In a Spring Boot application, I have the following working code for submitting a request-response request in a Rest controller:
#GetMapping("/request-response")
public ResponseEntity<Mono<Message>> requestResponseCtr() throws InterruptedException {
Mono<Message> message = this.rsocketRequesterMono.flatMap(
requester -> requester.route("request-response")
.data(new Message(...))
.retrieveMono(Message.class)
);
log.info("\nResponse was: {}", message);
return ResponseEntity.of(Optional.of(message));
}
Based on my understanding of the RSocket Java document, I need to replace the retriveveMono(...) with send() for submitting a fire-n-forget request (on page 12 of the document). The following code should work.
#GetMapping("fire-and-forget")
public ResponseEntity<Mono<Void>> fireAndForget() throws InterruptedException {
log.info("\nFire-And-Forget...");
this.rsocketRequesterMono.flatMap(
requester -> requester.route("fire-and-forget")
.data(new Message(...))
.send()
);
return ResponseEntity.of(Optional.of(Mono.empty()));
}
It doesn't work, however. On a TCP debuting tool, there isn't any traffic for it.
What is the right way of submitting a fire-n-forget?
This call
this.rsocketRequesterMono.flatMap(
requester -> requester.route("fire-and-forget")
.data(new Message(...))
.send()
);
isn't doing anything because nothing is subscribing to it.
You likely need
ResponseEntity.of(Optional.of(this.rsocketRequesterMono.flatMap(
requester -> requester.route("fire-and-forget")
.data(new Message(...))
.send()
)));
Related
I want to be able to extract the List<Payload> from the Mono<List<Payload>> to pass it to a downstream service for processing (or maybe return from the read(RequestParams params) method, instead of it returning void):
#PostMapping("/subset")
public void read(#RequestBody RequestParams params){
Mono<List<Payload>> result = reader.read(params.getDate(), params.getAssetClasses(), params.getFirmAccounts(), params.getUserId(), params.getPassword());
....
}
where reader.read(...) is a method on an autowired Spring service utilizing a webClient to get the data from external web service API:
public Mono<List<Payload>> read(String date, String assetClasses, String firmAccounts, String id, String password) {
Flux<Payload> nodes = client
.get()
.uri(uriBuilder -> uriBuilder
.path("/api/subset")
.queryParam("payloads", true)
.queryParam("date", date)
.queryParam("assetClasses", assetClasses)
.queryParam("firmAccounts", firmAccounts)
.build())
.headers(header -> header.setBasicAuth("abc123", "XXXXXXX"))
.retrieve()
.onStatus(HttpStatus::is4xxClientError, response -> {
System.out.println("4xx error");
return Mono.error(new RuntimeException("4xx"));
})
.onStatus(HttpStatus::is5xxServerError, response -> {
System.out.println("5xx error");
return Mono.error(new RuntimeException("5xx"));
})
.bodyToFlux(Payload.class);
Mono<List<Payload>> records = nodes
.collectList();
return records;
}
Doing a blocking result.block() is not allowed in WebFlux and throws an exception:
new IllegalStateException("block()/blockFirst()/blockLast() are blocking, which is not supported in thread ..." ;
What is a proper way to extract the contents of a Mono in WebFlux?
Is it some kind of a subscribe()? What would be the syntax?
Thank you in advance.
There is no "proper way" and that is the entire point. To get the value you need to block, and blocking is bad in webflux for many reasons (that I won't go into right now).
What you should do is to return the publisher all the way out to the calling client.
One of the things that many usually have a hard time understanding is that webflux works with a producer (Mono or Flux) and a subscriber.
Your entire service is also a producer, and the calling client can be seen as the subscriber.
Think of it as a long chain, that starts at the datasource, and ends up in the client showing the data.
A simple rule of thumb is that whomever is the final consumer of the data is the subscriber, everyone else is a producer.
So in your case, you just return the Mono<List<T> out to the calling client.
#PostMapping("/subset")
public Mono<List<Payload>> read(#RequestBody RequestParams params){
Mono<List<Payload>> result = reader.read(params.getDate(), params.getAssetClasses(), params.getFirmAccounts(), params.getUserId(), params.getPassword());
return result;
}
While the following does return the value of the Mono observable in the logs:
#PostMapping("/subset")
#ResponseBody
public Mono<ResponseEntity<List<Payload>>> read1(#RequestBody RequestParams params){
Mono<List<Payload>> result = reader.read(params.getDate(), params.getAssetClasses(), params.getFirmAccounts(), params.getUserId(), params.getPassword());
return result
.map(e -> new ResponseEntity<List<PayloadByStandardBasis>>(e, HttpStatus.OK));
}
the understanding I was seeking was a proper way to compose a chain of calls, with WebFlux, whereby a response from one of its operators/legs (materialized as as a result from a webclient call, producing a set of records, as above) could be passed downstream to another operator/leg to facilitate a side effect of saving those records in a DB, or something to that effect.
It would probably be a good idea to model each of those steps as a separate REST endpoint, and then have another endpoint for a composition operation which internally calls each independent endpoint in the right order, or would other design choices be more preferred?
That is ultimately the understanding I was looking for, so if anyone wants to share an example code as well as opinions to better implement the set of steps described above, I'm willing to accept the most comprehensive answer.
Thank you.
I'm looking for a simple example of error handling with WebFlux. I've read lots of stuff online, but can't find something that fits what I want.
I'm running with Spring Boot 2.45
I am calling services like this:
Mono<ResponseObject> mono = webClient.post()
.uri(url.toString())
.header("Authorization", authToken)
.body(Mono.just(contract), contract.getClass())
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(ResponseObject.class);
All of my services return Json that is deserialized to ResposeObject which looks something like this:
"success" : true,
"httpStatus": 200,
"messages" : [
"Informational message or, if not 200, then error messages"
],
result: {
"data": {}
}
data is simply a map of objects that are the result of the service call.
If there is an error, obviously success is false.
When I eventually do a ResponseObject response = mono.block(), I want to get a ResponseObject each time, even if there was an error. My service returns a ResponseObject even if it returns an http status of 400, but WebFlux seems to intercept this and throws an exception. Obviously, there might also be 400 and 500 errors where the service wasn't even called. But I still want to wrap whatever message I get into a ResponseObject. How can I eliminate all exceptions and always get a ResponseObject returned?
Update
Just want to clarify that the service itself is not a Reactive Webflux service. It is not returning a Mono. Instead, it is calling out to other Restful services, and I want to do that using Webflux. So what I do is I call the external service, and then this service does a block(). In most cases, I'm calling multiple services, and then I do a Mono.zip and call block() to wait for all of them.
This seems to be what I want to do: Spring Webflux : Webclient : Get body on error, but still can't get it working. Not sure what exchange() is
Correct way of handling this is via .onErrorResume that allows you to subscribe to a fallback publisher using a function, when any error occurs. You can look at the generated exception and return a custom fallback response.
You can do something like this:
Mono<ResponseObject> mono = webClient.post()
.uri(url.toString())
.header("Authorization", authToken)
.bodyValue(contract)
.exchangeToMono(response -> {
if (response.statusCode().equals(HttpStatus.OK)) {
return response.bodyToMono(ResponseObject.class);
}
else if (response.statusCode().is4xxClientError()) {
return response.bodyToMono(ResponseObject.class);
}
else {
Mono<WebClientResponseException> wcre = response.createException();
// examine wcre and create custom ResponseObject
ResponseObject customRO = new ResponseObject();
customRO.setSuccess(false);
customRO.setHttpStatus(response.rawStatusCode());
// you can set more default properties in response here
return Mono.just( customRO );
}
});
Moreover, you should not be using .block() anywhere in your Java code. Just make sure to return a Mono<ResponseObject> from your REST controller. If you want to examine response before returning to client you can do so in a .map() hander like this at the end of pipeline (right after .onErrorResume handler)
.map(response -> {
// examine content of response
// in the end just return it
return response;
});
I am new to Reactive programming paradigm, but recently I have decided to base a simple Http client on Spring WebClient, since the old sync RestTemplate is already under maintenance and might be deprecated in upoming releases.
So first I had a look at Spring documentation and, after that, I've searched the web for examples.
I must say that (only for the time being) I have consciously decided not to go through the Reactor lib documentation, so beyond the Publisher-Subscriber pattern, my knowledge about Mono's and Flux's is scarce. I focused instead on having something working.
My scenario is a simple POST to send a callback to a Server from which the client is only interested in response status code. No body is returned. So I finally came up with this code snippet that works:
private void notifyJobSuccess(final InternalJobData jobData) {
SuccessResult result = new SuccessResult();
result.setJobId(jobData.getJobId());
result.setStatus(Status.SUCCESS);
result.setInstanceId(jobData.getInstanceId());
log.info("Result to send back:" + System.lineSeparator() + "{}", result.toString());
this.webClient.post()
.uri(jobData.getCallbackUrl())
.body(Mono.just(result), ReplaySuccessResult.class)
.retrieve()
.onStatus(s -> s.equals(HttpStatus.OK), resp -> {
log.info("Expected CCDM response received with HttpStatus = {}", HttpStatus.OK);
return Mono.empty();
})
.onStatus(HttpStatus::is4xxClientError, resp -> {
log.error("CCDM response received with unexpected Client Error HttpStatus {}. "
+ "The POST request sent by EDA2 stub did not match CCDM OpenApi spec", resp.statusCode());
return Mono.empty();
})
.onStatus(HttpStatus::is5xxServerError, resp -> {
log.error("CCDM response received with unexpected Server Error HttpStatus {}", resp.statusCode());
return Mono.empty();
}).bodyToMono(Void.class).subscribe(Eda2StubHttpClient::handleResponseFromCcdm);
}
My poor understanding of how the reactive WebClient works starts with the call to subscribe. None of the tens of examples that I checked before coding my client included such a call, but the fact is that before I included that call, the Server was sitting forever waiting for the request.
Then I bumped into the mantra "Nothing happens until you subscribe". Knowing the pattern Plublisher-Subscriber I knew that, but I (wrongly) assumed that the subscription was handled by WebClient API, in any of the exchage, or bodyToMono methods... block() definitely must subscribe, because when you block it, the request gets out at once.
So my first question is: is this call to subscribe() really needed?
Second question is why the method StubHttpClient::handleResponse is never called back. For this, the only explanation that I find is that as the Mono returned is a Mono<Void>, because there is nothing in the response besides the status code, as it is never instantiated, the method is totally dummy... I could even replace it by just .subscribe(). Is this a correct assumption.
Last, is it too much to ask for a complete example of a a method receiving a body in a Mono that is later consumed? All examples I find just focus on getting the request out, but how the Mono or Flux is later consumed is now beyond my understanding... I know that I have to end up checking the Reactor doc sooner better than later, but I would appreciate a bit of help because I am having issues with Exceptions and errors handlin.
Thanks!
Some time has passed since I asked for help here. Now I'd like not to edit but to add an answer to my previous question, so that the answer remains clear and separate from he original question and comments.
So here goes a complete example.
CONTEXT: An application, acting as a client, that requests an Access Token from an OAuth2 Authorization server. The Access Token is requested asynchronously to avoid blocking the appliction's thread while the token request is processed at the other end and the response arrives.
First, this is a class that serves Access Token to its clients (method getAccessToken): if the Access Token is already initialized and it's valid, it returns the value stored; otherwise fetches a new one calling the internal method fetchAccessTokenAsync:
public class Oauth2ClientBroker {
private static final String OAUHT2_SRVR_TOKEN_PATH= "/auth/realms/oam/protocol/openid-connect/token";
private static final String GRANT_TYPE = "client_credentials";
#Qualifier("oAuth2Client")
private final WebClient oAuth2Client;
private final ConfigurationHolder CfgHolder;
#GuardedBy("this")
private String token = null;
#GuardedBy("this")
private Instant tokenExpireTime;
#GuardedBy("this")
private String tokenUrlEndPoint;
public void getAccessToken(final CompletableFuture<String> completableFuture) {
if (!isTokenInitialized() || isTokenExpired()) {
log.trace("Access Token not initialized or has exired: go fetch a new one...");
synchronized (this) {
this.token = null;
}
fetchAccessTokenAsync(completableFuture);
} else {
log.trace("Reusing Access Token (not expired)");
final String token;
synchronized (this) {
token = this.token;
}
completableFuture.complete(token);
}
}
...
}
Next, we will see that fetchAccessTokenAsync does:
private void fetchAccessTokenAsync(final CompletableFuture<String> tokenReceivedInFuture) {
Mono<String> accessTokenResponse = postAccessTokenRequest();
accessTokenResponse.subscribe(tr -> processResponseBodyInFuture(tr, tokenReceivedInFuture));
}
Two things happen here:
The method postAccessTokenRequest() builds a POST request and declares how the reponse will be consumed (when WebFlux makes it available once it is received), by using exchangeToMono:
private Mono postAccessTokenRequest() {
log.trace("Request Access Token for OAuth2 client {}", cfgHolder.getClientId());
final URI uri = URI.create(cfgHolder.getsecServiceHostAndPort().concat(OAUHT2_SRVR_TOKEN_PATH));
} else {
uri = URI.create(tokenUrlEndPoint);
}
}
log.debug("Access Token endpoint OAuth2 Authorization server: {}", uri.toString());
return oAuth2Client.post().uri(uri)
.body(BodyInserters.fromFormData("client_id", cfgHolder.getEdaClientId())
.with("client_secret", cfgHolder.getClientSecret())
.with("scope", cfgHolder.getClientScopes()).with("grant_type", GRANT_TYPE))
.exchangeToMono(resp -> {
if (resp.statusCode().equals(HttpStatus.OK)) {
log.info("Access Token successfully obtained");
return resp.bodyToMono(String.class);
} else if (resp.statusCode().equals(HttpStatus.BAD_REQUEST)) {
log.error("Bad request sent to Authorization Server!");
return resp.bodyToMono(String.class);
} else if (resp.statusCode().equals(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED)) {
log.error("OAuth2 Credentials exchange with Authorization Server failed!");
return resp.bodyToMono(String.class);
} else if (resp.statusCode().is5xxServerError()) {
log.error("Authorization Server could not generate a token due to a server error");
return resp.bodyToMono(String.class);
} else {
log.error("Authorization Server returned an unexpected status code: {}",
resp.statusCode().toString());
return Mono.error(new Exception(
String.format("Authorization Server returned an unexpected status code: %s",
resp.statusCode().toString())));
}
}).onErrorResume(e -> {
log.error(
"Access Token could not be obtained. Process ends here");
return Mono.empty();
});
}
The exchangeToMono method does most of the magic here: tells WebFlux to return a Mono that will asynchronously receive a signal as soon as the response is received, wrapped in a ClientResponse, the parameter resp consumed in the lambda. But it is important to keep in mind that NO request has been sent out yet at this point; we are just passing in the Function that will take the ClientResponse when it arrives and will return a Mono<String> with the part of the body of our interest (the Access Token, as we will see).
Once the POST is built and the Mono returned, then the real thing starts when we subscribe to the Mono<String> returned before. As the Reacive mantra says: nothing happens until you subscribe or, in our case, the request is not actually sent until something attempts to read or wait for the response. There are other ways in WebClient fluent API to implicitly subscribe, but we have chosen here the explicit way of returing the Mono -which implements the reactor Publisher interface- and subscribe to it. Here we blocking the thread no more, releasing CPU for other stuff, probably more useful than just waiting for an answer.
So far, so good: we have sent out the request, released CPU, but where the processing will continue whenever the response comes? The subscribe() method takes as an argument a Consumer parameterized in our case with a String, being nothing less than the body of the response we are waiting for, wrapped in Mono. When the response comes, WebFlux will notify the event to our Mono, which will call the method processResponseBodyInFuture, where we finally receive the response body:
private void processResponseBodyInFuture(final String body, final CompletableFuture<String> tokenReceivedInFuture) {
DocumentContext jsonContext = JsonPath.parse(body);
try {
log.info("Access Token response received: {}", body);
final String aTkn = jsonContext.read("$.access_token");
log.trace("Access Token parsed: {}", aTkn);
final int expiresIn = jsonContext.read("$.expires_in");
synchronized (this) {
this.token = aTkn;
this.tokenExpireTime = Instant.now().plusSeconds(expiresIn);
}
log.trace("Signal Access Token request completion. Processing will continue calling client...");
tokenReceivedInFuture.complete(aTkn);
} catch (PathNotFoundException e) {
try {
log.error(e.getMessage());
log.info(String.format(
"Could not extract Access Token. The response returned corresponds to the error %s: %s",
jsonContext.read("$.error"), jsonContext.read("$.error_description")));
} catch (PathNotFoundException e2) {
log.error(e2.getMessage().concat(" - Unexpected json content received from OAuth2 Server"));
}
}
}
The invocation of this method happens as soon as the Mono is signalled about the reception of the response. So here we try to parse the json content with an Access Token and do something with it... In this case call complete() onto the CompletableFuture passed in by the caller of the initial method getAccessToken, that hopefully will know what to do with it. Our job is done here... Asynchronously!
Summary:
To summarize, these are the basic considerations to have your request sent out and the responses processed when you ise reactive WebClient:
Consider having a method in charge of preparing the request by means of the WebClient fluent API (to set http method, uri, headers and body). Remember: by doing this you are not sending any request yet.
Think on the strategy you will use to obtain the Publisher that will be receive the http client events (response or errors). retreive() is the most straight forward, but it has less power to manipulate the response than exchangeToMono.
Subscribe... or nothing will happen.
Many examples you will find around will cheat you: they claim to use WebClient for asyncrhony, but then they "forget" about subscribing to the Publisher and call block() instead. Well, while this makes things easier and they seem to work (you will see responses received and passed to your application), the thing is that this is not asynchronous anymore: your Mono (or Flux, whatever you use) will be blocking until the response arrives. No good.
Have a separate method (being the Consumer passed in the subscribe() method) where the response body is processed.
Staring with the tutorial code at benwilcock/spring-rsocket-demo I am trying to write a server that replicates messages to a second server before responding to a client.
To try to debug my issues I am only attempting a trivial ping-pong exchange between servers. Only when the second server responds to the pong message should the first server reply to the client:
#MessageMapping("request-response")
Mono<Message> requestResponse(final Message request) {
// register a mono that will be completed when replication to another server has happened
String uuid = UUID.randomUUID().toString();
Mono<Message> deferred = Mono.create(sink -> replicationNexus.registerRequest(uuid, sink));
// FIXME attempt to send a nested request-response message that will complete the outer message later
this.requesterMono.flatMap(requester -> requester.route("pong")
.data(uuid)
.retrieveMono(String.class))
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.elastic())
.subscribe( uuid2 -> replicationNexus.complete(uuid2, new Message(SERVER, RESPONSE)));
// return the deferred work that will be completed by the pong response
return deferred;
}
That logic is trying to use this answer to create a connection to the second server that will reconnect:
this.requesterMono = builder.rsocketConnector(connector -> connector
.reconnect(Retry.fixedDelay(Integer.MAX_VALUE, Duration.ofSeconds(1))))
.connectTcp("localhost", otherPort).cache();
To complete the picture here is the trivial ping-pong logic:
#MessageMapping("pong")
public Mono<String> pong(String m) {
return Mono.just(m);
}
and here is the logic that holds the state of the outer client response that is completed when the other server responds:
public class ReplicationNexus<T> {
final Map<String, MonoSink<T>> requests = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
public void registerRequest(String v, MonoSink<T> sink) {
requests.put(v, sink);
}
public boolean complete(String uuid, T message) {
Optional<MonoSink<T>> sink = Optional.of(requests.get(uuid));
if( sink.isPresent() ){
sink.get().success(message);
}
return sink.isPresent();
}
}
Debugging the second server it never runs the pong method. It seems that the first server does not actually send the inner request message.
What is the correct way to run an inner request-response exchange that completes an outer message exchange with automated reconnection logic?
Not sure if I'm missing some of the complexity of your question, but if the middle server is just activing like a proxy I'd start with the simplest case of chaining through the calls. I feel like I'm missing some nuance of the question, so let's work through that next.
#MessageMapping("runCommand")
suspend fun runCommandX(
request: CommandRequest,
): Mono<String> {
val uuid = UUID.randomUUID().toString()
return requesterMono
.flatMap { requester: RSocketRequester ->
requester.route("pong")
.data("TEST")
.retrieveMono(String::class.java)
}
.doOnSubscribe {
// register request with uuid
}
.doOnSuccess {
// register completion
}
.doOnError {
// register failure
}
}
Generally if you can avoid calling subscribe yourself in typical spring/reactive/rsocket code. You want the framework to do this for you.
I am using web client in a spring application
I am facing memory leak issues while doing the same
I am using below code to get the response body for non 2XX response from service:
return client.get()
.uri(uriString)
.headers(ServiceCommonUtil.getHttpHeaderConsumer(headersMap))
.exchange()
.flatMap(clientResponse -> {
try {
clientResponse.body((clientHttpResponse, context) ->
clientHttpResponse.getBody());
logResponseStatus(clientResponse.statusCode(), serviceName);
return clientResponse.bodyToMono(String.class);
} catch (Exception e) {
return null;
}
})
and later on subscriber uses subscribe/ error block to process this response.
responseMono.subscribe(response -> {
//process response string
},error->{
//process error response
});
My question is, if i use dispose method on responseMono, it takes way long time for processing while without it i face memory leak issues.
Am i doing anything wrong here?
Yes, actually you are not consumming response in case of Exception is thrown.
If you want to use exchange() your responsibillity is to consume response.
See: docs
Take a look on toBodilessEntity()/ releaseBody() in 'ClientResponse` api.
Seems you've gotten a little complicated. Why a try/catch block in the clientResponse lambda? If your logResponseStatus throws a checked exception then handle it there. I suggest starting simpler.
Ex 1:
Mono<String> stringMono = webClient.get().uri("test").header("head", "value").exchange().flatMap(clientResponse->clientResponse.bodyToMono(String.class));
stringMono.subscribe(System.out::println);
Ex 2:
Mono<String> stringMono = webClient.get().uri("test").header("head", "value").exchange().flatMap(clientResponse->clientResponse.body(BodyExtractors.toMono(String.class)));
stringMono.subscribe(System.out::println);
Ex 3:
Mono<String> stringMono = webClient.get().uri("test").header("head", "value").retrieve().bodyToMono(String.class);
stringMono.subscribe(System.out::println);
For logging it is better to use ExchangeFilterFunctions. See How to intercept a request when using SpringBoot WebClient
.