I have a variable in a deluge script and I want to display its data type in the log. I tried this, which reports there is no function type(): info type(my variable);
Also I searched for zoho deluge data type and zoho deluge introspection but didn't find anything that was actionable.
Any suggestions will be appreciated.
Thank you.
2020-09-25 update:
In the online deluge editor, the tooltips will display the type of a variable as one enters the variable name. That means the javascript in the editor is able to get the variable types and display them. Is there a deluge command to do the same thing?
If you are looking for a function to fetch the variable data type in Zoho Creator, I have written one for you:
string type(list var)
{
v = var.get(0);
if(v == null)
{
return "NULL";
}
try
{
m = v.toMap();
if(m != null)
{
return "MAP";
}
}
catch (e)
{
}
try
{
m = v.get(0);
if(m != null)
{
return "LIST";
}
}
catch (e)
{
}
try
{
if(isNumber(v))
{
return "NUMBER";
}
}
catch (e)
{
}
try
{
if(isText(v))
{
return "STRING";
}
}
catch (e)
{
}
try
{
if(isDate(v))
{
return "DATE";
}
}
catch (e)
{
}
try
{
if(isFile(v))
{
return "FILE";
}
}
catch (e)
{
}
try
{
if(isNull(v))
{
return "NULL";
}
}
catch (e)
{
}
try
{
if(v.isEmpty())
{
try
{
v.add(1);
return "LIST";
}
catch (e)
{
}
return "MAP";
}
}
catch (e)
{
}
return "COLLECTION";
}
And you can use the following function to test it:
void testType()
{
info thisapp.type({50});
info thisapp.type({"ABC"});
info thisapp.type({"01-01-2010"});
info thisapp.type({'01-01-2010'});
info thisapp.type({{1,2,3}});
info thisapp.type({{"a":"b"}});
x = List();
info thisapp.type({x});
x = Map();
info thisapp.type({x});
csv_file = "\"Name\",\"Age\"\n\"Mathew\",\"20\"".tofile("sample.csv");
info thisapp.type({csv_file});
info thisapp.type({null});
products = Collection("Creator":5,"CRM":2,"Mail":8);
info thisapp.type({products});
}
Have you tried just:
info myvariable;
It is not possible to get the data type.
Related
How to change the size of fields in Infor EAM?
Anyone with experience with Infor EAM would be gladly appreciated.
You could do it using Extensible Framework. For example, following code will change width of work order and equipment description fields if you put it in EF of WSJOBS screen.
Ext.define(
'EAM.custom.external_WSJOBS', {
extend: 'EAM.custom.AbstractExtensibleFramework',
getSelectors: function () {
if( EAM.app.designerMode == false) {
return {
'[extensibleFramework] [tabName=HDR][isTabView=true]': {
afterlayout: function() {
try {
document.getElementsByName( 'description')[0].style.width = '700px';
document.getElementsByName( 'equipmentdesc')[0].style.width = '700px';
return true;
} catch( err) {
return true;
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
);
I need help with filtering data in ng-repeat. I've tried to do few things but I can't find solution that works in my case. I need to to something like this:
sensor in sensors | filter: { group: group.id, (name: search || description: search) }
Search is ng-model (text input) and group.id is ID of group that are genereted in ng-repeat (I have two nested ng-repeat). I've tried to do my filter:
$scope.search = '';
$scope.searchFilter = function() {
return function (p) {
if ($scope.search!='') {
for (var i in p) {
console.log("p.name: "+p.name+", search: "+$scope.search);
if (p.name == $scope.search || p.description == $scope.search) {
return p;
}
}
} else {
return p;
}
}
}
Almost works. It filters my data but only if I write correct name. For example I want to find "engine". If I start writing "en" there is no data but if I write "engine" it will display correct data. So I need to work on that too. I hope you understand what I want to do.
I've found solution!
sensor in sensors filter: { group: group.id } | filter: searchFilter()
And this:
$scope.search = '';
$scope.searchFilter = function() {
return function (p) {
if ($scope.search!='') {
for (var i in p) {
var re = new RegExp($scope.search, 'i'); // This I've add
if (p.name.match(re) || p.description.match(re) ) { // This I've change
return true;
}
}
} else {
return true;
}
}
}
I am using protractor for my e2e tests and jasmine2 as framework. I am using a plugin for html reporter with screenshots ( html-report for protractor ).
In these reports there will be shown a list of all failed/passed expects. When the expect fails I get a descriptive message of the expectation. However when the expect passes I only see the word: Passed. The reason behind that is that jasmine overrides the message when the expect passes.
That is done in the following file:
node_modules/protractor/node_modules/jasmine/node_modules/jasmine-core/lib/jasmine-core/jasmine.js
getJasmineRequireObj().buildExpectationResult = function () {
function buildExpectationResult(options) {
var messageFormatter = options.messageFormatter || function () {
},
stackFormatter = options.stackFormatter || function () {
};
var result = {
matcherName: options.matcherName,
message: message(),
stack: stack(),
passed: options.passed
};
if (!result.passed) {
result.expected = options.expected;
result.actual = options.actual;
}
return result;
function message() {
if (options.passed) {
// Here is the message overriden
return 'Passed.';
} else if (options.message) {
return options.message;
} else if (options.error) {
return messageFormatter(options.error);
}
return '';
}
function stack() {
if (options.passed) {
return '';
}
var error = options.error;
if (!error) {
try {
throw new Error(message());
} catch (e) {
error = e;
}
}
return stackFormatter(error);
}
}
return buildExpectationResult;
};
What I wanted is to override this function in my protractor protractor.conf.js file. And replace it with one with the desired behaviour.
I've tried to do so unsuccessfully doing the following:
onPrepare: function () {
jasmine.buildExpectationResult = function () {
function buildExpectationResult(options) {
var messageFormatter = options.messageFormatter || function () {
},
stackFormatter = options.stackFormatter || function () {
};
return {
matcherName: options.matcherName,
expected: options.expected,
actual: options.actual,
message: message(),
stack: stack(),
passed: options.passed
};
function message() {
if (options.message) {
return options.message;
} else if (options.error) {
return messageFormatter(options.error);
}
return "";
}
function stack() {
if (options.passed) {
return "";
}
var error = options.error;
if (!error) {
try {
throw new Error(message());
} catch (e) {
error = e;
}
}
return stackFormatter(error);
}
}
return buildExpectationResult;
};
}
Then my questions is: What is the right way to override a jasmine method?
Since we use gulp task to run protractor tests, we override the lib (like jasmine lib) as one of the gulp task with custom copy. We do that as part of installation or every test execution.
I didn't find any good way to override it unless we create another npm module.
I had the same issue, I'm not sure if my solution
onPrepare: function () {
// ...
jasmine.Spec.prototype.addExpectationResult = function(passed, data, isError) {
var buildExpectationResult = function(options) {
var messageFormatter = options.messageFormatter || function() {},
stackFormatter = options.stackFormatter || function() {};
var result = {
matcherName: options.matcherName,
message: message(),
stack: stack(),
passed: options.passed
};
if(!result.passed) {
result.expected = options.expected;
result.actual = options.actual;
}
return result;
function message() {
if (options.passed) {
return options.message ? options.message : 'Passed';
} else if (options.message) {
return options.message;
} else if (options.error) {
return messageFormatter(options.error);
}
return '';
}
function stack() {
if (options.passed) {
return '';
}
var error = options.error;
if (!error) {
try {
throw new Error(message());
} catch (e) {
error = e;
}
}
return stackFormatter(error);
}
}
var exceptionFormatter = jasmine.ExceptionFormatter;
var expectationResultFactory = function(attrs) {
attrs.messageFormatter = exceptionFormatter.message;
attrs.stackFormatter = exceptionFormatter.stack;
return buildExpectationResult(attrs);
}
var expectationResult = expectationResultFactory(data);
if (passed) {
this.result.passedExpectations.push(expectationResult);
} else {
this.result.failedExpectations.push(expectationResult);
if (this.throwOnExpectationFailure && !isError) {
throw new j$.errors.ExpectationFailed();
}
}
};
// ...
}
I have a view that is loaded with a blank viewmodel initially. I want to populate that already rendered view with a json object (obtained view ajax post) that was based off the viewmodel for that view.
Is there a way of automatically doing this?
Is there a way of doing it in reverse? (fields to matching viewmodel json object)
The only way I am aware of taking data return from an ajax call and putting it in a field is manually
$('#TextField1').val(result.TextField1);
etc..
to send it back to the controller you can do
data: $('form').serialize(),
this will take all of the fields in that form and send them back to the controller
Ok it looks like this will suit my needs.
I need to follow a convention of naming containers the same name as their respective properties as well as putting a class on them to indicate that they contain subfields.
function MapJsonObjectToForm(obj, $container) {
for (var key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
var $field = $container.find('#' + key);
if ($field.is('div')) {
MapJsonObjectToForm(obj[key], $field);
} else {
if (obj[key] == null) {
if ($field.hasClass('select2-offscreen')) {
$field.select2('val', '');
$field.select2().trigger('change');
} else {
$field.val("");
}
} else {
if ($field.hasClass('select2-offscreen')) {
$field.select2('val', obj[key]);
$field.select2().trigger('change');
} else {
$field.val(obj[key]);
}
}
}
}
}
}
function MapFormToJsonObject(containerid) {
var obj = {};
$('.dataitem').each(function () {
var exclude = "s2id";
if ($(this).attr("ID").substring(0, exclude.length) !== exclude) {
var parents = $(this).parents(".has-sub-fields");
if (parents.length > 0) {
obj = FindParents(obj, parents.get(), $(this).attr("ID"), $(this).val());
} else {
obj[$(this).attr("ID")] = $(this).val();
}
}
});
return obj;
}
function FindParents(obj, arr, id, value) {
if (arr.length == 0) {
obj[id] = value;
return obj;
}
var parentID = $(arr[arr.length - 1]).attr("ID");
arr.pop();
if (obj[parentID] == null) {
obj[parentID] = {};
}
obj[parentID] = FindParents(obj[parentID], arr, id, value);
return obj;
}
How can I validate only certain attributes on a model? Currently I check if the attribute exists in the object passed into validate:
validate: function(attrs) {
// Number
if (attrs.minimum) {
if (isNaN(attrs.minimum)) {
return -1;
}
}
if (attrs.maximum) {
if (isNaN(attrs.maximum)) {
return -1;
}
}
}
but if I want to validate string value then:
if (attrs.mystring) {
// Do validation
}
would fail and the validation never takes place.
Backbone now supports the has property. So you can do something like that:
var Person = Backbone.Model.extend({
defaults: {
"name": "Kevin",
"age" : 26,
"job" : "web"
},
validate: function(attrs, options) {
for(k in attrs) {
if(!this.has(k)) {
return k + ' attribute is not exist';
}
}
}
});
var person = new Person;
person.on("invalid", function(model, error) {
console.log(error);
});
Im a little confused by your wording, but I think you want to check if its not an empty string first? and also work out the possibility that it is undefined..if so then this is what you'll want to do..
validate: function(attrs) {
// Number
if (attrs.minimum) {
if (isNaN(attrs.minimum)) {
return -1;
}
}
if (attrs.maximum) {
if (isNaN(attrs.maximum)) {
return -1;
}
}
if (typeof(attrs.mystring) != "undefined"){
if (!attrs.mystring){
return -1;
}
}
}
if you want to only validate one of your attributes, you should write your validate function to accommodate the options accordingly
validate: function(attrs, option) {
if (!option){
// Number
if (attrs.minimum) {
if (isNaN(attrs.minimum)) {
return -1;
}
}
if (attrs.maximum) {
if (isNaN(attrs.maximum)) {
return -1;
}
}
if (!attrs.mystring){
return -1;
}
}else{
switch(option){
case("string"):
if (!attrs.mystring){
return -1;
}
break;
case("number"):
// Number
if (attrs.minimum) {
if (isNaN(attrs.minimum)) {
return -1;
}
}
if (attrs.maximum) {
if (isNaN(attrs.maximum)) {
return -1;
}
}
break;
}
}
}
there are many ways to do this, this probably being the least efficient lol but using your example, it will do the job.
also, this isn't really a backbone.js problem per say...but general js