Both left join and right join in only one linq query? [duplicate] - linq

Question

I have a list of people's ID and their first name, and a list of people's ID and their surname. Some people don't have a first name and some don't have a surname; I'd like to do a full outer join on the two lists.
So the following lists:
ID FirstName
-- ---------
1 John
2 Sue
ID LastName
-- --------
1 Doe
3 Smith
Should produce:
ID FirstName LastName
-- --------- --------
1 John Doe
2 Sue
3 Smith
I have found quite a few solutions for 'LINQ Outer Joins' which all look quite similar, but really seem to be left outer joins.
My attempts so far go something like this:
private void OuterJoinTest()
{
List<FirstName> firstNames = new List<FirstName>();
firstNames.Add(new FirstName { ID = 1, Name = "John" });
firstNames.Add(new FirstName { ID = 2, Name = "Sue" });
List<LastName> lastNames = new List<LastName>();
lastNames.Add(new LastName { ID = 1, Name = "Doe" });
lastNames.Add(new LastName { ID = 3, Name = "Smith" });
var outerJoin = from first in firstNames
join last in lastNames
on first.ID equals last.ID
into temp
from last in temp.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new
{
id = first != null ? first.ID : last.ID,
firstname = first != null ? first.Name : string.Empty,
surname = last != null ? last.Name : string.Empty
};
}
}
public class FirstName
{
public int ID;
public string Name;
}
public class LastName
{
public int ID;
public string Name;
}
But this returns:
ID FirstName LastName
-- --------- --------
1 John Doe
2 Sue
What am I doing wrong?

Answer 1

Update 1: providing a truly generalized extension method FullOuterJoin
Update 2: optionally accepting a custom IEqualityComparer for the key type
Update 3: this implementation has recently become part of MoreLinq - Thanks guys!
Edit Added FullOuterGroupJoin (ideone). I reused the GetOuter<> implementation, making this a fraction less performant than it could be, but I'm aiming for 'highlevel' code, not bleeding-edge optimized, right now.
See it live on http://ideone.com/O36nWc
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var ax = new[] {
new { id = 1, name = "John" },
new { id = 2, name = "Sue" } };
var bx = new[] {
new { id = 1, surname = "Doe" },
new { id = 3, surname = "Smith" } };
ax.FullOuterJoin(bx, a => a.id, b => b.id, (a, b, id) => new {a, b})
.ToList().ForEach(Console.WriteLine);
}
Prints the output:
{ a = { id = 1, name = John }, b = { id = 1, surname = Doe } }
{ a = { id = 2, name = Sue }, b = }
{ a = , b = { id = 3, surname = Smith } }
You could also supply defaults: http://ideone.com/kG4kqO
ax.FullOuterJoin(
bx, a => a.id, b => b.id,
(a, b, id) => new { a.name, b.surname },
new { id = -1, name = "(no firstname)" },
new { id = -2, surname = "(no surname)" }
)
Printing:
{ name = John, surname = Doe }
{ name = Sue, surname = (no surname) }
{ name = (no firstname), surname = Smith }
Explanation of terms used:
Joining is a term borrowed from relational database design:
A join will repeat elements from a as many times as there are elements in b with corresponding key (i.e.: nothing if b were empty). Database lingo calls this inner (equi)join.
An outer join includes elements from a for which no corresponding
element exists in b. (i.e.: even results if b were empty). This is usually referred to as left join.
A full outer join includes records from a as well as b if no corresponding element exists in the other. (i.e. even results if a were empty)
Something not usually seen in RDBMS is a group join[1]:
A group join, does the same as described above, but instead of repeating elements from a for multiple corresponding b, it groups the records with corresponding keys. This is often more convenient when you wish to enumerate through 'joined' records, based on a common key.
See also GroupJoin which contains some general background explanations as well.
[1] (I believe Oracle and MSSQL have proprietary extensions for this)
Full code
A generalized 'drop-in' Extension class for this
internal static class MyExtensions
{
internal static IEnumerable<TResult> FullOuterGroupJoin<TA, TB, TKey, TResult>(
this IEnumerable<TA> a,
IEnumerable<TB> b,
Func<TA, TKey> selectKeyA,
Func<TB, TKey> selectKeyB,
Func<IEnumerable<TA>, IEnumerable<TB>, TKey, TResult> projection,
IEqualityComparer<TKey> cmp = null)
{
cmp = cmp?? EqualityComparer<TKey>.Default;
var alookup = a.ToLookup(selectKeyA, cmp);
var blookup = b.ToLookup(selectKeyB, cmp);
var keys = new HashSet<TKey>(alookup.Select(p => p.Key), cmp);
keys.UnionWith(blookup.Select(p => p.Key));
var join = from key in keys
let xa = alookup[key]
let xb = blookup[key]
select projection(xa, xb, key);
return join;
}
internal static IEnumerable<TResult> FullOuterJoin<TA, TB, TKey, TResult>(
this IEnumerable<TA> a,
IEnumerable<TB> b,
Func<TA, TKey> selectKeyA,
Func<TB, TKey> selectKeyB,
Func<TA, TB, TKey, TResult> projection,
TA defaultA = default(TA),
TB defaultB = default(TB),
IEqualityComparer<TKey> cmp = null)
{
cmp = cmp?? EqualityComparer<TKey>.Default;
var alookup = a.ToLookup(selectKeyA, cmp);
var blookup = b.ToLookup(selectKeyB, cmp);
var keys = new HashSet<TKey>(alookup.Select(p => p.Key), cmp);
keys.UnionWith(blookup.Select(p => p.Key));
var join = from key in keys
from xa in alookup[key].DefaultIfEmpty(defaultA)
from xb in blookup[key].DefaultIfEmpty(defaultB)
select projection(xa, xb, key);
return join;
}
}

Answer 2

I don't know if this covers all cases, logically it seems correct. The idea is to take a left outer join and right outer join then take the union of the results.
var firstNames = new[]
{
new { ID = 1, Name = "John" },
new { ID = 2, Name = "Sue" },
};
var lastNames = new[]
{
new { ID = 1, Name = "Doe" },
new { ID = 3, Name = "Smith" },
};
var leftOuterJoin =
from first in firstNames
join last in lastNames on first.ID equals last.ID into temp
from last in temp.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new
{
first.ID,
FirstName = first.Name,
LastName = last?.Name,
};
var rightOuterJoin =
from last in lastNames
join first in firstNames on last.ID equals first.ID into temp
from first in temp.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new
{
last.ID,
FirstName = first?.Name,
LastName = last.Name,
};
var fullOuterJoin = leftOuterJoin.Union(rightOuterJoin);
This works as written since it is in LINQ to Objects. If LINQ to SQL or other, the query processor might not support safe navigation or other operations. You'd have to use the conditional operator to conditionally get the values.
i.e.,
var leftOuterJoin =
from first in firstNames
join last in lastNames on first.ID equals last.ID into temp
from last in temp.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new
{
first.ID,
FirstName = first.Name,
LastName = last != null ? last.Name : default,
};

Answer 3

I think there are problems with most of these, including the accepted answer, because they don't work well with Linq over IQueryable either due to doing too many server round trips and too much data returns, or doing too much client execution.
For IEnumerable I don't like Sehe's answer or similar because it has excessive memory use (a simple 10000000 two list test ran Linqpad out of memory on my 32GB machine).
Also, most of the others don't actually implement a proper Full Outer Join because they are using a Union with a Right Join instead of Concat with a Right Anti Semi Join, which not only eliminates the duplicate inner join rows from the result, but any proper duplicates that existed originally in the left or right data.
So here are my extensions that handle all of these issues, generate SQL as well as implementing the join in LINQ to SQL directly, executing on the server, and is faster and with less memory than others on Enumerables:
public static class Ext {
public static IEnumerable<TResult> LeftOuterJoin<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult>(
this IEnumerable<TLeft> leftItems,
IEnumerable<TRight> rightItems,
Func<TLeft, TKey> leftKeySelector,
Func<TRight, TKey> rightKeySelector,
Func<TLeft, TRight, TResult> resultSelector) {
return from left in leftItems
join right in rightItems on leftKeySelector(left) equals rightKeySelector(right) into temp
from right in temp.DefaultIfEmpty()
select resultSelector(left, right);
}
public static IEnumerable<TResult> RightOuterJoin<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult>(
this IEnumerable<TLeft> leftItems,
IEnumerable<TRight> rightItems,
Func<TLeft, TKey> leftKeySelector,
Func<TRight, TKey> rightKeySelector,
Func<TLeft, TRight, TResult> resultSelector) {
return from right in rightItems
join left in leftItems on rightKeySelector(right) equals leftKeySelector(left) into temp
from left in temp.DefaultIfEmpty()
select resultSelector(left, right);
}
public static IEnumerable<TResult> FullOuterJoinDistinct<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult>(
this IEnumerable<TLeft> leftItems,
IEnumerable<TRight> rightItems,
Func<TLeft, TKey> leftKeySelector,
Func<TRight, TKey> rightKeySelector,
Func<TLeft, TRight, TResult> resultSelector) {
return leftItems.LeftOuterJoin(rightItems, leftKeySelector, rightKeySelector, resultSelector).Union(leftItems.RightOuterJoin(rightItems, leftKeySelector, rightKeySelector, resultSelector));
}
public static IEnumerable<TResult> RightAntiSemiJoin<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult>(
this IEnumerable<TLeft> leftItems,
IEnumerable<TRight> rightItems,
Func<TLeft, TKey> leftKeySelector,
Func<TRight, TKey> rightKeySelector,
Func<TLeft, TRight, TResult> resultSelector) {
var hashLK = new HashSet<TKey>(from l in leftItems select leftKeySelector(l));
return rightItems.Where(r => !hashLK.Contains(rightKeySelector(r))).Select(r => resultSelector(default(TLeft),r));
}
public static IEnumerable<TResult> FullOuterJoin<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult>(
this IEnumerable<TLeft> leftItems,
IEnumerable<TRight> rightItems,
Func<TLeft, TKey> leftKeySelector,
Func<TRight, TKey> rightKeySelector,
Func<TLeft, TRight, TResult> resultSelector) where TLeft : class {
return leftItems.LeftOuterJoin(rightItems, leftKeySelector, rightKeySelector, resultSelector).Concat(leftItems.RightAntiSemiJoin(rightItems, leftKeySelector, rightKeySelector, resultSelector));
}
private static Expression<Func<TP, TC, TResult>> CastSMBody<TP, TC, TResult>(LambdaExpression ex, TP unusedP, TC unusedC, TResult unusedRes) => (Expression<Func<TP, TC, TResult>>)ex;
public static IQueryable<TResult> LeftOuterJoin<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult>(
this IQueryable<TLeft> leftItems,
IQueryable<TRight> rightItems,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TKey>> leftKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TRight, TKey>> rightKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TRight, TResult>> resultSelector) {
var sampleAnonLR = new { left = default(TLeft), rightg = default(IEnumerable<TRight>) };
var parmP = Expression.Parameter(sampleAnonLR.GetType(), "p");
var parmC = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TRight), "c");
var argLeft = Expression.PropertyOrField(parmP, "left");
var newleftrs = CastSMBody(Expression.Lambda(Expression.Invoke(resultSelector, argLeft, parmC), parmP, parmC), sampleAnonLR, default(TRight), default(TResult));
return leftItems.AsQueryable().GroupJoin(rightItems, leftKeySelector, rightKeySelector, (left, rightg) => new { left, rightg }).SelectMany(r => r.rightg.DefaultIfEmpty(), newleftrs);
}
public static IQueryable<TResult> RightOuterJoin<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult>(
this IQueryable<TLeft> leftItems,
IQueryable<TRight> rightItems,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TKey>> leftKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TRight, TKey>> rightKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TRight, TResult>> resultSelector) {
var sampleAnonLR = new { leftg = default(IEnumerable<TLeft>), right = default(TRight) };
var parmP = Expression.Parameter(sampleAnonLR.GetType(), "p");
var parmC = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TLeft), "c");
var argRight = Expression.PropertyOrField(parmP, "right");
var newrightrs = CastSMBody(Expression.Lambda(Expression.Invoke(resultSelector, parmC, argRight), parmP, parmC), sampleAnonLR, default(TLeft), default(TResult));
return rightItems.GroupJoin(leftItems, rightKeySelector, leftKeySelector, (right, leftg) => new { leftg, right }).SelectMany(l => l.leftg.DefaultIfEmpty(), newrightrs);
}
public static IQueryable<TResult> FullOuterJoinDistinct<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult>(
this IQueryable<TLeft> leftItems,
IQueryable<TRight> rightItems,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TKey>> leftKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TRight, TKey>> rightKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TRight, TResult>> resultSelector) {
return leftItems.LeftOuterJoin(rightItems, leftKeySelector, rightKeySelector, resultSelector).Union(leftItems.RightOuterJoin(rightItems, leftKeySelector, rightKeySelector, resultSelector));
}
private static Expression<Func<TP, TResult>> CastSBody<TP, TResult>(LambdaExpression ex, TP unusedP, TResult unusedRes) => (Expression<Func<TP, TResult>>)ex;
public static IQueryable<TResult> RightAntiSemiJoin<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult>(
this IQueryable<TLeft> leftItems,
IQueryable<TRight> rightItems,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TKey>> leftKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TRight, TKey>> rightKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TRight, TResult>> resultSelector) {
var sampleAnonLgR = new { leftg = default(IEnumerable<TLeft>), right = default(TRight) };
var parmLgR = Expression.Parameter(sampleAnonLgR.GetType(), "lgr");
var argLeft = Expression.Constant(default(TLeft), typeof(TLeft));
var argRight = Expression.PropertyOrField(parmLgR, "right");
var newrightrs = CastSBody(Expression.Lambda(Expression.Invoke(resultSelector, argLeft, argRight), parmLgR), sampleAnonLgR, default(TResult));
return rightItems.GroupJoin(leftItems, rightKeySelector, leftKeySelector, (right, leftg) => new { leftg, right }).Where(lgr => !lgr.leftg.Any()).Select(newrightrs);
}
public static IQueryable<TResult> FullOuterJoin<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult>(
this IQueryable<TLeft> leftItems,
IQueryable<TRight> rightItems,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TKey>> leftKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TRight, TKey>> rightKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TRight, TResult>> resultSelector) {
return leftItems.LeftOuterJoin(rightItems, leftKeySelector, rightKeySelector, resultSelector).Concat(leftItems.RightAntiSemiJoin(rightItems, leftKeySelector, rightKeySelector, resultSelector));
}
}
The difference between a Right Anti-Semi-Join is mostly moot with Linq to Objects or in the source, but makes a difference on the server (SQL) side in the final answer, removing an unnecessary JOIN.
The hand coding of Expression to handle merging an Expression<Func<>> into a lambda could be improved with LinqKit, but it would be nice if the language/compiler had added some help for that. The FullOuterJoinDistinct and RightOuterJoin functions are included for completeness, but I did not re-implement FullOuterGroupJoin yet.
I wrote another version of a full outer join for IEnumerable for cases where the key is orderable, which is about 50% faster than combining the left outer join with the right anti semi join, at least on small collections. It goes through each collection after sorting just once.
I also added another answer for a version that works with EF by replacing the Invoke with a custom expansion.

Answer 4

Here is an extension method doing that:
public static IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<TLeft, TRight>> FullOuterJoin<TLeft, TRight>(this IEnumerable<TLeft> leftItems, Func<TLeft, object> leftIdSelector, IEnumerable<TRight> rightItems, Func<TRight, object> rightIdSelector)
{
var leftOuterJoin = from left in leftItems
join right in rightItems on leftIdSelector(left) equals rightIdSelector(right) into temp
from right in temp.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new { left, right };
var rightOuterJoin = from right in rightItems
join left in leftItems on rightIdSelector(right) equals leftIdSelector(left) into temp
from left in temp.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new { left, right };
var fullOuterJoin = leftOuterJoin.Union(rightOuterJoin);
return fullOuterJoin.Select(x => new KeyValuePair<TLeft, TRight>(x.left, x.right));
}

Answer 5

I'm guessing #sehe's approach is stronger, but until I understand it better, I find myself leap-frogging off of #MichaelSander's extension. I modified it to match the syntax and return type of the built-in Enumerable.Join() method described here. I appended the "distinct" suffix in respect to #cadrell0's comment under #JeffMercado's solution.
public static class MyExtensions {
public static IEnumerable<TResult> FullJoinDistinct<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult> (
this IEnumerable<TLeft> leftItems,
IEnumerable<TRight> rightItems,
Func<TLeft, TKey> leftKeySelector,
Func<TRight, TKey> rightKeySelector,
Func<TLeft, TRight, TResult> resultSelector
) {
var leftJoin =
from left in leftItems
join right in rightItems
on leftKeySelector(left) equals rightKeySelector(right) into temp
from right in temp.DefaultIfEmpty()
select resultSelector(left, right);
var rightJoin =
from right in rightItems
join left in leftItems
on rightKeySelector(right) equals leftKeySelector(left) into temp
from left in temp.DefaultIfEmpty()
select resultSelector(left, right);
return leftJoin.Union(rightJoin);
}
}
In the example, you would use it like this:
var test =
firstNames
.FullJoinDistinct(
lastNames,
f=> f.ID,
j=> j.ID,
(f,j)=> new {
ID = f == null ? j.ID : f.ID,
leftName = f == null ? null : f.Name,
rightName = j == null ? null : j.Name
}
);
In the future, as I learn more, I have a feeling I'll be migrating to #sehe's logic given it's popularity. But even then I'll have to be careful, because I feel it is important to have at least one overload that matches the syntax of the existing ".Join()" method if feasible, for two reasons:
Consistency in methods helps save time, avoid errors, and avoid unintended behavior.
If there ever is an out-of-the-box ".FullJoin()" method in the future, I would imagine it will try to keep to the syntax of the currently existing ".Join()" method if it can. If it does, then if you want to migrate to it, you can simply rename your functions without changing the parameters or worrying about different return types breaking your code.
I'm still new with generics, extensions, Func statements, and other features, so feedback is certainly welcome.
EDIT: Didn't take me long to realize there was a problem with my code. I was doing a .Dump() in LINQPad and looking at the return type. It was just IEnumerable, so I tried to match it. But when I actually did a .Where() or .Select() on my extension I got an error: "'System Collections.IEnumerable' does not contain a definition for 'Select' and ...". So in the end I was able to match the input syntax of .Join(), but not the return behavior.
EDIT: Added "TResult" to the return type for the function. Missed that when reading the Microsoft article, and of course it makes sense. With this fix, it now seems the return behavior is in line with my goals after all.

Answer 6

As you've found, Linq doesn't have an "outer join" construct. The closest you can get is a left outer join using the query you stated. To this, you can add any elements of the lastname list that aren't represented in the join:
outerJoin = outerJoin.Concat(lastNames.Select(l=>new
{
id = l.ID,
firstname = String.Empty,
surname = l.Name
}).Where(l=>!outerJoin.Any(o=>o.id == l.id)));

Answer 7

My clean solution for situation that key is unique in both enumerables:
private static IEnumerable<TResult> FullOuterJoin<Ta, Tb, TKey, TResult>(
IEnumerable<Ta> a, IEnumerable<Tb> b,
Func<Ta, TKey> key_a, Func<Tb, TKey> key_b,
Func<Ta, Tb, TResult> selector)
{
var alookup = a.ToLookup(key_a);
var blookup = b.ToLookup(key_b);
var keys = new HashSet<TKey>(alookup.Select(p => p.Key));
keys.UnionWith(blookup.Select(p => p.Key));
return keys.Select(key => selector(alookup[key].FirstOrDefault(), blookup[key].FirstOrDefault()));
}
so
var ax = new[] {
new { id = 1, first_name = "ali" },
new { id = 2, first_name = "mohammad" } };
var bx = new[] {
new { id = 1, last_name = "rezaei" },
new { id = 3, last_name = "kazemi" } };
var list = FullOuterJoin(ax, bx, a => a.id, b => b.id, (a, b) => "f: " + a?.first_name + " l: " + b?.last_name).ToArray();
outputs:
f: ali l: rezaei
f: mohammad l:
f: l: kazemi

Answer 8

I like sehe's answer, but it does not use deferred execution (the input sequences are eagerly enumerated by the calls to ToLookup). So after looking at the .NET sources for LINQ-to-objects, I came up with this:
public static class LinqExtensions
{
public static IEnumerable<TResult> FullOuterJoin<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult>(
this IEnumerable<TLeft> left,
IEnumerable<TRight> right,
Func<TLeft, TKey> leftKeySelector,
Func<TRight, TKey> rightKeySelector,
Func<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult> resultSelector,
IEqualityComparer<TKey> comparator = null,
TLeft defaultLeft = default(TLeft),
TRight defaultRight = default(TRight))
{
if (left == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("left");
if (right == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("right");
if (leftKeySelector == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("leftKeySelector");
if (rightKeySelector == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("rightKeySelector");
if (resultSelector == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("resultSelector");
comparator = comparator ?? EqualityComparer<TKey>.Default;
return FullOuterJoinIterator(left, right, leftKeySelector, rightKeySelector, resultSelector, comparator, defaultLeft, defaultRight);
}
internal static IEnumerable<TResult> FullOuterJoinIterator<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult>(
this IEnumerable<TLeft> left,
IEnumerable<TRight> right,
Func<TLeft, TKey> leftKeySelector,
Func<TRight, TKey> rightKeySelector,
Func<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult> resultSelector,
IEqualityComparer<TKey> comparator,
TLeft defaultLeft,
TRight defaultRight)
{
var leftLookup = left.ToLookup(leftKeySelector, comparator);
var rightLookup = right.ToLookup(rightKeySelector, comparator);
var keys = leftLookup.Select(g => g.Key).Union(rightLookup.Select(g => g.Key), comparator);
foreach (var key in keys)
foreach (var leftValue in leftLookup[key].DefaultIfEmpty(defaultLeft))
foreach (var rightValue in rightLookup[key].DefaultIfEmpty(defaultRight))
yield return resultSelector(leftValue, rightValue, key);
}
}
This implementation has the following important properties:
Deferred execution, input sequences will not be enumerated before the output sequence is enumerated.
Only enumerates the input sequences once each.
Preserves order of input sequences, in the sense that it will yield tuples in the order of the left sequence and then the right (for the keys not present in left sequence).
These properties are important, because they are what someone new to FullOuterJoin but experienced with LINQ will expect.

Answer 9

I decided to add this as a separate answer as I am not positive it is tested enough. This is a re-implementation of the FullOuterJoin method using essentially a simplified, customized version of LINQKit Invoke/Expand for Expression so that it should work the Entity Framework. There's not much explanation as it is pretty much the same as my previous answer.
public static class Ext {
private static Expression<Func<TP, TC, TResult>> CastSMBody<TP, TC, TResult>(LambdaExpression ex, TP unusedP, TC unusedC, TResult unusedRes) => (Expression<Func<TP, TC, TResult>>)ex;
public static IQueryable<TResult> LeftOuterJoin<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult>(
this IQueryable<TLeft> leftItems,
IQueryable<TRight> rightItems,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TKey>> leftKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TRight, TKey>> rightKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TRight, TResult>> resultSelector) {
// (lrg,r) => resultSelector(lrg.left, r)
var sampleAnonLR = new { left = default(TLeft), rightg = default(IEnumerable<TRight>) };
var parmP = Expression.Parameter(sampleAnonLR.GetType(), "lrg");
var parmC = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TRight), "r");
var argLeft = Expression.PropertyOrField(parmP, "left");
var newleftrs = CastSMBody(Expression.Lambda(resultSelector.Apply(argLeft, parmC), parmP, parmC), sampleAnonLR, default(TRight), default(TResult));
return leftItems.GroupJoin(rightItems, leftKeySelector, rightKeySelector, (left, rightg) => new { left, rightg }).SelectMany(r => r.rightg.DefaultIfEmpty(), newleftrs);
}
public static IQueryable<TResult> RightOuterJoin<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult>(
this IQueryable<TLeft> leftItems,
IQueryable<TRight> rightItems,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TKey>> leftKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TRight, TKey>> rightKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TRight, TResult>> resultSelector) {
// (lgr,l) => resultSelector(l, lgr.right)
var sampleAnonLR = new { leftg = default(IEnumerable<TLeft>), right = default(TRight) };
var parmP = Expression.Parameter(sampleAnonLR.GetType(), "lgr");
var parmC = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TLeft), "l");
var argRight = Expression.PropertyOrField(parmP, "right");
var newrightrs = CastSMBody(Expression.Lambda(resultSelector.Apply(parmC, argRight), parmP, parmC), sampleAnonLR, default(TLeft), default(TResult));
return rightItems.GroupJoin(leftItems, rightKeySelector, leftKeySelector, (right, leftg) => new { leftg, right })
.SelectMany(l => l.leftg.DefaultIfEmpty(), newrightrs);
}
private static Expression<Func<TParm, TResult>> CastSBody<TParm, TResult>(LambdaExpression ex, TParm unusedP, TResult unusedRes) => (Expression<Func<TParm, TResult>>)ex;
public static IQueryable<TResult> RightAntiSemiJoin<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult>(
this IQueryable<TLeft> leftItems,
IQueryable<TRight> rightItems,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TKey>> leftKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TRight, TKey>> rightKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TRight, TResult>> resultSelector) where TLeft : class where TRight : class where TResult : class {
// newrightrs = lgr => resultSelector(default(TLeft), lgr.right)
var sampleAnonLgR = new { leftg = (IEnumerable<TLeft>)null, right = default(TRight) };
var parmLgR = Expression.Parameter(sampleAnonLgR.GetType(), "lgr");
var argLeft = Expression.Constant(default(TLeft), typeof(TLeft));
var argRight = Expression.PropertyOrField(parmLgR, "right");
var newrightrs = CastSBody(Expression.Lambda(resultSelector.Apply(argLeft, argRight), parmLgR), sampleAnonLgR, default(TResult));
return rightItems.GroupJoin(leftItems, rightKeySelector, leftKeySelector, (right, leftg) => new { leftg, right }).Where(lgr => !lgr.leftg.Any()).Select(newrightrs);
}
public static IQueryable<TResult> FullOuterJoin<TLeft, TRight, TKey, TResult>(
this IQueryable<TLeft> leftItems,
IQueryable<TRight> rightItems,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TKey>> leftKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TRight, TKey>> rightKeySelector,
Expression<Func<TLeft, TRight, TResult>> resultSelector) where TLeft : class where TRight : class where TResult : class {
return leftItems.LeftOuterJoin(rightItems, leftKeySelector, rightKeySelector, resultSelector).Concat(leftItems.RightAntiSemiJoin(rightItems, leftKeySelector, rightKeySelector, resultSelector));
}
public static Expression Apply(this LambdaExpression e, params Expression[] args) {
var b = e.Body;
foreach (var pa in e.Parameters.Cast<ParameterExpression>().Zip(args, (p, a) => (p, a))) {
b = b.Replace(pa.p, pa.a);
}
return b.PropagateNull();
}
public static Expression Replace(this Expression orig, Expression from, Expression to) => new ReplaceVisitor(from, to).Visit(orig);
public class ReplaceVisitor : System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionVisitor {
public readonly Expression from;
public readonly Expression to;
public ReplaceVisitor(Expression _from, Expression _to) {
from = _from;
to = _to;
}
public override Expression Visit(Expression node) => node == from ? to : base.Visit(node);
}
public static Expression PropagateNull(this Expression orig) => new NullVisitor().Visit(orig);
public class NullVisitor : System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionVisitor {
public override Expression Visit(Expression node) {
if (node is MemberExpression nme && nme.Expression is ConstantExpression nce && nce.Value == null)
return Expression.Constant(null, nce.Type.GetMember(nme.Member.Name).Single().GetMemberType());
else
return base.Visit(node);
}
}
public static Type GetMemberType(this MemberInfo member) {
switch (member) {
case FieldInfo mfi:
return mfi.FieldType;
case PropertyInfo mpi:
return mpi.PropertyType;
case EventInfo mei:
return mei.EventHandlerType;
default:
throw new ArgumentException("MemberInfo must be if type FieldInfo, PropertyInfo or EventInfo", nameof(member));
}
}
}

Answer 10

Performs a in-memory streaming enumeration over both inputs and invokes the selector for each row. If there is no correlation at the current iteration, one of the selector arguments will be null.
Example:
var result = left.FullOuterJoin(
right,
x=>left.Key,
x=>right.Key,
(l,r) => new { LeftKey = l?.Key, RightKey=r?.Key });
Requires an IComparer for the correlation type, uses the Comparer.Default if not provided.
Requires that 'OrderBy' is applied to the input enumerables
/// <summary>
/// Performs a full outer join on two <see cref="IEnumerable{T}" />.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="TLeft"></typeparam>
/// <typeparam name="TValue"></typeparam>
/// <typeparam name="TRight"></typeparam>
/// <typeparam name="TResult"></typeparam>
/// <param name="left"></param>
/// <param name="right"></param>
/// <param name="leftKeySelector"></param>
/// <param name="rightKeySelector"></param>
/// <param name="selector">Expression defining result type</param>
/// <param name="keyComparer">A comparer if there is no default for the type</param>
/// <returns></returns>
[System.Diagnostics.DebuggerStepThrough]
public static IEnumerable<TResult> FullOuterJoin<TLeft, TRight, TValue, TResult>(
this IEnumerable<TLeft> left,
IEnumerable<TRight> right,
Func<TLeft, TValue> leftKeySelector,
Func<TRight, TValue> rightKeySelector,
Func<TLeft, TRight, TResult> selector,
IComparer<TValue> keyComparer = null)
where TLeft: class
where TRight: class
where TValue : IComparable
{
keyComparer = keyComparer ?? Comparer<TValue>.Default;
using (var enumLeft = left.OrderBy(leftKeySelector).GetEnumerator())
using (var enumRight = right.OrderBy(rightKeySelector).GetEnumerator())
{
var hasLeft = enumLeft.MoveNext();
var hasRight = enumRight.MoveNext();
while (hasLeft || hasRight)
{
var currentLeft = enumLeft.Current;
var valueLeft = hasLeft ? leftKeySelector(currentLeft) : default(TValue);
var currentRight = enumRight.Current;
var valueRight = hasRight ? rightKeySelector(currentRight) : default(TValue);
int compare =
!hasLeft ? 1
: !hasRight ? -1
: keyComparer.Compare(valueLeft, valueRight);
switch (compare)
{
case 0:
// The selector matches. An inner join is achieved
yield return selector(currentLeft, currentRight);
hasLeft = enumLeft.MoveNext();
hasRight = enumRight.MoveNext();
break;
case -1:
yield return selector(currentLeft, default(TRight));
hasLeft = enumLeft.MoveNext();
break;
case 1:
yield return selector(default(TLeft), currentRight);
hasRight = enumRight.MoveNext();
break;
}
}
}
}

Answer 11

I've written this extensions class for an app perhaps 6 years ago, and have been using it ever since in many solutions without issues. Hope it helps.
edit: I noticed some might not know how to use an extension class.
To use this extension class, just reference its namespace in your class by adding the following line
using joinext;
^ this should allow you to to see the intellisense of extension functions on any IEnumerable object collection you happen to use.
Hope this helps. Let me know if it's still not clear, and I'll hopefully write a sample example on how to use it.
Now here is the class:
namespace joinext
{
public static class JoinExtensions
{
public static IEnumerable<TResult> FullOuterJoin<TOuter, TInner, TKey, TResult>(
this IEnumerable<TOuter> outer,
IEnumerable<TInner> inner,
Func<TOuter, TKey> outerKeySelector,
Func<TInner, TKey> innerKeySelector,
Func<TOuter, TInner, TResult> resultSelector)
where TInner : class
where TOuter : class
{
var innerLookup = inner.ToLookup(innerKeySelector);
var outerLookup = outer.ToLookup(outerKeySelector);
var innerJoinItems = inner
.Where(innerItem => !outerLookup.Contains(innerKeySelector(innerItem)))
.Select(innerItem => resultSelector(null, innerItem));
return outer
.SelectMany(outerItem =>
{
var innerItems = innerLookup[outerKeySelector(outerItem)];
return innerItems.Any() ? innerItems : new TInner[] { null };
}, resultSelector)
.Concat(innerJoinItems);
}
public static IEnumerable<TResult> LeftJoin<TOuter, TInner, TKey, TResult>(
this IEnumerable<TOuter> outer,
IEnumerable<TInner> inner,
Func<TOuter, TKey> outerKeySelector,
Func<TInner, TKey> innerKeySelector,
Func<TOuter, TInner, TResult> resultSelector)
{
return outer.GroupJoin(
inner,
outerKeySelector,
innerKeySelector,
(o, i) =>
new { o = o, i = i.DefaultIfEmpty() })
.SelectMany(m => m.i.Select(inn =>
resultSelector(m.o, inn)
));
}
public static IEnumerable<TResult> RightJoin<TOuter, TInner, TKey, TResult>(
this IEnumerable<TOuter> outer,
IEnumerable<TInner> inner,
Func<TOuter, TKey> outerKeySelector,
Func<TInner, TKey> innerKeySelector,
Func<TOuter, TInner, TResult> resultSelector)
{
return inner.GroupJoin(
outer,
innerKeySelector,
outerKeySelector,
(i, o) =>
new { i = i, o = o.DefaultIfEmpty() })
.SelectMany(m => m.o.Select(outt =>
resultSelector(outt, m.i)
));
}
}
}

Answer 12

Full outer join for two or more tables:
First extract the column that you want to join on.
var DatesA = from A in db.T1 select A.Date;
var DatesB = from B in db.T2 select B.Date;
var DatesC = from C in db.T3 select C.Date;
var Dates = DatesA.Union(DatesB).Union(DatesC);
Then use left outer join between the extracted column and main tables.
var Full_Outer_Join =
(from A in Dates
join B in db.T1
on A equals B.Date into AB
from ab in AB.DefaultIfEmpty()
join C in db.T2
on A equals C.Date into ABC
from abc in ABC.DefaultIfEmpty()
join D in db.T3
on A equals D.Date into ABCD
from abcd in ABCD.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new { A, ab, abc, abcd })
.AsEnumerable();

Answer 13

I think that LINQ join clause isn't the correct solution to this problem, because of join clause purpose isn't to accumulate data in such way as required for this task solution. The code to merge created separate collections becomes too complicated, maybe it is OK for learning purposes, but not for real applications. One of the ways how to solve this problem is in the code below:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
List<FirstName> firstNames = new List<FirstName>();
firstNames.Add(new FirstName { ID = 1, Name = "John" });
firstNames.Add(new FirstName { ID = 2, Name = "Sue" });
List<LastName> lastNames = new List<LastName>();
lastNames.Add(new LastName { ID = 1, Name = "Doe" });
lastNames.Add(new LastName { ID = 3, Name = "Smith" });
HashSet<int> ids = new HashSet<int>();
foreach (var name in firstNames)
{
ids.Add(name.ID);
}
foreach (var name in lastNames)
{
ids.Add(name.ID);
}
List<FullName> fullNames = new List<FullName>();
foreach (int id in ids)
{
FullName fullName = new FullName();
fullName.ID = id;
FirstName firstName = firstNames.Find(f => f.ID == id);
fullName.FirstName = firstName != null ? firstName.Name : string.Empty;
LastName lastName = lastNames.Find(l => l.ID == id);
fullName.LastName = lastName != null ? lastName.Name : string.Empty;
fullNames.Add(fullName);
}
}
}
public class FirstName
{
public int ID;
public string Name;
}
public class LastName
{
public int ID;
public string Name;
}
class FullName
{
public int ID;
public string FirstName;
public string LastName;
}
If real collections are large for HashSet formation instead foreach loops can be used the code below:
List<int> firstIds = firstNames.Select(f => f.ID).ToList();
List<int> LastIds = lastNames.Select(l => l.ID).ToList();
HashSet<int> ids = new HashSet<int>(firstIds.Union(LastIds));//Only unique IDs will be included in HashSet

Answer 14

Thank You everybody for the interesting posts!
I modified the code because in my case I needed
a personalized join predicate
a personalized union distinct comparer
For the ones interested this is my modified code (in VB, sorry)
Module MyExtensions
<Extension()>
Friend Function FullOuterJoin(Of TA, TB, TResult)(ByVal a As IEnumerable(Of TA), ByVal b As IEnumerable(Of TB), ByVal joinPredicate As Func(Of TA, TB, Boolean), ByVal projection As Func(Of TA, TB, TResult), ByVal comparer As IEqualityComparer(Of TResult)) As IEnumerable(Of TResult)
Dim joinL =
From xa In a
From xb In b.Where(Function(x) joinPredicate(xa, x)).DefaultIfEmpty()
Select projection(xa, xb)
Dim joinR =
From xb In b
From xa In a.Where(Function(x) joinPredicate(x, xb)).DefaultIfEmpty()
Select projection(xa, xb)
Return joinL.Union(joinR, comparer)
End Function
End Module
Dim fullOuterJoin = lefts.FullOuterJoin(
rights,
Function(left, right) left.Code = right.Code And (left.Amount [...] Or left.Description.Contains [...]),
Function(left, right) New CompareResult(left, right),
New MyEqualityComparer
)
Public Class MyEqualityComparer
Implements IEqualityComparer(Of CompareResult)
Private Function GetMsg(obj As CompareResult) As String
Dim msg As String = ""
msg &= obj.Code & "_"
[...]
Return msg
End Function
Public Overloads Function Equals(x As CompareResult, y As CompareResult) As Boolean Implements IEqualityComparer(Of CompareResult).Equals
Return Me.GetMsg(x) = Me.GetMsg(y)
End Function
Public Overloads Function GetHashCode(obj As CompareResult) As Integer Implements IEqualityComparer(Of CompareResult).GetHashCode
Return Me.GetMsg(obj).GetHashCode
End Function
End Class

Answer 15

Yet another full outer join
As was not that happy with the simplicity and the readability of the other propositions, I ended up with this :
It does not have the pretension to be fast ( about 800 ms to join 1000 * 1000 on a 2020m CPU : 2.4ghz / 2cores). To me, it is just a compact and casual full outer join.
It works the same as a SQL FULL OUTER JOIN (duplicates conservation)
Cheers ;-)
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
namespace NS
{
public static class DataReunion
{
public static List<Tuple<T1, T2>> FullJoin<T1, T2, TKey>(List<T1> List1, Func<T1, TKey> KeyFunc1, List<T2> List2, Func<T2, TKey> KeyFunc2)
{
List<Tuple<T1, T2>> result = new List<Tuple<T1, T2>>();
Tuple<TKey, T1>[] identifiedList1 = List1.Select(_ => Tuple.Create(KeyFunc1(_), _)).OrderBy(_ => _.Item1).ToArray();
Tuple<TKey, T2>[] identifiedList2 = List2.Select(_ => Tuple.Create(KeyFunc2(_), _)).OrderBy(_ => _.Item1).ToArray();
identifiedList1.Where(_ => !identifiedList2.Select(__ => __.Item1).Contains(_.Item1)).ToList().ForEach(_ => {
result.Add(Tuple.Create<T1, T2>(_.Item2, default(T2)));
});
result.AddRange(
identifiedList1.Join(identifiedList2, left => left.Item1, right => right.Item1, (left, right) => Tuple.Create<T1, T2>(left.Item2, right.Item2)).ToList()
);
identifiedList2.Where(_ => !identifiedList1.Select(__ => __.Item1).Contains(_.Item1)).ToList().ForEach(_ => {
result.Add(Tuple.Create<T1, T2>(default(T1), _.Item2));
});
return result;
}
}
}
The idea is to
Build Ids based on provided key function builders
Process left only items
Process inner join
Process right only items
Here is a succinct test that goes with it :
Place a break point at the end to manually verify that it behaves as expected
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
using Newtonsoft.Json;
using Newtonsoft.Json.Linq;
using NS;
namespace Tests
{
[TestClass]
public class DataReunionTest
{
[TestMethod]
public void Test()
{
List<Tuple<Int32, Int32, String>> A = new List<Tuple<Int32, Int32, String>>();
List<Tuple<Int32, Int32, String>> B = new List<Tuple<Int32, Int32, String>>();
Random rnd = new Random();
/* Comment the testing block you do not want to run
/* Solution to test a wide range of keys*/
for (int i = 0; i < 500; i += 1)
{
A.Add(Tuple.Create(rnd.Next(1, 101), rnd.Next(1, 101), "A"));
B.Add(Tuple.Create(rnd.Next(1, 101), rnd.Next(1, 101), "B"));
}
/* Solution for essential testing*/
A.Add(Tuple.Create(1, 2, "B11"));
A.Add(Tuple.Create(1, 2, "B12"));
A.Add(Tuple.Create(1, 3, "C11"));
A.Add(Tuple.Create(1, 3, "C12"));
A.Add(Tuple.Create(1, 3, "C13"));
A.Add(Tuple.Create(1, 4, "D1"));
B.Add(Tuple.Create(1, 1, "A21"));
B.Add(Tuple.Create(1, 1, "A22"));
B.Add(Tuple.Create(1, 1, "A23"));
B.Add(Tuple.Create(1, 2, "B21"));
B.Add(Tuple.Create(1, 2, "B22"));
B.Add(Tuple.Create(1, 2, "B23"));
B.Add(Tuple.Create(1, 3, "C2"));
B.Add(Tuple.Create(1, 5, "E2"));
Func<Tuple<Int32, Int32, String>, Tuple<Int32, Int32>> key = (_) => Tuple.Create(_.Item1, _.Item2);
var watch = System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch.StartNew();
var res = DataReunion.FullJoin(A, key, B, key);
watch.Stop();
var elapsedMs = watch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
String aser = JToken.FromObject(res).ToString(Formatting.Indented);
Console.Write(elapsedMs);
}
}
}

Answer 16

I really hate these linq expressions, this is why SQL exists:
select isnull(fn.id, ln.id) as id, fn.firstname, ln.lastname
from firstnames fn
full join lastnames ln on ln.id=fn.id
Create this as sql view in database and import it as entity.
Of course, (distinct) union of left and right joins will make it too, but it is stupid.