Connection problem with WinRM and Ansible - windows

I am trying to connect to multiple Windows nodes but I am getting different errors. The behaviour is the same for all of them. I have done it many times successfully in other enviroments, but in this case there must be some problem that I cannot find out. In case it is relevant, my infrastructure consists of a Kubernetes cluster made up of several pods. One of those pods has a container in which I have Ansible installed and it is from which I want to establish the remote connection with machines out of the cluster. Below I show all my attempts to make it work in one of the nodes.
First of all, I have run the script ConfigureAnsibleForRemoting.ps1 to initiate WinRM so that Ansible can connect. The WinRM configuration shows that Basic, Kerberos, Negotiate, and Certificate auth are enabled. Both HTTP and HTTPS listeners are configured too:
WinRM configuration and listeners
To check that everything is set up correctly, I have carried out some tests:
Run Test-WSMan
Log in powershell session from remote machine
Node is reachable from the container
Tests
I have used Basic, NTLM and Certificate auth. Here is my inventory (I do not utilize a domain user but a local user) and the result when I make a win_ping with Ansible in each case:
- Basic: port 5986
[prueba_cinco]
host ansible_host=IP
[prueba_cinco:vars]
ansible_user=user
ansible_password=pass
ansible_connection=winrm
ansible_winrm_server_cert_validation=ignore
Basic: port 5986 output
- Basic: port 5985
[prueba_cinco]
host ansible_host=IP
[prueba_cinco:vars]
ansible_user=user
ansible_password=pass
ansible_connection=winrm
ansible_port=5985
Basic: port 5985 output
This is the expected behaviour, since AllowUnencrypted in the winrm configuration is set to false.
Just to gain more insight into the problem, I allowed unencrypted traffic, and after that the connection could be established normally:
WinRM config: AllowUnencrypted and Basic: port 5985 output 2
- NTLM: port 5986
[prueba_siete]
host ansible_host=IP
[prueba_siete:vars]
ansible_user=user
ansible_password=pass
ansible_connection=winrm
ansible_winrm_server_cert_validation=ignore
ansible_winrm_transport=ntlm
NTML: port 5986 output
- NTLM: port 5985
[prueba_siete]
host ansible_host=IP
[prueba_siete:vars]
ansible_user=user
ansible_password=pass
ansible_connection=winrm
ansible_winrm_transport=ntlm
ansible_port=5985
NTLM: port 5985 output
This works, although a huge error is obtained. I later tried this option with a domain user and the credentials were rejected.
- Certificate: port 5986 (only works with HTTPS)
For this method, I have followed the procedure of the official documentation. I have generated a certificate with New-SerfSignedcertificate in Powershell. Then I have converted the PFX file created to a private key with OpenSSL (that also contains the public key). By last, I have imported a certificate to the Certificate Store and mapped the certificate to an account.
[WINDOWS]
host ansible_host=IP
[WINDOWS:vars]
ansible_connection='winrm'
ansible_winrm_cert_pem='cert_win.pem'
ansible_winrm_cert_key_pem='cert_win.pem'
ansible_winrm_transport='certificate'
ansible_winrm_scheme='https'
ansible_winrm_server_cert_validation='ignore'
Certificate: port 5986 output
As you may have noticed, when I try to connect through the port 5986, I always obtain a time out (Read timed out) regardless of the method or credentials. I have increased the execution time out, but the result is the same. On the other hand, the port 5985 seems to work but an error related to headers appears and I do not know the reason. Anyway, I only would use this one as a last option, since I need to use the port 5986.
To make sure that the container configuration is not what is causing these issues, I have deployed the same image in another environment and everything works perfectly when I try to connect to Windows nodes, I can connect without any error.
Does anyone know what is happening?
Thank you in advance.

Related

VNC viewer failing to make connection with "channel 3: open failed: connect failed: No route to host"

I ssh into a server with the following:
ssh -g -L5912:server:5912 user#host
It goes through, and I can access my files on the other server through the command line (meaning I can connect to the server, it is my vnc viewer that is failing!) but when I try to open my vnc viewer (RealVNC) and connect to localhost:12 i get the following error message in the vnc viewer application:
The connection closed unexpectedly.
Additionally in the original command line shell i get:
channel 3: open failed: connect failed: No route to host
I've tried switching to different ports and even checked out other posts on the same error message but the problem is i don't really understand them... ssh tunnels are still relatively new to me so i don't really know what im doing. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
You're trying to setup a port forwarding, this may fail because of many reasons:
SSH port forwarding not enabled in the host
Check SSH server in the host if AllowTcpForwarding is enabled:
$ grep AllowTcpForwarding /etc/ssh/sshd_config
AllowTcpForwarding yes
Typically, it's commented out. Uncomment and restart the sshd.
No connection between the host and server over port 5912
SSH to the host and try:
$ telnet server 5912
Connected to server.
Escape character is '^]'.
Finally, does the server listen on 5912?
Similarly, as above, but from the server - go there and try telnet server 5912.
Best regards,
Jarek
In my case it was the port forwarding rule I had set in Putty.
Please make sure you enter the correct hostname when defining the rule in Putty. I changed
localhost:5903
with
myserver:5903
and it worked...

Cento 7 Firewalld refuses all incoming connections to my web-server

I have Centos7 VM built using vagrant with private IP address of:192.168.56.255
I am running my Spring boot application on that VM on port 8443. It supports HTTPS. My issue is that when try to send https requests to 192.168.56.255 web server via Curl command i got
curl: (7) Couldn't connect to server
I have read many tutorials that explain how to configure my Firewall in Cento7 but still got the same issue one is provided by DigitalOcean
When I type
sudo firewall-cmd --list-all-zones
I got
public
target: default
icmp-block-inversion: no
interfaces:
sources:
services: ssh dhcpv6-client https http mysql
ports: 8443/tcp 3306/tcp
protocols:
masquerade: no
forward-ports:
source-ports:
icmp-blocks:
rich rules:
As you can see I enabled everything I need and more but still. I even shut down the Firewall but still the connection is refused from my host.
When I made the changes I did reload my firewall
sudo firewall-cmd --realod
So that is not the problem
The problem was not with the Firewalld but with the pre-configured IP address using Vagrant.
The IP address should not be 255 in the first byte as I did 192.168.56.255
because that indicates that this is a broadcast address. So i solved it by changing it to 192.168.56.10

Can't connect to MongoDB instance running on remote azure windows machine

I'm having trouble connecting to a mongo instance running on a windows azure vm running Windows Server 2012 R2. I've verified the following things
The network security group has rule allowing port 27017 inbound (* -> 27017)
The VM has TCP port 27017 inbound open on all profiles (currently, my firewall is completely disabled)
Mongo is running as a windows service. I've verified it is up and running. I was able to connect, insert, and find records in the shell on the remote vm that's running Mongo
When I run netstat -a, I can see 0.0.0.0:27017 with the status "LISTENING"
If I try to ping the VM, it times out (I believe this is expected)
Port 22 is open in the firewall and in the network security group rules
I am not running any 3rd party anti-virus software on my local machine
I tried restarting the VM both from the OS and from azure portal
I tried removing the rules from network security group and readding them
I've tried connection via SSH in bash on my local machine running windows 10 using the most basic command mongo <ip-address>. It times out with the message ssh: connect to host x.x.x.x port 22: Resource temporarily unavailable
I've tried connection via Putty/SSH. Same result
I've tried connection via MongoDB Compass which gives a similar error Could not connect to MongoDB on the provided host and port
any ideas?
Here's the config I'm using
systemLog:
logAppend: true
verbosity: 0
traceAllExceptions: true
path: c:\MongoLogs\mongolog.log
destination: file
net:
port: 27017
bindIp: [127.0.0.1, <external-ip>]
http:
enabled: true
JSONPEnabled: false
RESTInterfaceEnabled: true
storage:
dbPath: c:\MongoData\
As it turns out, the VM had multiple network security group profiles attached to it. When I click "Effective security rules" it showed a second tab that had another profile that appears to have been inherited from the subnet -- sufficed to say, it did not have the permissions that are needed. By opening the correct ports on that profile as well, connections we then going through just fine. We're gonna clean that up, but in short, there was a conflict of permissions.

Can't connect to public IP for EC2 instance

I have an EC2 instance which is running with the following security groups:
HTTP - TCP - 80 - 0.0.0.0/0
Custom UDP Rule - UDP - 1194 - 0.0.0.0/0
SSH - TCP - 22 - 0.0.0.0/0
Custom TCP Rule - TCP - 943 - 0.0.0.0/0
HTTPS - TCP - 443 - 0.0.0.0/0
However, when I try to access http://{PUBLIC_IP} or https://{PUBLIC_IP} in the browser, I get a "{IP} refused to connect" error. I'm new to AWS. Am I missing something here? What should I do to debug?
One way to debug this particular class of problem is to use netcat in order to determine where the problem lies.
If you run netcat against port 80 on the public IP address of your instance and just get a hang (no output at all), then most likely your security group isn't allowing traffic through. Here is an example from an EC2 instance that is in a security group that doesn't allow port 80 traffic inbound:
% nc -v 55.35.300.45 80
<just hangs>
Whereas if the security group is changed to allow port 80, but the EC2 instance doesn't have any process listening on port 80, you'll get the following:
% nc -v 55.35.300.45 80
nc: connectx to 52.38.300.43 port 80 (tcp) failed: Connection refused
Given that your browser gave you a similar "connection refused", most likely the problem is that there is no web server running on your instance. You can verify this by ssh'ing into the instance and seeing if you can connect to port 80 there:
ssh ec2-user#55.35.300.45
% nc -v localhost 80
nc: connect to localhost port 80 (tcp) failed: Connection refused
If you get something like the above, you're definitely not running a webserver.
I'm not sure if it's too late to help but I was stuck with a similar issue with my test server
SG Inbound: ssh -> 22
HTTP -> 80
NACL: default allow/deny settings
but still couldn't ping to the server from my browser, then I realize there's nothing running on the server that can serve the request, and I started httpd server (webserver) and it worked.
sudo yum -y install httpd
sudo service httpd start
this way you can test the connectivity if you are playing with SGs and NACLs and of course it's not the only way, just an example if you're figuring your System N/W out.
Have you installed webserver(ngingx/apache) to serve your requests. If so please share your the config files. (So that it will help to troubleshoot)
I think the reason is probably that you did not set up a web server for your EC2 instance, because if you try to access http://{PUBLIC_IP} or https://{PUBLIC_IP}, you need to have a background server to serve the http request as #Niranj Rajasekaran said.
By the way, by simply pinging the {PUBLIC_IP}, you could see if your connection to your EC2 instance is normal or not.
In command prompt or terminal, type
ping {PUBLIC_IP}
In my case, the server was running but available on just 127.0.0.1 so it refused connections from external hosts. To see if this is your situation, you can run
netstat -an | grep <port number>
If it says 127.0.0.1:<port number> instead of 0.0.0.0:<port number>, you have this problem.
Usually there's a flag or an argument in your server code somewhere to set the host to 0.0.0.0:
app.run(host='0.0.0.0') # flask example
However, in my case, I had already set this so I thought that couldn't possibly be the issue, which is how I ended up on this thread, which asks more generally about the problem. Unfortunately, I was using docker, and had set 0.0.0.0 on the container but was mapping that explicitly to 127.0.0.1 on the host in the docker-compose port-mapping:
ports:
- "127.0.0.1:<port number>:<port number>"
Changing that line to remove the host IP specification fixed the problem upon re-deploy:
ports:
- "<port number>:<port number>"

SSH -L connection successful, but localhost port forwarding not working "channel 3: open failed: connect failed: Connection refused"

My lab runs RStudio on a server. A couple weeks ago, from my cousin's house, I successfully ssh'd into the server and pulled up the server-side RStudio through my local Firefox browser. Now when I try to access the server RStudio from home (via my own router), it doesn't work. I need help troubleshooting, and I'm guessing it's some problem on the router. I'm running Mac OSX 10.6.8. No idea what the university server's running, but I don't think it's a server-side problem.
Here's how it worked the first time I did it, at my cousin's house: first, I VPN into the university network; then I call SSH with port forwarding; then I open a Firefox browser, connect to my localhost port, and it opens up RStudio on the server side which I can access through my local browser window.
Here's the problem I'm having right now when I try to log-in from my home network:
I can make the VPN connection successfully. I can also set up SSH successfully with this command:
ssh -v -L 8783:localhost:8783 myacct#server.com
Here are the last several lines of the verbose output from the successful ssh command:
debug1: Authentication succeeded (password).
debug1: Local connections to LOCALHOST:8783 forwarded to remote address localhost:8783
debug1: Local forwarding listening on 127.0.0.1 port 8783.
debug1: channel 0: new [port listener]
debug1: Local forwarding listening on ::1 port 8783.
debug1: channel 1: new [port listener]
debug1: channel 2: new [client-session]
debug1: Entering interactive session.
Last login: Mon Sep 2 04:02:40 2013 from vpnipaddress
So I think I'm still succeeding at the VPN and SSH stage (though I don't know why it says my last login was Sep 2 when I've logged in a few times since then).
Next, I open Firefox, and I type localhost:8783, and instead of getting an RStudio server app through my browser window, I get the following errors:
In the Firefox browser window, it says: Server not found, Firefox can't find the server at www.localhost.com, Check the address for typing errors etc.
In the terminal window, it says:
debug1: Connection to port 8783 forwarding to localhost port 8783 requested.
debug1: channel 3: new [direct-tcpip]
channel 3: open failed: connect failed: Connection refused
debug1: channel 3: free: direct-tcpip: listening port 8783 for localhost port 8783, connect from 127.0.0.1 port 50420, nchannels 4
I'm not sure what I've got wrong. I haven't changed anything on my laptop since my last successful connection. I'm on my own router (instead of my cousin's), so maybe I need to mess with the firewall? I already allowed ports 22 and 8783 to come through the firewall to my laptop (I'm not even sure I needed to do that though). Help?
ssh -v -L 8783:localhost:8783 myacct#server.com
...
channel 3: open failed: connect failed: Connection refused
When you connect to port 8783 on your local system, that connection is tunneled through your ssh link to the ssh server on server.com. From there, the ssh server makes TCP connection to localhost port 8783 and relays data between the tunneled connection and the connection to target of the tunnel.
The "connection refused" error is coming from the ssh server on server.com when it tries to make the TCP connection to the target of the tunnel. "Connection refused" means that a connection attempt was rejected. The simplest explanation for the rejection is that, on server.com, there's nothing listening for connections on localhost port 8783. In other words, the server software that you were trying to tunnel to isn't running, or else it is running but it's not listening on that port.
Posting this to help someone.
Symptom:
channel 2: open failed: connect failed: Connection refused
debug1: channel 2: free: direct-tcpip:
listening port 8890 for 169.254.76.1 port 8890,
connect from ::1 port 52337 to ::1 port 8890, nchannels 8
My scenario; i had to use the remote server as a bastion host to connect elsewhere. Final Destination/Target: 169.254.76.1, port 8890. Through intermediary server with public ip: ec2-54-162-180-7.compute-1.amazonaws.com
SSH local port forwarding command:
ssh -i ~/keys/dev.tst -vnNT -L :8890:169.254.76.1:8890
glue#ec2-54-162-180-7.compute-1.amazonaws.com
What the problem was:
There was no service bound on port 8890 in the target host. i had forgotten to start the service.
How did i trouble shoot:
SSH into bastion host and then do curl.
Hope this helps.
Note: localhost is the hostname for an address using the local (loopback) network interface, and 127.0.0.1 is its IP in the IPv4 network standard (it's ::1 in IPv6). 0.0.0.0 is the IPv4 standard "current network" IP address.
I experienced this error with a Docker setup. I had a Docker container running on an external server, and I'd (correctly) mapped its ports out as 127.0.0.1:9232:9232. By port-forwarding ssh remote -L 9232:127.0.0.1:9232, I'd expected to be able to communicate with the remote server's port 9232 as if it were my own local port.
It turned out that the Docker container was internally running its process on 127.0.0.1:9232 rather than 0.0.0.0:9232, and so even though I'd specified the container's port-mappings correctly, they weren't on the correct interface for being mapped out.
In my case, it worked after running the vncserver on linux.
Entered this on linux command line : sudo ssh -L 5901:localhost:5901 -i <ssh_private_key> <username>#<public-IP-address>
Type there vncserver
Go to VncViewer application and connect using localhost:5901
I used to meet the similar problem because 'localhost' was not available on server when it restarted network service, e.g. 'ifdown -a' but followed by only 'ifup -eo1'. Besides server is not listening to the port, you can also check 'localhost' is available or not.
ps: Post it just hope someone who has the similar problem may benefit.
I had this problem when I wanted to make a vnc connection via a tunnel.
But the vncserver was not running.
I solved it by opening the channel on the remote machine with vncserver :3.
In my case, it worked after checking the correct IP address of the user credentials
previously I was using the wrong IP of the server
ssh -NfL 127.0.0.1:8084:127.0.0.1:8888 user#ip_address_of_server
after correcting it, works fine.
Encountered with the same error.
In my case, I found the problem was in the config file of jupyter.
Let's say there are 3 computers named A, B, and C, and A can access B but can't access C; B can access C.
To access jupyter-notebook service of C from A, first I established ssh tunnel from A to C through B, then I access jupyter-notebook by typing localhost:port_number, then I got the error.
Finally the problem was solved by writing the "c.NotebookApp.ip = '0.0.0.0'" in jupyter-notebook's config file, where '0.0.0.0' allows the access of other IPs.
Hope someone in a similar situation may benefit.
I had the same error when I was trying to tunnel my mlflow ui over ssh to view remotely. As mentioned in the first answer, the error arises because nothing on the server is listening for the port. This, for me, is because I forgot to start the mlflow app on my remote machine! So in general – make sure the app you're trying to access remotely is running.
Just replace localhost with 127.0.0.1.
(The answer is based on answers of other people on this page.)
This means the remote vm is not listening to current port i solved this by adding the port in the vm server

Resources