I created a custom repository per https://aspnetboilerplate.com/Pages/Documents/Articles/Using-Stored-Procedures,-User-Defined-Functions-and-Views/index.html for my asp.net zero project. Everything works great when I test with the Swagger API test application and from my angular client. I then tried to write automated tests for the API using asp.net zero testing framework I get
System.AggregateException : One or more errors occurred. (The CommandType 'StoredProcedure' is invalid.)
---- System.ArgumentException : The CommandType 'StoredProcedure' is invalid."
It seems like the testing framework is using SQLLite for the DB Context. I am not sure how to work around this.
TEST THAT IS FAILING
[Fact]
public void Should_Get_All_StaticItems()
{
LoginAsTenant("Default", "admin");
//Act
**var types = _ptStaticDataTypeAppService.Get(new PTGetPTStaticDataTypeInput());**
//Assert
types.Result.Count.ShouldBe(_totalItems);
}
APP SERVICE METHOD
[AbpAuthorize(AppPermissions.Pages_Administration_PT_StaticDataType)]
public class PTStaticDataTypeAppService : PieceTrackerAppServiceBase, IPTStaticDataTypeAppService
{
IPTStaticDataTypeRepository _ptStaticDataRepository;
public PTStaticDataTypeAppService(IPTStaticDataTypeRepository ptStaticDataTypeRepository)
{
_ptStaticDataRepository = ptStaticDataTypeRepository;
}
public async Task<List<PTGetPTStaticDataTypeForViewDto>> Get(PTGetPTStaticDataTypeInput input)
{
return await _ptStaticDataRepository.Get(input);
}
REPOSITORY
public class PTStaticDataTypeRepository : PieceTrackerRepositoryBase<PTStaticDataType, long>, IPTStaticDataTypeRepository
{
private readonly IActiveTransactionProvider _transactionProvider;
public PTStaticDataTypeRepository(IDbContextProvider<PieceTrackerDbContext> dbContextProvider, IActiveTransactionProvider transactionProvider)
: base(dbContextProvider)
{
_transactionProvider = transactionProvider;
}
public async Task<List<PTGetPTStaticDataTypeForViewDto>> Get(PTGetPTStaticDataTypeInput input)
{
var data = new List<PTGetPTStaticDataTypeForViewDto>();
var cn = Context.Database.GetDbConnection();
if (cn.State != ConnectionState.Open)
await cn.OpenAsync();
using (var cmd = cn.CreateCommand())
{
cmd.CommandText = "usp_GetPTStaticDataType";
**cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;**
The testing framework uses an in memory SQL Lite DB to pass thru the SQL commands. So I created a workaround in my custom repository.
private DbConnection GetSqlConnection()
{
const string TESTINGDB = "memory";
const string PTCONNSTRING = "Server=(local); Database=PieceTrackerDb; Trusted_Connection=True;";
var cn = Context.Database.GetDbConnection();
if (cn.ConnectionString.Contains(TESTINGDB))
{
cn = new SqlConnection(PTCONNSTRING);
}
var logMsg = "PTStaticDataTypeRepository.Get Connection String = " + cn.ConnectionString;
Console.WriteLine(logMsg);
return cn;
}
Related
I want to create and AMP version of my website in ASP.NET MVC using .NET Core 2.0. Previously I had done some work with DisplayModeProvider instances in tha past on .Net framework, but that does not seem to be an option in .NET Core.
What I want to be able to do is alter the view names to be index.amp.cshtml rather than index.cshtml when my URL starts iwth /amp. What's the best way to achieve this in .NET Core?
You can do something like this using IViewLocationExpander. As it happens, I was playing with this a few days ago so I have some code samples to hand. If you create something like this:
public class AmpViewLocationExpander : IViewLocationExpander
{
public void PopulateValues(ViewLocationExpanderContext context)
{
var contains = context.ActionContext.HttpContext.Request.Query.ContainsKey("amp");
context.Values.Add("AmpKey", contains.ToString());
var containsStem = context.ActionContext.HttpContext.Request.Path.StartsWithSegments("/amp");
context.Values.Add("AmpStem", containsStem.ToString());
}
public IEnumerable<string> ExpandViewLocations(ViewLocationExpanderContext context, IEnumerable<string> viewLocations)
{
if (!(context.ActionContext.ActionDescriptor is ControllerActionDescriptor descriptor)) { return viewLocations; }
if (context.ActionContext.HttpContext.Request.Query.ContainsKey("amp")
|| context.ActionContext.HttpContext.Request.Path.StartsWithSegments("/amp")
)
{
return viewLocations.Select(x => x.Replace("{0}", "{0}.amp"));
}
return viewLocations;
}
}
iViewLocationExpander can be found in Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Razor
Then in your Configure Services method in Startup.cs, add the following:
services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(options =>
{
options.ViewLocationExpanders.Add(new AmpViewLocationExtender());
});
What this will do is update the view locations per request to insert .amp before .cshtml any time the URL either starts with /amp or there is a query string key of amp. If your AMP views don't exist, it might blow-up a little, I've not fully tested it, but it should get you started.
You can define this Middleware :
public class AmpMiddleware
{
private RequestDelegate _next;
public AmpMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
{
_next = next;
}
public Task Invoke(HttpContext context)
{
const string ampTag = "/amp";
var path = context.Request.Path;
if (path.HasValue)
{
var ampPos = path.Value.IndexOf(ampTag);
if (ampPos >= 0)
{
context.Request.Path = new PathString(path.Value.Remove(ampPos, ampTag.Length));
context.Items.Add("amp", "true");
}
}
return _next(context);
}
}
public static class BuilderExtensions
{
public static IApplicationBuilder UseAmpMiddleware(this IApplicationBuilder app)
{
return app.UseMiddleware<AmpMiddleware>();
}
}
And call it in Startup:
app.UseAmpMiddleware();
Then can check in page and simple set another layout or limit some code, in his way no need to create separate page for amp version:
#if (HttpContext.Items.ContainsKey("amp"))
{
<b>Request AMP Version</b>
}
I have an ASP.NET MVC4 Web API project with an ApiController-inheriting controller that accepts an ODataQueryOptions parameter as one of its inputs.
I am using NUnit and Moq to test the project, which allow me to setup canned responses from the relevant repository methods used by the ApiController. This works, as in:
[TestFixture]
public class ProjectControllerTests
{
[Test]
public async Task GetById()
{
var repo = new Mock<IManagementQuery>();
repo.Setup(a => a.GetProjectById(2)).Returns(Task.FromResult<Project>(new Project()
{
ProjectID = 2, ProjectName = "Test project", ProjectClient = 3
}));
var controller = new ProjectController(repo.Object);
var response = await controller.Get(2);
Assert.AreEqual(response.id, 2);
Assert.AreEqual(response.name, "Test project");
Assert.AreEqual(response.clientId, 3);
}
}
The challenge I have is that, to use this pattern, I need to pass in the relevant querystring parameters to the controller as well as the repository (this was actually my intent). However, in the case of ODataQueryOptions-accepting ApiController methods, even in the cases where I would like to use just the default parameters for ODataQueryOptions, I need to know how to instantiate one. This gets tricky:
ODataQueryOptions does not implement an interface, so I can't mock it directly.
The constructor requires an implementation of System.Web.Http.OData.ODataQueryContext, which requires an implementation of something implementing Microsoft.Data.Edm.IEdmModel, for which the documentation is scarce and Visual Studio 2012 Find References and View Call Hierarchy do not provide insight (what implements that interface?).
What do I need to do/Is there a better way of doing this?
Thanks.
Looks like someone else already answered this in the comments here, but it's not a complete solution for my use-case (see comment below):
ODataModelBuilder modelBuilder = new ODataConventionModelBuilder();
modelBuilder.EntitySet<Customer>("Customers");
var opts = new ODataQueryOptions<Customer>(new ODataQueryContext(modelBuilder.GetEdmModel(),typeof(Customer)), request);
This is the solution I have been using in my NUnit tests to inject ODataQueryOptions
private static IEdmModel _model;
private static IEdmModel Model
{
get
{
if (_model == null)
{
var builder = new ODataConventionModelBuilder();
var baseType = typeof(MyDbContext);
var sets = baseType.GetProperties().Where(c => c.PropertyType.IsGenericType && c.PropertyType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(IDbSet<>));
var entitySetMethod = builder.GetType().GetMethod("EntitySet");
foreach (var set in sets)
{
var genericMethod = entitySetMethod.MakeGenericMethod(set.PropertyType.GetGenericArguments());
genericMethod.Invoke(builder, new object[] { set.Name });
}
_model = builder.GetEdmModel();
}
return _model;
}
}
public static ODataQueryOptions<T> QueryOptions<T>(string query = null)
{
query = query ?? "";
var url = "http://localhost/Test?" + query;
var request = new HttpRequestMessage(HttpMethod.Get, url);
return new ODataQueryOptions<T>(new ODataQueryContext(Model, typeof(T)), request);
}
When I tried to use the Selfhosted WebAPI in LINQPad, I just kept getting the same error that a controller for the class didn't exist.
Do I have to create separate assemblies for the WebAPI (Controllers/Classes) and then reference them in my query?
Here's the code I'm using
#region namespaces
using AttributeRouting;
using AttributeRouting.Web.Http;
using AttributeRouting.Web.Http.SelfHost;
using System.Web.Http.SelfHost;
using System.Web.Http.Routing;
using System.Web.Http;
#endregion
public void Main()
{
var config = new HttpSelfHostConfiguration("http://192.168.0.196:8181/");
config.Routes.MapHttpAttributeRoutes(cfg =>
{
cfg.AddRoutesFromAssembly(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly());
});
config.Routes.Cast<HttpRoute>().Dump();
AllObjects.Add(new UserQuery.PlayerObject { Type = 1, BaseAddress = "Hej" });
config.IncludeErrorDetailPolicy = IncludeErrorDetailPolicy.Always;
using(HttpSelfHostServer server = new HttpSelfHostServer(config))
{
server.OpenAsync().Wait();
Console.WriteLine("Server open, press enter to quit");
Console.ReadLine();
server.CloseAsync();
}
}
public static List<PlayerObject> AllObjects = new List<PlayerObject>();
public class PlayerObject
{
public uint Type { get; set; }
public string BaseAddress { get; set; }
}
[RoutePrefix("players")]
public class PlayerObjectController : System.Web.Http.ApiController
{
[GET("allPlayers")]
public IEnumerable<PlayerObject> GetAllPlayerObjects()
{
var players = (from p in AllObjects
where p.Type == 1
select p);
return players.ToList();
}
}
This code works fine when in a separate Console Project in VS2012.
I started using AttributeRouting via NuGET when I didn't get the "normal" WebAPI-routing to work.
The error I got in the browser was: No HTTP resource was found that matches the request URI 'http://192.168.0.196:8181/players/allPlayers'.
Additional error: No type was found that matches the controller named 'PlayerObject'
Web API by default will ignore controllers that are not public, and LinqPad classes are nested public, we had similar problem in scriptcs
You have to add a custom controller resolver, which will bypass that limitation, and allow you to discover controller types from the executing assembly manually.
This was actually fixed already (now Web API controllers only need to be Visible not public), but that happened in September and the latest stable version of self host is from August.
So, add this:
public class ControllerResolver: DefaultHttpControllerTypeResolver {
public override ICollection<Type> GetControllerTypes(IAssembliesResolver assembliesResolver) {
var types = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetExportedTypes();
return types.Where(x => typeof(System.Web.Http.Controllers.IHttpController).IsAssignableFrom(x)).ToList();
}
}
And then register against your configuration, and you're done:
var conf = new HttpSelfHostConfiguration(new Uri(address));
conf.Services.Replace(typeof(IHttpControllerTypeResolver), new ControllerResolver());
Here is a full working example, I just tested against LinqPad. Note that you have to be running LinqPad as admin, otherwise you won't be able to listen at a port.
public class TestController: System.Web.Http.ApiController {
public string Get() {
return "Hello world!";
}
}
public class ControllerResolver: DefaultHttpControllerTypeResolver {
public override ICollection<Type> GetControllerTypes(IAssembliesResolver assembliesResolver) {
var types = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetExportedTypes();
return types.Where(x => typeof(System.Web.Http.Controllers.IHttpController).IsAssignableFrom(x)).ToList();
}
}
async Task Main() {
var address = "http://localhost:8080";
var conf = new HttpSelfHostConfiguration(new Uri(address));
conf.Services.Replace(typeof(IHttpControllerTypeResolver), new ControllerResolver());
conf.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional }
);
var server = new HttpSelfHostServer(conf);
await server.OpenAsync();
// keep the query in the 'Running' state
Util.KeepRunning();
Util.Cleanup += async delegate {
// shut down the server when the query's execution is canceled
// (for example, the Cancel button is clicked)
await server.CloseAsync();
};
}
here's my controller
[POST("signup")]
public virtual ActionResult Signup(UserRegisterViewModel user)
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{
var newUser = Mapper.Map<UserRegisterViewModel, User>(user);
var confirmation = _userService.AddUser(newUser);
if (confirmation.WasSuccessful)
return RedirectToAction(MVC.Home.Index());
else
ModelState.AddModelError("Email", confirmation.Message);
}
return View(user);
}
here's my unit test:
[Test]
public void Signup_Action_When_The_User_Model_Is_Valid_Returns_RedirectToRouteResult()
{
// Arrange
const string expectedRouteName = "~/Views/Home/Index.cshtml";
var registeredUser = new UserRegisterViewModel { Email = "newuser#test.com", Password = "123456789".Hash()};
var confirmation = new ActionConfirmation<User>
{
WasSuccessful = true,
Message = "",
Value = new User()
};
_userService.Setup(r => r.AddUser(new User())).Returns(confirmation);
_accountController = new AccountController(_userService.Object);
// Act
var result = _accountController.Signup(registeredUser) as RedirectToRouteResult;
// Assert
Assert.IsNotNull(result, "Should have returned a RedirectToRouteResult");
Assert.AreEqual(expectedRouteName, result.RouteName, "Route name should be {0}", expectedRouteName);
}
Unit test failed right here.
var result = _accountController.Signup(registeredUser) as RedirectToRouteResult;
when I debug my unit test, I got following error message: "Missing type map configuration or unsupported mapping."
I think its because configuration is in web project, not the unit test project. what should I do to fix it?
You need to have the mapper configured, so in your test class set up, not the per-test setup, call the code to set up the mappings. Note, you'll also probably need to modify your expectation for the user service call as the arguments won't match, i.e, they are different objects. Probably you want a test that checks if the properties of the object match those of the model being passed to the method.
You should really use an interface for the mapping engine so that you can mock it rather than using AutoMapper otherwise it is an integration test not a unit test.
AutoMapper has an interface called IMappingEngine that you can inject into your controller using your IoC container like below (this example is using StructureMap).
class MyRegistry : Registry
{
public MyRegistry()
{
For<IMyRepository>().Use<MyRepository>();
For<ILogger>().Use<Logger>();
Mapper.AddProfile(new AutoMapperProfile());
For<IMappingEngine>().Use(() => Mapper.Engine);
}
}
You will then be able to use dependency injection to inject AutoMapper's mapping engine into your controller, allowing you to reference your mappings like below:
[POST("signup")]
public virtual ActionResult Signup(UserRegisterViewModel user)
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{
var newUser = this.mappingEngine.Map<UserRegisterViewModel, User>(user);
var confirmation = _userService.AddUser(newUser);
if (confirmation.WasSuccessful)
return RedirectToAction(MVC.Home.Index());
else
ModelState.AddModelError("Email", confirmation.Message);
}
return View(user);
}
You can read more about this here: How to inject AutoMapper IMappingEngine with StructureMap
Probably it is cool to abstract mapping into MappingEngine.
Sometimes I use following approach to IOC Automapper
In IOC builder:
builder.RegisterInstance(AutoMapperConfiguration.GetAutoMapper()).As<IMapper>();
where GetAutoMapper is:
public class AutoMapperConfiguration
{
public static IMapper GetAutoMapper()
{
var config = new MapperConfiguration(cfg =>
{
cfg.AddProfile<OrderModelMapperProfile>();
cfg.AddProfile<OtherModelMapperProfile>();
//etc;
});
var mapper = config.CreateMapper();
return mapper;
}
}
And finally in Controller ctor
public MyController(IMapper mapper)
{
_mapper = mapper;
}
I have a manually invoked process which is tied to the account entity. This process has a number of steps. One of the first steps is to create a task and assign it to someone. It's expected that this person will add some notes and complete the task.
Further down the process, I have a step to create a service case. After this is created, I want to copy the note(s) from the task above to the newly created service case.
I have created a custom workflow activity to try and accomplish this. I have gotten as far as deploying it and using it within my process without any errors and it does copy content into the notes field of the service case, however it copies the title of the task, not the note content and I can't quite fathom out why.
public class CopyNotes : CodeActivity
{
protected override void Execute(CodeActivityContext executionContext)
{
//Create the context
IWorkflowContext context = executionContext.GetExtension<IWorkflowContext>();
IOrganizationServiceFactory serviceFactory = executionContext.GetExtension<IOrganizationServiceFactory>();
IOrganizationService service = serviceFactory.CreateOrganizationService(context.UserId);
//get the notes associated with the source entity
Guid copyFromId = CopyFrom.Get(executionContext).Id;
Guid copyToId = CopyTo.Get(executionContext).Id;
EntityCollection copyFromNotes = RetrieveNotes(service, copyFromId);
if (copyFromNotes.Entities.Any())
{
foreach (Entity e in copyFromNotes.Entities)
{
Entity newNote = new Entity("annotation");
newNote.Attributes["subject"] = e.Attributes["subject"];
newNote.Attributes["notetext"] = e.Attributes["notetext"];
newNote.Attributes["objectid"] = new EntityReference() { Id = copyToId, LogicalName = CopyTo.Get(executionContext).LogicalName };
}
}
}
private EntityCollection RetrieveNotes(IOrganizationService service, Guid relatedObject)
{
ConditionExpression condition = new ConditionExpression();
condition.AttributeName = "objectid";
condition.Operator = ConditionOperator.Equal;
condition.Values.Add(relatedObject.ToString());
ColumnSet columns = new ColumnSet("subject", "notetext");
QueryExpression query = new QueryExpression();
query.ColumnSet = columns;
query.EntityName = "annotation";
query.Criteria.AddCondition(condition);
EntityCollection results = service.RetrieveMultiple(query);
return results;
}
[RequiredArgument]
[ReferenceTarget("task")]
[Input("Copy notes from item")]
public InArgument<EntityReference> CopyFrom { get; set; }
[RequiredArgument]
[ReferenceTarget("incident")]
[Input("Copy notes to item")]
public InArgument<EntityReference> CopyTo { get; set; }
}
I think you need to actually create the newNote after defining it.
foreach (Entity e in copyFromNotes.Entities)
{
Entity newNote = new Entity("annotation");
newNote.Attributes["subject"] = e.Attributes["subject"];
newNote.Attributes["notetext"] = e.Attributes["notetext"];
newNote.Attributes["objectid"] = new EntityReference() { Id = copyToId, LogicalName = CopyTo.Get(executionContext).LogicalName };
service.Create(newNote);
}
Once I did that your code worked just fine creating a new note with both the title and note text.
You could do this with a standard workflow, if Async creation is fast enough.
Andreas