my job is in automation and I deal a lot with Boolean logic for when a piece of equipment has permission to do something or not do something. this requires that I design expressions in simple one line equations. I'm trying to figure out how I can design a little helper app to make it easier to code.
For example, let's say I'm trying to design a permissive to allow a vehicle to start moving, just jumping into a car won't make it start going, there steps that need to happen before the car will go any where. such as turning on the motor. i'f you look at the image below you can kind of get an idea of a simpler equation.
https://i.ibb.co/fnQ3x9x/IMG-2389.jpg
The eq for the picture is:
Start Permission = MotorTurnedOn AND ((AutoMode OR (ManualMode AND (OilTempNorm OR OilCoolingActive))) OR EmerOvr)
A lot of time I'm editing code that someone wrote a long time ago so it's not always easy to understand and some are very long as seen in the picture below
https://i.ibb.co/tXtrKwk/IMG-2388.jpg
the picture are generated by a third party software that is used to create the GUI's for the equipment.
I'm trying to figure how how could I design something where I could take block and drop them into something resembling the picture and it could export an equation for the equivalent boolean expression.
I'm only familiar with Python, Matlab, C++ and a little bit of java, if there's some template out there that could help me get started I'd be willing to learn a new language otherwise, i'd wanna stick closer to what I know.
Any help or ideas would be appreciated.
Related
Im new to uipath and coding in general. I know most of the basics from what was taught but they didnt go through how to form "condition" statements in the "if" activity. or basically any form of conditions. Where can i go about to learning them? is it a specific language?
kinda like: not Months.Contains(ExpenseMonth)
i wouldnt be able to come up with that because i dont know what is acceptable/readable to uipath studio
also regarding those calculations. where can i find more information on those? to learn more about
kinda like: (int32.Parse(row("Value").ToString) * 100 / monthlyTotal).ToString
they didnt really give me details on how to form that
so essentially, if i wasnt spoon fed with those statements, i would be stuck
It depends on which activity you are using. Usually it's VB.net. Find more about that programming language here.
And yes you will need to get the basics of that language on your own. UiPath isn't really helping you find the correct condition. It is more a tool that can use VB.net.
And soon you can switch to C# completely. But that is not yet ready and still experimental. Also, I would recommend you to stay with VB.net as it is way easier to learn as a first language. Currently, you can only use C# and Invoke Code activity.
To your first example from above:
not Months.Contains(ExpenseMonth)
That depends on your variable type. That looks like a DateTime or a String type and so you are able to use predefined functions that come with it. You can show them but simply clicking CTRL + SPACE after the dot.
And your second one:
(int32.Parse(row("Value").ToString) * 100 / monthlyTotal).ToString
I would always recommend you to use CInt instead of int32.parse. Look here. And it is often not needed to convert the row value into a String. As it is usually already in that type by default.
But again. You will need to learn the basics of VB.net before you are able to write a good business logic in UiPath that makes sense and is best practice.
I have been searching for a FAQ to tell me how to open a Excel Workbook/Worksheet and also how to Save the File once I have finished.
I notice that in most FAQ and all the books I have purchased on F# one is show how to create a new Workbook/Worksheet but is never shown how to either open or Save it.
Being a newbie to F# I would very much appreciate it if anyone could kindly provide me with either an answer or perhaps a few pointers?
Update
As for why F# and not C# or VB?
I am pleased to say that inspite of being a newbie (with the exception of Forth, VBA & Excel 2003, 2007 & 2010 and Visual Basic) I can do this in both VB, VBA & C# and since I've been retired on medical grounds, with plenty of time unfortunately on my hands, I like to continually set myself challenges to keep my little grey cells active and being a sucker for trying new languages....well!
F# is now an intergral part of Visual Studio 2010 so I thought - why not. Consider this - if we are not willing to use or at least try a new languages - I would always be wonder if I might have prefer it to VBA, VB, C# ..... and if you look at it from another point of view, if no one is going to use it - why create it in the first place? I suppose you can say if cave men hadn't experimented and made fire by rubbing two sticks together - where would we be now and would matches have been invented?
Although an complete answer would be good, I prefer a few pointers, to keep my challenge going.
And lastly but not least - thank you for taking the trouble to respond!
I don't think their is a specific F# library for Office, so you will just use the exact same .NET library that you use in VB.NET/C#. F# is a .NET language, so anything that can be done in C# can be done in F# (but you probably already knew that :) ). The API call will be exactly the same, it just that they will be done using the F# syntax instead of the VB/C# one. So for example something that look like this
public void SaveMyWorkbook() {
string filePath = #"C:\failworkbooks\catfail.xlsx";
workbook.Save(filepath);
}
Will be expressed in F# as
let filePath = "C:\\failworkbooks\\catfail.xlsx";
let saveWorkbook() = workbook.Save(filePath) |> ignore //if the Save method return something
Now, what you will soon realize is that the API isn't exactly designed to be easily used from a functional language. It can be done, but this task in particuliar is much more tailored to C#/VB.NET.
If you really want to enjoy F#, I suggest you use in area where its strength really show. My personal experience is that functional language are awesome when a lot of math is involved. It is also marvellous if you want to easily introduce parallelism in your application (since F# code is usually side effect free). So anything that require data crunching on a lot of data is perfect for it. But for task that consist mainly of putting together a bunch of API call to an external library, F# is kind of meh. You could say that F# is kind of like a graphic card programming language, while C# a general purpose CPU programming language. A lot of thing run better with C#, but the stuff that run better on F# run really better on it.
But if you really want to go that route, my suggestion is to try to use the Office API as you already know it, but with a F# syntax. If at some point you really have no idea how to do a specific task, ask a question about it on stackoverflow with your code and exactly want you want to do. Those question get answered ridiculously fast compared to broad all-encompassing question, so you won't wait long. (Programmer seem to love precise question with a specific answer ^^)
I hope that it helped a little.
I found this http://iouri-khramtsov.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/automating-excel-with-f.html helpful advice. Briefly, you'd use something like this:
#r "Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel" // Assuming it's a script
let excel = ApplicationClass(Visible = true)
let openFileName = #"C:\MyDir\MyFilenameToOpen.xls"
excel.Workbooks.Open(openFileName)
// Do stuff
let savedFileName = #"C:\MyDir\MyFilename.xls"
workbook.SaveAs(savedFileName)
Using F# with Excel seems like a natural fit.
Getting to a result in Excel requires the use of several immutable values, each driven by formulas. Excel has a brilliant user interface, a lovely model of the world - I love rows, columns and cells - but to automate or customise things requires macros. Why learn this when you can use F#? Formulas and immutable values are fundamental to its design.
Ideally you'd write formulas yourself as a User Defined Function (UDFs) also in F# - see http://excel-dna.net/ . Then, perhaps, you'd want to do something interesting with objects/types - Look for "github com mndrake ExcelObjectHandler" (I don't have enough reputation to post a 3rd link).
Jack
What are the best ways to improve the standards of coding-styles at a company? Let's use C# as an example here.
I guess there are many differences between developers that need to be taken into consideration. The concrete ones could be education, experience and past programming-languages.
How does one justify that something is right over something else?
One person may say "I move my body to the place where I earn my money with my 4-wheeled vehicle". So why is it more "right" to say "I drive to work in my car"?
Some people might like code more explicit with more lines of code. Some might like more tight code.
// Explicit
string text = defaultValue;
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(text)) {
text = fallbackValue;
}
// Tighter
string text = defaultValue ?? fallbackValue;
Or the old protective programming-style, where you check for error-cases in the beginning and not wrap the whole method body inside a positive if-clause:
public string ChangeText(string text)
{
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(text))
{
// Do a lot of stuff
}
else {
throw new Exception();
}
}
// vs.
public string ChangeText(string text)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(text)) {
throw new Exception();
}
// Do a lot of stuff
}
Is the old "I'm having troubles reading this code" valid here? It's the same situation that was when Generics was introduced to C#, people had an initial trouble reading it.
Where is the line drawn between unreadable code and code that some developers are not used to?
Which part of Phil Haacks "7 Stages of new language keyword grief" has valid points here?
Are there any easy ways to set coding-standards and uphold them in a company?
UPDATE: Take in consideration things like variable-naming, that can't really be defined in a document. Or can it?
The easiest way to set coding-standards at a company:
Create a Standards Document and enforce it.
...people love to complain about code quality, but few will sit down and take the time to create a standards document. It's worth the effort and as long as you can enforce it (code reviews, etc.) then you're bound to notice an improvement in your code.
You always can use free tools like StyleCop from Microsoft.
You can disable or modify rules you don't like
There are two main sides of coding style:
"Where do I put the opening brace?" type issues - These are usually unimportant, i.e. there are no real reasons to prefer one style over the other.
Actual coding rules, like do we use return's in the middle of a function.
The way I see it, for #1 type issues, there is no point in any debate. Just set a standard in a standards document, and enforce it (more on this later).
As for the second issue, I'm honestly not sure whether it should be regulater. I personally love sprinkling functions with return values to check for error conditions, and I know some people who cringe at the practice. But at the end of the day, we can usually read each other's code just fine. These kinds of issues are much more about how you prefer expressing yourself, what is easier for you to write, and I wouldn't want a company making rules that get to this level.
As for how to enforce things, standards documents are good, but in my experience, are just never read or followed closely, and are soon forgotten. The best way is to have some kind of automated tool which tells you that you're violating the standard.
For example, even as a completely new Java programmer, I knew when to uppercase/lowercase my identifiers, simply because Eclipse let me (quietly, unobtrusively) know what the standard is.
First, you will always have to enforce the coding styles - there will never be a consent.
That's, why I would try to automate the check for consistency. Depending on your language you can use StyleCop (for .Net) or something like indent under linux.
Every developer can work with his own code style in his environment (the reformat can be very easy, depending on your environment), but all checked-in code has to be of the company's style.
Which style do you choose? Well, often there are already popular styles - depending on the language. For your example (C#) I would choose the Microsoft style. At last: only the project manager (senior programmer) has the right to adjust it.
Most companies use Coding-Style-Guidelines/Conventions. These are documents telling that you should always do braces around the if body even for one command, that you should indent with tabs/spaces, and so on.
There are a lot of tools for (automatically) check and enforce the coding-style. (An example for the java-world is checkstyle, which can be integrated into eclipse and also in a continuous integration solution like 'hudson'.)
How does one justify that something is
right over something else?
Easy: just don't. Pick a coding style, communicate it, and enforce it.
I think consistency is important here. There's not a lot of point in getting into a semantic debate over which way is better than the other unless the current methodology is particularly bad.
What is important is that the team writes their code consistently so that if someone resigns or gets hit by a bus then his/her colleagues know what is going on with the code when they are forced to work with it.
I'm running a refactoring code dojo for some coworkers who asked how refactoring and patterns go together, and I need a sample code base. Anyone know of a good starting point that isn't to horrible they can't make heads or tails of the code, but can rewrite their way to something useful?
I would actually suggesting refactoring some of your and your coworkers' code.
There are always places that an existing codebase can be refactored, and the familiarity with the existing code will help make it feel more like a useful thing and less like an exercise. Find something in your company's code to use as an example, if possible.
Here are some codes, both the original and the refactored version, so you can prepare your kata or simply compare the results once the refactoring is performed:
My books have both shorter examples and a longer, actually a book long example. Code is free to download.
VB Code Examples
C# Code Examples
A nice example from Refactoring Workbook
There are a lot of examples on the internet of simple games like Tic-Tac-Toe or Snake that have a lot of smells but are simple enough to start with refactoring.
The first chapter in Martin Fowler "Refactoring" is a good starting point to refactoring. I understood most of the concepts when one of my teachers at school used this example.
What is the general knowledge level of your coworkers?
Something basic as code duplication should be easy to wrap their heads around. Two pieces of (nearly) identical code that can be refactored into a reusable method, class, whatever. Using a (past) example from your own codebase would be good.
I would recommend you to develop a simple example project for a specific requirement.
Then you add one more requirement and make changes to the existing classes . You keep on doing this and show them how you are finding it difficult to make each change when the code is not designed properly. This will make them realize easily because, this is what those ppl will be doing in their day to day work. Make them realize that , if patterns and principles are not followed from beginning, how are they going to end up in mess at the end.
When they realize that,then you start from scratch or refactor the existing messed up code .Now add a requirement and make them realize that it is easy to make a change in the refactored code, so that you need to test only a few classes. One change would not affect others and so on.
You could use the computer ,keyboard and printer class as an example. Add requirements like, you will be wanting the computer to read from mouse , then one more requirement can be like your computer would want to save it in hard disk than printing. Finally your refactored code should be like, your computer class should depend on abstract input device class and output device class. And your keyboard class should inherit from Inputdevice class.
Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship by Robert C. Martin considers refactoring.
I'm loving Refactoring Guru examples.
In there you can find design patterns examples too.
Refactoring is non-functional requirement when code perform correct functionality for which it is designed however difficult to debug, requires more effort to maintain and some performance bottleneck. Refactoring is to change to be easily maintainable, good readability and improve efficiency.
Thus we need to focus on criteria to make code more readable, easy to maintain.
Its obvious that having very large method/function might be difficult to understand.
Class depends on other hundreds of class make thing worst while debugging.
Code should be readable just like reading some workflow.
You can also use tools like sonar which can help you to identify critical criteria such as "Cyclomatic Complexity"
http://www.sonarsource.org/managing-cyclomatic-complexity-to-increase-maintainability/
You ask them to write code them self and check how tool does refactoring.
Apart from that, you can write code in eclipse and there is option available which does refactoring for you...
It's a bit dated (2003), but IBM has several refactoring examples (that work[ed?] in Eclipse) at http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/os-ecref/
I'm writing a small program in Ruby to parse a hand history log from a poker site.
The log is split over several lines and looks a bit like this:
Table 123456 NL Hold'em $1/$2
5 Players
Seat 3 is the button
Seat 1: randomGuy112 $152.56
Seat 2: randomGirl99 $200
Seat 3: PokerPro $357.12
Seat 4: FishCake556 $57.19
Seat 6: MooMoo $188.98
Dealt to MooMoo [Ah, Ks]
randomGuy112 folds
randomGirl99 raises to $7
etc.. etc..
I want to summarise this information in an object which then might, for example,
render it differently or save it to database.
When I originally thought of this problem I thought I'd just have one realativly straight forward class with a number of regexes and several if/else statements. I then realised this could turn into quite a large method and potentially be a nightmare to debug/maintain. Keep in mind it needs to loop at each stage of the game (preflop,flop etc) to collect player's actions.
I also want to tackle this with a TDD approach, but the 'one long method' way means that the tests for with checking later input will kind of rely on earlier tests.
I'm quite new to Ruby and havn't yet clicked on the 'Ruby way' to do things. I'm catching myself writing C# code
in a different language.
Can you give me some pointers on how to design the parser so it isn't one huge mess of if/else statements and more testable?
Use Treetop
It does look like you are on the borderline between what ad hoc string matching and RE's are good for, and what requires an actual parser.
There is nothing wrong with handwritten parsers, and as long as you keep your methods short, without a lot of complexity in any given one, it's OK to have as many if statements in total as the parser requires.
I'm not sure 10 lines with incomprehensible regular expressions is any better than 30 lines of nice looking code.
Now, Ruby does have an advanced PEG parser generator. I think in this case I wouldn't worry about whether it was overkill, I would just go ahead and use Treetop.
State Machine, anyone?
At any point in the play of a poker hand there is a clearly-defined set of possible next actions. I'd think you could encapsulate them into a state machine. There are a few around, amongst which (no recommendations, I'm afraid - not enough experience with any) are
Alter Ego (updated July this year)
ruby-state-machine (seems also to be alive)
statemachine (looks a bit stale)
You can checkout this open source poker game hand parser
It looks like they created a hash of regular expressions and then they probably iterate over the regex data structures. It is a more simple machine than a parser and probably a more light weight approach.
I wrote hand history parser for PokerStars log files https://github.com/malikbakt/pokerstars
You may want to look at: StringScanner.
I have two different pointers for you, which will point you to the solution, on how to write code in the ruby way.
Get a ruby book. The ruby book will have a lot of examples on how to write code in the ruby way. From my personal expirience I can recommend you the pixake(is this spelled right?) book: http://www.ruby-doc.org/docs/ProgrammingRuby/html/index.html
Read existing ruby code. You seem to know enough ruby to write code? Then you should certainly be able to read existing code. I assume you already have installed ruby on your system. If so, you will find plenty of sourcecode on your harddrive. If not just use the internet.
I'd recommend the book Refactoring by Martin Fowler (available in both dead-tree and electronic formats, IIRC). He covers object-oriented remedies for exactly the design problems you're asking about, all in a test-driven context. This is one of those books that everyone in the profession should read.