Spring annotations question. I am using a default value like so
#Service
public class MyClient{
#Value("${apikey}")
private String apikey;
public MyClient(){}
}
I imagine that every instantiation of this class should initialize the value of apikey to the default value apikey from the application.properties file. Is this not so? I ask because I am finding apikey to be null after I've instantiated MyClient object.
Your class is annotated #Service and so it is a spring-managed bean. By default all spring beans are singleton so exists in only one instance.
If you try to create this bean manually auto wiring of #value won't work because you bypass the spring initialization.
Btw: it is a bad idea to mix self-managed and spring-managed bean from the same class.
Related
I have some #Value annotation in spring-boot project. To Simplify, I have few classes: a restcontroller, service (annotated with #Service) and a pojo.
In each of these classes, I declared a variable as below:
#Value("${somevalue}")
private String somevalueVariable
In the controller class, the value is getting populated as defined in the application.properties. So no problem here.
In the service class, the value is showing up as null. This is my issue, how should i fix it to get the value from the application.properties
In the pojo, the value is showing up as null, I am thinking this is expected behaviour as spring does not manage this class.
Try this:
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Value;
#Value("#{${somevalue}}")
private String somevalueVariable
ideally service class should have #Service anotation over it, either you missed that or this class is not scanned by spring context, so please add ComponentScan anotation for service class package over main class to scan classes uner this package -
#SpringBootApplication
#ComponentScan({"com.in28minutes.springboot"})
public class Application
It uses Spring Expression Language (SpEL):
https://docs.spring.io/spring-integration/docs/5.3.0.RELEASE/reference/html/spel.html
Also there is 2 #Value : org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Value and lombok.Value;
Make sure you are using the right one.
To get value from property try this:
#Value("${systemValue}")
private String systemValue;
For more information I find this useful:
https://www.baeldung.com/spring-value-annotation
Even when we create the Beans in a Spring configuration class, I feel it is still useful to use #Component annotation on the class just to document/indicate that it's a Bean. Is it a good idea? Can there be any other issue that Spring will find the same bean defined in two different ways?
It is bad practice to create two beans from one class...
#Component
class SimpleComponent {
}
#Bean
public SimpleComponent simpleComponentBean(){
new SimpleComponent();
}
By default if we use #Component spring creates bean with name of class, but starts with small letter simpleComponent, if we use #Bean it takes method name and create bean with name simpleComponentBean and we have duplicated beans...
If we have method name the same, as component class name, spring replace one of them and we can Inject unexpected bean.
PS: intellij idea enterprise - correct indicate about all beans.
I know and understand constructor based injection. But, the autowiring modes confuse me.
1) I have read that default mode for autowiring is 'no autowiring' i.e. We have to manually set the properties in xml file. But, isn't xml based configuration a type of autowiring? How can it be considered 'No autowiring'?
2) Other modes for autowiring are i) byName ii) byType iii)constructor iv) auto-detect. Am i correct to assume the following:
a) When using xml configuration based autowiring, the default mode is 'byName'(i.e. I have to keep the name of property reference the same as the name of the bean which is being used as a property.)
b) When using Annotations, default mode is 'byType'( Regardless of the place the #Autowired keyword is placed i.e on the setter, on the constructor or on the property, it will search the type of the property being autowried)
3) What is the difference between constructor based injection and 'constructor' mode of autowiring?(I have read that constructor mode means it applies byType mode on all the constructor arguments, but how is it different from placing #Autowired keyword on the constructor)
4) I know that to enable autowired mode byName in annotations, in the bean definition in the xml file, I have to use " autowire = 'byName' ". But, suppose I am using Annotations only config( using #Component, and no bean definitions in the xml ), and I want to use byName autowire mode, then what is the way of doing that?
I think you are a bit confused. First, you need to understand dependency injection (see here). There is ton of info about DI but in short, it means some third party (e.g spring IOC) passes the dependencies to the objects rather than the objects to create/obtain the references themselves. This could happen either through constructor or setter. For instance, consider constructor DI
class B{
}
class A{
private B b;
public A(B b){
this.b = b;
}
}
Some third party will inject an instance of class B into A rather class A create a reference to B itself. Very often you would use an interface so class A wouldn't even know what object will be injected into it.
Now in Spring there are different ways to configure these associations between the objects (the example above). You can either use XML, Java Config or Autowiring. They are independent but do the same stuff.
In both XML and JAVA config you need to configure the dependencies explicitly - either in xml file or having a #Configuration class for the JAVA Config and annotating the beans with #Bean. The autowiring is different. There you create simple POJOs which you annotate with #Component, #Controller, #Service or #Repository. They will be automatically registered as beans via component scanning. With autowiring you don't need to explicitly configure the dependencies in XML file or JAVA Config class. You can do it in code directly. For instance, if we have to compare java config vs autowiring using the previous example
Java Config (explicit config in a config class)
#Bean
public A getA(){
return new A(new B());
}
Autowiring (implicit - done in code)
#Component
class B{
}
#Component
class A{
private B b;
#Autowired
public A(B b){
this.b = b;
}
}
In the latter we autowire class B into class A (they both will be registered as beans due to #Component annotation) without having explicitly defined this association in an xml file or java config class. I hope it makes sense.
If you have to specify the bean names in the xml, its not happening automatically, hence its not autowiring.
With autowiring spring will figure out what bean to inject even though it may not be explicitly written.
When using xml configuration based autowiring, the default mode is 'byName'
When using Annotations, the ordering that happens depends on the annotation used as there are a few that can be used. #Autowire #Resource #Inject.
When using #Component, the default wiring is of type. The method below will resolve on any autowiring needs for a Service object.
#Bean
public Service getMyService(){
return new Service();
}
If there are multiple #Bean methods that return a Service you will get an error.
If you wanted to do wire via name while using #Component you would add the #Qualifier("nameToUse") annotation to the variable. It would find an #Bean annotated method called getNameToUse().
#Autowired
#Qualifier("nameToUse")
private Service myService;
I am a Spring neophyte who is working on a large Spring-based project that has extensive coupling between Spring beans. I am trying to write some integration tests that exercise subsets of the total application functionality. To do so, I'd like to override some of the autowiring.
For example, suppose I have a class
public class MyDataServiceImpl implements MyDataService {
#Qualifier("notNeededForMyDataServiceTest")
#Autowired
private NotNeededForMyDataServiceTest notNeededForMyDataServiceTest;
//...
}
and a context file with:
<bean id="myDataService"
class="MyDataServiceImpl">
</bean>
In my test, I have no need to use the notNeededForMyDataServiceTest field. Is there some way I can override the #Autowired annotation and set notNeededForMyDataServiceTest to null, perhaps in the XML file? I don't want to modify any of the Java classes, but I do want to avoid the (problematic) configuration of notNeededForMyDataServiceTest.
I tried doing:
<bean id="myDataService"
class="MyDataServiceImpl">
<property name="notNeededForMyDataServiceTest"><null/></property>
</bean>
That doesn't work. IntelliJ informs me "Cannot resolve property 'notNeededForMyDataServiceTest'", apparently because there are no getters and setters for that field.
I'm using Spring Framework 3.1.3.
The following configuration should work, I took the liberty of mixing in Java configuration
#Configuration
//This will load your beans from whichever xml file you are using
#ImportResource("classpath:/path/beans.xml")
public class TestConfigLoader{
// This will declare the unused bean and inject MyDataServiceImpl with null.
public #Bean(name="notNeededForMyDataServiceTest") NotNeededForMyDataServiceTest getNotNeededForMyDataServiceTest(){
return null;
}
... any other configuration beans if required.
}
And annotate your test class like so:
// In your test class applicationContext will be loaded from TestConfigLoader
#ContextConfiguration(classes = {TestConfigLoader.class})
public class MyTest {
// class body...
}
These could help:
Context configuration with annotated classes
Testing with #Configuration Classes and Profiles
Spring TestContext Framework
and profiles:
beans profile="..."
Introducing #Profile
You could create different beans definition in the XML configuration and then activate them using the -Dspring.profiles.active="profile1,profile2" env.
You're using the #Autowired mechanism wrong. The qualifier is not a property that you need to set. That's actually the name of a bean, so that the container will be able to choose one particular instance in case multiple beans of the same type are defined in the same context.
So the container will look for a bean of type NotNeededForMyDataServiceTest and the name (which would actually be the bean id in XML): notNeededForMyDataServiceTest.
What I think you want is to instruct the container to not inject anything in that field if no bean of type NotNeededForMyDataServiceTest is defined in the application context. That could be achieved simply by setting the required attribute of the annotation to false:
#Autowired(required = false)
NotNeededForMyDataServiceTest someOptionalDependency;
The only drawback of this approach would be that the container will never complain at runtime if there's nothing to inject in that field (and perhaps you would want this sanity check when your code runs in production).
If you don't want to make that dependency optional (or you can't edit that code for some reason), you'll need to provide a mock / null value for that field by setting that explicitly in your context. One option to do that would be to use Java configuration instead of XML (like in #Abe's answer) and another approach would be to make use of a factory bean which returns null (like in this question).
I'm using spring mvc 3.1.x and jets3t.
I have a DataAccessObject that i instantiate as a Singleton bean..
I managed to get it working through extending the applicationcontextloader class and adding it to the web.xml
EDIT:
I changed my method, I tried inject and autowired but it's not suitable for my needs.
What I've done was to implement ApplicationContextAware and set it up as a bean, in the code I use it as follows:
ApplicationContext ctx = BannerApplicationContext.getApplicationContext();
BannerGenericDAO bdao = (BannerGenericDAO) ctx.getBean("dao");
I'm new to Spring and in general the servlet world..
Questions are:
what's the best way of doing this? Is this considered a "best-practice"?
How do you inject an object, keeping other method fields that are not supplied by autowiring?
How do you get an object to be used throughout the entire application?
Thanks!!
You could use annotations in your controller.
#Controller
public class MyController{
#Autowired // or #Inject, which is more JEEish (JSR330).
private SomeDao daoService;
}
Given "SomeDao" is the type of your singleton DAO, of course.