I try to use libbsm/openbsm library and Swift5 in Xcode11.
Why? I can not fine AUDITPIPE_SET_PRESELECT_MODE.
Can I use libbsm/openbsm in Swift?
var mode = AUDITPIPE_PRESELECT_MODE_LOCAL // <- works very well
if ioctl(auditFD, AUDITPIPE_SET_PRESELECT_MODE, &mode) == -1 {
return -1
}
I ran into the same issue with Swift unable to import these complex macros. Quinn “The Eskimo!” pointed me in the direction of declaring them as c constants. So I created them in a c file in my project.
In the .h file I did the following:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <bsm/libbsm.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <security/audit/audit_ioctl.h>
// -- Macros used for creating an auditpipe
extern unsigned long QAUDITPIPE_SET_PRESELECT_MODE;
extern unsigned long QAUDITPIPE_GET_QLIMIT_MAX;
extern unsigned long QAUDITPIPE_SET_QLIMIT;
extern unsigned long QAUDITPIPE_SET_PRESELECT_FLAGS;
extern unsigned long QAUDITPIPE_SET_PRESELECT_NAFLAGS;
// -- End auditpipe macros
And in my .c file i have:
unsigned long QAUDITPIPE_SET_PRESELECT_MODE = AUDITPIPE_SET_PRESELECT_MODE;
unsigned long QAUDITPIPE_GET_QLIMIT_MAX = AUDITPIPE_GET_QLIMIT_MAX;
unsigned long QAUDITPIPE_SET_QLIMIT = AUDITPIPE_SET_QLIMIT;
unsigned long QAUDITPIPE_SET_PRESELECT_FLAGS = AUDITPIPE_SET_PRESELECT_FLAGS;
unsigned long QAUDITPIPE_SET_PRESELECT_NAFLAGS = AUDITPIPE_SET_PRESELECT_NAFLAGS;
So now I can just use QAUDITPIPE_SET_PRESELECT_MODE in my Swift code. Works great!
Related
Here is the minimal C program to reproduce:
#include <alsa/asoundlib.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
int main( void )
{
}
This will compile with gcc -c -o timealsa.o timealsa.c, but if you include the -std=c99 switch, you get a redefinition error:
In file included from /usr/include/sys/time.h:28:0,
from timealsa.c:3:
/usr/include/bits/time.h:30:8: error: redefinition of ‘struct timeval’
struct timeval
^
In file included from /usr/include/alsa/asoundlib.h:49:0,
from timealsa.c:2:
/usr/include/alsa/global.h:138:8: note: originally defined here
struct timeval {
^
How can I resolve this conflict while still using -std=c99?
Since your question suggests you are using GLIBC's time.h there is a way to avoid this by telling it not to define timeval. Include asoundlib.h first then define _STRUCT_TIMEVAL. The one defined in asoundlib.h will be the one that gets used.
#include <alsa/asoundlib.h>
#ifndef _STRUCT_TIMEVAL
# define _STRUCT_TIMEVAL
#endif
#include <sys/time.h>
int main( void )
{
}
With C99 and later you can't have duplicate definitions of the same struct. The problem is that alsa/asoundlib.h includes alsa/global.h which contains this code:
/* for timeval and timespec */
#include <time.h>
...
#ifdef __GLIBC__
#if !defined(_POSIX_C_SOURCE) && !defined(_POSIX_SOURCE)
struct timeval {
time_t tv_sec; /* seconds */
long tv_usec; /* microseconds */
};
struct timespec {
time_t tv_sec; /* seconds */
long tv_nsec; /* nanoseconds */
};
#endif
#endif
So the Michael Petch's solution won't work - by the time you've included alsa/asoundlib.h it is already too late. The proper solution is to define _POSIX_C_SOURCE (_POSIX_SOURCE is obsolete). There's more information about these macros here and here.
For example you could try -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200809L. However, if you do that you'll get errors like this:
/usr/include/arm-linux-gnueabihf/sys/time.h:110:20: error: field ‘it_interval’ has incomplete type
struct timeval it_interval;
^
/usr/include/arm-linux-gnueabihf/sys/time.h:112:20: error: field ‘it_value’ has incomplete type
struct timeval it_value;
^
/usr/include/arm-linux-gnueabihf/sys/time.h:138:61: error: array type has incomplete element type
extern int utimes (const char *__file, const struct timeval __tvp[2])
^
This is all a big mess of old C code and macro madness. The only way I got it to work was to give up and use -std=gnu11.
I'm working on a port from some old Delphi code to VC++ 2013, and I'm encountering an error that I feel should be an easy fix but cannot for the life of me figure out...
The problem is this: I have a number of common utility functions in a local file Utils.h that I am deploying as part of a windows form. Most (90%) of the functions in this header work as normal. GetMsg(...), however, throws a C3861 Identifier not found error...
Utils.h (snippet): GetMsg declared at bottom
#pragma once
/*------------------------------------------------------------------------*
Includes:
*------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
using namespace std;
/*------------------------------------------------------------------------*
Constants:
*------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
#define GET_MSG_TIMEOUT 2
/*------------------------------------------------------------------------*
Typedefs, Structs, Enums:
*------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
typedef union
{
unsigned long ui32;
unsigned char ui8[4];
} UI32_UI8;
typedef union
{
unsigned short ui16;
unsigned char ui8[2];
} UI16_UI8;
typedef union
{
float f;
unsigned char ui8[4];
} F_UI8;
typedef struct
{
string sName;
string sVersion;
string sCompany;
string sCopyright;
} PRODUCT_INFORMATION;
/*------------------------------------------------------------------------*
Prototypes:
*------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
unsigned short SwapShort(unsigned short aShort);
float SwapFloat(float aFloat);
unsigned long SwapLong(unsigned long aLong);
unsigned int ReadLine(unsigned char *msgBuf, SerialPort^ Hdl, bool ReturnLF);
void __stdcall FillTheBuffer(char *buf, String sss, int length);
string __stdcall FillTheString(string sss, int length);
unsigned int __stdcall GetMsg(SerialPort^ Hdl, unsigned char *msgBuf);
GetMsg Definition in Utils.cpp:
//---------------------------------------------------------
unsigned int __stdcall GetMsg(SerialPort^ Hdl, unsigned char *msgBuf)
{
...
}
And, finally, GetMsg usage in form file:
#include "Utils.h"
...
void MainForm::UploadButton_Click
(System::Object^ object, System::EventArgs^ e)
{
...
SwapShort(1); //Works fine, also declared in Utils.h
GetMsg(spCom, inBuf); //C3861 ERROR
...
}
Where spCom is a (SerialPort^) contained, configured, and opened within the windows form. inBuf is a simple array of characters (char*) to buffer the input. I've tried renaming the function, thinking that there may have been an unintentional conflict / overload in other files, to no avail.
Any advice? Thanks, in advance
Solved the problem -- As it turns out I needed to be more explicit in my function definitions. Changing the declaration to read
GetMsg(System::IO::Ports::SerialPort^ Hdl, unsigned char *msgBuf)
eliminated the C3861 error. It would seem that the lack of a specific namespace on the declaration passed Intellisense but confused the compiler, rendering it unable to determine which prototype to use with the function call.
I am trying to convert a c++ program I have which uses random library which is a C++11 feature. After having read through a couple of similar posts here, I tried by separating out the code into three files. At the outset I would like to say that I am not very conversant at C/C++ and mostly use R at work.
The main file looks as follows.
#ifndef _KERNEL_SUPPORT_
#define _KERNEL_SUPPORT_
#include <complex>
#include <random>
#include <iostream>
#include "my_code_header.h"
using namespace std;
std::default_random_engine generator;
std::normal_distribution<double> distribution(0.0,1.0);
const int rand_mat_length = 24561;
double rand_mat[rand_mat_length];// = {0};
void create_std_norm(){
for(int i = 0 ; i < rand_mat_length ; i++)
::rand_mat[i] = distribution(generator);
}
.
.
.
int main(void)
{
...
...
call_global();
return 0;
}
#endif
The header file looks as follows.
#ifndef mykernel_h
#define mykernel_h
void call_global();
void two_d_example(double *a, double *b, double *my_result, size_t length, size_t width);
#endif
And the .cu file looks like the following.
#ifndef _MY_KERNEL_
#define _MY_KERNEL_
#include <iostream>
#include "my_code_header.h"
#define TILE_WIDTH 8
using namespace std;
__global__ void two_d_example(double *a, double *b, double *my_result, size_t length, size_t width)
{
unsigned int row = blockIdx.y*blockDim.y + threadIdx.y;
unsigned int col = blockIdx.x*blockDim.x + threadIdx.x;
if ((row>length) || (col>width)) {
return;
}
...
}
void call_global()
{
const size_t imageLength = 528;
const size_t imageWidth = 528;
const dim3 threadsPerBlock(TILE_WIDTH,TILE_WIDTH);
const dim3 numBlocks(((imageLength) / threadsPerBlock.x), ((imageWidth) / threadsPerBlock.y));
double *d_a, *d_b, *mys ;
...
cudaMalloc((void**)&d_a, sizeof(double) * imageLength);
cudaMalloc((void**)&d_b, sizeof(double) * imageWidth);
cudaMalloc((void**)&mys, sizeof(double) * imageLength * imageWidth);
two_d_example<<<numBlocks,threadsPerBlock>>>(d_a, d_b, mys, imageLength, imageWidth);
...
cudaFree(d_a);
cudaFree(d_b);
}
#endif
Please note that the __global__ has been removed from .h since I was getting the following error owing to it being compiled by g++.
In file included from my_code_main.cpp:12:0:
my_code_header.h:5:1: error: ‘__global__’ does not name a type
When I compile the .cu file with nvcc it is all fine and generates a my_code_kernel.o. But since I am using C++11 in my .cpp I am trying to compile it with g++ and I am getting the following error.
/tmp/ccR2rXzf.o: In function `main':
my_code_main.cpp:(.text+0x1c4): undefined reference to `call_global()'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
I understand that this might not have to do anything with CUDA as such and may just be the wrong use of including the header at both places. Also what is the right way to compile and most importantly link the my_code_kernel.o and my_code_main.o(hopefully)? Sorry if this question is too trivial!
It looks like you are not linking with my_code_kernel.o. You have used -c for your nvcc command (causes it to compile but not link, i.e. generate the .o file), I'm going to guess that you're not using -c with your g++ command, in which case you need to add my_code_kernel.o to the list of inputs as well as the .cpp file.
The separation you are trying to achieve is completely possible, it just looks like your not linking properly. If you still have problems, add the compilation commands to your question.
FYI: You don't need to declare two_d_example() in your header file, it is only used within your .cu file (from call_global()).
#include <string.h>
#include <memcopy.h>
#include <pagecopy.h>
#undef memcpy
void *
memcpy (dstpp, srcpp, len)
void *dstpp;
const void *srcpp;
size_t len;
{
unsigned long int dstp = (long int) dstpp;
unsigned long int srcp = (long int) srcpp;
...
This is our familiar lib function memcpy's implementation, but I don't recognize its
signature and I've never seen it before. Can anyone tell me what it is?
This is our familiar lib function memcpy's implementation, but I don't recognize its signature
Which aspect of it don't you recognize? Is it the fact that it is written in K&R (pre-ANSI) C, or something else? Would you have recognized it if it was written that way instead:
void *
memcpy(void *dstpp, const void *srcpp, size_t len)
{
...
}
Thank you for looking at this post. I am trying to patch up a network block device driver. If you need to see the sources they are at http : / / code.ximeta.com.
I noticed that lock_kernel() seems deprecated as of linux 2.6.37. I read "The new way of ioctl()" and found that device drivers now should perform a specific lock before operating.
So I would like some advice replacing this if possible.
I have found two sections in the current code that I think are related, in the block folder section.
Source
block->io.c
->ctrldev.c
I put snippets from each for your consideration.
io.c contains one call to lock_kernel:
NDAS_SAL_API xbool sal_file_get_size(sal_file file, xuint64* size)
{
definitions and declarations etc..
lock_kernel();
#ifdef HAVE_UNLOCKED_IOCTL
if (filp->f_op->unlocked_ioctl) {
some small statements
error = filp->f_op->unlocked_ioctl(filp, BLKGETSIZE64, (unsigned long)size);
actions if error or not etc.
}
#endif
unlock_kernel();
return ret;
}
And ctrldev.c contains the main io function:
#include <linux/spinlock.h> // spinklock_t
#include <linux/semaphore.h> // struct semaphore
#include <asm/atomic.h> // atomic
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/ide.h>
#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
#include <linux/time.h>
......
int ndas_ctrldev_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
{
lots of operations and functions.
return result;
}
Later ndas_ctrldev_ioctl function is set as the former .ioctl.
static struct file_operations ndasctrl_fops = {
.write = ndas_ctrldev_write,
.read = ndas_ctrldev_read,
.open = ndas_ctrldev_open,
.release = ndas_ctrldev_release,
.ioctl = ndas_ctrldev_ioctl,
};
Now I want to convert this to avoid using lock_kernel();
According to my understanding I will modified the former sections as below:
NDAS_SAL_API xbool sal_file_get_size(sal_file file, xuint64* size)
{
definitions and declarations etc..
#ifndef HAVE_UNLOCKED_IOCTL
lock_kernel();
#endif
#ifdef HAVE_UNLOCKED_IOCTL
if (filp->f_op->unlocked_ioctl) {
some small statements
error = filp->f_op->unlocked_ioctl(filp, BLKGETSIZE64, (unsigned long)size);
actions if error or not etc.
}
#endif
#ifndef HAVE_UNLOCKED_IOCTL
unlock_kernel();
#endif
return ret;
}
#ifdef HAVE_UNLOCKED_IOCTL
long ndas_ctrldev_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
#else
int ndas_ctrldev_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
#endif
{
#ifdef HAVE_UNLOCKED_IOCTL
! add some sort of lock here !
#endif
lots of operations and functions.
#ifdef HAVE_UNLOCKED_IOCTL
! add unlock statement here !
#endif
return result;
}
static struct file_operations ndasctrl_fops = {
.write = ndas_ctrldev_write,
.read = ndas_ctrldev_read,
.open = ndas_ctrldev_open,
.release = ndas_ctrldev_release,
#ifdef HAVE_UNLOCKED_IOCTL
.unlocked_ioctl = ndas_ctrldev_ioctl,
#else
.ioctl = ndas_ctrldev_ioctl,
#endif
};
So, I would ask the following advice.
Does this look like the right
proceedure?
Do I understand correct to move the
lock into the io function?
Based on the includes in crtrldev.c, can you
recommend any lock off the top of
your head? (I tried to research some
other drivers dealing with filp and
lock_kernel, but I am too much a
noob to find the answer right away.)
The Big Kernel Lock (BKL) is more than deprecated - as of 2.6.39, it does not exist anymore.
The way the lock_kernel() conversion was done was to replace it by per-driver mutexes. If the driver is simple enough, you can simply create a mutex for the driver, and replace all uses of lock_kernel() and unlock_kernel() by the mutex lock/unlock calls. Note, however, that some functions used to be called with the BKL (the lock lock_kernel() used to lock) held; you will have to add lock/unlock calls to these functions too.
This will not work if the driver could acquire the BKL recursively; if that is the case, you would have to track it yourself to avoid deadlocks (this was done in the conversion of reiserfs, which depended somewhat heavily both in the recursive BKL behavior and in the fact that it was dropped when sleeping).
The next step after the conversion to a per-driver mutex would be to change it to use a per-device mutex instead of a per-driver mutex.
Here is the solution.
#if HAVE_UNLOCKED_IOCTL
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#else
#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
#endif
.
.
.
#if HAVE_UNLOCKED_IOCTL
mutex_lock(&fs_mutex);
#else
lock_kernel();
#endif
This only shows replacing the lock call. The other parts worked out as I guessed in the question part above concerning unlocked_ioctl. Thanks for checking and for helping.