I am working with (a customized install of) msys2, and I would like to make it run in the VSCode integrated terminal. However, it doesen't seem to want to run there. Unlike normal msys, it has msys2_shell.bat & msys2_shell.cmd. It seems to always open up a separate shell window, but I don't want this to always happen, I would like to keep it integrated so I can use shortcuts and such. I already tried the -no-start option. Any suggestions?
Thanks!
msys2_shell.cmd -no-start -defterm could work. Other than that, you can invoke Bash directly if you remember to set MSYSTEM and invoke a login shell: C:\msys64\usr\bin\env MSYSTEM=MSYS /usr/bin/bash -li
For more details, see https://www.msys2.org/wiki/Launchers/.
Related
I am creating an installation using InstallShield 2018 in windows 10. I need to execute a script file (.sh) in Ubuntu from a function in Installscript. I tried the following but it did not work:
szCmdPath = "C:\\Users\\Admin\\AppData\\Local\\Microsoft\\WindowsApps\\Ubuntu.exe";
szCmdLine = ". /mnt/d/test.sh";
LaunchAppAndWait( szCmdPath, szCmdLine, WAIT);
However I can execute the exact same file in Ubuntu Terminal and it works great. I did turn on Window sub system for Linux and install Ubuntu on windows. Why is this happening? Why can I run cmd.exe from installscript but not Ubuntu?
Thank you in advance.
EDIT 1: if I pass an empty string as parameter, Ubuntu is start and waits for my input commands. But when I pass the path to my script file, nothing happened except a flash of the terminal console before my installation goes on running.
From my reading, wsl and ubuntu differ slightly. It looks like wsl is a bit magical and occasionally similar to bash -c or ubuntu -c, whereas you can consider Ubuntu.exe as somewhat equivalent to /bin/bash.
If you try to run /bin/bash . /mnt/d/test.sh from a bash prompt, things don't go well. So the correct approach will depend on the contents of your script and what you need to happen. I think one of the following options are the most likely:
remove . from your command; instead run ...\Ubuntu.exe /mnt/d/test.sh
add -c to your command; instead run ...\Ubuntu.exe -c . /mnt/d/test.sh
Note that %LOCALAPPDATA%\Microsoft\WindowsApps\Ubuntu.exe is a special file (zero bytes), so it's also plausible that it needs some special handling. For instance, maybe it requires a 64-bit caller. If that's the case, you may need to wrap it in a call through a 64-bit cmd prompt. My quick tests don't show this as likely, however, so I think it will work without this extra indirection.
It feels impossible to get it to run on any custom terminal. I know that octave-cli.app is there but it always opens in the standard terminal. Any ways to execute octave scripts like a compiler (or) run it interactively like an interpreter from Iterm?
Using Mac OSX 10.9+
Edit:
I know how to export path variables. But having searched the web can't find a way to do it. Is it even possible? I even tried it using homebrew to no avail.
You can see the content of octave-cli.app, it's a script. Mine goes like this
open -a Terminal.app /usr/local/octave/3.8.0/bin/octave | logger 2>&1
It specify the terminal application used to open octave. This is the reason of your problem, as I think.
The solution is linking octave-cli in system path, better locates at "/usr/local/bin". like
ln -s /usr/local/octave/3.8.0/bin/octave-cli /usr/local/bin/octave-cli
Finally, octave can be accessed via any terminal(like iTerm) or shell(bash, zsh) by just type "octave-cli" command, which will be searched in system path and found to executed directly.
I'm just getting started trying to use command line and gitbash, and I've run into some basic issues.
As I understand it from the lesson I'm trying to go through online, I can run gitbash on windows instead of standard command line I would find on Mac and Linux(?)
The blurb about it was:
"WINDOWS USERS: You might want to jump ahead to the Installations Assignment and use the "Git Bash" application you'll install there instead of using the default Command Prompt. That way you can be sure all the commands will be the same."
So I downloaded Gitbash via Railsinstaller but the first command, man/man ls, gives me this error.
Am I misunderstanding the function of Gitbash? Do I need to install something to add on or something else entirely?
Unfortunately, one of the notable faults of Git Bash is that it does not ship with a man command, so no, you are not misunderstanding anything. If you try to ls or cd or grep you'll see that it works fine.
Without going into too much background, Git Bash is a shell environment on Windows that emulates standard POSIX terminal behavior and makes some common Linux tools available. I'm not personally prone to the reasoning behind this decision, but I just double-checked and man (and man-db, etc.) are available in the ecosystem behind the tool that Git Bash derives from. If you want to fight for it, you might want to open an issue on the Git for Windows GH repository; Johannes Schindelin is the lead maintainer there and is very active.
I have a "stock" xmonad install on Arch.
No changes to my xmonad.hs yet
I have installed dmenu.
It runs by alt-p, the default, and displays and filters as expected.
Chromium runs, but other items, like ranger, alsamixer or other tasks do not.
I am not finding anything anywhere about anyone having to do anything to get these items to run, nor anyone having any issues with doing so.
Surely, then, there is something wrong in my install.
my dmenu_run is as follows:
#!/bin/sh
dmenu_path | dmenu "$#" | ${SHELL:-"/bin/sh"} &
I would normally run terminology with bash or zsh. I have tried to alter the SHELL to /bin/bash, but to no avail.
Is there any other place I must look or items I should alter?
Such a shame as I am really liking xmonad so far, and want to get dmenu working before I start exploring xmonad.hs...
Thanks in advance
UPDATE: I have found the following
here over at Archwiki that involves changing dmenu_run and adding a .demenu_term in one's home. It seems to work, but still wonder if there was a more orthadox mechanism.
ranger and alsamixer are applications which run inside a terminal. Imagine (or try) to run ls via dmenu, where should the directory listing be printed to without a terminal?
You look for functionality which is provided either by prompt imported from XMonad.Prompt.Shell by using a convinient keybinding like
((modm .|. shiftMask, xK_c), prompt ("xterm" ++ " -e") greenXPConfig)
(described in the linked documentation) or shellPrompt where you execute
xterm -e alsamixer
or any other command, e.g.
feh path/to/image/you/want/to/open/now.jpg
instead of opening a terminal, running above with tailing & and exiting the terminal.
Im trying to automatically run a script using Cygwin via CMD. I basically created a BAT file that goes to the directory and executes an .SH file. SH files are accosiated with Cygwin, and I tried something like "cygwin update.sh" in the command line. But all it really does is open Cygwin. I want Cygwin to automatically run the script file. Is there any easy way to do this, I've been trying to find but can't. Thank you!
You'll want to call the shell script with a particular shell, e.g. bash.
When having Cygwin open, call which bash to figure out where the binary is located. Cygwin also comes with tools that can convert paths between Cygwin and Win32 form, which is pretty helpful in cases like yours.
There is one other thing that may work, depending on your setup. There is an environment variable named PATHEXT which declares file extensions that are deemed "executable" by CMD. This can be used to your advantage, if Windows is configured so that the shell's "open" verb executes the correct shell for the file extension .sh (in your case).
Good luck.
From Cygwin Terminal, read man mintty. Try something like the following from a Windows Command Prompt:
c:\cygwin\bin\mintty --hold always --exec /cygdrive/c/path/to/bash/script.sh
I also found this!
http://rothmanshore.com/2011/01/26/kick-off-a-cygwin-script-from-a-windows-bat-file-with-a-different-working-directory/
I didn't quite understand it at first, but then it worked as I wanted it. Just if anyone knows, is there a way to make the script run without the CMD window open?? Thanks