I am doing a multi-match search using the following query object:
{
_source: [
'baseline',
'cdrp',
'date',
'description',
'dev_status',
'element',
'event',
'id'
],
track_total_hits: true,
query: {
bool: {
filter: [{name: "baseline", values: ["1f.0.1.0", "1f.1.8.3"]}],
should: [
{
multi_match:{
query: "national",
fields: ["cdrp","description","narrative.*","title","cop"]
}
}
]
}
},
highlight: { fields: { '*': {} } },
sort: [],
from: 0,
size: 50
}
I'm expecting the word "national" to be found within description or narrative.* fields but only one record out of 2 returned meet my expectations. I'm trying to understand why.
elasticsearch.config.ts
"settings": {
"analysis": {
"analyzer": {
"search_synonyms": {
"tokenizer": "whitespace",
"filter": [
"graph_synonyms",
"lowercase",
"asciifolding"
],
}
}
}
},
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"description": {
"type": "text",
"analyzer": "search_synonyms"
},
"narrative": {
"type":"object",
"properties":{
"_all":{
"type": "text",
"analyzer": "search_synonyms"
}
}
},
}
}
Should clause works like OR, it doesn't filter out documents it affects scoring. Documents which match should clause are scored higher.
If you want to filter on multi-match you can move it inside filter clause
filter: [
{
name: "baseline", values: ["1f.0.1.0", "1f.1.8.3"]
},
{
multi_match:
{
query: "national",
fields: ["cdrp","description","narrative.*","title","cop"]
}
}
]
Filter vs Must:- Both return documents matching clauses specified. Filter doesn't score documents. So if you are not interested in score of documents or are not concerned with order of documents returned, you can use filter. So both are same with difference of scoring.
Documents with more matches are scored higher
Multi_match by default uses best_fields
Finds documents which match any field, but uses the _score from the
best field.
It uses score returned for field with maximum number of matches to calculate score for each document.
Example
Document 1 has matches in two field , field1 (score 2), field2 (score 1)
Document 2 has matches in one field , field2 (score 3)
Documnet 2 will be ranked higher even if 1 field has matched.
You can change it to most_fields
Finds documents which match any field and combines the _score from
each field.
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"multi_match": {
"query": "test",
"fields": [],
"type": "most_fields"
}
}
]
}
}
}
Still a document with fewer number of fields matched can be ranked higher due to high score in a field caused by multiple terms.
If you want to give same score to a single field irrespective of number of tokens matched. You need to use constant_score query
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"should": [
{
"constant_score": {
"filter": {
"term": {
"field1": "test"
}
}
}
},
{
"constant_score": {
"filter": {
"term": {
"field2": "test"
}
}
}
}
]
}
},
"highlight": {
"fields": {
"field1": {},
"field2": {}
}
}
}
Result:
"hits" : [
{
"_index" : "index18",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "iSCe6nEB8J88APx3YBGn",
"_score" : 2.0, --> one score per field matched
"_source" : {
"field1" : "test",
"field2" : "test"
},
"highlight" : {
"field1" : [
"<em>test</em>"
],
"field2" : [
"<em>test</em>"
]
}
},
{
"_index" : "index18",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "iiCe6nEB8J88APx3ghF-",
"_score" : 1.0,
"_source" : {
"field1" : "test",
"field2" : "abc"
},
"highlight" : {
"field1" : [
"<em>test</em>"
]
}
},
{
"_index" : "index18",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "iyCf6nEB8J88APx3UhF8",
"_score" : 1.0,
"_source" : {
"field1" : "test do",
"field2" : "abc"
},
"highlight" : {
"field1" : [
"<em>test</em> do"
]
}
}
]
}
Related
I'm trying to query ElasticSearch to match every document that in a list of list contains all the values requested, but I can't seem to find the perfect query.
Mapping:
"id" : {
"type" : "keyword"
},
"mainlist" : {
"properties" : {
"format" : {
"type" : "keyword"
},
"tags" : {
"type" : "keyword"
}
}
},
...
Documents:
doc1 {
"id" : "abc",
"mainlist" : [
{
"type" : "big",
"tags" : [
"tag1",
"tag2"
]
},
{
"type" : "small",
"tags" : [
"tag1"
]
}
]
},
doc2 {
"id" : "abc",
"mainlist" : [
{
"type" : "big",
"tags" : [
"tag1"
]
},
{
"type" : "small",
"tags" : [
"tag2"
]
}
]
},
doc3 {
"id" : "abc",
"mainlist" : [
{
"type" : "big",
"tags" : [
"tag1"
]
}
]
}
The query I've tried that got me closest to the result is:
GET /index/_doc/_search
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"term": {
"mainlist.tags": "tag1"
}
},
{
"term": {
"mainlist.tags": "tag2"
}
}
]
}
}
}
although I get as result doc1 and doc2, while I'd only want doc1 as contains tag1 and tag2 in a single list element and not spread across both sublists.
How would I be able to achieve that?
Thanks for any help.
As mentioned by #caster, you need to use the nested data type and query as in normal way Elasticsearch treats them as object and relation between the elements are lost, as explained in offical doc.
You need to change both mapping and query to achieve the desired output as shown below.
Index mapping
{
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"id": {
"type": "keyword"
},
"mainlist" :{
"type" : "nested"
}
}
}
}
Sample Index doc according to your example, no change there
Query
{
"query": {
"nested": {
"path": "mainlist",
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"term": {
"mainlist.tags": "tag1"
}
},
{
"match": {
"mainlist.tags": "tag2"
}
}
]
}
}
}
}
}
And result
hits": [
{
"_index": "71519931_new",
"_id": "1",
"_score": 0.9139043,
"_source": {
"id": "abc",
"mainlist": [
{
"type": "big",
"tags": [
"tag1",
"tag2"
]
},
{
"type": "small",
"tags": [
"tag1"
]
}
]
}
}
]
use nested field type,this is work for it
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/8.1/nested.html
I have two fields in my elastic search which is lowest_local_price and lowest_global_price.
I want to map dynamic value to third field price on run time based on local or global country.
If local country matched then i want to map lowest_local_price value to price field.
If global country matched then i want to map lowest_global_price value to price field.
If local or global country matched then i want to apply range query on the price field and boost that doc by 2.0.
Note : This is not compulsary filter or query, if matched then just want to boost the doc.
I have tried below solution but does not work for me.
Query 1:
$params["body"] = [
"runtime_mappings" => [
"price" => [
"type" => "double",
"script" => [
"source" => "if (params['_source']['country_en_name'] == '$country_name' ) { emit(params['_source']['lowest_local_price']); } else { emit( params['_source']['global_rates']['$country->id']['lowest_global_price']); }"
]
]
],
"query" => [
"bool" => [
"filter" => [
"range" => [ "price" => [ "gte" => $min_price]]
],
"boost" => 2.0
]
]
];
Query 2:
$params["body"] = [
"runtime_mappings" => [
"price" => [
"type" => "double",
"script" => [
"source" => "if (params['_source']['country_en_name'] == '$country_name' ) { emit(params['_source']['lowest_local_price']); } else { emit( params['_source']['global_rates']['$country->id']['lowest_global_price']); }"
]
]
],
"query" => [
"bool" => [
"filter" => [
"range" => [ "price" => [ "gte" => $min_price, "boost" => 2.0]]
],
]
]
];
None of them working for me, because it can boost the doc. I know filter does not work with boost, then what is the solution for dynamic field mapping with range query and boost?
Please help me to solve this query.
Thank you in advance!
You can (most likely) achieve what you want without runtime_mappings by using a combination of bool queries, here's how.
Let's define test mapping
We need to clarify what mapping we are working with, because different field types require different query types.
Let's assume that your mapping looks like this:
PUT my-index-000001
{
"mappings": {
"dynamic": "runtime",
"properties": {
"country_en_name": {
"type": "text"
},
"lowest_local_price": {
"type": "float"
},
"global_rates": {
"properties": {
"UK": {
"properties":{
"lowest_global_price": {
"type": "float"
}
}
},
"FR": {
"properties":{
"lowest_global_price": {
"type": "float"
}
}
},
"US": {
"properties":{
"lowest_global_price": {
"type": "float"
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
Note that country_en_name is of type text, in general such fields should be indexed as keyword but for the sake of demonstration of the use of runtime_mappings I kept it text and will show later how to overcome this limitation.
bool is the same as if for Elasticsearch
The query without runtime mappings might look like this:
POST my-index-000001/_search
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"should": [
{
"match_all": {}
},
{
"bool": {
"should": [
{
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"match": {
"country_en_name": "UK"
}
},
{
"range": {
"lowest_local_price": {
"gte": 1000
}
}
}
]
}
},
{
"range": {
"global_rates.UK.lowest_global_price": {
"gte": 1000
}
}
}
],
"boost": 2
}
}
]
}
}
}
This can be interpreted as the following:
Any document
OR (
(document with country_en_name=UK AND lowest_local_price > X)
OR
(document with global_rates.UK.lowest_global_price > X)
)[boost this part of OR]
The match_all is needed to return also documents that do not match the other queries.
How will the response of the query look like?
Let's put some documents in the ES:
POST my-index-000001/_doc/1
{
"country_en_name": "UK",
"lowest_local_price": 1500,
"global_rates": {
"FR": {
"lowest_global_price": 1000
},
"US": {
"lowest_global_price": 1200
}
}
}
POST my-index-000001/_doc/2
{
"country_en_name": "FR",
"lowest_local_price": 900,
"global_rates": {
"UK": {
"lowest_global_price": 950
},
"US": {
"lowest_global_price": 1500
}
}
}
POST my-index-000001/_doc/3
{
"country_en_name": "US",
"lowest_local_price": 950,
"global_rates": {
"UK": {
"lowest_global_price": 1100
},
"FR": {
"lowest_global_price": 1000
}
}
}
Now the result of the search query above will be something like:
{
...
"hits" : {
"total" : {
"value" : 3,
"relation" : "eq"
},
"max_score" : 4.9616585,
"hits" : [
{
"_index" : "my-index-000001",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "1",
"_score" : 4.9616585,
"_source" : {
"country_en_name" : "UK",
"lowest_local_price" : 1500,
...
}
},
{
"_index" : "my-index-000001",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "3",
"_score" : 3.0,
"_source" : {
"country_en_name" : "US",
"lowest_local_price" : 950,
"global_rates" : {
"UK" : {
"lowest_global_price" : 1100
},
...
}
}
},
{
"_index" : "my-index-000001",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "2",
"_score" : 1.0,
"_source" : {
"country_en_name" : "FR",
"lowest_local_price" : 900,
"global_rates" : {
"UK" : {
"lowest_global_price" : 950
},
...
}
}
}
]
}
}
Note that document with _id:2 is on the bottom because it didn't match any of the boosted queries.
Will runtime_mappings be of any use?
Runtime mappings are useful in case there's an existing mapping with data types that do not permit to execute a certain type of query. In previous versions (before 7.11) one would have to do a reindex in such cases, but now it is possible to use runtime mappings (but the query is more expensive).
In our case, we have got country_en_name indexed as text which is suited for full-text search and not for exact lookups. We should rather use keyword instead. This is how the query may look like with the help of runtime_mappings:
POST my-index-000001/_search
{
"runtime_mappings": {
"country_en_name_keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"script": {
"source": "emit(params['_source']['country_en_name'])"
}
}
},
"query": {
"bool": {
"should": [
{
"match_all": {}
},
{
"bool": {
"should": [
{
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"term": {
"country_en_name_keyword": "UK"
}
},
{
"range": {
"lowest_local_price": {
"gte": 1000
}
}
}
]
}
},
{
"range": {
"global_rates.UK.lowest_global_price": {
"gte": 1000
}
}
}
],
"boost": 2
}
}
]
}
}
}
Notice how we created a new runtime field country_en_name_keyword with type keyword and used a term lookup instead of match query.
Let's say I have two indexes kids and outings_for_kids with the following data
kids
[
{
"name": "little kid 1",
"i_like":["drawing","teddybears"]
},
]
outings for kids
[
{
"name": "Teddybear drawing fights with apples!",
"for_kids_that_like":["apples","teddybears","drawing", "play outside games"]
},
{
"name": "drawing and teddies!",
"for_kids_that_like":["teddybears","drawing"]
}
]
I want to find an outing that likes the same things little kid 1 likes and a lower score if it has more.
Little kid 1 should not match 100% with the first outing. It has what little kid 1 wants, but but it has more e.g. apples, it should match 50%.
It should match 100% with the second outing.
This will be a 2 step process:
Get i_like value from fields index
Use i_like from step 1 to query outings index
Use terms query to match each value
Use script to compare array size with number of values
Use constant score to give same score based on index count
Query
GET outings/_search
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"should": [
{
"constant_score": {
"filter": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"term": {
"for_kids_that_like": {
"value": "teddybears"
}
}
},
{
"term": {
"for_kids_that_like": {
"value": "drawing"
}
}
},
{
"script": {
"script": "doc['for_kids_that_like.keyword'].size()==2" --> replace 2 with size of elements searched
}
}
]
}
},
"boost": 100
}
},
{
"constant_score": {
"filter": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"term": {
"for_kids_that_like": {
"value": "teddybears"
}
}
},
{
"term": {
"for_kids_that_like": {
"value": "drawing"
}
}
},
{
"script": {
"script": "doc['for_kids_that_like.keyword'].size()>2"
}
}
]
}
},
"boost": 50
}
}
]
}
}
}
Result:
"hits" : [
{
"_index" : "outings",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "IH7tVHEBbLcSRUWr6wPj",
"_score" : 100.0,
"_source" : {
"name" : "Teddybear drawing fights with apples!",
"for_kids_that_like" : [
"teddybears",
"drawing"
]
}
},
{
"_index" : "outings",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "IX7zVHEBbLcSRUWrhgM9",
"_score" : 50.0,
"_source" : {
"name" : "Teddybear drawing fights with apples!",
"for_kids_that_like" : [
"teddybears",
"drawing",
"apples"
]
}
}
]
If you just want to show exact match documents on top followed by partial matches then you don't need constant score(must query with term search will work). By default exact matches are given higher score
The goal is to filter products with multiple prices.
The data looks like this:
{
"name":"a",
"price":[
{
"membershipLevel":"Gold",
"price":"5"
},
{
"membershipLevel":"Silver",
"price":"50"
},
{
"membershipLevel":"Bronze",
"price":"100"
}
]
}
I would like to filter by membershipLevel and price. For example, if I am a silver member and query price range 0-10, the product should not appear, but if I am a gold member, the product "a" should appear. Is this kind of query supported by Elasticsearch?
You need to make use of nested datatype for price and make use of nested query for your use case.
Please see the below mapping, sample document, query and response:
Mapping:
PUT my_price_index
{
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"name":{
"type":"text"
},
"price":{
"type":"nested",
"properties": {
"membershipLevel":{
"type":"keyword"
},
"price":{
"type":"double"
}
}
}
}
}
}
Sample Document:
POST my_price_index/_doc/1
{
"name":"a",
"price":[
{
"membershipLevel":"Gold",
"price":"5"
},
{
"membershipLevel":"Silver",
"price":"50"
},
{
"membershipLevel":"Bronze",
"price":"100"
}
]
}
Query:
POST my_price_index/_search
{
"query": {
"nested": {
"path": "price",
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"term": {
"price.membershipLevel": "Gold"
}
},
{
"range": {
"price.price": {
"gte": 0,
"lte": 10
}
}
}
]
}
},
"inner_hits": {} <---- Do note this.
}
}
}
The above query means, I want to return all the documents having price.price range from 0 to 10 and price.membershipLevel as Gold.
Notice that I've made use of inner_hits. The reason is despite being a nested document, ES as response would return the entire set of document instead of only the document specific to where the query clause is applicable.
In order to find the exact nested doc that has been matched, you would need to make use of inner_hits.
Below is how the response would return.
Response:
{
"took" : 128,
"timed_out" : false,
"_shards" : {
"total" : 1,
"successful" : 1,
"skipped" : 0,
"failed" : 0
},
"hits" : {
"total" : {
"value" : 1,
"relation" : "eq"
},
"max_score" : 1.9808291,
"hits" : [
{
"_index" : "my_price_index",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "1",
"_score" : 1.9808291,
"_source" : {
"name" : "a",
"price" : [
{
"membershipLevel" : "Gold",
"price" : "5"
},
{
"membershipLevel" : "Silver",
"price" : "50"
},
{
"membershipLevel" : "Bronze",
"price" : "100"
}
]
},
"inner_hits" : {
"price" : {
"hits" : {
"total" : {
"value" : 1,
"relation" : "eq"
},
"max_score" : 1.9808291,
"hits" : [
{
"_index" : "my_price_index",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "1",
"_nested" : {
"field" : "price",
"offset" : 0
},
"_score" : 1.9808291,
"_source" : {
"membershipLevel" : "Gold",
"price" : "5"
}
}
]
}
}
}
}
]
}
}
Hope this helps!
Let me take show you how to do it, using the nested fields and query and filter context. I will take your example to show, you how to define index mapping, index sample documents, and search query.
It's important to note the include_in_parent param in Elasticsearch mapping, which allows us to use these nested fields without using the nested fields.
Please refer to Elasticsearch documentation about it.
If true, all fields in the nested object are also added to the parent
document as standard (flat) fields. Defaults to false.
Index Def
{
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"product": {
"type": "nested",
"include_in_parent": true
}
}
}
}
Index sample docs
{
"product": {
"price" : 5,
"membershipLevel" : "Gold"
}
}
{
"product": {
"price" : 50,
"membershipLevel" : "Silver"
}
}
{
"product": {
"price" : 100,
"membershipLevel" : "Bronze"
}
}
Search query to show Gold with price range 0-10
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"match": {
"product.membershipLevel": "Gold"
}
}
],
"filter": [
{
"range": {
"product.price": {
"gte": 0,
"lte" : 10
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
Result
"hits": [
{
"_index": "so-60620921-nested",
"_type": "_doc",
"_id": "1",
"_score": 1.0296195,
"_source": {
"product": {
"price": 5,
"membershipLevel": "Gold"
}
}
}
]
Search query to exclude Silver, with same price range
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"match": {
"product.membershipLevel": "Silver"
}
}
],
"filter": [
{
"range": {
"product.price": {
"gte": 0,
"lte" : 10
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
Above query doesn't return any result as there isn't any matching result.
P.S :- this SO answer might help you to understand nested fields and query on them in detail.
You have to use Nested fields and nested query to archive this: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/query-dsl-nested-query.html
Define you Price property with type "Nested" and then you will be able to filter by every property of nested object
I have an elastic search index with the following mapping:
PUT /student_detail
{
"mappings" : {
"properties" : {
"id" : { "type" : "long" },
"name" : { "type" : "text" },
"email" : { "type" : "text" },
"age" : { "type" : "text" },
"status" : { "type" : "text" },
"tests":{ "type" : "nested" }
}
}
}
Data stored is in form below:
{
"id": 123,
"name": "Schwarb",
"email": "abc#gmail.com",
"status": "current",
"age": 14,
"tests": [
{
"test_id": 587,
"test_score": 10
},
{
"test_id": 588,
"test_score": 6
}
]
}
I want to be able to query the students where name like '%warb%' AND email like '%gmail.com%' AND test with id 587 have score > 5 etc. The high level of what is needed can be put something like below, dont know what would be the actual query, apologize for this messy query below
GET developer_search/_search
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"match": {
"name": "abc"
}
},
{
"nested": {
"path": "tests",
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"term": {
"tests.test_id": IN [587]
}
},
{
"term": {
"tests.test_score": >= some value
}
}
]
}
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
The query must be flexible so that we can enter dynamic test Ids and their respective score filters along with the fields out of nested fields like age, name, status
Something like that?
GET student_detail/_search
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"wildcard": {
"name": {
"value": "*warb*"
}
}
},
{
"wildcard": {
"email": {
"value": "*gmail.com*"
}
}
},
{
"nested": {
"path": "tests",
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"term": {
"tests.test_id": 587
}
},
{
"range": {
"tests.test_score": {
"gte": 5
}
}
}
]
}
},
"inner_hits": {}
}
}
]
}
}
}
Inner hits is what you are looking for.
You must make use of Ngram Tokenizer as wildcard search must not be used for performance reasons and I wouldn't recommend using it.
Change your mapping to the below where you can create your own Analyzer which I've done in the below mapping.
How elasticsearch (albiet lucene) indexes a statement is, first it breaks the statement or paragraph into words or tokens, then indexes these words in the inverted index for that particular field. This process is called Analysis and that this would only be applicable on text datatype.
So now you only get the documents if these tokens are available in inverted index.
By default, standard analyzer would be applied. What I've done is I've created my own analyzer and used Ngram Tokenizer which would be creating many more tokens than just simply words.
Default Analyzer on Life is beautiful would be life, is, beautiful.
However using Ngrams, the tokens for Life would be lif, ife & life
Mapping:
PUT student_detail
{
"settings": {
"analysis": {
"analyzer": {
"my_analyzer": {
"tokenizer": "my_tokenizer"
}
},
"tokenizer": {
"my_tokenizer": {
"type": "ngram",
"min_gram": 3,
"max_gram": 4,
"token_chars": [
"letter",
"digit"
]
}
}
}
},
"mappings" : {
"properties" : {
"id" : {
"type" : "long"
},
"name" : {
"type" : "text",
"analyzer": "my_analyzer",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword"
}
}
},
"email" : {
"type" : "text",
"analyzer": "my_analyzer",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword"
}
}
},
"age" : {
"type" : "text" <--- I am not sure why this is text. Change it to long or int. Would leave this to you
},
"status" : {
"type" : "text",
"analyzer": "my_analyzer",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword"
}
}
},
"tests":{
"type" : "nested"
}
}
}
}
Note that in the above mapping I've created a sibling field in the form of keyword for name, email and status as below:
"name":{
"type":"text",
"analyzer":"my_analyzer",
"fields":{
"keyword":{
"type":"keyword"
}
}
}
Now your query could be as simple as below.
Query:
POST student_detail/_search
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"match": {
"name": "war" <---- Note this. This would even return documents having "Schwarb"
}
},
{
"match": {
"email": "gmail" <---- Note this
}
},
{
"nested": {
"path": "tests",
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"term": {
"tests.test_id": 587
}
},
{
"range": {
"tests.test_score": {
"gte": 5
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
Note that for exact matches I would make use of Term Queries on keyword fields while for normal searches or LIKE in SQL I would make use of simple Match Queries on text Fields provided they make use of Ngram Tokenizer.
Also note that for >= and <= you would need to make use of Range Query.
Response:
{
"took" : 233,
"timed_out" : false,
"_shards" : {
"total" : 1,
"successful" : 1,
"skipped" : 0,
"failed" : 0
},
"hits" : {
"total" : {
"value" : 1,
"relation" : "eq"
},
"max_score" : 3.7260926,
"hits" : [
{
"_index" : "student_detail",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "1",
"_score" : 3.7260926,
"_source" : {
"id" : 123,
"name" : "Schwarb",
"email" : "abc#gmail.com",
"status" : "current",
"age" : 14,
"tests" : [
{
"test_id" : 587,
"test_score" : 10
},
{
"test_id" : 588,
"test_score" : 6
}
]
}
}
]
}
}
Note that I observe the document you've mentioned in your question, in my response when I run the query.
Please do read the links I've shared. It is vital that you understand the concepts. Hope this helps!