I have this GitHub Action which should work only after three other Actions have completed. I have configured it this way:
on:
workflow_run:
workflows: ["Extrae usuario y repo","Nombre contenedor Docker","Crea artefacto con configuración"]
The problem is I have noticed that it triggers after every one of them has run, not when all three of them have completed. Is there any way to create this graph-based hooks in GitHub Actions? Alternatively, I guess I could just skip running until the goods (some artifacts) have already been created.
This is not possible out of the box. You need kind of orchestration for that, like outside stateful app which is aware what was already run, and once you condition passed fire another workflow.
With workflow_run your workflow every time one of the listed workflow completes..
Related
Is there a way that I can auto trigger job B exactly 1 hour after triggering job A, here the issue is job A would have not finished its work in mid of the job itself it has to trigger job B that too exactly after an hour or the other option would be to skip to build script 2 exactly after an hour of execution in script 1 , is there any way to do this ?
Thanks in advance
I cannot offer a good practice as a solution, but I can suggest two possible workarounds:
1. Build Pause
You can add a 'Command Line' shell pause as the last build step of project A or the first build step of project B. That pause must be set to one hour:
sleep 1h
You need to reconfigure the default build timeout for this or the job will fail.
2. Strict Scheduling
If you have some flexibility on the time where A can or should be triggered, you can use the 'Schedule Trigger' to schedule both A and B, e.g. if you schedule project A to 1 pm and project B to 2 pm, you make sure that there is at least one hour between those two. This can be scheduled as often as necessary.
I don't think what you are proposing is a good way to go about setting up the deployment, but I can think of a few workarounds that might help if you are forced in this direction.
In configuration A, add build step which adds a scheduled build trigger to configuration B for an hours time (using the API). In configuration B, add a build step to the end of the configuration to remove this scheduled trigger. This feels like a really horrible hack which should be avoided, but more details here.
Outside of TeamCity make use of any pub/sub mechanism so the deployment to the VM can create an event when it has completed. Subscribe to this event and trigger a follow on build using the TeamCity API. For example, if you are using AWS you could have an SNS topic with a lambda function as a subscriber. This lambda function would call the API to queue configuration B when the environment is in a suitable state.
There are probably much nicer solutions if you share what deployment software you are using.
I need to trigger custom logic (e.g. shell script) once the TC job fails. How can I do that?
I already found that. It can be achieved by adding a build step that will be executed even if any of the previous steps failed or were stopped.
i have two Workflow XML files such as WF1 WF2. Can I link all these workflows in a single co-ordinator for the below actions? WF1 is Time dependent WF2 is No Dependency of anything.i want to execute after completion of one workflow next one to be execute in a single coordinator
The best way to go forward is to use a subworkflow in Oozie; for details see: Sub-workflow_Action.
A similar question was also asked here.
I have a job upstream that executes 4 downstream jobs.
If the upstream job finish successfully the downstream jobs start their execution.
The upstream job, since it finish successfully, gets a blue ball (build result=stable), but even tough the downstream jobs fail (red ball) or are unstable (yellow ball), the upstream job maintain its blue color.
Is there anyway to get the result of the upstream job dependent on the downstream jobs?, i mean, if three downstream jobs get a stable build but one of them get an unstable build, the upstream build result should be unstable.
I found the solution. There is a plugin called Groovy Postbuild pluging that let you execute a Groovy script in the post build phase.
Addind a simple code to the downstream jobs you can modify the upstream overall status.
This is the code you need to add:
upstreamBuilds = manager.build.getUpstreamBuilds();
upstreamJob = upstreamBuilds.keySet().iterator().next();
lastUpstreamBuild = upstreamJob.getLastBuild();
if(lastUpstreamBuild.getResult().isBetterThan(manager.build.result)) {
lastUpstreamBuild.setResult(manager.build.result);
}
You can find more info in the entry of my blog here.
Another option that might work for you is to use the parametrised build plugin. It allows you to have your 4 "downstream" builds as build steps. This means that your "parent" build can fail if any of the child builds do.
We do this when we want to hide complexity for the build-pipeline plugin view.
We had a similar sort of issue and haven't found a perfect solution. A partial solution is to use the Promoted Builds Plugin. Configure it for your upstream project to include some visual indicator when the downstream job finishes. It doesn't change the overall job status, but it does notify us when the downstream job fails.
Perhaps this plugin does what you are looking for?
Jenkins Prerequisite build step Plugin
the work around for my project is to create a new job, which is the down stream of the down streams. We set a post build step "Trigger parameterized build on other projects " in all three of the original downstream jobs. The parameter that parse into the new job depends on the three jobs' status and the parameter will causes the new job react accordingly.
1. Create new job which contains one simple class and one simple test. Both parameters dependens, i.e. class fail if parameter "status" = fail, class pass but test fail if parameter "status"=unstable, etc.
2. Set Trigger parameterized build on other projects for the three original downstream jobs with relevant configurations.
3. Set notification of the new job accordingly.
I have job A in Hudson A and Job B in Hudson B. I want to trigger job A by Job B.
In your job B configuration, check the Trigger builds remotely (e.g., from scripts) checkbox and provide a token.
The help text there shows you the URL you can call to trigger a build from remote scripts (e.g. from a shell script in Hudson job A).
However, that would trigger job B no matter what the result of job A is.
Morechilli's answer is probably the best solution.
I haven't used Hudson but I would guess your simplest approach would be to use the URL trigger:
http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/URL+Change+Trigger
I think there is a latest build url that could be used for this.
In the latest versions of Hudson, the lastSuccessfultBuild/ HTML page will contain the elapased time since it was built, which will be different for each call. This causes the URL Change Trigger to spin.
One fix is to use the xml, json, or python APIs to request only a subset of the information. Using the 'tree' request parameter, the following URL will return an XML document containing only the build number of the last successful build.
http://SERVER:PORT/job/JOBNAME/lastSuccessfulBuild/api/xml?tree=number
Using this URL restored the behavior I expected from the URL Change Trigger.
Personally, I find the easiest way to do this is to watch the build timestamp:
PROJECT_NAME/lastSuccessfulBuild/buildTimestamp
I'm using wget to trigger the build:
wget --post-data 'it-just-need-to-be-a-POST-request'
--auth-no-challenge --http-user=myuser --http-password=mypassword
http://jenkins.xx.xx/xxx/job/A/build?delay=0sec
There's other ways how you can trigger a build, see the REST and other APIs of jenkins.
But this works great on unix.