Define publish folder per project when publishing whole solution with dotnet publish - visual-studio

I have a C# dotnet core solution and it contains many projects. Then I want to publish my solution to distribute my build application.
When I run dotnet publish -o publish/win1064 -r win10-x64 in a folder with the sln file (I'm using dotnet core sdk 3.1), all build artifacts (dlls) are stored in the publish/win1064 folder. I want to have some projects to be published in a subfolders, like publish/win1064/plugins/pluginA for a project "pluginA" for example.
I can do it by running the dotnet publish for every project and set the output folder accordingly, but is there any way to do it with a one command?

I'm not aware of a safe way of invoking dotnet publish at solution level, I would strongly advise you not to do it. You can find other answers stating the same out there.
That's why most CI tools allow you to use some kind of wildcards (i.e., **/*.csproj) to run dotnet commands over multiple projects, but not at solution level.
You'd face similar issues if you try to run tests at solution level and collect coverage/test results from that. (i.e. dotnet test /p:CollectCoverage=true /p:CoverletOutput=./CoverageResults).

Related

How to automate publishing .NET web applications

There is a Visual Studio solution that has multiple web application projects. All of them are to be published to a common folder - D:\inetpub\wwwroot\FirstSite.
Each project has a publish profile Local.pubxml which imports settings from a global publishsettings.xml, and I use the One-Click Publish feature to publish each project.
Now, I would like to automate this process, which will Rebuild the solution and on success, publish all the projects to the target folder.
I have managed to create a Console application using C#, which can build all the projects in a solution. But, unfortunately could only go that far, as I'm unable to figure out how to get started about the publishing.
I'm not looking for setting up a build server. Just want to save time publishing projects to local folders.
Can we achieve this in a console application, by passing parameters like 'solution path' & 'target folder path', so that it can work for any such solution with multiple projects.
If not, are there any simple tools for this.
When you invoke msbuild for the solution build, you can pass
/p:DeployOnBuild=true /p:PublishProfile=Local /p:SkipInvalidConfigurations=true
which will publish each project with the Local profile for you

WebDeployment is not

I am trying to deploy an web application that was created on VB with the .NET Framework 2.0 using the TFS 2017 continuous deploy. It doesn’t have a solution file inside like vbproj or csproj, so I needed to avoid all the suggestions to include extra information on the vbproj.In order to run the MSBuild even locally I need to change in my .sln this tag, so all my compiled code is also there
Debug.AspNetCompiler.TargetPath = "....\PrecompiledWeb\ARB\Debug\"
Unfortunately, I can’t deploy the application using the TFS. So far I tried to deploy it through my Visual Studio project, and is working fine with every option: I tried MSDeploy, Web Deploy Package, and FileSystem, and is working fine from the Visual Studio Publish Option
With that, even my transformation take place.
Now lets say I go to my TFS and I put this parameters on the MSBuild
/p:DeployOnBuild=true /p:WebPublishMethod=Package /p:PackageAsASingleFile=true /p:SkipInvalidConfigurations=true /p:PackageLocation="\\MyServer\Content"
My files are compiled but never stored in my Content folder. No one of them!!! I can’t figure out what is going on here.
From your screenshot, you are using a Web Site project, not a Web Application project. The output structure of a Web Site project in TFS is different from build in VS (you can see a PrecompiledWeb folder in your build source directory on build agent server). Instead of using MSBuild argument, you can consider add tasks below to copy the files you want to publish:
We strongly suggest you switch from Web Site projects to Web Application projects to avoid these issues.

Publishing NuGet Packages - TeamCity

I have just setup TeamCity to automate our builds, our current solution has both a dev and main branch. What I am trying to achieve is to have the development branch build and publish to a development NuGet feed on our ProGet installation, and then have the main branch publish to our Main NuGet feed on ProGet server.
We are using octopus deploy to deploy the packages, within TeamCity we have the octopus deploy plugin installed and if I tick the box to run OctoPack it builds the packages and they appear as artifacts when the build completes. If I try to use the NuGet Pack build step in TeamCity I get the following error for one of our projects:
[08:33:49] : [pack] Attempting to build package from 'xxx.csproj'.
[08:33:50]W: [pack] Unable to find 'xxx.exe'. Make sure the project has been built.
The project has been built and it works with OctoPack so why isn't it working with the NuGet Pack? Wwe have five projects being built and the first four run fine, one is a console app, one is an mvc website, and two are class libraries. The one that doesn't work is a windows service.
The end goal here is to publish these packages to a private feed on ProGet. I don't mind using OctoPack but in my head wanted to remove that dependency from TeamCity but I can live with it. However when I try to use the NuGet Publish runner type how do I select to publish any NuGet artifacts that have been created?
I have been googling like mad and I cannot find any helpful links that describe what you are supposed to enter, I would really appreciate any helpful comments/answers.
We are using version 8.15 of TeamCity.
Hopefully the following will help with at least part of your question; mainly the bit relating to how to publish packaged artifacts.
NuSpec Approach
When using the NuGet Pack build step, you can specify the Output Directory, which will determine the output location of the packages. You can specify this as a relative path to the checkout directory, probably best to define it as a build parameter, such as %system.PackageDeployOutput% as you'll be using it in the next step...:
Next, specify a NuGet Publish build step, fill in the Package Source / API key etc, and specify the Packages to upload as
%system.PackageDeployOutput%\*.nupkg
This will pick up the packages output in the previous step. I've used this quite effectively, and the parameterisation approach encourages conventions across all your builds.
OctoPack Support
If you're using the MsBuild build step with OctoPack, you can use a similar approach by declaring a system parameter called
system.OctoPackPublishPackageToFileShare = %teamcity.build.checkoutDir%\%system.PackageDeployOutput% (note the same parameter as above)
You can declare these as root project parameters, so you get the best of both worlds. My preferred approach to packaging is currently to use nuspec files for deployable endpoints. I've found OctoPack to be a bit of an overhead when it comes to more complex deployments (it's fine for basic MsBuild projects).

Deploying umbraco with TeamCity

First post on Stack, so please be gentle!
We are just getting into Continuous Integration with TeamCity. We have setup a TeamCity project(s) that looks like so:
Solution Build (builds entire solution) - .Sln file
Debug to Dev Server (builds .csproj in Debug configuration and Deploys to test server using MSDeploy)
Release to Production (builds .csproj in Release configuration and Deploys to production server using MSDeploy)
Within our Umbraco Visual Studio project (which is a Web Application not the standard Website project type) we have the umbraco_client and umbraco folders excluded from the Project, primarily because they are already compiled and don't need to be re-compiled by our process. Both folders are however included in the SVN repo.
The problem we are experiencing is that because these two folders are excluded from the Visual Studio project, TeamCity does not deploy them.
So my question boils down to "how do you include folders in the TeamCity build package where the folders are in the SVN but excluded from the Visual Studio project?".
Any pointers would be really appreciated.
Thanks
dotdev
We've been using TeamCity for umbraco. This is what we've been doing recently on our internal dev servers:
/p:Configuration=Debug
/p:DeployOnBuild=True
/p:DeployTarget=MSDeployPublish
/p:MsDeployServiceUrl=OurDevServer/msdeployagentservice
/p:AllowUntrustedCertificate=True
/p:MSDeployPublishMethod=RemoteAgent
/p:CreatePackageOnPublish=True
/p:DeployIisAppPath=umbraco_site
/p:IgnoreDeployManagedRuntimeVersion=True
/p:FilesToIncludeForPublish=AllFilesInProjectFolder
/p:SkipExtraFilesOnServer=True
/p:ExcludeFoldersFromDeployment="media;App_Data\Logs;App_Data\preview"
/p:IncludeSetAclProviderOnDestination=False
/p:AuthType=NTML /p:UserName=
They key to solving the problem you are having is
/p:FilesToIncludeForPublish=AllFilesInProjectFolder
By default, it is set to something like "AllFilesInProject". Combining FilesToIncludeForPublish with the ExcludeFoldersFromDeployment can give you some control over exactly what TeamCity attempts to deploy
I would suggest using an approach similar to the one described in this blog post: http://blog.iqit.dk/2013/11/using-package-restore-in-umbraco-projects
You don't mention nuget, so assuming you use a zip or web pi to setup Umbraco in your solution, but you should still be able to use the targets listed in msbuild or add to your web applications .csproj when building your solution. It would require that you have the Umbraco and Umbraco_client folders somewhere in Svn repo or on your build server in order to copy it in.
As an alternative I can also recommend that you download the UmbracoCms nuget as that contains an extension to the msdeploy pipeline that includes the two mentioned folders in an msdeploy zip package. But again also based on the nuget install and thus a standard location for the Umbraco folders.
Hope this helps.
I've based my TeamCity builds on Troy Hunt's excellent "You're Deploying it Wrong" series - which is an excellent step by step guide to integrating Visual Studio based projects and TeamCity. http://www.troyhunt.com/2010/11/you-deploying-it-wrong-teamcity.html
As to excluding the umbraco and umbraco_client folders from SVN; a complex Umbraco build will probably have changes in the Umbraco folder to the default build eg adding Umbraco Event Handlers, adding new Umbraco Sections, changes to back-office tabs. I don't think umbraco_client will change unless you get into changing rich text editors and so on - but it is possible. So I'm not sure that excluding those particular folders is correct. Excluding the media folder is often discussed as well - but it does make TeamCity config simpler if everything is there.
But to answer your question you could exclude them from the build and copy them onto your build server; then add a 'Command Line' runner build step that simply copies them back into place before the build step starts.
I usually add a source control change step that fires a rebuild and have two build steps in TeamCity for an Umbraco project. One is a 'Visual Studio (sln)' runner to check that the sln file has every reference and third party product set up correctly (this should eliminate the 'it works on my machine' issues); and the second is a 'MSBuild' runner that replicates the csproj build process. With the second build step with the right permissions (if your ports are open on the machine you're deploying to, or you're deploying to the same machine as you are on) you could test this in Visual Studio or DOS.
These two build steps should be able to deploy to the IIS website on a staging server; and if the right ports are open on your live or UAT server you could then add a third build step and deploy it onwards (if the first two build steps run properly).

Use Visual Studio solution in ci server or maintain a separate build file

What is common way of doing this?
Maintaining a separate build file (nant by example) costs time but Will not lock you in to Visual studio.
Do most developers build with the Visual studio solution or do they have to use the nant build file.
What are the best practices?
What I do is use the proj files rather than sln files. MSbuild processes them just fine.
This way you have the best of both worlds. You are not locked into VS, but you do not have to maintain 2 copies of your build files either
It depends on your project...
I have multiple solutions that i want to build as one product, so i use msbuild / nant to include them all.
Another reason to use a build file is when you have more actions you want to execute when the CI server builds the project and you don't want those actions to be executed when the developers build the solution (Copying files for deployment or setting assembly version for example)
In general, i think that unless you have a reason to use a build file, you can just use the sln file

Resources