On certain pages in my tests I have are-you-sure-popups that my or may not show up.
I solve this obvious problem using
On Error Resume Next
[Click OK]
This works fine but for all the popups that have actually not been present but it generates a warning which does look unnecessarily alarming. Is there any way to suppress these warning in UFT?
On Error Resume Next
Reporter.Filter = rfDisableAll
Dialog("TITLE").Button("LABEL").Click
Reporter.Filter = rfEnableAll
On Error GoTo 0
This is the Hacky Way.
For a very pure implementation you should be deterministic: always be in control, always know, what will happen and use the Exist Property on the Object if it's optional.
For Random Events the UFT Solution is Recovery Scenarios - but I did not see many implementations for it.
Related
I work with Projucer (Juce v5.2.0) and xCode 9.2 and I have some strange error when I use setLookAndFeel on Slider.
I go step by step with that tutorial:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=po46y8UKPOY&t=1020s
And I make exactly the same code. On the video there is no problem. My error appear when I compile the same code as it's in the 17:13 duration of the movie.
My problem is: when I compile the code everything is OK, my compiled app works great, "setLookAndFeel" works as expect. But the problem is when I close app. Then app looks like closed, but the icon is on the dock, and xCode shows "Stop" button active, so it looks like my app still works in some way. And xCode takes me automatically to something called "Juce Massage Thread (1)" and there is error:
Juce Message Thread (1): EXC_BREAKPOINT (code=EXC_I386_BPT, subcode=0x0
It's next to that code:
jassert (masterReference.getNumActiveWeakReferences() == 0
|| (masterReference.getNumActiveWeakReferences() == 1
&& this == &getDefaultLookAndFeel()));
Could anyone help me?
Thanks in advance.
There's a large comment block above the assertion that you've hit explaining why you have hit it:
/* This assertion is triggered if you try to delete a LookAndFeel object while something
is still using it!
Reasons may be:
- it's still being used as the default LookAndFeel; or
- it's set as a Component's current lookandfeel; or
- there's a WeakReference to it somewhere else in your code
Generally the fix for this will be to make sure you call
Component::setLookandFeel (nullptr) on any components that were still using
it before you delete it, or call LookAndFeel::setDefaultLookAndFeel (nullptr)
if you had set it up to be the default one. This assertion can also be avoided by
declaring your LookAndFeel object before any of the Components that use it as
the LookAndFeel will be destroyed before the Components.
Deleting a LookAndFeel is unlikely to cause a crash since most things will use a
safe WeakReference to it, but it could cause some unexpected graphical behaviour,
so it's advisable to clear up any references before destroying them!
*/
So you need to call setLookAndFeel (nullptr) on your slider before it is deleted, probably in the destructor of its parent component.
I am experiencing very strange behavior within VB6 IDE whenever the break point hits(Step Into, Out, Over), the class is closed and makes it impossible to debug. Then within window-Cascade i can re-open the class but again when break point hits, the class is closed. Can anyone help please.
Step execution does sometimes behave that way. The reason is that VB is event driven and when an event occurs, then the code behind that event will run, and your code that you are stepping through might NOT be the code that gets run, so things change and code runs while your PAUSED code is still on hold.
When I encounter that I overcome it by using debug.print to send my monitored variables' current values to the OUTPUT window, or if you need more elaborate capability, write a sub that sends the data to a local text file and then invoke that sub as needed, passing into the variables ( and labels ) that you want displayed.
Once debug.print or a logging routine is in place then run the code WITHOUT pauses or breaks. The debugging output will tell you what is happening, in what order etc, so no need to stop the code or risk altering the order of execution.
Be sure to include lots of 'context' data such as : 'Entering SUB_XYZ, Param values are A, B, C... NOW at line 99 in SUB XYZ.... NOW in TRUE side of IF TEST # 1....
Include time stamps on all outputs.
Put your tracing logic only around the suspected problem area, expand from there only as needed.
It's a pain, but it works.
I finally resolved this issue and problem was within Display settings within windows 10. Basically if I apply vertical settings by placing both screen vertically 2nd on top of first then this issue happens,if i apply horizontal settings then this issue does not happen.
problematic settings with vb
settings that does solves debugging issue. VB is so weird and old cannot cope with display settings
I have a VB6 application that I'm trying to make log out differently. What I have is a flag in the registry (existing) which states if the application is set to Debug mode so that it would log out.
Within my code I then have lots of if statements checking if this is true. This means that there is a lot of processing time checking if a statement is true, which maybe not much really but as it does it so often it's an overhead I would like to reduce.
The code is full of statements like this
If isDebug = True Then
LogMessage("Log what is happening")
End If
So what I'm looking for is a better way to do this. I know I can set a debug mode within Project Properties -> Make, but this needs to be set prior to building the .exe and I want to be able to set this in production via the registry key.
Consider using a command line argument to set debug mode. I used to do this.
Dim sCommandLine() As String
sCommandLine = Split(Command$)
For I = 0 To UBound(sCommandLine)
' do something with each arg
Next I
You can also persist command line args inside the IDE, so you always have them when debugging. When running outside of the IDE, make a shortcut to the compiled application with the arguments in it.
I do something almost identical to what you have in mind in a lot of my code. Add this:
Sub LogDebug(ByVal strMsg As String)
If (isDebug) Then
LogMessage(strMsg)
End If
End Sub
Then just call LogDebug in your main program body, or call LogMessage directly if it's something you always want to log, regardless of the debug flag.
I'm assuming isDebug is a boolean here. If it's a function call, you should just create a global flag that you set at the beginning of the code, and check that instead of looking at the registry over and over. I don't think checking a boolean is that much of a processing load, is it?
You want to call a function if a runtime flag is set. The only thing I can see that could be faster is:
If isDebug Then
LogMessage("Log what is happening")
End If
But I doubt that either would be the cause of performance problems. Most logging frameworks promote code like that and even put the flag/log level as a parameter to the function. Just be sure that you don't have other places where you needlessly compute a log message outside of the conditional statement.
You might evaluate why you need logging and if the logs produced are effective for that purpose.
If you are looking for a problem that can be trapped using VB error handling, consider a good error handling library like HuntERR31. With it you can choose to log only errors instead of the debug message you are now doing. Even if you don't use the library, the docs have a very good description of error handling in VB.
Another answer still:
Read your registry flag into your app so that it's a session based thing (i.e. when you close and restart the app the flag will be checked again - there's no point in checking the registry with every single test).
Then (as per Tom's post) assign the value to a global variable and test that - far faster than a function.
To speed up logging you may want to consider dimensioning a string buffer in your app and, once it has reached a specific size, fire it into your log file. Obviously there are certain problems with this approach, namely the volatility of the memory, but if you want performance over disk access I would recommend such an approach.
This would, of course, be a lot easier if you could show us some code for your logging process etc.
In .Net 3.5, I have the following code.
If File.Exists(sFilePath & IndexFileName & ".NX") Then
Kill(sFilePath & IndexFileName & ".NX")
End If
At runtime, on one client's machine, I get the following exception, over and over, when this code executes
Source: Microsoft.VisualBasic
TargetSite: Microsoft.VisualBasic.FileSystem.Kill
Message: No files found matching 'I:\RPG\HGIAPVXD.NX'.
StackTrace:
at Microsoft.VisualBasic.FileSystem.Kill(String PathName)
(More trace that identifies the exact line of code.)
There are two people on different machines running this code, but only one of them is getting the exception. The exception does not happen every time, but it is happening regularly. (Multiple times every hour.) The code is not in a loop, nor does it run continuously, more like once every couple of minutes or so.
On the surface, this looks like a race condition, but given how infrequently this code is run and how often the error is happening I think there must be something else going on.
I would appreciate any suggestions on how I can track down what is really going on here. A solution to keep the error from happening would be even better.
I guess the first question to ask is "IS the file really there or not?" and if so, does it have any specical attributes (Is it Read-only or Hidden, or System --- or a Directory)?
Note the Microsoft.VisualBasic.FileSystem.Kill specifically looks for, and silently skips, any file marked "System" or "Hidden". For pretty much any other problem you would have gotten a different exception.
as James pointed out the Kill functions checks if the file in case is a system or hidden, you better use System.IO.File.Delete() instead
Try
System.IO.File.Delete(sFilePath & IndexFileName & ".NX")
Catch ex As System.Exception
...
End Try
using File.Exits is not neccasary because File.Delete() checks this by itself.
Is there any chance that the I: drive is a network drive? it could be some network issue... or then maybe a race condition
I'm trying to watch the execution of a VB6 app and I'm running into an issue because once I enter the debugger and then hit Continue, it no longer lets me step through the code until I hit another break point. I want to be able to execute a program without stepping through something until I hit a point where I want to watch it execute. Ideally this would be something to the effect of holding a key down while I pressed a button to 'step into' that function.
Thanks in advance!
[EDIT]: I'm aware that I can use break points to stop the execution. To be more clear, the problem is that I don't know where the execution is going to, so I can't set the break point there (because I don't know where there is). That's why I essentially want to be able to say, 'after this next thing that I do, break, no matter what'. It sounds like this functionality does not exist, but I'm still keeping my fingers crossed.
While the code is running, press ctrl+break (or the 'VCR pause' button in the IDE) then press F8 (or choose 'Step Into'from the Debug menu in the IDE) to continue running the app. The next action will cause execution to break.
Note that the which causes the break will not always be the one you hoped it would be. Particularly annoying is the _MouseOver event which prevents you from doing a mouse down or a timer firing quckier than you can perform your action. Some breaks may even be fatal as regards running your app e.g. where Windows messages have been hooked (subclassing). Also consider there may not be an event handler in code (yet) for your action where it can break. But usually this technique identifies where you should be setting your breakpoint.
There is a Stop statement available for use in VB6 that will drop to the debugger when the statement is executed from code running through the IDE. (Just be sure to remove the all of the Stop statements from the code when compiling a release build.)
There are several techniques you can use.
These two have been mentioned
Using F8 and Shift-F8 to step through the program
Adding Stops (and later removing)
Others
Use a global variable to create a collection. Use it as a stack and have the subroutines you are interested in push and and pop strings. Conversely don't pop anything and you will get a trace.
Use Watches to monitor and break at selection conditions. You can setup just about any condition to break.
Make a Global String and have your procedures set when you enter them. Monitor it through a Watch.
Use Debug.Print in your code. Also Unlike Stop you can leave these in without effecting the production code.
Use the File System Object to create a text file to act as a log.
Sometimes problem only occurs in the Complied version then you need to use MsgBox or log to a text file. MsgBox can alter the behavior of complex user interactions with forms.
These are all techniques I used in debugging an application. If I had to monitor an application I would use Debug.Print. If that doesn't do the trick compile then log to a text file.
If you have something really complex going on then I recommend moving all your code out of the events into classes implementing a Command Pattern. Your commands classes should interact with the form through and interface.
In the Execute method of the command classes you will something like
<save the current state>
<Do your original code>
<save the modified state>
<push the command onto a stack>
What will happen is that you wind up with a list of all the commands you have executed (even things like mouseover) with the state they encountered and the modified state. You can then examine each object in turn to see what is happening. This is nearly the equivalent of creating Undo/Redo
Note however things like MouseOver can push a lot of classes on the command stack so you will have to structure your tests carefully or be overloaded with information. Remember you can always skip pushing the command onto the stack.
The downside of using commands is that you gone beyond debugging into redesigning. You will to decide whether the problem is worth doing this.
You can press the F8 key to step through the code line by line. Alternatively, you can press SHIFT-F8 to step through line by line.
F8 will step you in to a function, where SHIFT-F8 will step you over the function. If you click on the DEBUG menu in the VB IDE, you will see other options too.
EDIT:
You can also put a permanent break point in your code by using:
Debug.Assert False
By doing it this way, the 'breakpoint' is saved in your code. When you compile the app, debug code is ignored.