first I want to state that I am a novice when it comes to code/programming. Also, I have a Mac (that runs Catalina, if that matters).
This is my first time posting to this forum, so please forgive any missteps in protocol...
Here's some background info to my question:
I have Microsoft 365 for Business and I use Teams. I'm a small business and I'm the owner and administrator. I need to be able to share externally with anyone. I have changed the settings in SharePoint admin and OneDrive admin to be able to share externally. Look here to see an example of what I have done, and the problem: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/onedrive-for-business/share-with-anyone-with-the-link-setting-is-grey-out-why/m-p/810390
Even after allowing for external sharing, the sharing options are still greyed-out. But this is not my question. I know how to fix it; as it says in the above link, I need to enable sharing in Powershell via set-sposite "siteurl" -sharingcapability ExternalUserAndGuestSharing
After some research, I found that there is a Microsoft Pwsh for Mac. I downloaded Homebrew, Microsoft PowerShell and Azure. (I also have Node.js, if that matters.) Here is a screenshot of my terminal (I hid any identifying information...):
terminal screenshot
As you can see, I get this error: Connect-SPOService -Url https://<organization name here>admin.sharepoint.com Connect-SPOService: The term 'Connect-SPOService' is not recognized as the name of a cmdlet, function, script file, or operable program. Check the spelling of the name, or if a path was included, verify that the path is correct and try again.
I contacted Microsoft and had a technician with me on the phone trying to troubleshoot their way into my SPOService on my Mac using Homebrew in order to fix the greyed-out "share with anyone" option. We were unsuccessful. At the moment, I do have access to a Windows computer, and I was able to enter my SPOService on that Windows computer and resolve the problem. However, for each new SharePoint site I create and want to share externally, I will need to repeat this process (at least, this is what the technician told me). I will not always have access to a Windows computer, therefore I need to be able to enter my SPOService on my Macbook.
Are there any workarounds? Is there an SPOService powershell for Mac? If I have the pswh for Microsoft, why won't it let me into sharepoint?
Thank you in advance for any assistance
First, I can still not rename the domain, but I can help you with a general SharePoint update. It does not work either in Azure or on Mac OX X.
If you like to check, repeat the following steps on your computer setup, assuming you don't use a Windows Computer.
Check the availability of SharePoint
Get-Module -Name Microsoft.Online.SharePoint.PowerShell -ListAvailable | Select Name,Version
Install the module if missing
On a mac with the name of your user directory
Import-Module /Users/username/.local/share/powershell/Modules Microsoft.Online.SharePoint.PowerShell -Verbose
On Azure Powershell
Import-Module Microsoft.Online.SharePoint.PowerShell -Verbose
You get a PowerShell via a one-month Test-Subscription.
Prepare your Admin URL
$AdminCenterURL="https://name_you_used_during_first_setup-admin.sharepoint.com"
Make sure you add "-admin" at the end of your domain name. You received this when you signed up. It is not the domain name you can use for your subscription later; it's, unfortunately, how Microsoft decided to implement it. Therefore, changing from Mac or Azure is not possible.
Connect to your side
Connect-SPOService -Url $AdminCenterURL -Credential (Get-Credential)
And now it will fail with
Connect-SPOService: The type initializer for 'Microsoft.Win32.Registry' threw an exception.
Unfortunately, after exchanging many emails with Microsoft, I could not resolve this with the Support desk. However, the error seems to be known.
I wrote this note to allow others to save valuable time so that somebody would not waste his time if they tried to resolve it as I tried.
If like me, you are stuck with renaming the initial SharePoint subdomain, you currently have the following options.
Buy a Windows PC with a License or install a VM with a MS Windows trial license
Buy an Enterprise License, and use the Beta functionality.
Delete your subscription, but then you might lose the active licenses and the work you have put in already. But you can re-register, and this time put the name into the subscription, which you like to see as a subdomain of SharePoint. But you lose all work put in, in the first place.
Related
I do laptop provisioning at home and something I use at the end is the DJOIN.exe command so the laptops will be ready for use when connecting on our offices' network.
Typically if I want to do an offline domain join, I will use:
DJOIN /REQUESTODJ /LOADFILE .\[filename] /WINDOWSPATH C:\windows /LOCALOS
On most laptop models this will execute fine and allow users to login to their Windows accounts once they're on the office network. I'm working with a new model today (thanks supply chain issues!) and even though it is also running Windows 10, I am getting the error message:
/LOCALOS specified but the current OS does not support domain join functionality.
The request is not supported.
Doing a google search for that exact message shows there are no results and most of the other results aren't for offline joining specifically as they include steps on the DC side of things -- which don't apply here since it's an offline join. I tried it without the /LOCALOS flag just to see what happens and it gave me:
/REQUESTODJ only operates on an offline (not running) Windows image
by default. The path supplied [C:\windows] is the current running Windows
installation. To override the default behavior and target the currently
running local operating system also specify /LOCALOS.
The parameter is incorrect.
Has anyone else encountered this and know why/how this happens and how to get past it? I didn't see any hints generated in Event Viewer; hoping to avoid a bunch of tickets down the line asking for domain joins once they've reached the office 😅
MAJOR facepalm here.
Just posting this so there's a reference for others, but this batch of laptops have Windows HOME installed on them, not Pro. Per this page with Home vs Pro features, Active Directory / Domain Joining is not supported on Windows Home. Either install Pro on the laptops or return them and purchase a batch with Pro on them.
A customer installing my companies software package has no problem installing the package silently when running as an admin account. The software and the service both install correctly and start up post installation. However - they need to push this application to all the computers in a particular group.
They are using SCCM (I do not know the version) and the software package is a InstallShield .exe packaged .msi.
When they try to use the NT Authority\System user to push the package to their test device, the installation fails soon after the 3rd party software package that is included completes. The error log displays that it is a SDDL error 1943. Any idea why this would occur on the NTA\System account and not on a local admin account for a given machine?
The silent install string we are using is setup.exe /s /v" /qn AgreeToLicense=Yes SetupType=Typical"
I'm not a dev, so I dont have direct access to any code in the software, simply a tier 3 tech support working with customers.
Sounds like your MSI is using the MsiLockPermissionsEx table to specify an SDDL string on some resource its installing or configuring (either file, directory, service or registry entry). Either the SDDL string is misconfigured (unlikely if it works from one account but not another) or the ACL on the target directory/service/registry key have become corrupted, which isn't completely unheard of.
You could try getting the customer to deploy a domain account as local admin to the computers and then set SCCM to run the package with this account. I wouldn't recommend this though as it carries inherent security risks of its own.
I'm afraid this may be one that your developers (or whoever created the MSI) need to work out with the customers to find out which resources are at fault and progress the diagnosis.
Sorry I couldn't be of further help.
I think I have found the issue. During install the .msi writes a file to the desktop to be read for configuration settings for the service as being installed. I had the file (and I am sure the customer did as well) already written to the desktop when I tried to invoke the System User for install. This does seem to be an ACL issue, in reference to the System User read/writing to a local user desktop. When the file was deleted, I received error 1406, that it could not write the value of a key. Looking on the desktop, the file had also never been written to the local desktop. When the file was already there (as such with a previous install) I get the error in the original post. At this point I am moving forward testing this as an ACL error and notifying the devs of my findings.
First off, I read all other Questions, that relate to this, I did an extensive google search on this topic and could not get a working answer.
I installed the Community Version of Visual Studio 2015 in mid November and been using it since then. After finishing my project, I went back to pen and paper for new formulas and noe came back to implement all those neat things.
Now it says, that my trial license has expired and should be renewed. I already read, I should use my MicrosoftAccount to do that, and proceeded by doing that.
Now this happened
It says, I should check firewall and prxoy settings and I read about contactiong the administrator. So that, what I did, but he says, there is no proxy, no block by firewall or anything else.
When running VS as administrator (after entering my credentials) I can create new projects and debug existing ones, so no problem there. However I can not use the program as normal user.
I read somewhere here to try repair it via systemcontrol, but that did not work either.
Does anyone has a solution?
In addition: There is also no "Enter License Key here" field, so that is also not an option.
(several Days later)
Halleluja, I found the answer! After digging through some Microsoft Help-Forums, I came upon this Thread, that not only perfectly describes my problem, but also gives a solution. So dear visitor from the future, who googled the problem and came upen this Stackoverflow Question: Follow the link above!
So, after sniffing packets harder than a drug addict, trying to find a difference in TLS exchanges between my computer and VS licensing server when using a domain account and when a using local account, and noticing no difference, I recalled why I had pushed this hypothesis to the side: our network supports TLS 1.2 perfectly well, as I can connect to TLS 1.2-only remote hosts without any issue.
This means the issue lies elsewhere, and is caused by Visual Studio treating domain accounts and local accounts differently when trying to renew licensing information.
The good news is I've found why and how to fix it.
I recalled that earlier this year, when we upgraded our commercial department from Windows 7 to Windows 10, they all encountered issues while trying to configure their mail accounts on Microsoft Outlook: an unknown error 0x8004011c. If you search around for it you'll quickly find that this only happens when using domain accounts and not when using local accounts (sounds familiar, heh?). The fix to bypass this issue is to set a specific Windows cryptography-related registry key.
When digging a little deeper, you can find that this fix is related to KB 3000850 (which I sadly cannot link to due to my account not being verified) and is actually described in the "Known issues" section, as well as in Samba-related documentation ("Required Settings for Samba NT4 Domains").
In short: Windows 8.1+ clients (with KB3000850) joined to an NT-Style domain are not able to use Windows Credential Manager. This doesn't occur when not using a NT-Style domain. The fix seems to globally authorize using Windows Credential Manager whatever the domain context.
So, to wrap it up, if:
You have a NT-Style domain (such as when using a Samba domain controller)
You have Windows 8.1 or later
vYou encounter issues when renewing your Visual Studio license
Then, set the following registry key:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\Protect\Providers\df9d8cd0-1501-11d1-8c7a-00c04fc297eb]
"ProtectionPolicy"=dword:00000001
This solved the issue on our domain, for all machines and accounts tested.
As to why Visual Studio 2015 needs to use Windows Credential Manager and not Visual Studio 2013, someone from Microsoft will have to chime in there to explain because I have no clue.
You are using a very old Samba server that uses unsupported features. NT4 came out in 1995. Active Directory didn't exist back then. A lot has changed in the last 20 years, including strengthening security and gradually removing older, less secure features like LanMan and NT4 domains.
Instead of weakening security, you should follow the advice posted in the page you linked, Required Settings for Samba NT4 Domains:
Microsoft discontinued the official support for NT4 domains in their Windows operating systems. ... Anyway, consider migrating to a Samba Active Directory (AD) to avoid problems if a future update from Microsoft disables or removes the unsupported NT4 features.
Looking for suggestions on how to go about the following, i.e what would be the best language to do it in etc, third party tools are a no :(
I've been tasked to create some sort of windows shell/command line interface that will allow a standard users to install a specific set of applications (configurable by administrators) (installation requires Admin/UAC elevation) due to security restrictions the user cannot have elevated privileges so they'll be able to run the shell as a standard user and it would have hidden/encrypted credentials built in to run the installs as.
Some of the requirements are as follows:
It would need to work on Server 2008 R2, 2012 r1 and 2012 r2
The credentials used to perform the install would have to be hidden (encrypted) from the end user.
Ideally it could work by us providing some config to it prior to handing that server over to the customer and limit what it could be used to install to a particular .exe or .msi (so we know of a need to install an app, we are advised of the name of the install and can logon and can enter it into a form maybe so only that app can be installed, then hand the server over to the customer who runs the same utility or shell extension or whatever and can then install their app.
Even more ideally it was more intelligent than that and some means of ensuring any .msi was indeed installing the application that the msi name related to (seems unlikely but just in case a normal user created an .msi to grant himself further admin access as per http://blogs.technet.com/b/fdcc/archive/2011/01/25/alwaysinstallelevated-is-equivalent-to-granting-administrative-rights.aspx )
Ideally its lifespan would be limited in terms of time (unsure if this could be for example to x number of days).
Any pointers on how to go about this, seems like a good challenge :)
Thanks for reading all that!
Mike
Thanks for the responses,
I managed to do this in C#, with no prior experience in the language :)
The application has 2 parts to it, a GUI and a service. It works by having the application send an install command via IPC to it's counterpart elevated service. (Thanks Hans Passant for pointing me in the right direction there). The service initiates the installer under it's own elevated account but displays the installer GUI on the users session. Files are HMACSHA1 checksum validated prior to install, on both the app and the service.
Thanks,
Mike
If a user requires the ability to install application in the Program Files folder, then instruct the domain administrator to give Full Control of the Program Files folder to Everyone:
Just because the default setting forbids standard users from modifying programs, doesn't mean you have to keep it that way. Windows is a secure operating system that gives you the capability to keep it secure.
If your administrator only wants some users to be able to modify the contents of the Program Files folder, then only give that permission to certain users.
The better solution is to re-design the applications so that they do not install in a (by default) protected location. Have them instead install in:
%APPDATA_LOCAL%\Contoso\Frobber\Grob.exe
e.g.
D:\Users\Ian\AppData\Local\Contoso\Frobber\Grob.exe
A user is always allowed to write anything in their own profile folder.
The title says it. I'm looking for a way to determine exactly which file/registry key this executable is attempting to access. I have attempted to use Windows auditing capabilities and Process Monitor to determine where the failure is happening but, this failure does not produce audit failure events or show as access denial in Process Monitor.
Of course, If someone has experienced this and can provide a solution to resolve the error directly that would be almost as nice.
Background:
I am using moveuser.exe which is part of the Windows Server 2003 Resource Kit Tools to convert the security of local user profiles on a number Windows XP workstations.
Symptom:
Occasionally, moveuser.exe will fail to convert the security of a profile with the error "Error: 5 access denied". I have not been able to determine any commonality among the failing accounts or the computers they reside upon. A given computer may have host 6 profiles, 5 of which convert without issue and 1 which produces the error.
There are a few factors that I'm as sure as I can be about:
-The account I'm using to run moveuser.exe with has full Administrator rights to the local machine and the domain to which the profile security is being converted.
-The failure is not related to file permissions within the profile directory (the entire directory can be moved, renamed, deleted, or successfully converted via a workaround).
I've developed a reliable workaround for these cases but, it is fairly involved and I would much rather understand the root cause of this error and correct it pre-emptively.
My workaround (glad to share it, left out for brevity) seems to indicate that the failure is related to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE \ SOFTWARE\ Microsoft\ Windows NT \ CurrentVersion \ ProfileList registry keys but, I cannot determine exactly how/why.
Did you try to use the "regini" command line tool to grab registry permissions for the administrator account?
Use FileMon and RegMon (now Microsoft, formerly SysInternals, still free) to monitor what exactly is being accessed, how, and what rights/access are being requested.
I don't have a URL handy, but a Google search should be able to hook you up with these tools.
A couple items I would try. First, could it be that the user was logged in and the computer hasn't been rebooted. Microsoft has a product called UPHClent which helps in unloading unneeded user hives.
Next thing I wanted to know, is if you try rebooting before running the moveuser executable. This Conversation seems to indicate this would help with this kind of error.
Two days after posting this I got to the bottom of the problem. It turned out, just as Rob Haupt suggested to be related to a stuck user hive. The program I was running, moveuser, was reading the Refcount key found under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\ SOFTWARE\ Microsoft\ Windows NT\ CurrentVersion\ ProfileList\ <SID>\ and ending immediately.
Setting Refcount to 0 solved the problem immediately
Pushing out UPHClean to all the target machines pre-emptively has all but elimated the problem and we were able to successfully convert profiles on several hundred machines over the last week.
An important note about UPHClean:
I'd tried installing it previously but, it didn't appear to help. I was too impatient, the UPHClean ReadMe revealed that the service just takes time to do its job.