I've been pulling my hair for hours now trying to find the problem with this lines of code:
ContentSetting::updateOrCreate(
['content_id' => $this->id, 'key' => 'max_width'],
['value' => $value]
);
It is supposed to check if there is a row in my content_settings table with a certain content id and the key "max_width" and if so update it and if not create it. It's used in a model mutator, hence the $this.
Anyway, no matter what values I try to put in, this ALWAYS results in this mysql query being executed (only with different time stamps):
insert into `content_settings` (`content_id`, `updated_at`, `created_at`) values (2, '2020-10-15 14:07:00', '2020-10-15 14:07:00')
...simply making new rows with empty key and value. Can anyone please spot the error? Or is this a bug somewhere? Something with "key" being a reserved word?
you should set the fields you want to use in mass assignment in the $fillable array in your model:
class ContentSetting extends Model
{
protected $fillable = ['content_id','key','value'];
}
Related
I want to extract the values from array in a column from database. For example, my value in my permission column is ["Create","Edit","Delete]. So when I dd($user->permission) it would return like that. How can I get the value from it so that I can return the result in a list. I have really no idea for now and what I cannot find similar question to mine.
This is a task for mutators. Simply add to your model:
protected $casts = [
'permission' => 'array',
];
I add test records to the database using seeds
public function run()
{
DB::table('categories')->insert([
['id' => 1,'name' => 'Select a category', 'slug' => null],
['id' => 2,'name' => 'Computers', 'slug' => 'computer-&-office'],
]);
}
But then, if I want to add a new record to the database, already through the form, I get the error
SQLSTATE[23505]: Unique violation: 7 ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "categories_pkey"
I understand that when I add a new record through the form, it is created with id = 1, and I already have this id in the database. How can I avoid this error?
You should remove id from insert() and make it auto increment in mysql,
It complains about a unique constraint, meaning your primary key is indexed as "categories_pkey" or you have another field that is unique.
This happens because you are inserting a record and a record already exists where that column must be unique.
In general production workflow, when you add a record you never specify an ID. Most cases (there are exceptions) ID is an autoincrement integer, meaning it adds up automatically. On the first insert the database set its ID to 1, the second to 2 and so on.
As a seeder, its generally a good idea to set up the ID so you know that a certain ID matches a certain item (as a base content of a project like user states or roles).
As a regular workflow (from a form submission), you can have something like this
DB::table('categories')->insert([
['name' => 'some value', 'slug' => 'some slug']
]);
However, I don't advise to use DB::table when Laravel provides ActiveRecords pattern (ORM, called Eloquent) which you should take a look here.
https://laravel.com/docs/8.x/eloquent#introduction
Besides the benefits of layer abstraction and working with activerecords, It produces a much cleaner code like
$data = ['slug' => 'some slug', 'name' => 'some name'];
Category::create($data);
So I'm trying to attach id's with some meta data to a pivot table in Laravel 5.
For some reason, I get the two inserts where there should be one, and the wrong ID's being inserted the second time round.
I'm not sure if there is something I might be missing here.
This is the code:
$match_values = array(
'dataId' => $result->id,
'dataMetaId' => $the_meta->id
);
$result->campaignDataMeta()->attach($match_values, [
'meta_value' => $value
]);
The database structure consists of a main campaignData table for email campaigns, a campaignDataMeta table (id, timestamps, name) for email meta data names, and a lookup table campaignDataMatches (id, campaignDataId, campaignDataMetaId, meta_value).
In campaignDataMatches I get the campaignDataId value sometimes being inserted into the campaignDataMeta column.
I've solved the problem.
Apparently had to add the relevant ID (in this case the dataMetaId) within the attach parameter.
Like this:
$result->dataMeta()->attach([$data_meta_id => [
'meta_value' => $value
]]);
Check the database columns primary maybe the dataId and metaId are both primary.
Please could anyone explain to me a difference between [attributes:protected] array and [original:protected] array in laravel when using print_r to an array?
When Model reads data from table, arrays 'original' and 'attribute' contains same data. When you change the attribute value (ex $user->name='John'), the change is reflected only on the 'attributes' array but 'original' remains same. (hence the name).
When update() on a model is called, method checks what has changed comparing two arrays and construct query only for changed fields. Thus, in the case of $users->name change Laravel will not create this code:
UPDATE users set name = 'John', password = 'pass', email = 'email' where id = 1
but this:
UPDATE users set name = 'John' where id = 1
This may not be the only way Eloquent uses 'original' array. I found clockwork helpful when you need to see what's going on under the hood of Eloquent.
I am trying to do a Laravel validation rules as follow:
"permalink" => "required|unique:posts,permalink,hotel_id,deleted_at,NULL|alpha_dash|max:255",
The explanation to the rules is:
I have a table "Posts" in my system with the following fields (among others): hotel_id, permalink, deleted_at. If MySQL would allow make an unique index with null values, the sql would be:
ALTER TABLE `posts`
ADD UNIQUE `unique_index`(`hotel_id`, `permalink`, `deleted_at`);
So: I just add a new row IF: the combination of hotel_id, permalink and deleted_atfield (witch must be NULL) are unique.
If there is already a row where the permalink and hotel_id field are the same and 'deleted_at' field is NULL, the validation would return FALSE and the row wouldnt be inserted in the database.
Well. I don't know why, but the query Laravel is building looks like:
SELECT count(*) AS AGGREGATE FROM `posts`
WHERE `hotel_id` = the-permalink-value AND `NULL` <> deleted_at)
What the heck...
The query I was hoping Laravel build to validation is:
SELECT count(*) AS AGGREGATE FROM `posts`
WHERE `permalink` = 'the-permalink-value' AND `hotel_id` = ? AND `deleted_at` IS NULL
Could someone explain me how this effectively works? Because everywhere I look it looks like this:
$rules = array(
'field_to_validate' =>
'unique:table_name,field,anotherField,aFieldDifferentThanNull,NULL',
);
Does anyone could help me?
Thank you
all.
Finally, I got a proper understanding of the validation (at least, I think so), and I have a solution that, if it is not beautiful, it can helps someone.
My problem, as I said before, was validate if a certain column (permalink) is unique ONLY IF other columns values had some specific values. The problem is the way Laravel validation string rules works. Lets get to it:
First I wrote this:
"permalink" => "required|unique:posts,permalink,hotel_id,deleted_at,NULL|alpha_dash|max:255",
And it was generating bad queries. Now look at this:
'column_to_validate' => 'unique:table_name,column_to_validate,id_to_ignore,other_column,value,other_column_2,value_2,other_column_N,value_N',
So. The unique string has 3 parameters at first:
1) The table name of the validation
2) The name of the column to validate the unique value
3) The ID of the column you want to avoid (in case you are editing a row, not creating a new one).
After this point, all you have to do is put the other columns in sequence like "key,value" to use in your unique rule.
Oh, easy, an? Not so quickly, paw. If you're using a STATIC array, how the heck you will get your "currently" ID to avoid? Because $rules array in Laravel Model is a static array. So, I had to came up with this:
public static function getPermalinkValidationStr() {
$all = Input::all();
# If you are just building the frozenNode page, just a simple validation string to the permalink field:
if(!array_key_exists('hotel', $all)) {
return 'required|alpha_dash|max:255';
}
/* Now the game got real: are you saving a new record or editing a field?
If it is new, use 'NULL', otherwise, use the current id to edit a row.
*/
$hasId = isset($all['id']) ? $all['id'] : 'NULL';
# Also, check if the new record with the same permalink belongs to the same hotel and the 'deleted_at' field is NULL:
$result = 'required|alpha_dash|max:255|unique:posts,permalink,' . $hasId . ',id,hotel_id,' . $all['hotel'] . ',deleted_at,NULL';
return $result;
}
And, in the FrozenNode rules configuration:
'rules' => array(
'hotel_id' => 'required',
'permalink' => Post::getPermalinkValidationStr()
),
Well. I dont know if there is a easiest way of doing this (or a much better approach). If you know something wrong on this solution, please, make a comment, I will be glad to hear a better solution. I already tried Ardent and Observer but I had some problems with FrozenNode Administrator.
Thank you.