I am trying to make a console app that uses a custom AppService by adapting from the example https://github.com/aspnetboilerplate/aspnetboilerplate-samples/blob/master/AbpEfConsoleApp/AbpEfConsoleApp/Program.cs
It works for me to call the service, but when I try to use a IRepository gives me the following error
Castle.MicroKernel.Handlers.HandlerException: 'Can't create component 'VCloud.Rtdm.CashAudit.TestManager' as it has dependencies to be satisfied.
It's as if I didn't have the IRepository registered.
Program.cs
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
TestUserReferencedService();
}
/// <summary>
/// Prueba de USAR un servicio de aspnetzero referenciando al proyecto. Spoiler: No funciona
/// </summary>
static async void TestUserReferencedService()
{
Clock.Provider = ClockProviders.Utc;
Console.WriteLine("Starting");
//Bootstrapping ABP system
using (var bootstrapper = AbpBootstrapper.Create<VCloudConsoleApplicationModule>())
{
bootstrapper.IocManager
.IocContainer
.AddFacility<LoggingFacility>(f => f.UseAbpLog4Net().WithConfig("log4net.config"));
bootstrapper.Initialize();
//Getting a Tester object from DI and running it
using (var tester = bootstrapper.IocManager.ResolveAsDisposable<TestAppService>())
{
var x = (await tester.Object.TestCount());
} //Disposes tester and all it's dependencies
Console.WriteLine("Press enter to exit...");
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
VCloudConsoleApplicationModule.cs
[DependsOn(
typeof(VCloudApplicationSharedModule),
typeof(VCloudConsoleCoreModule),
typeof(AbpEntityFrameworkCoreModule),
typeof(AbpDapperModule),
typeof(AbpZeroCommonModule)
)]
public class VCloudConsoleApplicationModule : AbpModule
{
public override void PreInitialize()
{
//Adding authorization providers
Configuration.Authorization.Providers.Add<AppAuthorizationProvider>();
//Adding custom AutoMapper configuration
Configuration.Modules.AbpAutoMapper().Configurators.Add(CustomDtoMapper.CreateMappings);
Configuration.BackgroundJobs.IsJobExecutionEnabled = false;
}
public override void Initialize()
{
IocManager.RegisterAssemblyByConvention(typeof(VCloudConsoleApplicationModule).GetAssembly());
DapperExtensions.DapperExtensions.SetMappingAssemblies(new List<Assembly>
{typeof(VCloudConsoleApplicationModule).GetAssembly()});
DapperExtensions.DapperExtensions.SetMappingAssemblies(new List<Assembly>
{
typeof(VCloud.Dapper.Mappers.DapperMapper_RtdmOrder).GetAssembly(),
typeof(VCloud.Dapper.Mappers.DapperMapper_RtdmOrderItem).GetAssembly(),
typeof(VCloud.Dapper.Mappers.DapperMapper_RtdmCompany).GetAssembly(),
typeof(VCloud.Dapper.Mappers.DapperMapper_RtdmRestaurant).GetAssembly()
});
//DapperExtensions.DapperExtensions.Configure();
//Dapper.DefaultTypeMap.MatchNamesWithUnderscores = true;
}
}
TestManager.cs
public class TestManager : VCloudDomainServiceBase, ITestManager
{
private IRepository<Invoice> _repository;
public TestManager(IRepository<Invoice> repository)
{
_repository = repository;
}
public async Task<int> GetCount()
{
return await _repository.CountAsync();
}
}
Your problem is not related to Dependeny Injection, the problem may be you forget to add the entity Invoice to the DbContext of your application in EntityFramework project.
Once you add it your problem will be solved.
public class VCloudApplicationDbContext : AbpZeroDbContext<Tenant, Role, User, VCloudApplicationDbContext>, IAbpPersistedGrantDbContext
{
public DbSet<Invoice> Invoice { get; set; }
}
I hope it could help you
Related
When I want to Insert A New Object into the db bellow Error Occured:
No database provider has been configured for this DbContext
Services:
private IConfiguration config;
public Startup(IConfiguration config) => this.config = config;
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddEntityFrameworkSqlServer().AddDbContext<DataContext>(options => options.UseSqlServer(config["ConnectionStrings:MainConnection"]));
services.AddMvc();
}
DataContext:
public class DataContext:DbContext
{
public DataContext() { }
public DataContext(DbContextOptions<DataContext> options) : base(options) { }
public DbSet<Request> Request { get; set; }
public DbSet<AdminAccept> AdminAccept { get; set; }
public DbSet<Payment> Payment { get; set; }
protected override void OnConfiguring(DbContextOptionsBuilder builder)
{
base.OnConfiguring(builder);
}
}
Insert command :
public async Task <int> SaveToStorageAsync()
{
using (DataContext context=new DataContext())
{
context.Request.Add(this);
return await context.SaveChangesAsync();
}
}
however migrations and database created succefully
I solved it finally.
everything is okay but use of using expression cause an error.(I wonder why)
to solving it first of all I removed a using and declare a DataContext as parameter:
public async Task<int> SaveToStorageAsync(DataContext context)
{
context.Request.Add(this);
return await context.SaveChangesAsync();
}
after it initiate constructor in the main controller :
DataContext context;
public HomeController(DataContext context)
{
this.context = context;
}
and finally call function by sending context as a parameter.
hopped you used in your scenarios and good luck
Since you register the DataContext with the constructor receiving a DbContextOptions<DataContext> option.You also need to pass that when you create a DataContext
var optionsBuilder = new DbContextOptionsBuilder<DataContext >();
optionsBuilder.UseSqlServer("Your connection string");
using (DataContext context = new DataContext (optionsBuilder.Options))
{
context.Request.Add(this);
return await context.SaveChangesAsync();
}
I suggest that you could use dbContext by DI in controller which is a more recommended way in asp.net core:
public class StudentsController : Controller
{
private readonly DataContext _context;
public StudentsController(DataContext context)
{
_context = context;
}
public async Task <int> SaveToStorageAsync()
{
_context.Request.Add(this);
return await context.SaveChangesAsync();
}
}
The two ways are included in below link:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/miscellaneous/configuring-dbcontext#configuring-dbcontextoptions
I'm a beginner with Simple Injector and have a scenario where I need help to implement. I will try to simplify what I need to do.
I have a WebAPI where I need to authenticate users and based on the type of user choose an implementation.
Consider this structure
public interface ICarRepository {
void SaveCar(Car car);
}
//Some implementation for ICarRepository
public interface ICarLogic {
void CreateCar(Car car);
}
public class CarLogicStandard: ICarLogic {
private ICarRepository _carRepository;
public CarLogicStandard(ICarRepository carRepository) {
_carRepository = carRepository;
}
public void CreateCar(Car car) {
car.Color = "Blue";
_carRepository.SaveCar();
//Other stuff...
}
}
public class CarLogicPremium: ICarLogic {
private ICarRepository _carRepository;
public CarLogicPremium(ICarRepository carRepository) {
_carRepository = carRepository;
}
public void CreateCar(Car car) {
car.Color = "Red";
_carRepository.SaveCar();
//Other stuff 2...
}
}
And now I have a controller
public class CarController: ApiController {
private ICarLogic _carLogic;
public CarController(ICarLogic carLogic) {
_carLogic = carLogic;
}
public void Post(somePostData) {
//Identify the user based on post data
//....
Car car = somePostData.SomeCar();
_carLogic.CreateCar(car);
}
}
The code above will not work because in my request I need to identify the user. If it is a premium user the controller should use the CarLogicPremium and if it is a standard user the controller should use the CarLogicStandard.
I can configure the repository and others interfaces that don't need this logic on Global.asax however, since this case I need the request to decide which implementation should be used, I supose that I need to solve this in some other way.
There is a "Simple Injector" way to handle this? Or should I try another approach?
The simplest solution would be to configure the decision in the composition root, along with the rest of the container's configuration:
protected void Application_Start()
{
GlobalConfiguration.Configure(WebApiConfig.Register);
var container = new Container();
container.Register<CarLogicStandard>();
container.Register<CarLogicPremium>();
container.RegisterPerWebRequest<ICarRepository, CarRepository>();
container.Register<ICarLogic>(
() =>
HttpContext.Current != null &&
HttpContext.Current.User != null &&
HttpContext.Current.User.IsInRole("Premium")
? (ICarLogic)container.GetInstance<CarLogicPremium>()
: (ICarLogic)container.GetInstance<CarLogicStandard>()
);
// This is an extension method from the integration package.
container.RegisterWebApiControllers(GlobalConfiguration.Configuration);
container.Verify();
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.DependencyResolver =
new SimpleInjectorWebApiDependencyResolver(container);
}
You could also create an abstraction over the current user and decorate standard features with premium features
public class CarLogicPremium : ICarLogic
{
private readonly ICarLogic decorated;
private readonly ICurrentUser currentUser;
private readonly ICarRepository carRepository;
public CarLogicPremium(
ICarLogic decorated,
ICurrentUser currentUser,
ICarRepository carRepository)
{
this.decorated = decorated;
this.currentUser = currentUser;
this.carRepository = carRepository;
}
public void CreateCar(Car car)
{
if (currentUser.IsPremiumMember)
{
car.Color = "Red";
this.carRepository.SaveCar(car);
//Other stuff 2...
}
else
{
this.decorated.CreateCar(car);
}
}
}
which would be configured a bit like this
protected void Application_Start()
{
GlobalConfiguration.Configure(WebApiConfig.Register);
var container = new Container();
container.Register<ICurrentUser, HttpCurrentUserProxy>();
container.RegisterPerWebRequest<ICarRepository, CarRepository>();
container.Register<ICarLogic, CarLogicStandard>();
container.RegisterDecorator(typeof(ICarLogic), typeof(CarLogicPremium));
container.RegisterWebApiControllers(GlobalConfiguration.Configuration);
container.Verify();
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.DependencyResolver =
new SimpleInjectorWebApiDependencyResolver(container);
}
But it really depends how many variations of services you will be creating over time. If you will be constantly adding new premium features you should look to implement a variation of the Try-X pattern. Let me know if one of the above works for you or if you need more info ...
I am using Umbraco 6.1 with an UmbracoApiController which has a IUnitOfWork injected into it's constructor. To inject the dependencies, I am using Unity, like I have in the past with standard Web API projects. Normally, I set unity up in the Global.asax.cs. As Umbraco does not have this I have created my own UmbracoEvents handler, which inherits from IApplicationEventHandler, and has the methods:
OnApplicationInitialized
OnApplicationStarting
OnApplicationStarted
ConfigureApi
In the OnApplicationStarted method I set up my EF database, db initializer etc and call ConfigureApi to set up Unity. My OnApplication Started and ConfigureApi methods looks like this:
public void OnApplicationStarted(UmbracoApplicationBase umbracoApplication, ApplicationContext applicationContext)
{
_applicationContext = applicationContext;
_umbracoApplication = umbracoApplication;
_contentService = ApplicationContext.Current.Services.ContentService;
this.ConfigureApi(GlobalConfiguration.Configuration);
Database.SetInitializer(null);
PropertySearchContext db = new PropertySearchContext();
db.Database.Initialize(true);
}
private void ConfigureApi(HttpConfiguration config)
{
var unity = new UnityContainer();
unity.RegisterType<PropertiesApiController>();
unity.RegisterType<IUnitOfWork, UnitOfWork>(new HierarchicalLifetimeManager());
config.DependencyResolver = new IoCContainer(unity);
}
My Controller code:
public class PropertiesApiController : UmbracoApiController
{
private readonly IUnitOfWork _unitOfWork;
public PropertiesApiController(IUnitOfWork unitOfWork)
{
if(null == unitOfWork)
throw new ArgumentNullException();
_unitOfWork = unitOfWork;
}
public IEnumerable GetAllProperties()
{
return new[] {"Table", "Chair", "Desk", "Computer", "Beer fridge"};
}
}
My Scope Container/IoC Container code: (as per http://www.asp.net/web-api/overview/extensibility/using-the-web-api-dependency-resolver)
public class ScopeContainer : IDependencyScope
{
protected IUnityContainer container;
public ScopeContainer(IUnityContainer container)
{
if (container == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("container");
}
this.container = container;
}
public object GetService(Type serviceType)
{
if (container.IsRegistered(serviceType))
{
return container.Resolve(serviceType);
}
else
{
return null;
}
}
public IEnumerable<object> GetServices(Type serviceType)
{
if (container.IsRegistered(serviceType))
{
return container.ResolveAll(serviceType);
}
else
{
return new List<object>();
}
}
public void Dispose()
{
container.Dispose();
}
}
public class IoCContainer : ScopeContainer, IDependencyResolver
{
public IoCContainer(IUnityContainer container)
: base(container)
{
}
public IDependencyScope BeginScope()
{
var child = this.container.CreateChildContainer();
return new ScopeContainer(child);
}
}
My IUnitOfWork code:
public interface IUnitOfWork : IDisposable
{
GenericRepository<Office> OfficeRepository { get; }
GenericRepository<Property> PropertyRepository { get; }
void Save();
void Dispose(bool disposing);
void Dispose();
}
My UnitOfWork implementation:
public class UnitOfWork : IUnitOfWork
{
private readonly PropertySearchContext _context = new PropertySearchContext();
private GenericRepository<Office> _officeRepository;
private GenericRepository<Property> _propertyRepository;
public GenericRepository<Office> OfficeRepository
{
get
{
if (this._officeRepository == null)
{
this._officeRepository = new GenericRepository<Office>(_context);
}
return _officeRepository;
}
}
public GenericRepository<Property> PropertyRepository
{
get
{
if (this._propertyRepository == null)
{
this._propertyRepository = new GenericRepository<Property>(_context);
}
return _propertyRepository;
}
}
public void Save()
{
_context.SaveChanges();
}
private bool disposed = false;
public virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
if (!this.disposed)
{
if (disposing)
{
_context.Dispose();
}
}
this.disposed = true;
}
public void Dispose()
{
Dispose(true);
GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
}
}
I have used unity/DI with MVC4/WebAPI controllers and this implementation of UnitOfWork many times before without issue, so I'm thinking it's Umbraco specific.
I have also debugged the application and made sure that it hits OnApplicationStarted and that its parameters are not null.
The GetAllProperties method in the controller is just a test method to make sure it is all working fine, however, when I try and access this action I get the error:
"The type IUnitOfWork does not have an accessible constructor"
Does anyone have experience with using Umbraco 6.1 and it's UmbracoApiController with dependency injection/Unity?
Also, on an unrelated note, is there a way to return JSON instead of XML in the action? In Web API you would just define the formatter in the WebApi.config but there is none in Umbraco.
Thanks,
Justin
In case you haven't found a solution to your problem? Download this nuget package and right after building your unity container:
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.DependencyResolver =
new Unity.WebApi.UnityDependencyResolver(Bootstrapper.Container);
Notice the namespace which is different than Unity.Mvc4.UnityDependencyResolver.
I am using SignalR in my MVC3 application, and since I have implemented StructureMap Dependency Injection on my controllers I would like to do the same in my hub, but I can't seem to get it working.
Please tell me what's wrong with my codes below:
SignalRSmDependencyResolver.cs
public class SignalRSmDependencyResolver : DefaultDependencyResolver
{
private IContainer _container;
public SignalRSmDependencyResolver(IContainer container)
{
_container = container;
}
public override object GetService(Type serviceType)
{
object service = null;
if (!serviceType.IsAbstract && !serviceType.IsInterface && serviceType.IsClass)
{
// Concrete type resolution
service = _container.GetInstance(serviceType);
}
else
{
// Other type resolution with base fallback
service = _container.TryGetInstance(serviceType) ?? base.GetService(serviceType);
}
return service;
}
public override IEnumerable<object> GetServices(Type serviceType)
{
var objects = _container.GetAllInstances(serviceType).Cast<object>();
objects.Concat(base.GetServices(serviceType));
return objects;
}
}
SignalRExtensionsRegistry.cs
public class SignalRExtensionsRegistry : Registry
{
public SignalRExtensionsRegistry()
{
For<IDependencyResolver>().Add<SignalRSmDependencyResolver>();
}
}
IoC.cs
public static class IoC {
public static IContainer Initialize() {
var container = BootStrapper.Initialize();
container.Configure(x =>
{
x.For<IControllerActivator>().Singleton().Use<StructureMapControllerActivator>();
});
return container;
}
}
public class StructureMapControllerActivator : IControllerActivator {
public StructureMapControllerActivator(IContainer container) {
_container = container;
}
private IContainer _container;
public IController Create(RequestContext requestContext, Type controllerType) {
IController controller = DependencyResolver.Current.GetService(controllerType) as IController;
return controller;
}
}
AppStart_Structuremap.cs
[assembly: WebActivator.PreApplicationStartMethod(typeof(StoreUI.AppStart_Structuremap), "Start")]
namespace MyNameSpace {
public static class AppStart_Structuremap {
public static void Start() {
var container = (IContainer) IoC.Initialize();
DependencyResolver.SetResolver(new StructureMapDependenceyResolver(container));
AspNetHost.SetResolver(new StructureMapDependencyResolver(container));
}
}
}
NotificationsHub.cs
[HubName("notificationsHub")]
public class NotificationsHub : Hub
{
#region Declarations
private readonly IUserService userService;
#endregion
#region Constructor
public NotificationsHub(IUserService userService)
{
this.userService = userService;
}
#endregion
public void updateServer(string message)
{
Clients.updateClient(message);
}
}
Thanks
Getting Structuremap into SignalR is actually pretty easy. First you want to create your own resolver:
StructureMap Resolver
Usings:
using SignalR.Infrastructure;
using StructureMap;
Class:
public class StructureMapResolver : DefaultDependencyResolver
{
private IContainer _container;
public StructureMapResolver(IContainer container)
{
_container = container;
}
public override object GetService(Type serviceType)
{
object service = null;
if (!serviceType.IsAbstract && !serviceType.IsInterface && serviceType.IsClass)
{
// Concrete type resolution
service = _container.GetInstance(serviceType);
}
else
{
// Other type resolution with base fallback
service = _container.TryGetInstance(serviceType) ?? base.GetService(serviceType);
}
return service;
}
public override IEnumerable<object> GetServices(Type serviceType)
{
var objects = _container.GetAllInstances(serviceType).Cast<object>();
return objects.Concat(base.GetServices(serviceType));
}
}
The idea here is to try and use your container to resolve the dependencies, if you do not have the dependency wired up, pass it through to the default resolver. This way you don't have to worry about all of the other dependencies in SignalR and can focus only on the stuff you want to inject into (Hubs, ConnectionIdFactory, MessageBus, etc.).
Bindings for Resolver and Hub
Next you will want to register this in your container (i like using registries):
Usings:
using SignalR.Infrastructure;
using StructureMap.Configuration.DSL;
Class:
public class ExtensionsRegistry : Registry
{
public ExtensionsRegistry()
{
For<IDependencyResolver>().Add<StructureMapResolver>();
}
}
Resolver Replacement
Finally you will want to tell SignalR to use your resolver instead of the default:
Global::Application_Start or WebActivator::Pre_Start
Usings:
using SignalR.Hosting.AspNet;
using SignalR.Infrastructure;
Application_Start:
// Make sure you build up the container first
AspNetHost.SetResolver(StructureMap.ObjectFactory.GetInstance<IDependencyResolver>());
Silly Hub with injected dependencies
Now you can just inject any dependencies your container knows about into the hubs themselves:
[HubName("defaultHub")]
public class DefaultHub : Hub, IDisconnect
{
private readonly IRepository _repo;
public DefaultHub(IRepository repo)
{
_repo = repo;
}
public void Connect()
{
Caller.setUser(Context.ConnectionId);
Clients.addMessage(string.Format("{0} has connected", Context.ConnectionId));
}
public void MessageSender(string message)
{
Caller.addMessage(_repo.RepositoryMessage());
Clients.addMessage(message);
}
public Task Disconnect()
{
var clientId = this.Context.ConnectionId;
return Task.Factory.StartNew(() => { Clients.addMessage(string.Format("{0} has disconnected", clientId)); });
}
}
Have you followed the instructions here:- https://github.com/SignalR/SignalR/wiki/Extensibility ?
You'll need to use AspNetHost.SetResolver.
I know this is an old thread, but for those who are wondering where is the AspNetHost.SetResolver in the newer version of signalR, you can use this in the App_Start StructuremapMvc.cs:
public static void Start() {
IContainer container = IoC.Initialize();
GlobalHost.DependencyResolver = new SignalRSmDependencyResolver(container); // for signalR
DependencyResolver.SetResolver(new StructureMapDependencyResolver(container));
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.DependencyResolver = new StructureMapDependencyResolver(container);
}
Add something like this to a file in your App_Start folder. This code snippet is for Ninject, so just replace AspNetHost.SetResolver()
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Web.Mvc;
using Ninject;
using SignalR.Hosting.AspNet;
using SignalR.Infrastructure;
using SignalR.Ninject;
using Web.Models;
[assembly: WebActivator.PreApplicationStartMethod(typeof(Web.App_Start.NinjectSignalR), "Start")]
namespace Web.App_Start
{
public static class NinjectSignalR
{
public static void Start()
{
IKernel kernel = CreateKernel();
// switch this line to the structuremap resolver
AspNetHost.SetResolver(new NinjectDependencyResolver(kernel));
}
private static IKernel CreateKernel()
{
var kernel = new StandardKernel();
RegisterServices(kernel);
return kernel;
}
private static void RegisterServices(IKernel kernel)
{
// add your services here
//kernel.Bind<IRepository>().To<Repository>();
}
}
}
Using MVVM Light, I'm trying to develop a rather simple WP7 application. I've run into a problem using the navigation service. I can navigate to a page, but after pressing the back button I can't navigate to the same page again. NavigationService throws a NullReferenceException.
I have implemented my navigation using Messaging from the GalaSoft.MvvmLight.Messaging namespace. All my views inherits from a customized PhoneApplicationPage base class that registrers a listener on "NavigationRequest":
public class PhoneApplicationPage : Microsoft.Phone.Controls.PhoneApplicationPage
{
public PhoneApplicationPage() : base()
{
Messenger.Default.Register<Uri>(this, "NavigationRequest", (uri) => NavigationService.Navigate(uri));
}
}
From my view models I post Uri's to this listener:
SendNavigationRequestMessage(new Uri("/View/AppSettingsView.xaml", UriKind.Relative));
Like i said, this works except when navigating after pressing the Back button.
Why is this and how can I solve it?
Is there a better way to implement navigation using MVVM Light?
I'm using MVVM Light as well. I have a class called PageConductor, which is based on what John Papa (Silverlight MVP) from Microsoft uses. Here's the PageConductor Service I use
public class PageConductor : IPageConductor
{
protected Frame RootFrame { get; set; }
public PageConductor()
{
Messenger.Default.Register<Messages.FrameMessage>(this, OnReceiveFrameMessage);
}
public void DisplayError(string origin, Exception e, string details)
{
string description = string.Format("Error occured in {0}. {1} {2}", origin, details, e.Message);
var error = new Model.Error() { Description = description, Title = "Error Occurred" };
Messenger.Default.Send(new Messages.ErrorMessage() { Error = error });
}
public void DisplayError(string origin, Exception e)
{
DisplayError(origin, e, string.Empty);
}
private void OnReceiveFrameMessage(Messages.FrameMessage msg)
{
RootFrame = msg.RootFrame;
}
private void Go(string path, string sender)
{
RootFrame.Navigate(new Uri(path, UriKind.Relative));
}
public void GoBack()
{
RootFrame.GoBack();
}
}
In my MainPage.xaml.cs constructor, I have this, which creates an instance of my ContentFrame in my PageConductor service.:
Messenger.Default.Send(new Messages.FrameMessage() { RootFrame = ContentFrame });
I then use dependency injection to instantiate an instance of my PageConductor Service into my MainPage ViewModel. Here is my MainViewModel class:
protected Services.IPageConductor PageConductor { get; set; }
public RelayCommand<string> NavigateCommand { get; set; }
public MainViewModel(Services.IPageConductor pageConductor)
{
PageConductor = pageConductor;
RegisterCommands();
}
private void RegisterCommands()
{
NavigateCommand = new RelayCommand<string>(
(source) => OnNavigate(source));
}
private void OnNavigate(string sender)
{
PageConductor.GoToView(sender, "main");
}
Notice the instance of my PageConductorService as a parameter in my MainViewModel constructor method. I pass this in via my ViewModelLocator:
private readonly TSMVVM.Services.ServiceProviderBase _sp;
public ViewModelLocator()
{
_sp = Services.ServiceProviderBase.Instance;
CreateMain(_sp);
}
#region MainPageViewModel
public static MainViewModel MainStatic
{
get
{
Services.ServiceProviderBase SP = Services.ServiceProviderBase.Instance;
if (_main == null)
{
CreateMain(SP);
}
return _main;
}
}
[System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis.SuppressMessage("Microsoft.Performance",
"CA1822:MarkMembersAsStatic",
Justification = "This non-static member is needed for data binding purposes.")]
public MainViewModel Main
{
get
{
return MainStatic;
}
}
public static void ClearMain()
{
_main.Cleanup();
_main = null;
}
public static void CreateMain(Services.ServiceProviderBase SP)
{
if (_main == null)
{
_main = new MainViewModel(SP.PageConductor);
}
}
#endregion
For further reference, my Messages.FrameMessage class is simply:
internal class FrameMessage
{
public Frame RootFrame { get; set; }
}
I've had no issues with forward/back buttons.