Short description:
Im using laravel application which already has system for logging in with microsoft account. That system works, but this is the first time im working on it, and i can not establish locally that users can sign in with their microsoft account into the application. Because system in the application works, and i get error when logging in, the issue must be in my configuration at Azure portal.
My configuration is as following:
I have created tenant and registered app in it. My SAML config is as following:
Entity ID: https://login.microsoftonline.com/tenant-id/saml2
Reply URL (Assertion Consumer Service URL): https://sts.windows.net/tenant-id/
In my .env i have set following values:
AZURE_AD_CALLBACK_URL=/login/microsoft/callback
AZURE_AD_CLIENT_ID=id-of-the-application-in-tenant
AZURE_AD_CLIENT_SECRET=tenant-secret-key
SAML2_AZURE_SAML_ENABLED=true
SAML2_AZURE_IDP_SSO_URL="https://login.microsoftonline.com/tenant-id/saml2"
SAML2_AZURE_IDP_ENTITYID="https://sts.windows.net/tenant-id/"
SAML2_AZURE_IDP_x509="tenant-id"
SAML2_AZURE_SP_ENTITYID="https://some-app.com/"
I get following error after entering my credentials:
AADSTS700016: Application with identifier 'https://someapp/' was not found in the directory 'tenant-id'. This can happen if the application has not been installed by the administrator of the tenant or consented to by any user in the tenant. You may have sent your authentication request to the wrong tenant.
I have added user to the application, which i use to test login, so this error is totally confusing for me.
I dont know if i provided all neccessary info, but if some missing i will provide them.
I hope someone knows what is wrong with the configuration
The tenant id is a GUID. Have you used this or are you using the "tenant-id" string?
Also, the ACS is an endpoint in your application - not an Azure URL.
Related
I have followed the solution explained in the Azure SSO related question in the forum
After that i checked in the Portal Azure try testing from the portal itself but it keeps redirecting me to the login page only if doing it first time so its new to me though. am i missing something or i need to write login handler for my application to handle this as for now i have not created any handler for login because as per the description in the link it supposed to work .
I tried by having dd in the service provider that has been created but its not reflecting as i am confused and stuck here i am not getting where i need to write the logic where i need to handle users with type in this as for login now it is redirecting me to login route when i test it from azure portal.
Any guidance on this would be helpful !
• I would suggest you follow the Github documentation below for configuring the lavarel SAML SSO in Azure AD as it uses Lavarel package for SAML2 integration as a service provider itself. Also, as you have added the service provider in your case, it doesn’t need to if you are using v 5.5 and higher of Lavarel as it gets automatically registered. Its just for older versions that you need to add the service provider in ‘config/app.php’.
https://github.com/aacotroneo/laravel-saml2
• Thus, once you do the above and publish the config files accordingly by executing the php commands, then you will need to modify the IDP settings in PHP app’s configuration and in here, please ensure that you are entering the ACS(Reply) URL and Identifier (Entity ID) from the Azure AD created application correctly. Also, ensure that the required SAML URLs and certificate keys are correctly entered in the environment variables required in the aad_idp_settings.php
Also, please check the actual routes in the metadata, by navigating to ‘http(s)://{laravel_url}/{idpName}/metadata’ as they must be reachable for your application to pass the authentication claims to AAD for get the authentication token and since, you are configuring SSO, please check the IDP metadata for ‘http(s)://{laravel_url}/single_sign_on/mytestidp1/metadata’ and finally please ensure that ‘RedirectIfAuthenticated.php’ is configured to redirect to ‘/routesPrefix/myIdp1/login’ and the same in '/Exceptions/Handler.php'
By following the above steps, your issue should be resolved.
I want to use azure active directory as my authentication provider for my Spring boot application. Which seems to be quite easy as long as you've got either admin rights yourself or you know someone with admin rights who can give you permission for the tickbox "Directory.AccessAsUser.All". Unfortunatly I dont have that. I know due to other successful projetcs that azure itself gives the oppertunity to still act as an authentication provider even without given any permission to the API Call permission section.
When I start the Server and go on localhost:8080/home whilst tracking my network traffic I can see in the Autherization file the following scope: openid profile https://graph.microsoft.com/User.Read https://graph.microsoft.com/Directory.AccessAsUser.All
So My Idea of Handling this is to reducing the scope of the Authorization request spring is asking for, to meet the authorization scope which I allowed in azure. Which is all of them but the last one as mentioned before.
I tried to configure the scope in my application.propertie with the following: spring.security.oauth2.client.registration.azure.scope=openid
So what happens is after im trying to access my application online im redirected to the mircosoft login page. After putting in my details im getting this:
In order to be able to access resources in your organization, requires authorization that only an administrator can grant. Ask
an administrator to grant permission for this app so that you can use
the app.
Has anyone an Idea of how to handle this?
I'd be greatfull for any help!
I think you can only log in as an administrator, because you are using the SDK provided by Microsoft when you log in, so you cannot customize the scope of permissions in application.propertie.
When you log in to the application, it will require you to consent to all permissions. If you just log in as a user, you cannot consent to all permissions. So, at least in the login module, I think it cannot meet your requirements.
Usually we can customize the scope of permissions only when requesting an access token. For example, if you only need to read user permissions, you can set: scope: https://graph.microsoft.com/User.Read .
Login sample.
Ok, I found the Problem. In my application.property I had this line of code azure.activedirectory.user-group.allowed-groups=. That was reponsible for the bigger scope. After deleting it everything worked fine.
I am trying to authenticate user from my bot using azure active directory.
I have done all the steps accordingly as per official documentation.
Unfortunately,while I run the bot emulator it doesn't prompt user login and anything only shows 401 directline.conversationUpdate. See the screen shot below:
I am trying this example from Git Hub
Note: I have also integrated ngrok exe and configured like below:
Based on your capture, pls have a check that if you have configed your app id and secret correctly as 401 error means you have not authorized successfully. At this period, the most related thing here is app id and secret.
You can find app id here in your bot :
And click "Manage" to create a secret.
Once the auth card pompted up, pls make sure that your account to login belongs to the tenant that you configed in OAuth Connection Settings on Azure portal.
I am trying to run the active-directory-dotnet-webapi-onbehalfof sample in single tenant mode. I've registered the web app service and the native app client as global admin for the tenant. When I run the sample, as a user in the tenant, I can get a token in the client only after consent pops up (first-time for user), and then call makes it to the service, but there it fails with below. Why is that? Documentation says that when a tenant admin registers the application no further consent is needed? I don't think it is possible to give consent when a remote webapi tries to get OBO token. Something seems buggy... AAD team, please clarify how the OBO feature should be used.
AADSTS65001: The user or administrator has not consented to use the application with ID 'b824502e-fe8a-4770-bd98-8d65a07efcc3'. Send an interactive authorization request for this user and resource.
Trace ID: ad7843d0-be4e-4098-8f7c-43c8e5505cfc
Correlation ID: 140466a4-7250-429f-8843-dbd4f63dc60e
Timestamp: 2016-11-25 21:46:13Z
When you register an application using the Azure Management Portal (manage.windowsazure.com) as a tenant administrator, then yes you should not get consent, as long as subsequent tokens are being retrieved in that same tenant.
Because you are seeing consent for the native client app, and then getting that error message, we must assume that something is not being satisfied which would suppress consent for your app.
To resolve this issue, my recommendation is to simply initiate an interactive authorization request just like the error message implies. You can do this by generating a log-in url for your application, with a specific query string that will force prompt tenant wide consent (prompt=admin_consent).
Here is the skeleton for the URL you need to complete:
https://login.microsoftonline.com/<TenantID>/oauth2/authorize?client_id=<AppID>&response_type=code&redirect_uri=<RedirectURI>&resource=<ResourceURI>&prompt=admin_consent
You can do this for all the applications you registered, and you should not run into consent issues (assuming you are indeed signing in as a tenant admin).
I hope this resolves your issue.
Background
I have a Web API registered in Azure AD and secured using WindowsAzureActiveDirectoryBearerAuthentication (OAuth2 bearer token). This is a B2B-type scenario where there are no interactive users - the applications calling the API are daemon-like background apps. As such, I don't need any consent experience - I just want trusted applications to be able to call the API, and other applications - even if they present a valid OAuth token - to be denied.
What I've tried
This sample seemed to describe my scenario almost exactly. However, the way it determines if a caller is a trusted app or not is by comparing the clientID presented via a claim by the caller to a hard-coded value. Obviously you could store the list of trusted clientIDs externally instead of hardcoding, but it seems like I should be able to accomplish this via configuration in the AAD portal so that a) I don't have to maintain a list of clientIDs, and b) I don't have to write my own authorization logic.
It seems like I should be able to define a permission for my API, grant that permission to each calling app in AAD (or a one-time admin consent), and then in my API just check for the presence of that permission in the scp claim.
From looking at the portal it seems like this is what Application Permissions are intended for:
I can create a permission just fine via the application manifest. Unfortunately, I can't figure out how to specify that it's an Application Permission, not a Delegated Permission! I tried changing the type from User to Admin as described on MSDN, but that seemed to have no effect.
"oauth2Permissions": [
{
...
"type": "Admin",
...
}
Question
Am I correct that Application Permissions are the best solution for my scenario? If so, how do I configure it? Or, as I fear, is this yet another feature that is On The Roadmap™ but not currently functional?
Ben, Application Permissions are declared in the appRoles section of the manifest. Indeed, if you declare an appRole called say 'trusted' in your resource application's (storage broker demo) manifest - it will show up in the Application Permissions drop down there. Then, when you assign that Application Permission to the client app - the access token that the client app will receive using the client credentials OAuth flow will contain a roles claim with value 'trusted'. Other apps in the tenant will also be able to get an access token for your resource app - but they wont have the 'trusted' roles claim. See this blog post for details: http://www.dushyantgill.com/blog/2014/12/10/roles-based-access-control-in-cloud-applications-using-azure-ad/
Finally, the above way to assign an application permission to a client app only works when both the resource and client application are declared in the same directory - if however these apps are multi-tenant and a customer will install these apps separately - a global admin from customer's directory will need to consent to the client app - which will result in the application permission getting assigned to the instance of client app in the customer's tenant. (my blog post covers this too)
Hope this helps.
ps: if you're stuck - feel free to ping me on the contact page of http://www.dushyantgill.com/blog