I'm creating a chatbot using Bot Composer and want to add a feedback dialog at the end of the conversation.
I was wondering how this feedback would be triggered? I've taken a look and there is a activities trigger called 'Conversation ended (EndOfConversation activity)' that I've tried out but struggling to get it working. I can't find a lot of information/documentation on the use of this trigger. Could it be used to infer the end of a conversation and then send a feedback dialog?
Has anyone managed to add a feedback dialog triggered by the end of a conversation to their chatbot using Bot Composer?
I was wondering how this feedback would be triggered?
Where do you want to trigger it? After the entire dialog has been done, or multiple places in multiple dialogs? One feedback for everything or do you need multiple?
I've taken a look and there is a activities trigger called 'Conversation ended (EndOfConversation activity)' that I've tried out but struggling to get it working. I can't find a lot of information/documentation on the use of this trigger. Could it be used to infer the end of a conversation and then send a feedback dialog?
EndOfConversation happens after everything is done. You won't be able to utilize this to trigger feedback as feedback is part of the conversation and if this event happens, then that is already done.
By default, dialogs automatically end after they complete.
"autoEndDialog": true,
You should add an action to the end (or any appropriate location) of your other dialogs to call (Begin a new dialog) the feedback dialog . You could keep track of whether certain feedback dialogs had been set and check for that value in your dialog to see if it should run again (if using a prompt, you can utilize the "alwaysPrompt" property). There is quite a bit of flexibility and it really depends on your need. But at the simplest scneario; you would make your feedback dialog, and make that the last action in your main dialog.
I hope that helped. If not, please let me know where I can clarify. Feel free to share any code/json/repo if appropriate.
This seems to be an old post but can we have some example to show how this is impleemented. I ammusing the bit framework sdk 4 and this should worked out of the box.x
Somestimes this works
Related
I have recently started to use Google Analytics 4 for event tracking, using Google Tag Manager to send events to Analytics. I have set up the custom variables in Tag Manager as well as in GA4.
Everything seems to work very well in Tag Manager's debug mode, and also if I look up the events in real-time view I get the requested event along with all the parameters I have set in Tag Manager. However, once I look up the events for the last couple of days in the Engagement -> Event view, a couple of my parameters are missing, and also I'm not getting the same hit count for each parameter, even though each event has all parameters set:
As you can see, 86 events have been recorded, but the event count for the parameters widely varies.
Here's a screenshot of my Tag manager settings:
I have tried to set up a new event with the same parameters, but (logically) I got the same result. I am under the strong impression I'm missing something obvious here. Does anyone have experience with this, or has anyone come across this same issue?
To be honest, you can just try to click on mark as conversion in the Events tab, and this should save them. I think for some reason GA4 doesn't save parameters otherwise...
i cant get this til work with fields and parameters for an event so i try to create a user custom dimension instead and also to send it as a content group and as user property
also i can see the user id under app instance for the standard report user explorer
but i can't filter on or select this one myself
i cant create the custom parameter reports like gerrit did
but yeah create them as custom dimensions /metric first should be the way
ga4 has a bug when you edit a standard report, you add 3 card and deselect one it still thinks you are maxed out and you have to start over...
the test internal users filters dont work, though you can see data in debug and under events, but since i know they work i know try to just make the filters active
I am trying to track clicks on the phone number on the website. After I set up the trigger using following settings:
Trigger Type: all elements;
Page URL: contains "tel:" ;
Click Text: contains "13";
With these settings, the trigger is firing correctly on the desktop but isn't working on mobile.
I tried to use only "Page URL"/"Text Only"/"Form Text"/"Form contains" as conditions for the trigger to fire, but all attempts are unsuccessful. I also tried to use "Just Links" as a trigger type but it's not helping.
I also tested the URL in different mobile browsers (chrome/safari) and emulator. With an emulator, the tag is firing correctly but it's not working on the
Please have a look at the preview to see the page and tracking I am talking about:
https://www.googletagmanager.com/start_preview/gtm?uiv2&id=GTM-T92J432>m_auth=MmNY2ZtOefQOp1Kce4yUFQ>m_preview=env-5>m_debug=x&url=https://lp.acfc.com.au/good-credit
I appreciate your advice on what is the problem and how it can be fixed.
Thanks!
Kirill
Actually, better way of doing this to set generic trigger in GTM, then you will be able to track any phones on your website:
1) Enable built-in variable Click Element (if you already have it, you can skip this step)
2) Create trigger, which will fire for all links which have tel:***** (it can be any phone).
CSS selector on the screenshot is a[href*="tel:"]
3) Create a tag, which will send data to GA
4) Check your events in GA.
Keep in mind that it might take a couple of hours to appear in Behaviour-> Events tab. Or you can check it immediately in Real Time -> Events tab
RESOLVED:
I just found out that in order to identify an event it is safer to look at how the data layer is changing after the action rather than on the "Variable" tab.
By doing so, you can see what data is actually going to google analytics, and it is more stable to use it as an ID for a trigger to fire.
In my case, I've had only elementURL that was pushed back to the datalayer. I used the parameter elementID equals "tel:xxxxxx" to make the tracker work. Hope it will help (just put your number instead of x).
Cheers!
Dialog can do almost everything according to the bot framework documentation, but it will take a lot more time to investigate than FormFlow. I failed to find a place that have lots of samples of bot framework yet. At the moment, before I spend a lot of time to try dialog, anyone know if it's possible to chain commands using FormFlow.
The work I am trying to do is to code a chain of commands:
query records
select a record from the results
actions/operations on the record
etc...
Really appreciate if anyone familiar with Bot Framework can help me on this.
Use the IDialogStack.Call method in your FormFlow handlers to call another dialog and push it on the stack.
Then use the IDialogStack.Done method to pop it off the stack. Both described here.
I was wondering if anybody ran into the same issue as I am facing now.
What I'm trying to do is have a workflow that checks the condition of a field (optionset) of a form. If the field has option 1, 2 or 3 then create new record with certain shared attributes, otherwise start a child workflow. The child workflow is a "Dialog" process, not a "workflow" process which informs the user that the record was not created and why. For some reason I cannot select the dialog workflow from the dropdown list of available child workflows...
Both the parent workflow and the "dialog" workflow process are based on the same entity.
If anybody has any ideas on how I could debug this or any clues in general I would greatly appreciate your feedback.
Thanks for taking the time to read this post!
It is not possible to call a dialog from a workflow (see here).
Workflows are generally triggered by events.
Imagine the ramifications - which user would receive the dialog and what if no-one was logged in?
One option is to drive everything with JavaScript
Trigger on change of the option set
Create the records
Start the workflow
Start the dialog
See the section under the heading "Opening a Dialog Process by Using a URL" on MSDN here
Rather use the URL than showModalDialog or showModelessDialog.
What might work even better is to call an Action from JavaScript. The Action can run synchronously and create all records, start child workflows and dialogs.
A synchronous workflow can stop an event and return an error message to the user, but cannot return success messages - it look like this will not meet your requirements, but Gareth Tucker has an example here.
Vista puts out a new security preventing Session 0 from accessing hardware like the video card, and the user no longer logs into session 0. I know this means that I cannot show the user a GUI, however, does that also mean I can't show one at all? The way my code is set up right now, it would be more work to make it command line only, however if I can use my existing code and just programmatically manage the GUI it would take a lot less code.
Is this possible?
The article from MSDN says this:
• A service attempts to create a user interface (UI), such as a dialog box, in Session 0. Because the user is not running in Session 0, he or she never sees the UI and therefore cannot provide the input that the service is looking for. The service appears to stop functioning because it is waiting for a user response that does not occur.
Which makes me think it is possible to have an automated UI, but someone told me that you couldn't use SendKeys with a service because it was disabled in Session 0.
EDIT: I don't actually need to show the user the GUI
You can show one; it just doesn't show up.
There is a little notification in the taskbar about there being a GUI window and a way to switch to it.
Anyway, there actually is a TerminalServices API command to switch active session that you could call if you really needed it to show up.
You can write a separate process which provides the UI for your service process. The communication between your UI and service process can be done in various ways (search the web for "inter process communication" or "IPC").
Your service can have a GUI. It's simply that no human will ever see it. As the MSDN quote suggests, a service can display a dialog box. The call to MessageBox won't fail; it just won't ever return — there won't be anyone to press its buttons.
I'm not sure what you mean by wanting to "manage the GUI." Do you actually mean pretending to send input to the controls, as with SendInput? I see no reason that it wouldn't be possible; you'd be injecting input into your own program's queue, after all, and SendInput's Vista-specific warnings don't say anything about that. But I think you'd be making things much more complicated than they need to be. Revisit the idea to alter your program to have no UI at all. (That's not the same as having a console program. Consoles are UI.)
Instead of simulating the mouse messages necessary to click a button, for instance, eliminate the middle-man and simply call directly the function that the button-click event would have called.