I frequently use the VAR = sh(returnStdout: true, script './script.sh').trim() syntax in a declarative Jenkinsfile to set a variable in which I will refer to later in the pipeline. One thing I have not been able to figure out, is how can I get this to convert to an integer if I want to write a greater than/less than conditional?
I've tried
VAR = sh(returnStdout: true, script './script.sh').trim().toInteger()
if (VAR > 1) {
// do something
}
And this does not work. How come? What is the correct way to do this? I've also tried by separating them and not pipeing it right after the .trim()
VAR = sh(returnStdout: true, script './script.sh').trim()
VAR.toInteger()
if (VAR > 1) {
// do something
}
And this doesn't work either. How can I achieve making the sh output an integer that can be used in a greater than conditional statement?
Related
I am trying to pass to 3 AWS launch template userdata a bash script. This script calls other scripts from Github depending on a specific variable. Since each launch template must call different scripts what is the best way to accomplish it. I am currently trying to configure a data source template_file but I canĀ“t find a way to do what I need.
This is a piece of the bash script where I put a variable that need to change its value depending on which launch template is being built every time:
#------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Define here scripts (separated with 1 space) that will be executed on first run:
AMI_SCRIPTS="ami_base_lynis.sh ${ami_script}"
#------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
download_and_run_scripts
This is the template file data source:
data "template_file" "AMIs"{
template = "${file("../AMIs/s1_aws_userdata.sh")}"
vars = {
ami = var.dci_appserver_ami
}
}
And this is the user data attribute:
user_data_base64 = base64encode(data.template_file.AMIs.rendered)
This is not working for me as it will replace the variable has the same value for all 3 launch templates. How can I assign each time a different value?
The syntax you used for user_data_base64 tells me that you're using Terraform v0.12 or later, so you should no longer use template_file as shown in the template_file documentation:
In Terraform 0.12 and later, the templatefile function offers a built-in mechanism for rendering a template from a file. Use that function instead, unless you are using Terraform 0.11 or earlier.
Because of that, I'm going to answer using the templatefile function instead.
Inside each of your launch template resource blocks, you can call templatefile with different values for the template variables in order to get a different result each time:
resource "aws_launch_template" "example1" {
# ...
user_data = base64encode(templatefile("${path.module}/../AMIs/s1_aws_userdata.sh", {
ami = var.dci_appserver_ami
ami_script = "script1.sh"
}))
}
resource "aws_launch_template" "example2" {
# ...
user_data = base64encode(templatefile("${path.module}/../AMIs/s1_aws_userdata.sh", {
ami = var.dci_appserver_ami
ami_script = "script2.sh"
}))
}
resource "aws_launch_template" "example3" {
# ...
user_data = base64encode(templatefile("${path.module}/../AMIs/s1_aws_userdata.sh", {
ami = var.dci_appserver_ami
ami_script = "script3.sh"
}))
}
You could in principle factor out constructing the templates into a local value if you want to do it more systematically, but since your question didn't include any indication that you are doing anything special with the launch templates here I've just written the simplest possible approach, where each launch template has its own template-rendering expression.
I have a .env file that contains the following data
API_URL=${API_URL}
API_KEY=${API_KEY}
API_SECRET=${API_SECRET}
Setting environment variables in Jenkins and passing them to the pipeline is clear. But it is not clear how do I replace ${API_URL}, ${API_KEY} & ${API_SECRET} in the .env file with their values in the Jenkins environment variable? Plus, how do I loop through all the Jenkins variables?
This basically requires two steps:
Get all environment variables
Replace values of environment variables in the template (.env) file
Let's start with #2, because it dictates which kind of data #1 must produce.
2. Replace variables in a template
We can use Groovy's SimpleTemplateEngine for this task.
def result = new SimpleTemplateEngine().createTemplate( templateStr ).make( dataMap )
Here templateStr is the template string (content of your .env file) and dataMap must be a Map consisting of string keys and values (the actual values of the environment variables). Getting the template string is trivial (use Jenkins readFile step), reading the environment variables into a Map is slightly more involved.
1. Read environment variables into a Map
I wrote "slightly more involved" because Groovy goodness makes this task quite easy aswell.
#Chris has already shown how to read environment variables into a string. What we need to do is split this string, first into separate lines and then each line into key and value. Fortunately, Groovy provides the member function splitEachLine of the String class, which can do both steps with a single call!
There is a little caveat, because splitEachLine is one of the functions that doesn't behave well in Jenkins pipeline context - it would only return the first line. Moving the critical code into a separate function, annotated with #NonCPS works around this problem.
#NonCPS
Map<String,String> envStrToMap( String envStr ) {
def envMap = [:]
envStr.splitEachLine('=') {
envMap[it[0]] = it[1]
}
return envMap
}
Finally
Now we have all ingredients for letting Jenkins cook us a tasty template soup!
Here is a complete pipeline demo. It uses scripted style, but it should be easy to use in declarative style as well. Just replace node with a script block.
import groovy.text.SimpleTemplateEngine
node {
// TODO: Replace the hardcoded string with:
// def tmp = readFile file: 'yourfile.env'
def tmp = '''\
API_URL=${API_URL}
API_KEY=${API_KEY}
API_SECRET=${API_SECRET}'''
withEnv(['API_URL=http://someurl', 'API_KEY=123', 'API_SECRET=456']) {
def envMap = getEnvMap()
echo "envMap:\n$envMap"
def tmpResolved = new SimpleTemplateEngine().createTemplate( tmp ).make( envMap )
writeFile file: 'test.env', text: tmpResolved.toString()
// Just for demo, to let me see the result
archiveArtifacts artifacts: 'test.env'
}
}
// Read all environment variables into a map.
// Here, #NonCPS must NOT be used, because we are calling a Jenkins step.
Map<String,String> getEnvMap() {
def envStr = sh(script: 'env', returnStdout: true)
return envStrToMap( envStr )
}
// Split a multiline string, where each line consists of key and value separated by '='.
// It is critical to use #NonCPS to make splitEachLine() work!
#NonCPS
Map<String,String> envStrToMap( String envStr ) {
def envMap = [:]
envStr.splitEachLine('=') {
envMap[it[0]] = it[1]
}
return envMap
}
The pipeline creates an artifact "test.env" with this content:
API_URL=http://someurl
API_KEY=123
API_SECRET=456
You can access variables by executing simple shell in scripted pipeline:
def variables = sh(script: 'env|sort', returnStdout: true)
Then programatically in Groovy convert it to list and iterate using each loop.
According to replacing variables, if you're not using any solution which can access env variables then you can use simple text operations like executing sed on that file.
Is it possible to set one or more freemarker variable in a case like:
<#assign test=pp.loadData('eval', '
a="test1";
b="test2";
return "test";')>
and having access to a and b in the freemarker script ?
I guess it can't be done without writing a custom DataLoader. I'm saying "guess" because maybe I don't know about a BeanShell trick. The closest I could get is using return this.namespace; and then ${test.getVariable('a')}. This is too verbose of course.
Update:
Actually, the following horror is even closer:
<#assign test=pp.loadData('eval', '
a="test1";
b="test2";
// This should be factored out into a common function somehow
ns = this.namespace;
vars = new HashMap();
for (name : ns.getVariableNames()) {
vars.put(name, ns.getVariable(name));
}
return vars;
')>
${test.a}
I'd like to use CasperJS to evaluate a variable equals a certain value.
I simplified my exemple as much as I could that way:
var testDate = "24/03/14";
casper.test.begin('TEST', 1, function suite(test) {
casper.start('http://www.google.com/', function() {
this.test.assertEval(function() {
return testDate == "24/03/14";
}, "testDate is 24/03/14" );
});
casper.run(function() {
this.test.done();
});
});
I don't know why it fails, here is what I get in my console:
Test file: tests.js
#TEST
FAIL testDate is 24/03/14
# type: assertEval
# file: tests.js:7
# code: }, "testDate is 24/03/14" );
# subject: null
# fn: undefined
# params: undefined
FAIL 1 test executed in 2.896s, 0 passed, 1 failed, 0 dubious, 0 skipped.
Details for the 1 failed test:
In tests.js:7
TEST
assertEval: testDate is 24/03/14
Any idea ?
UPDATE
I realised my simplified example was faulty, it didn't represent what I really needed.
Actually, what I want to achieve is to test if a variable from the current page DOM context equals a local variable.
As per manual Asserteval:
Asserts that a code evaluation in remote DOM strictly resolves to a boolean true:
your testdate variable is local to the casperjs script and is not accessible in the remote dom. You would have to inject it to the window like described here.
Ok found the answer myself.
To test if a variable from the current page DOM context equals a local variable, I realised I could use a simple assertEvalEquals():
test.assertEvalEquals(function() {
return variableFromPageDomContext;
}, localVariable);
Likewise, when testing if a variable from the current page DOM context matches a RegExp pattern, we have to use evaluate() to get the variable from the DOM as the first parameter of an assertMatch():
test.assertMatch(this.evaluate(function() {
return variableFromPageDomContext;
}), RegExpPattern);
Hope that can help.
As #Surreal answers its possible to use the assertEvalEquals() passing the function and the expected value.
However the original question wants to pass a variable from casperjs context to assertEval() function, you can simply do it as follows, passing to assertEval() three arguments: the function which receive the value, a message for the assert and the value:
var varPassToEval = 'someValue';
test.assertEval(
function(varFromCasperContext){
return varFromPageDomContext === varFromCasperContext;
},
'Assert Eval to test',
varPassToEval
);
With the above example probably is clear to use assertEvalEquals() however could be useful for more complex cases, for example imagine that you want to check if a text appears in a some <li> inside <ul> in DOM which it's dynamic and can change but you don't know at first where your text is... for this case you can use:
var somePartOfText = 'blue';
test.assertEval(
function(varFromCasperContext){
return document.getElementsByTagName("ul")[0].textContent.indexOf(varFromCasperContext) != -1;
},
'Assert Eval to test',
somePartOfText
);
Hope it helps,
I'm attempting to write some Dashcode to but can't seem to get the environment variables when I run the /env command. The environment doesn't appear to be sourced because it always returns "Undefined". Below is my code and I'm open for any suggestions (I need more than just LANG, LANG is just the example).
var textFieldToChange = document.getElementById("LangField");
var newFieldText = widget.system("/usr/bin/env | grep LANG").outputString;
textFieldToChange.value = newFieldText;
Is there an easy way to source my environment and cache it in Dashcode or do I need to attempt to write something that will cache the entire environment somehow?
Thanks for any ideas!
Have you allowed Command Line Access? Go to Widget Attributes (in the left hand menu) , then extensions and check Allow Command Line Access else the widget is prevented from talking to the system. Not sure if this is what is causing the problem though.
I know this thread is quite aged, but anyway, the question is still up to date :-)
Just having started with Dashcode and widgets myself, I did a quick hack on this:
function doGetEnv(event)
{
if (window.widget)
{
var out = widget.system("/bin/bash -c set", null).outputString;
document.getElementById("content").innerText = out;
}
}
For my experimental widget, I did use a scroll area and a button. The doGetEnv(event) is fired upon onclick, set via inspector. The Id "content" is the standard naming of the content within the scroll area.
The out var containes a string with '\n' charaters, to transform it into an array use split().
function doGetEnv(event)
{
if (window.widget)
{
var out = widget.system("/bin/bash -c set", null).outputString;
out = out.split("\n");
document.getElementById("content").innerText = out[0];
}
}
The first entry is "BASH..." in my case.
If you search for a particular item, use STRING's match method (see also http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/jsref_match.asp) along with the following pages on regular expressions:
http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/jsref_obj_regexp.asp
http://www.w3schools.com/js/js_obj_regexp.asp
To cache the environment, you can use:
var envCache = "";
function cacheENV()
{
envCache = widget.system("/bin/bash -c set", null).outputString;
envCache = envCache.split("\n");
}
This will leave an array in envCache. Alternative:
function cacheENV()
{
var envCache = widget.system("/bin/bash -c set", null).outputString;
envCache = envCache.split("\n");
return envCache;
}