in our use case, we have the team channel id with me. This is captured and stored into the DB in the event below
this.onTeamsChannelCreatedEvent(async (channelInfo: any, teamInfo: any, turnContext: any, next: () => Promise<void>): Promise<void> => {
}
We are running a periodic job and need to find out the members of a channel to perform some operations. So, how can i find members info from the channelid?
I have seen examples which using the context or context.activity. But in this case context wont be available. we are using nodejs v4.
My code here is
var client = new ConnectorClient(credentials, { baseUri: channel.serviceUrl });
client.fetchMembers(channel.serviceUrl, channel.channelId,
(err, result) => {
if (err) {
functions.logger.log("failed to fetch team members")
}
else {
functions.logger.log("Team members are", result)
}
}
);
This now throws error
TypeError: client.fetchMembers is not a function
i have also tried client.fetchMembers but similar error.
There are two main ways you can do this:
Using the Microsoft Graph, in particular see the List Members operation.
By having a bot registered in the channel, which it sounds like you have already. You don't need an 'activity' at all, you can do this any time by accessing the Conversations object. In fact, this code doesn't even need to run in your "bot" project at all - as long as the bot is added to the team/channel, it will work to use the bot's credentials. You can see sample code here in the Microsoft docs, and I have a sample from a recent conference session, doing this in dotnet from a console app over here.
One thing that's worth noting, the members of a channel and the members of a Team are largely the same (only excluding Private channels), so that's why some of these options refer to the Team or Group.
You'll want to use teamsInfo.getTeamMembers() or teamsInfo.getPagedMembers() (if you want a paginated list), as in this sample:
async getPagedMembers(context) {
var continuationToken;
var members = [];
do {
var pagedMembers = await TeamsInfo.getPagedMembers(context, 100, continuationToken);
continuationToken = pagedMembers.continuationToken;
members.push(...pagedMembers.members);
} while (continuationToken !== undefined);
return members;
}
I have a service to manage logged in user. I have a second service that provides datasource for logged-in user's list items. Both services are singletons and (possibly) live longer than one users login.
I have this pattern reoccurring a lot:
this._loggedInUserService.loggedInUserObservable.subscribe(loggedInUser: User => {
// Remove old subscription
if (this._subscription) {
this._subscription.unsubscribe()
this._subscription = null
}
if (loggedInUser) {
this._subscription = this._otherService.getUserSpecificObservable(loggedInUser).subscribe(...)
}
})
Now that I have read a bit about switchMap, is the following functionally equal with the code above? Is the subscription correctly ended if the user changes?
this._loggedInUserService.loggedInUserObservable.pipe(
switchMap(user => {
if (user) {
return this._otherService.getUserSpecificObservable(loggedInUser)
} else {
// What to return here?
}
})
).subscribe(...)
Also, what should I return in the else? I don't need the subscription to work at all in that case, so is it safe just to return null or undefined? Or should I return empty Observable (import { EMPTY } from 'rxjs')? (The code in subscribe does not need to be run if there is no active user.)
As long as you aren't interested in values that are not defined, you can just filter them out before calling the second service:
this._loggedInUserService.loggedInUserObservable.pipe(
filter(user => !!user),
switchMap(user => this._otherService.getUserSpecificObservable(user))
).subscribe(...)
You can also see the principial idea in action here: https://stackblitz.com/edit/typescript-p75oku
I have an Angular 2 service:
import {Storage} from './storage';
import {Injectable} from 'angular2/core';
import {Subject} from 'rxjs/Subject';
#Injectable()
export class SessionStorage extends Storage {
private _isLoggedInSource = new Subject<boolean>();
isLoggedIn = this._isLoggedInSource.asObservable();
constructor() {
super('session');
}
setIsLoggedIn(value: boolean) {
this.setItem('_isLoggedIn', value, () => {
this._isLoggedInSource.next(value);
});
}
}
Everything works great. But I have another component which doesn't need to subscribe, it just needs to get the current value of isLoggedIn at a certain point in time. How can I do this?
A Subject or Observable doesn't have a current value. When a value is emitted, it is passed to subscribers and the Observable is done with it.
If you want to have a current value, use BehaviorSubject which is designed for exactly that purpose. BehaviorSubject keeps the last emitted value and emits it immediately to new subscribers.
It also has a method getValue() to get the current value.
The only way you should be getting values "out of" an Observable/Subject is with subscribe!
If you're using getValue() you're doing something imperative in declarative paradigm. It's there as an escape hatch, but 99.9% of the time you should NOT use getValue(). There are a few interesting things that getValue() will do: It will throw an error if the subject has been unsubscribed, it will prevent you from getting a value if the subject is dead because it's errored, etc. But, again, it's there as an escape hatch for rare circumstances.
There are several ways of getting the latest value from a Subject or Observable in a "Rx-y" way:
Using BehaviorSubject: But actually subscribing to it. When you first subscribe to BehaviorSubject it will synchronously send the previous value it received or was initialized with.
Using a ReplaySubject(N): This will cache N values and replay them to new subscribers.
A.withLatestFrom(B): Use this operator to get the most recent value from observable B when observable A emits. Will give you both values in an array [a, b].
A.combineLatest(B): Use this operator to get the most recent values from A and B every time either A or B emits. Will give you both values in an array.
shareReplay(): Makes an Observable multicast through a ReplaySubject, but allows you to retry the observable on error. (Basically it gives you that promise-y caching behavior).
publishReplay(), publishBehavior(initialValue), multicast(subject: BehaviorSubject | ReplaySubject), etc: Other operators that leverage BehaviorSubject and ReplaySubject. Different flavors of the same thing, they basically multicast the source observable by funneling all notifications through a subject. You need to call connect() to subscribe to the source with the subject.
I had similar situation where late subscribers subscribe to the Subject after its value arrived.
I found ReplaySubject which is similar to BehaviorSubject works like a charm in this case.
And here is a link to better explanation: http://reactivex.io/rxjs/manual/overview.html#replaysubject
const observable = of('response')
function hasValue(value: any) {
return value !== null && value !== undefined;
}
function getValue<T>(observable: Observable<T>): Promise<T> {
return observable
.pipe(
filter(hasValue),
first()
)
.toPromise();
}
const result = await getValue(observable)
// Do the logic with the result
// .................
// .................
// .................
You can check the full article on how to implement it from here.
https://www.imkrish.com/blog/development/simple-way-get-value-from-observable
I encountered the same problem in child components where initially it would have to have the current value of the Subject, then subscribe to the Subject to listen to changes. I just maintain the current value in the Service so it is available for components to access, e.g. :
import {Storage} from './storage';
import {Injectable} from 'angular2/core';
import {Subject} from 'rxjs/Subject';
#Injectable()
export class SessionStorage extends Storage {
isLoggedIn: boolean;
private _isLoggedInSource = new Subject<boolean>();
isLoggedIn = this._isLoggedInSource.asObservable();
constructor() {
super('session');
this.currIsLoggedIn = false;
}
setIsLoggedIn(value: boolean) {
this.setItem('_isLoggedIn', value, () => {
this._isLoggedInSource.next(value);
});
this.isLoggedIn = value;
}
}
A component that needs the current value could just then access it from the service, i.e,:
sessionStorage.isLoggedIn
Not sure if this is the right practice :)
A similar looking answer was downvoted. But I think I can justify what I'm suggesting here for limited cases.
While it's true that an observable doesn't have a current value, very often it will have an immediately available value. For example with redux / flux / akita stores you may request data from a central store, based on a number of observables and that value will generally be immediately available.
If this is the case then when you subscribe, the value will come back immediately.
So let's say you had a call to a service, and on completion you want to get the latest value of something from your store, that potentially might not emit:
You might try to do this (and you should as much as possible keep things 'inside pipes'):
serviceCallResponse$.pipe(withLatestFrom(store$.select(x => x.customer)))
.subscribe(([ serviceCallResponse, customer] => {
// we have serviceCallResponse and customer
});
The problem with this is that it will block until the secondary observable emits a value, which potentially could be never.
I found myself recently needing to evaluate an observable only if a value was immediately available, and more importantly I needed to be able to detect if it wasn't. I ended up doing this:
serviceCallResponse$.pipe()
.subscribe(serviceCallResponse => {
// immediately try to subscribe to get the 'available' value
// note: immediately unsubscribe afterward to 'cancel' if needed
let customer = undefined;
// whatever the secondary observable is
const secondary$ = store$.select(x => x.customer);
// subscribe to it, and assign to closure scope
sub = secondary$.pipe(take(1)).subscribe(_customer => customer = _customer);
sub.unsubscribe();
// if there's a delay or customer isn't available the value won't have been set before we get here
if (customer === undefined)
{
// handle, or ignore as needed
return throwError('Customer was not immediately available');
}
});
Note that for all of the above I'm using subscribe to get the value (as #Ben discusses). Not using a .value property, even if I had a BehaviorSubject.
Although it may sound overkill, this is just another "possible" solution to keep Observable type and reduce boilerplate...
You could always create an extension getter to get the current value of an Observable.
To do this you would need to extend the Observable<T> interface in a global.d.ts typings declaration file. Then implement the extension getter in a observable.extension.ts file and finally include both typings and extension file to your application.
You can refer to this StackOverflow Answer to know how to include the extensions into your Angular application.
// global.d.ts
declare module 'rxjs' {
interface Observable<T> {
/**
* _Extension Method_ - Returns current value of an Observable.
* Value is retrieved using _first()_ operator to avoid the need to unsubscribe.
*/
value: Observable<T>;
}
}
// observable.extension.ts
Object.defineProperty(Observable.prototype, 'value', {
get <T>(this: Observable<T>): Observable<T> {
return this.pipe(
filter(value => value !== null && value !== undefined),
first());
},
});
// using the extension getter example
this.myObservable$.value
.subscribe(value => {
// whatever code you need...
});
There are two ways you can achieve this.
BehaviorSubject has a method getValue() which you can get the value in a specific point of time.
You can subscribe directly with the BehaviorSubject and you may pass the subscribed value to a class member, field or property.
I wouldn't recommend both approaches.
In the first approach, it's a convenient method you can get the value anytime, you may refer to this as the current snapshot at that point of time. Problem with this is you can introduce race conditions in your code, you may invoke this method in many different places and in different timing which is hard to debug.
The second approach is what most developers employ when they want a raw value upon subscription, you can track the subscription and when do you exactly unsubscribe to avoid further memory leak, you may use this if you're really desperate to bind it to a variable and there's no other ways to interface it.
I would recommend, looking again at your use cases, where do you use it? For example you want to determine if the user is logged in or not when you call any API, you can combine it other observables:
const data$ = apiRequestCall$().pipe(
// Latest snapshot from BehaviorSubject.
withLatestFrom(isLoggedIn),
// Allow call only if logged in.
filter(([request, loggedIn]) => loggedIn)
// Do something else..
);
With this, you may use it directly to the UI by piping data$ | async in case of angular.
A subscription can be created, then after taking the first emitted item, destroyed. In the example below, pipe() is a function that uses an Observable as its input and returns another Observable as its output, while not modifying the first observable.
Sample created with Angular 8.1.0 packages "rxjs": "6.5.3", "rxjs-observable": "0.0.7"
ngOnInit() {
...
// If loading with previously saved value
if (this.controlValue) {
// Take says once you have 1, then close the subscription
this.selectList.pipe(take(1)).subscribe(x => {
let opt = x.find(y => y.value === this.controlValue);
this.updateValue(opt);
});
}
}
You could store the last emitted value separately from the Observable. Then read it when needed.
let lastValue: number;
const subscription = new Service().start();
subscription
.subscribe((data) => {
lastValue = data;
}
);
The best way to do this is using Behaviur Subject, here is an example:
var sub = new rxjs.BehaviorSubject([0, 1])
sub.next([2, 3])
setTimeout(() => {sub.next([4, 5])}, 1500)
sub.subscribe(a => console.log(a)) //2, 3 (current value) -> wait 2 sec -> 4, 5
Another approach, If you want / can to use async await (has to be inside of an async functions) you can do this with modern Rxjs:
async myFunction () {
const currentValue = await firstValueFrom(
of(0).pipe(
withLatestFrom(this.yourObservable$),
map((tuple) => tuple[1]),
take(1)
)
);
// do stuff with current value
}
This will emit a value "Right away" because of withLatestFrom, and then will resolve the promise.
I think I understand the concept of Observables in Rxjs but I am struggling to convert the theory into code.
I have an Angular component, say C. I want that it should show certain HTML components depending on whether the user is logged in or not. For this I am using the code similar to
<ng-container *ngIf = "userNotloggedIn">
...
I have an Angular Service which authenticates the user. I want that once the user is authenticated, the service should emit a value (say boolean true or false corresponding to signin and sign out). I will like to use an Observable for this and my component should subscribe to this Observable.
I am struggling to convert this into code. I my service, I have created an Observable as follows and then I emit the values (true or false) when the user signs in or signs out:
export class UserManagementService {
userSignedIn$: Observable<boolean>;
constructor(private http: HttpClient, private bs:WebToBackendInterfaceService) {
this.userSignedIn$ = Rx.Observable.of(false)
}
onUserSignout(){
console.log("In UserManagementService: onUserSignout")
return this.bs.onUserSignout().subscribe((res/*:ServerResponse*/)=>{
console.log("response fromm server",res)
this.userSignedIn$ = Rx.Observable.of(false)
}); //res is of type HttpResponse
}
signinUser(user:UserSigninInfo){
return this.bs.signinUser(user).subscribe((res:HttpResponse<any>)=>{console.log('response from server:',res);
console.log('response headers',res.headers.keys())
this.userSignedIn$ = Rx.Observable.of(true)
} )
}
Then in the component, I subscribe to the observable as follows:
ngOnInit(){
this.userloggedIn = false;
this.userManagementService.userSignedIn$.subscribe(x=>{console.log("got stream value ",x);
this.userloggedIn = x})
...
}
The above code doesn't work though. I get the very first value emitted by the Observable (corresponding to this.userManagementService.userSignedIn$.subscribe(x=>{console.log("got stream value ",x);) but nothing after that.
I suspect that it could be because I subscribe to the initial Observable but not to the new ones created in the signin and signout functions. How can I solve my problem?
Observable.of(true) returns a cold observable which cannot emit new values over time.
use Behavior Subject for userSignedIn$ instead
userSignedIn$=new BehabviorSubject();
and when you want to update the signin status use
userSignedIn$.next(true)
I'm just getting started with RXJS to see if it can replace my currently manual data streams. One thing I'm trying to port is a situation whereby the last value in the stream is remembered, so future observers will always get the 'current' value as well as subsequent ones. This seems to be fulfilled by BehaviorSubject.
However, I need to do this for a group of entities. For example, I might have data that represents a message from a user:
{ userId: 1, message: "Hello!" }
And I want a BehaviorSubject-like object that'll store the last message for all users. Is this something I can do with RXJS out-of-the-box, or would I need to do it myself? (If so, any pointers would be appreciated).
EDIT: After some more thought, it perhaps seems logical to having an 'incoming' subject, an observer that updates a Map, and then a function which I can call which initialises an Observable from the map values, and merges with the incoming stream...?
I use RxJS with a redux-like state setup. I have a BehaviorSubject that holds the current state, and every time an event/action is fired that current state gets passed through functions that produce a new state, which the subject is subscribed to.
Here's a simplified version of what I use:
export default class Flux {
constructor(state) {
//all resources are saved here for disposal (for example, when hot loading)
//this is just a flux dispatcher
this.dispatcher = new rx.Subject(),
// BehaviorSuject constructed with initial state
this.state = new Rx.BehaviorSubject(state),
}
addStore(store, initialState, feature = store.feature) {
this.dispatcher
.share()
// this is where the "reduction" happens. store is a reducer that
// takes an existing state and returns the new state
.flatMap(({action, payload}) =>
store(this.state.getValue(), action, payload))
.startWith(initialState || {})
.subscribe(this.state)
);
return this;
}
addActions(actions: rx.Subject) {
// actions are fed to the dispatcher
this.resources.push(actions.share().subscribe(this.dispatcher));
return this;
}
}
I create a global Flux object with manages state. Then, for every "feature" or "page" or whatever I wish I add actions and stores. It makes managing state very easy, and things like time-travel are something that are a given with Rx.