Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I’ve downloaded the free version of Varbox wanting to start a new project using this platform that seems to be Laravel based, but it seems that after install I don't see the specific Laravel homepage, as I'd expect from a Laravel project.
I’ve setup a git repository with the Varbox source code, but it doesn’t seem to be a working Laravel project (eg. it doesn’t have an .env file, php artisan is not accessible).
You shouldn't attempt to use Varbox as a monolithic application.
Varbox has been designed as a Composer package which you'll have to locally require in your own Laravel projects, so that means you'll need to already have a working Laravel projects on top of which to install Varbox.
please click to see what I'm talking about
Please follow the documentation (I suggest installing it in the automatic way, as it's less time consuming): https://varbox.io/docs/1.x/installation
Related
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 5 days ago.
Improve this question
The official documentation for deploying TYPO3 states "The composer install command should not be run on the live environment."
Why is this? As far as I know deployer - a well received deployment tool for TYPO3 - does exactly this.
TYPO3 Recommends Composer as the Main Installation method.
but its good practice to run "composer install" on your local machine (or a CI Pipline like Github Actions) then move the downloaded code to the final destination server. and i think deployer is dooing exaclty that.
this has multiple advantages:
less dependancies on the production system. (one less software there to be exploited)
possiblity to run unit tests before deployment
add additional build steps for your deployment (like compilin sass
or javascripts)
ther is no need for credentials of private repositories on the production server
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 10 hours ago.
Improve this question
I'm still a weekend-programmer-wannabe trying to learn the basics of MVC so excuse my silly question.
I have some client libraries that I'm trying to integrate into Laravel (the Amazon MWS libraries to be exact https://www.developer.amazonservices.com/phpclients). As far as I can tell, this client library is already built for MVC (it has 'models' and clients lol so that's what I'm going by.
My suspicion is that I can just install these libraries via composer like through one of these packages https://packagist.org/packages/mcs/amazon-mws.
My questions:
If I'm integrating a client library, would you almost always do this via composer? Would it only be very rarely that you integrate these manually?
If installing a client library via composer, do I just search on packagist for someone who has created a repository for this library? My initial thought was that I would want the Developer to have this hosted on packagist, not somebody random (like it appears to be for the MWS package).
I know I'm asking a lot of really basic questions and I've probably made some silly assumptions so excuse my ignorance. MVC is still daunting for me.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I checked out the codes of one of my Laravel website's view files this morning on the online server and noticed that they are not the same as what I was uploaded before and with my local backup files which contain my last updates! However, my website showing everything exactly what should be! (Matching with my last changes) I checked files multiple times but the result was the same and codes don't match! How is this possible?
Laravel caches the compiled views when the APP_DEBUG=false and the environment is production. so you can do two things
go to following path
storage/framework/views
and delete all the compiled views.
or
php artisan view:clear
run from console
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I want to upgrade laravel on my website from 5.1 to 5.6, please tell me how it is possible?
You should follow the upgrade guides here https://laravel.com/docs/5.2/upgrade
Start with 5.2 and work your way up to 5.6 or 5.7 that was released a few days ago.
I had to upgrade a 5.1 app before and I ended up just creating a new blank Laravel 5.5 project (latest at the time) and copying over everything from the old app starting with the route folder. Don't just copy them over, make sure you move each file individually to avoid breaking something. You should definitely be prepared to spend an hour or so on it.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
My next project will be a lightweight PHP alternative to Trac, since Trac is often confusing to install and is often a little too big or feature-rich for smaller project.
Features planned so far:
Wiki
Bug tracker
Forum(s)
Static pages (easily edited of course)
Markdown support
No code repo hosting (I consider this a feature since most people would prefer to use a 3rd party such as GitHub for the actual code hosting)
My question: if you were to use a self-hosted app for making a website about one of your open source projects, what would you want? Is there anything on that list that's missing? Would you absolutely require the ability to actually host the code repo on the site itself, or would you be ok hosting the code elsewhere (Google Code, GitHub, BitBucket), and using the site only to upload major versions?
Summary: if you were to use a self-hosted app to provide info and support for an open source project of yours, what would you want it to be like?
Redmine is my current favorite, I usually install it via BitNami