I have been reading through the API docs for YouTube, but I am having a hard time figuring out how I can calculate the number of views per week of a given video in Python. Is this possible? Thanks!
The YouTube Analytics and Reporting APIs does not provide a metric of the kind you need -- views per week (as far as I know).
The YouTube Data API doesn't provide the info you need -- views per week -- either, but you may well compute that yourself base on this property:
statistics.viewCount (unsigned long)
The number of times the video has been viewed.
Thus, you should call the Videos.list API endpoint, passing on to it the parameters id=VIDEO_ID and part=statistics, where VIDEO_ID is the ID of the video you're interested in.
Arrange your program to read the viewCount property weekly, for computing the views per week as needed.
In the context of Python, if you're using the Google APIs Client Library for Python, then your call to the Videos.list endpoint would look like:
from googleapiclient.discovery import build
youtube = build('youtube', 'v3', developerKey = APP_KEY)
response = youtube.videos().list(
id = VIDEO_ID,
part = 'statistics',
fields = 'items(statistics(viewCount))',
maxResults = 1
).execute()
view_count = response['items'][0]['statistics']['viewCount']
Note that the code above is simplified quite much since there's no error handling.
Also note that the code above is using the parameter fields to obtain from the endpoint only the viewCount property. (It's always good to ask from the API only the info that is really needed.)
Yet another caveat using this endpoint is the following:
Even if the official doc says that the endpoint's response contains a viewCount property of type unsigned long, the actual JSON response has the value of that property being of type string:
{
"items": [
{
"statistics": {
"viewCount": "54508"
}
}
]
}
Thus, the variable view_count above will be of type str; using it as an integer would, of course, require a conversion of form int(view_count).
Related
I am trying to develop a webapp using Google Apps Script to be embedded into a Google Site which simply displays the contents of a Google Sheet and filters it using some simple parameters. For the time being, at least. I may add more features later.
I got a functional app, but found that filtering could often take a while as the client sometimes had to wait up to 5 seconds for a response from the server. I decided that this was most likely due to the fact that I was loading the spreadsheet by ID using the SpreadsheetApp class every time it was called.
I decided to cache the spreadsheet values in my doGet function using the CacheService and retrieve the data from the cache each time instead.
However, for some reason this has meant that what was a 2-dimensional array is now treated as a 1-dimensional array. And, so, when displaying the data in an HTML table, I end up with a single column, with each cell being occupied by a single character.
This is how I have implemented the caching; as far as I can tell from the API reference I am not doing anything wrong:
function doGet() {
CacheService.getScriptCache().put('data', SpreadsheetApp
.openById('####')
.getActiveSheet()
.getDataRange()
.getValues());
return HtmlService
.createTemplateFromFile('index')
.evaluate()
.setSandboxMode(HtmlService.SandboxMode.IFRAME);
}
function getData() {
return CacheService.getScriptCache().get('data');
}
This is my first time developing a proper application using GAS (I have used it in Sheets before). Is there something very obvious I am missing? I didn't see any type restrictions on the CacheService reference page...
CacheService stores Strings, so objects such as your two-dimensional array will be coerced to Strings, which may not meet your needs.
Use the JSON utility to take control of the results.
myCache.put( 'tag', JSON.stringify( myObj ) );
...
var cachedObj = JSON.parse( myCache.get( 'tag' ) );
Cache expires. The put method, without an expirationInSeconds parameter expires in 10 minutes. If you need your data to stay alive for more than 10 minutes, you need to specify an expirationInSeconds, and the maximum is 6 hours. So, if you specifically do NOT need the data to expire, Cache might not be the best use.
You can use Cache for something like controlling how long a user can be logged in.
You could also try using a global variable, which some people would tell you to never use. To declare a global variable, define the variable outside of any function.
I'm trying to use Youtube Api V3 to get documentaries videos, unfortunately I can't get any results for many searched keys.
Is there any advanced configuration I can use to get more results or is there any alternative API(s) ?
this is my query
https://www.googleapis.com/youtube/v3/search?part=snippet&q=alien&type=video&videoCategoryId=35
First and foremost make sure you have an API_KEY. Follow link for details, then go to developer console to get one.
Then your request URL should look like this.
var API_KEY = "your api key";
var channelID = "The channel id u wan to pull";
var result = 30 // Limit the number of videos
`https://www.googleapis.com/youtube/v3/search?key=${API_KEY}&channelId=${channelID}&part=snippet,id&order=date&maxResults=${result}`
With an API key, I also pulled 0 results for 'alien' in the Documentary category. Perhaps there aren't any.
The Background
In an attempt to build some back-end services for my e-commerce (Shopify based) site I have set up a Firestore trigger that writes order details with every new order created which is updated by a web hook POST function provided by Shopify - (orders/Create webhook).
My current cloud function -
exports.saveOrderDetails = functions.https.onRequest((req, res) => {
var docRef = db.collection('orders').doc(req.body.name);
const details = req.body;
var setData = docRef.set(req.body).then( a =>{
res.status(200).send();
});
});
Which is able to capture the data from the webhook and store it in the order number's "name" document within my "orders" collection. This is how it looks in Firestore:
My question is - with the help of body-parser (already parsing out "name" which is represented as #9999 in my screenshot, to set my document name value) - how could I improve my cloud function to handle storing this webhook POST in a better data structure for Firestore and to query it later?
After reviewing the comments on this question, I moved this question over to Firebase-Talk and it appears the feature I am attempting here would be close to what is known as "collection group queries" and was informed I should adjust my data model approach since this feature is currently still on the road map - and perhaps look into the Firestore REST API as suggested by #jason-berryman
Besides the REST APi, #frank-van-puffelen made a great suggestion to look into working with Arrays, Lists, Sets for Firebase/Firestore
Another approach that could mitigate this in my scenario is to have my HTTP Firestore cloud trigger have multiple parsing arguments that create top more top level documents - however this could cause a point of scaling failure or an increase of cost factor due to putting more parsing processing logic in my cloud function and adding additional latency...
I will mark my question as answered for the time being to hopefully help others to understand how to work with documents in a single collection in Firestore and not attempt to query groups of collections before they get too far into modelling and need to restructure their app.
http://kb.mailchimp.com/api/resources/lists/members/lists-members-collection
Using this resource we can obtain only first 10 members. How to get all?
The answer is quite simple - use offset and count parameters in URL query:
https://us10.api.mailchimp.com/3.0/lists/b5b5fdc2fa/members?offset=150&count=10
Finally I found PHP API client for MailChimp API v3:
https://github.com/pacely/mailchimp-api-v3
And official docs about pagination.. I missed it before :(
http://kb.mailchimp.com/api/article/api-3-overview
I stumbled on this one while researching a way to get all list members in MC API 3.0 as well. I noticed that there were some comments on the API timing out when trying to get all list members on one page. I also encountered this at first but was able to overcome it by limiting the fields in the result by using the 'fields' param. My code is for a mass deleter so all I really needed was the ID of each member to put together a batch delete request. Here's how my fetch request looks (psuedo-code):
$total_members = $result['total_items'];//get number of members in list via previous request
https://usXX.api.mailchimp.com/3.0/lists/foobarx/members?fields=members.id&count=total_members
This way I'm able to fetch over 15,000 subscribers on one page without error.
offset and count is the official way on the docs, but the problem is that has linear slowdown. It appears to be an n^2 solution, so if you have 20,000 items, you're in trouble. Their docs http://developer.mailchimp.com/documentation/mailchimp/reference/lists/members/#read-get_lists_list_id_members warn you against using offset.
If you're scenario permits you to use other filters (like since_last_changed), then you can do it quickly. See What is the right syntax for "timeframe" in MailChimp API 3.0 for format for datetime.
Using offset and count parameters are correct as mentioned in some of the other answers, but becomes tedious for large lists.
A more efficient way, is to use a client for the MailChimp API. I used mailchimp3 for python. Using this, it's pretty easy to get all members on your list because it handles the pagination. Here's how you would do it.
from mailchimp3 import MailChimp
client = MailChimp('YOUR_USERNAME', 'YOUR_SECRET_KEY')
client.lists.members.all('YOUR_LIST_ID', get_all=True, fields="members.email_address")
You can do it just with count, making an API call to the list root so in the next API call you include the count parameter and you have all your list members.
I ran into issues with this because I had a moderate list with 2600 members and MailChimp was throwing an error, but it worked with 1500 people.
So for a list bigger than 1500 members I use MailChimp export API bare in mind that this is going to get discontinued but I could not find any other acceptable solutions.
Alternatively for bigger lists (>1500) you could get the total of members and then make multiple api calls to the Member endpoint but I really dislike that :(
If anyone has a better alternative I would be really glad to hear it.
With MailChimp.Net.
Use the offset value.
List<Member> listMembers = new List<Member>();
IMailChimpManager manager = new MailChimpManager(MailChimpApiKey);
bool moreAvailable = true;
int offset = 0;
while (moreAvailable)
{
var listMembers = manager.Members.GetAllAsync(yourListId, new MemberRequest
{
Status = Status.Subscribed,
Limit = 250,
Offset = offset
}).ConfigureAwait(false);
var Allmembers = listMembers.GetAwaiter().GetResult();
foreach(Member member in Allmembers)
{
listMembers.Add(member);
}
if (Allmembers.Count() == 250)
//if the count is < of 250 then it means that there aren't more results
offset += 250;
else
moreAvailable = false;
}
I am trying to develop a webapp using Google Apps Script to be embedded into a Google Site which simply displays the contents of a Google Sheet and filters it using some simple parameters. For the time being, at least. I may add more features later.
I got a functional app, but found that filtering could often take a while as the client sometimes had to wait up to 5 seconds for a response from the server. I decided that this was most likely due to the fact that I was loading the spreadsheet by ID using the SpreadsheetApp class every time it was called.
I decided to cache the spreadsheet values in my doGet function using the CacheService and retrieve the data from the cache each time instead.
However, for some reason this has meant that what was a 2-dimensional array is now treated as a 1-dimensional array. And, so, when displaying the data in an HTML table, I end up with a single column, with each cell being occupied by a single character.
This is how I have implemented the caching; as far as I can tell from the API reference I am not doing anything wrong:
function doGet() {
CacheService.getScriptCache().put('data', SpreadsheetApp
.openById('####')
.getActiveSheet()
.getDataRange()
.getValues());
return HtmlService
.createTemplateFromFile('index')
.evaluate()
.setSandboxMode(HtmlService.SandboxMode.IFRAME);
}
function getData() {
return CacheService.getScriptCache().get('data');
}
This is my first time developing a proper application using GAS (I have used it in Sheets before). Is there something very obvious I am missing? I didn't see any type restrictions on the CacheService reference page...
CacheService stores Strings, so objects such as your two-dimensional array will be coerced to Strings, which may not meet your needs.
Use the JSON utility to take control of the results.
myCache.put( 'tag', JSON.stringify( myObj ) );
...
var cachedObj = JSON.parse( myCache.get( 'tag' ) );
Cache expires. The put method, without an expirationInSeconds parameter expires in 10 minutes. If you need your data to stay alive for more than 10 minutes, you need to specify an expirationInSeconds, and the maximum is 6 hours. So, if you specifically do NOT need the data to expire, Cache might not be the best use.
You can use Cache for something like controlling how long a user can be logged in.
You could also try using a global variable, which some people would tell you to never use. To declare a global variable, define the variable outside of any function.