<configuration>
<testSourceDirectory>src/foobar/java</testSourceDirectory>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
Now again the simple usage of mvn test will execute the test at the not standard location.
I've searched up and down the internet for this one. There's lots of half-answers out there, to do with Maven properties such as ${sonar.jacoco.reportPath}, or org.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin:prepare-agent or setting maven-surefire-plugin argLine with -javaagent.
Some how, none of these answers, either on their own, or in combination, are producing what I'm after:
A coverage report which shows a class as covered if it is used in tests higher up the stack, such as entities being used by DAOs, even though it was not fully covered by tests in its own module.
Is there a definitive config somewhere, to achieve this, please?
I was in the same situation as you, the half answers scattered throughout the Internet were quite annoying, since it seemed that many people had the same issue, but no one could be bothered to fully explain how they solved it.
The Sonar docs refer to a GitHub project with examples that are helpful. What I did to solve this was to apply the integration tests logic to regular unit tests (although proper unit tests should be submodule specific, this isn't always the case).
In the parent pom.xml, add these properties:
<properties>
<!-- Sonar -->
<sonar.java.coveragePlugin>jacoco</sonar.java.coveragePlugin>
<sonar.dynamicAnalysis>reuseReports</sonar.dynamicAnalysis>
<sonar.jacoco.reportPath>${project.basedir}/../target/jacoco.exec</sonar.jacoco.reportPath>
<sonar.language>java</sonar.language>
</properties>
This will make Sonar pick up unit testing reports for all submodules in the same place (a target folder in the parent project). It also tells Sonar to reuse reports ran manually instead of rolling its own. We just need to make jacoco-maven-plugin run for all submodules by placing this in the parent pom, inside build/plugins:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.6.0.201210061924</version>
<configuration>
<destFile>${sonar.jacoco.reportPath}</destFile>
<append>true</append>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>agent</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
destFile places the report file in the place where Sonar will look for it and append makes it append to the file rather than overwriting it. This will combine all JaCoCo reports for all submodules in the same file.
Sonar will look at that file for each submodule, since that's what we pointed him at above, giving us combined unit testing results for multi module files in Sonar.
NEW WAY SINCE VERSION 0.7.7
Since Version 0.7.7 there is a new way to create an aggregated report:
You create a separate 'report' project which collects all the necessary reports (Any goal in the aggregator project is executed before its modules therefore it can't be used).
aggregator pom
|- parent pom
|- module a
|- module b
|- report module
The root pom looks like this (don't forget to add the new report module under modules):
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.7.8</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>prepare-agent</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
The poms from each sub module doesn't need to be changed at all. The pom from the report module looks like this:
<!-- Add all sub modules as dependencies here -->
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<module a>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<module b>
</dependency>
...
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.7.8</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>report-aggregate</id>
<phase>verify</phase>
<goals>
<goal>report-aggregate</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
A full exmple can be found here.
FAQ
Questions from the top of my head since that time I gone crazy with jacoco.
My application server (jBoss, Glassfish..) located in Iraq, Syria, whatever.. Is it possible to get multi-module coverage when running integration tests on it? Jenkins and Sonar are also on different servers.
Yes. You have to use jacoco agent that runs in mode output=tcpserver, jacoco ant lib. Basically two jars. This will give you 99% success.
How does jacoco agent works?
You append a string
-javaagent:[your_path]/jacocoagent.jar=destfile=/jacoco.exec,output=tcpserver,address=*
to your application server JAVA_OPTS and restart it. In this string only [your_path] have to be replaced with the path to jacocoagent.jar, stored(store it!) on your VM where app server runs. Since that time you start app server, all applications that are deployed will be dynamically monitored and their activity (meaning code usage) will be ready for you to get in jacocos .exec format by tcl request.
Could I reset jacoco agent to start collecting execution data only since the time my test start?
Yes, for that purpose you need jacocoant.jar and ant build script located in your jenkins workspace.
So basically what I need from http://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/ is jacocoant.jar located in my jenkins workspace, and jacocoagent.jar located on my app server VM?
That's right.
I don't want to use ant, I've heard that jacoco maven plugin can do all the things too.
That's not right, jacoco maven plugin can collect unit test data and some integration tests data(see Arquillian Jacoco), but if you have for example rest assured tests as a separated build in jenkins, and want to show multi-module coverage, I can't see how maven plugin can help you.
What exactly does jacoco agent produce?
Only coverage data in .exec format. Sonar then can read it.
Does jacoco need to know where my java classes located are?
No, sonar does, but not jacoco. When you do mvn sonar:sonar path to classes comes into play.
So what about the ant script?
It has to be presented in your jenkins workspace. Mine ant script, I called it jacoco.xml looks like that:
<project name="Jacoco library to collect code coverage remotely" xmlns:jacoco="antlib:org.jacoco.ant">
<property name="jacoco.port" value="6300"/>
<property name="jacocoReportFile" location="${workspace}/it-jacoco.exec"/>
<taskdef uri="antlib:org.jacoco.ant" resource="org/jacoco/ant/antlib.xml">
<classpath path="${workspace}/tools/jacoco/jacocoant.jar"/>
</taskdef>
<target name="jacocoReport">
<jacoco:dump address="${jacoco.host}" port="${jacoco.port}" dump="true" reset="true" destfile="${jacocoReportFile}" append="false"/>
</target>
<target name="jacocoReset">
<jacoco:dump address="${jacoco.host}" port="${jacoco.port}" reset="true" destfile="${jacocoReportFile}" append="false"/>
<delete file="${jacocoReportFile}"/>
</target>
</project>
Two mandatory params you should pass when invoking this script
-Dworkspace=$WORKSPACE
use it to point to your jenkins workspace and -Djacoco.host=yourappserver.com host without http://
Also notice that I put my jacocoant.jar to ${workspace}/tools/jacoco/jacocoant.jar
What should I do next?
Did you start your app server with jacocoagent.jar?
Did you put ant script and jacocoant.jar in your jenkins workspace?
If yes the last step is to configure a jenkins build. Here is the strategy:
Invoke ant target jacocoReset to reset all previously collected data.
Run your tests
Invoke ant target jacocoReport to get report
If everything is right, you will see it-jacoco.exec in your build workspace.
Look at the screenshot, I also have ant installed in my workspace in $WORKSPACE/tools/ant dir, but you can use one that is installed in your jenkins.
How to push this report in sonar?
Maven sonar:sonar will do the job (don't forget to configure it), point it to main pom.xml so it will run through all modules. Use sonar.jacoco.itReportPath=$WORKSPACE/it-jacoco.exec parameter to tell sonar where your integration test report is located. Every time it will analyse new module classes, it will look for information about coverage in it-jacoco.exec.
I already have jacoco.exec in my `target` dir, `mvn sonar:sonar` ignores/removes it
By default mvn sonar:sonar does clean and deletes your target dir, use sonar.dynamicAnalysis=reuseReports to avoid it.
I found another solution for new Sonar versions where JaCoCo's binary report format (*.exec) was deprecated and the preferred format is XML (SonarJava 5.12 and higher).
The solution is very simple and similar to the previous solution with *.exec reports in parent directory from this topic: https://stackoverflow.com/a/15535970/4448263.
Assuming that our project structure is:
moduleC - aggregate project's pom
|- moduleA - some classes without tests
|- moduleB - some classes depending from moduleA and tests for classes in both modules: moduleA and moduleB
You need following maven build plugin configuration in aggregate project's pom:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.8.5</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>prepare-and-report</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
<goal>report</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>report-aggregate</id>
<phase>verify</phase>
<goals>
<goal>report-aggregate</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<outputDirectory>${project.basedir}/../target/site/jacoco-aggregate</outputDirectory>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
Then build project with maven:
mvn clean verify
And for Sonar you should set property in administration GUI:
sonar.coverage.jacoco.xmlReportPaths=target/site/jacoco/jacoco.xml,../target/site/jacoco-aggregate/jacoco.xml
or using command line:
mvn sonar:sonar -Dsonar.coverage.jacoco.xmlReportPaths=target/site/jacoco/jacoco.xml,../target/site/jacoco-aggregate/jacoco.xml
Description
This creates binary reports for each module in default directories: target/jacoco.exec. Then creates XML reports for each module in default directories: target/site/jacoco/jacoco.xml. Then creates an aggregate report for each module in custom directory ${project.basedir}/../target/site/jacoco-aggregate/ that is relative to parent directory for each module. For moduleA and moduleB this will be common path moduleC/target/site/jacoco-aggregate/.
As moduleB depends on moduleA, moduleB will be built last and its report will be used as an aggregate coverage report in Sonar for both modules A and B.
In addition to the aggregate report, we need a normal module report as JaCoCo aggregate reports contain coverage data only for dependencies.
Together, these two types of reports providing full coverage data for Sonar.
There is one little restriction: you should be able to write a report in the project's parent directory (should have permission). Or you can set property jacoco.skip=true in root project's pom.xml (moduleC) and jacoco.skip=false in modules with classes and tests (moduleA and moduleB).
I'll post my solution as it it subtly different from others and also took me a solid day to get right, with the assistance of the existing answers.
For a multi-module Maven project:
ROOT
|--WAR
|--LIB-1
|--LIB-2
|--TEST
Where the WAR project is the main web app, LIB 1 and 2 are additional modules the WAR depends on and TEST is where the integration tests live.
TEST spins up an embedded Tomcat instance (not via Tomcat plugin) and runs WAR project and tests them via a set of JUnit tests.
The WAR and LIB projects both have their own unit tests.
The result of all this is the integration and unit test coverage being separated and able to be distinguished in SonarQube.
ROOT pom.xml
<!-- Sonar properties-->
<sonar.jacoco.itReportPath>${project.basedir}/../target/jacoco-it.exec</sonar.jacoco.itReportPath>
<sonar.jacoco.reportPath>${project.basedir}/../target/jacoco.exec</sonar.jacoco.reportPath>
<sonar.language>java</sonar.language>
<sonar.java.coveragePlugin>jacoco</sonar.java.coveragePlugin>
<!-- build/plugins (not build/pluginManagement/plugins!) -->
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.7.6.201602180812</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>agent-for-ut</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<append>true</append>
<destFile>${sonar.jacoco.reportPath}</destFile>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>agent-for-it</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent-integration</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<append>true</append>
<destFile>${sonar.jacoco.itReportPath}</destFile>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
WAR, LIB and TEST pom.xml will inherit the the JaCoCo plugins execution.
TEST pom.xml
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.19.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<skipTests>${skip.tests}</skipTests>
<argLine>${argLine} -Duser.timezone=UTC -Xms256m -Xmx256m</argLine>
<includes>
<includes>**/*Test*</includes>
</includes>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
I also found Petri Kainulainens blog post 'Creating Code Coverage Reports for Unit and Integration Tests With the JaCoCo Maven Plugin' to be valuable for the JaCoCo setup side of things.
There is a way to accomplish this. The magic is to create a combined jacoco.exec file. And with maven 3.3.1 there is an easy way to get this. Here my profile:
<profile>
<id>runSonar</id>
<activation>
<property>
<name>runSonar</name>
<value>true</value>
</property>
</activation>
<properties>
<sonar.language>java</sonar.language>
<sonar.host.url>http://sonar.url</sonar.host.url>
<sonar.login>tokenX</sonar.login>
<sonar.jacoco.reportMissing.force.zero>true</sonar.jacoco.reportMissing.force.zero>
<sonar.jacoco.reportPath>${jacoco.destFile}</sonar.jacoco.reportPath>
<jacoco.destFile>${maven.multiModuleProjectDirectory}/target/jacoco_analysis/jacoco.exec</jacoco.destFile>
</properties>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>default-prepare-agent</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<append>true</append>
<destFile>${jacoco.destFile}</destFile>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
<pluginManagement>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.sonarsource.scanner.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>sonar-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.2</version>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.7.8</version>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</pluginManagement>
</build>
</profile>
If you add this profile to your parent pom and call mvn clean install sonar:sonar -DrunSonar you get the complete coverage.
The magic here is maven.multiModuleProjectDirectory. This folder is always the folder where you started your maven build.
The configuration I use in my parent level pom where I have separate unit and integration test phases.
I configure the following properties in the parent POM
Properties
<maven.surefire.report.plugin>2.19.1</maven.surefire.report.plugin>
<jacoco.plugin.version>0.7.6.201602180812</jacoco.plugin.version>
<jacoco.check.lineRatio>0.52</jacoco.check.lineRatio>
<jacoco.check.branchRatio>0.40</jacoco.check.branchRatio>
<jacoco.check.complexityMax>15</jacoco.check.complexityMax>
<jacoco.skip>false</jacoco.skip>
<jacoco.excludePattern/>
<jacoco.destfile>${project.basedir}/../target/coverage-reports/jacoco.exec</jacoco.destfile>
<sonar.language>java</sonar.language>
<sonar.exclusions>**/generated-sources/**/*</sonar.exclusions>
<sonar.core.codeCoveragePlugin>jacoco</sonar.core.codeCoveragePlugin>
<sonar.coverage.exclusions>${jacoco.excludePattern}</sonar.coverage.exclusions>
<sonar.dynamicAnalysis>reuseReports</sonar.dynamicAnalysis>
<sonar.jacoco.reportPath>${project.basedir}/../target/coverage-reports</sonar.jacoco.reportPath>
<skip.surefire.tests>${skipTests}</skip.surefire.tests>
<skip.failsafe.tests>${skipTests}</skip.failsafe.tests>
I place the plugin definitions under plugin management.
Note that I define a property for surefire (surefireArgLine) and failsafe (failsafeArgLine) arguments to allow jacoco to configure the javaagent to run with each test.
Under pluginManagement
<build>
<pluginManagment>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.1</version>
<configuration>
<fork>true</fork>
<meminitial>1024m</meminitial>
<maxmem>1024m</maxmem>
<compilerArgument>-g</compilerArgument>
<source>${maven.compiler.source}</source>
<target>${maven.compiler.target}</target>
<encoding>${project.build.sourceEncoding}</encoding>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.19.1</version>
<configuration>
<forkCount>4</forkCount>
<reuseForks>false</reuseForks>
<argLine>-Xmx2048m ${surefireArgLine}</argLine>
<includes>
<include>**/*Test.java</include>
</includes>
<excludes>
<exclude>**/*IT.java</exclude>
</excludes>
<skip>${skip.surefire.tests}</skip>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<!-- For integration test separation -->
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.19.1</version>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.surefire</groupId>
<artifactId>surefire-junit47</artifactId>
<version>2.19.1</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<configuration>
<forkCount>4</forkCount>
<reuseForks>false</reuseForks>
<argLine>${failsafeArgLine}</argLine>
<includes>
<include>**/*IT.java</include>
</includes>
<skip>${skip.failsafe.tests}</skip>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>integration-test</id>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>verify</id>
<goals>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<!-- Code Coverage -->
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${jacoco.plugin.version}</version>
<configuration>
<haltOnFailure>true</haltOnFailure>
<excludes>
<exclude>**/*.mar</exclude>
<exclude>${jacoco.excludePattern}</exclude>
</excludes>
<rules>
<rule>
<element>BUNDLE</element>
<limits>
<limit>
<counter>LINE</counter>
<value>COVEREDRATIO</value>
<minimum>${jacoco.check.lineRatio}</minimum>
</limit>
<limit>
<counter>BRANCH</counter>
<value>COVEREDRATIO</value>
<minimum>${jacoco.check.branchRatio}</minimum>
</limit>
</limits>
</rule>
<rule>
<element>METHOD</element>
<limits>
<limit>
<counter>COMPLEXITY</counter>
<value>TOTALCOUNT</value>
<maximum>${jacoco.check.complexityMax}</maximum>
</limit>
</limits>
</rule>
</rules>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>pre-unit-test</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<destFile>${jacoco.destfile}</destFile>
<append>true</append>
<propertyName>surefireArgLine</propertyName>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>post-unit-test</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>report</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<dataFile>${jacoco.destfile}</dataFile>
<outputDirectory>${sonar.jacoco.reportPath}</outputDirectory>
<skip>${skip.surefire.tests}</skip>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>pre-integration-test</id>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent-integration</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<destFile>${jacoco.destfile}</destFile>
<append>true</append>
<propertyName>failsafeArgLine</propertyName>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>post-integration-test</id>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>report-integration</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<dataFile>${jacoco.destfile}</dataFile>
<outputDirectory>${sonar.jacoco.reportPath}</outputDirectory>
<skip>${skip.failsafe.tests}</skip>
</configuration>
</execution>
<!-- Disabled until such time as code quality stops this tripping
<execution>
<id>default-check</id>
<goals>
<goal>check</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<dataFile>${jacoco.destfile}</dataFile>
</configuration>
</execution>
-->
</executions>
</plugin>
...
And in the build section
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<!-- for unit test execution -->
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<!-- For integration test separation -->
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<!-- For code coverage -->
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
</plugin>
....
And in the reporting section
<reporting>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-report-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${maven.surefire.report.plugin}</version>
<configuration>
<showSuccess>false</showSuccess>
<alwaysGenerateFailsafeReport>true</alwaysGenerateFailsafeReport>
<alwaysGenerateSurefireReport>true</alwaysGenerateSurefireReport>
<aggregate>true</aggregate>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${jacoco.plugin.version}</version>
<configuration>
<excludes>
<exclude>**/*.mar</exclude>
<exclude>${jacoco.excludePattern}</exclude>
</excludes>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</reporting>
As Sonars sonar.jacoco.reportPath, sonar.jacoco.itReportPath and sonar.jacoco.reportPaths have all been deprecated, you should use sonar.coverage.jacoco.xmlReportPaths now. This also has some impact if you want to configure a multi module maven project with Sonar and Jacoco.
As #Lonzak pointed out, since Sonar 0.7.7, you can use Sonars report aggragation goal. Just put in you parent pom the following dependency:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.8.5</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>report</id>
<goals>
<goal>report-aggregate</goal>
</goals>
<phase>verify</phase>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
As current versions of the jacoco-maven-plugin are compatible with the xml-reports, this will create for every module in it's own target folder a site/jacoco-aggregate folder containing a jacoco.xml file.
To let Sonar combine all the modules, use following command:
mvn -Dsonar.coverage.jacoco.xmlReportPaths=full-path-to-module1/target/site/jacoco-aggregate/jacoco.xml,module2...,module3... clean verify sonar:sonar
To keep my answer short and precise, I did not mention the maven-surefire-plugin and
maven-failsafe-plugin dependencies. You can just add them without any other configuration:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.22.2</version>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.22.2</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>integration-test</id>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<sonar.language>java</sonar.language>
<sonar.java.coveragePlugin>jacoco</sonar.java.coveragePlugin>
<sonar.jacoco.reportPath>${user.dir}/target/jacoco.exec</sonar.jacoco.reportPath>
<sonar.jacoco.itReportPath>${user.dir}/target/jacoco-it.exec</sonar.jacoco.itReportPath>
<sonar.exclusions>
file:**/target/generated-sources/**,
file:**/target/generated-test-sources/**,
file:**/target/test-classes/**,
file:**/model/*.java,
file:**/*Config.java,
file:**/*App.java
</sonar.exclusions>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.7.9</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>default-prepare-agent</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<destFile>${sonar.jacoco.reportPath}</destFile>
<append>true</append>
<propertyName>surefire.argLine</propertyName>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>default-prepare-agent-integration</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent-integration</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<destFile>${sonar.jacoco.itReportPath}</destFile>
<append>true</append>
<propertyName>failsafe.argLine</propertyName>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>default-report</id>
<goals>
<goal>report</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>default-report-integration</id>
<goals>
<goal>report-integration</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
This sample works very well for me :
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.8.2</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>pre-unit-test</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<destFile>${project.build.directory}/coverage-reports/jacoco-ut.exec</destFile>
<propertyName>surefireArgLine</propertyName>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>pre-integration-test</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent-integration</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<destFile>${project.build.directory}/coverage-reports/jacoco-it.exec</destFile>
<!--<excludes>
<exclude>com.asimio.demo.rest</exclude>
<exclude>com.asimio.demo.service</exclude>
</excludes>-->
<propertyName>testArgLine</propertyName>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>post-integration-test</id>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>report</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<dataFile>${project.build.directory}/coverage-reports/jacoco-it.exec</dataFile>
<outputDirectory>${project.reporting.outputDirectory}/jacoco-it</outputDirectory>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>post-unit-test</id>
<phase>prepare-package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>report</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<dataFile>${project.build.directory}/coverage-reports/jacoco-ut.exec</dataFile>
<outputDirectory>${project.reporting.outputDirectory}/jacoco-ut</outputDirectory>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>merge-results</id>
<phase>verify</phase>
<goals>
<goal>merge</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<fileSets>
<fileSet>
<directory>${project.build.directory}/coverage-reports</directory>
<includes>
<include>*.exec</include>
</includes>
</fileSet>
</fileSets>
<destFile>${project.build.directory}/coverage-reports/aggregate.exec</destFile>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>post-merge-report</id>
<phase>verify</phase>
<goals>
<goal>report</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<dataFile>${project.build.directory}/coverage-reports/aggregate.exec</dataFile>
<outputDirectory>${project.reporting.outputDirectory}/jacoco-aggregate</outputDirectory>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.18.1</version>
<configuration>
<argLine>${surefireArgLine}</argLine>
<!--<skipTests>${skip.unit.tests}</skipTests>-->
<includes>
<include>**/*Test.java</include>
<!--<include>**/*MT.java</include>
<include>**/*Test.java</include>-->
</includes>
<!-- <skipTests>${skipUTMTs}</skipTests>-->
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.12.4</version>
<configuration>
<!--<skipTests>${skipTests}</skipTests>
<skipITs>${skipITs}</skipITs>-->
<argLine>${testArgLine}</argLine>
<includes>
<include>**/*IT.java</include>
</includes>
<!--<excludes>
<exclude>**/*UT*.java</exclude>
</excludes>-->
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
You can call a ant task called merge on maven, to put all coverage files (*.exec) together in the same file.
If you are run unit tests use the phase prepare-package, if you run integration test so use post-integration-test.
This site has an example to how call jacoco ant task in maven project
You can use this merged file on sonar.
to have unit-testing AND integration-testing you can use maven-surefire-plugin and maven-failsafe-plugin with restricted includes/excludes. I was playing with CDI while getting in touch with sonar/jacoco, so i ended up in this project:
https://github.com/FibreFoX/cdi-sessionscoped-login/
Maybe it helps you a little bit. in my pom.xml i use "-javaagent" implicit by setting the argLine-option in the configuration-section of the specified testing-plugins.
Explicit using ANT in MAVEN projects is something i would not give a try, for me its to much mixing two worlds.
I only have a single-module maven project, but maybe it helps you to adjust yours to work.
note: maybe not all maven-plugins are up2date, maybe some issues are fixed in later versions
As stated in the Jacoco Wiki, you could also generate a new reporting-module:
Strategy: Module with Dependencies: The problems with aggregator
projects can be solved with an extra "reporting" module. In a
multi-module Maven project a separate module is defined that does not
contribute actual content but creates a combined coverage report. It
defines a dependency to all the modules that should be included in the
combined report. The "reporting" module would be built after its
dependencies and have access to the exec files as well as class and
source files from projects it depends on. This strategy seems to work
best with the current Maven architecture. From a user's perspective
one could argue that such a separate module would bloat the build
definition. Or, that the separate module cannot have any submodules
from which it could consume exec or class files. However, compared to
the other strategies these drawbacks seem rather minor and can be
handled in a consistent manner.
This is especially helpful if your modularisation is more complex than one parent with some child modules.
Your reporting pom could look something like:
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.sonarqube</groupId>
<artifactId>module1</artifactId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.sonarqube</groupId>
<artifactId>module2</artifactId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>report</id>
<goals>
<goal>report-aggregate</goal>
</goals>
<phase>verify</phase>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
I have a project expected to deliver a jar file:
<packaging>jar</packaging>
but the jar is built in a custom way, so the default packaging done with jar:jar has been disabled
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-jar-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.3.2</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>default-jar</id>
<phase>none</phase>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
but then when I want to apply shade:shade on the existing jar I get an error
The project main artifact does not exist.
I assume that maven doesn't know about the .jar file created by my custom tool. How to let it know, because antrun attachArtifact doesn't work
<attachartifact file="./bin/classes.jar" classifier="" type="jar"/>
the error I get is
An Ant BuildException has occured: org.apache.maven.artifact.InvalidArtifactRTException: For artifact {:jar}: An attached artifact must have a different ID than its corresponding main artifact.
So this is not the method to register main artifact... Is there any (without writing custom java plugin)?
Thanks,
Lukasz
I checked the sources of JarMojo and it gave me an idea how to solve it with Groovy (via gmaven)
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.gmaven</groupId>
<artifactId>gmaven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.3</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>set-main-artifact</id>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>execute</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<source>
project.artifact.setFile(new File("./bin/classes.jar"))
</source>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
and it works!:)
Something like this
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>build-helper-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.8</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>attach-artifacts</id>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>attach-artifact</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<artifacts>
<artifact>
<file>${basedir}/bin/classes.jar</file>
<type>jar</type>
</artifact>
</artifacts>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
While your solution may work for a build to the install+ phase or where there are no dependencies in the reactor, in cases where only building to the compile or test phase the unpackaged classes won't be found by dependencies.
Building to compile happens when using plugins like the maven-release-plugin.
Extending your chosen solution to include identifying the unpacked classes during compile
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.gmaven</groupId>
<artifactId>gmaven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.3</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>set-main-artifact-compile</id>
<phase>compile</phase>
<goals>
<goal>execute</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<source>
project.artifact.setFile(new File("./bin/classes"))
</source>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>set-main-artifact</id>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>execute</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<source>
project.artifact.setFile(new File("./bin/classes.jar"))
</source>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
By default the maven-install-plugin will use the identified artifact along the lines of
${project.build.directory}/${project.finalname}.jar
So another option might go something like this
<build>
<directory>bin</directory>
<outputDirectory>bin/classes</outputDirectory>
<finalName>classes</finalName>
</build>
We were having the same problem, with getting the "attached artifact must have a different ID than its corresponding main artifact" error. We found the solution in the following excellent blog post:
embed-and-run-ant-tasks-and-scripts-from-maven
As detailed in this section, you can fix the problem by adding a classifier so Maven can distinguish between the ant-built jar and the maven-built jar. Since you're using antrun attachartifact, you'd need this:
<attachartifact file="./bin/classes.jar" classifier="foo" type="jar"/>
Note you'll also need to include that classifier (along with groupId, artifactId and version) whenever you want to grab this jar as a dependency in other projects.
I have a maven multi-module project (boy, I've written that opening way too many times on this site). Almost all the modules (that is, the ones that have code in them) should run the maven-site-plugin to generate reports about code coverage, etc. These have a detailed shared configuration -- which reports to run, which files to cover/exclude for certain plugins, etc.
However, there are a few modules that deal with packaging -- running the assembly plugin to generate a tarball, etc. These gain nothing from running a site report -- there's no code to analyze, no tests to report on.
So I have a lot of modules that need to share plugin configuration, and a few modules that need to not run the plugin, preferably at all. I can do the former (share configuration) if I put the plugin in the <build> section of the parent POM, but I can't seem to turn off the plugin when I need to in this case. I can do the latter (avoid running the plugin) if I push configuration down to each module's own POM, but I can't figure out a good way to share the configuration information in this case.
Is what I want -- shared configuration, for a plugin that's sometimes disabled by a child module -- even possible? If so, how?
By "run the plugin", I'm assuming you mean that the plugin is bound to a lifecycle phase, and you'd like to unbind it in some modules. First, you could consider changing your POM inheritance so that the modules that don't need the plugins have one parent and the ones that do have a different parent. If you don't want to do that, then you can explicitly set the execution phase to "nothing" in a child module. E.g. if you had a parent pom configuration like this:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>exec-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.2.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>i-do-something</id>
<phase>initialize</phase>
<goals>
<goal>exec</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
... lots of configuration
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
Then in a child module, you could do this:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>exec-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.2.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>i-do-something</id>
<phase/>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
Because it's the same plugin and the same execution id, it overrides the configuration specified in the parent, and now the plugin isn't bound to a phase in the child project.
Ryan Stewart's answer works if execution that you wish to suppress in the parent pom is tagged with an id. If, however, the parent pom doesn't tag the execution with an id (and, of course, you can't edit that parent pom) then I found that doing the following suppresses the parent pom's action.
First set the phase of the execution to none
Create another execution, give it an id and do in it what you need it to do.
run mvn help:effective-pom to confirm that it has correctly suppressed what you needed suppressed from the parent pom.
Here's an example:
This is how my parent pom looked like:
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-source-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.1.2</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>jar</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<inherited>true</inherited>
</plugin>
I needed to change the goal to jar-no-fork. Note that the execution in parent pom doesn't have an id that I could use to disable it. So here's what added to my child pom:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-source-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>none</phase>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>attach-sources</id>
<goals>
<goal>jar-no-fork</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
As a result this is how the effective-pom looks like:
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-source-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.2.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>none</phase>
<goals>
<goal>jar</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<archive>
<compress>false</compress>
</archive>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>attach-sources</id>
<goals>
<goal>jar-no-fork</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<archive>
<compress>false</compress>
</archive>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
<inherited>true</inherited>
<configuration>
<archive>
<compress>false</compress>
</archive>
</configuration>
</plugin>
This ensured that the goal jar never runs and only the goal jar-no-fork executes -- which is what I wanted to achieve.