I have one Renderer object and two scene objects. One scene contains the objects that should not be processed by the unrealbloom post-processing pass and the other scene contains all “glowing” objects.
Now I thought I could do:
const THREED_Composer = new THREE.EffectComposer( THREED_Renderer );
const THREED_RenderPass = new THREE.RenderPass( THREED_Scene, THREED_Camera );
const THREED_RenderPassGlow = new THREE.RenderPass(
THREED_SceneGlow, THREED_Camera );
const THREED_BloomPass = new THREE.UnrealBloomPass(
new THREE.Vector2(window.innerWidth, window.innerHeight), 0.5, 0.5, 0.4);
//THREED_BloomPass.renderToScreen = false; ???
THREED_Composer.addPass( THREED_RenderPassGlow );
THREED_Composer.addPass( THREED_BloomPass );
THREED_Composer.addPass( THREED_RenderPass );
The intention was to first render the glowing objects and then render the non-glowing objects over them. I want the non-glowing objects to be able to obscure the glowing objects.
My animate function looks like this:
function animate()
{
if(GLOBAL_FocusLost)
return;
requestAnimationFrame(animate);
update();
THREED_Composer.render();
}
Ultimate goal:
I want to have glowing monolith in the midst of a room that can be obscured by all other objects.
I tried to read my way through the documentation but I think that I do not understand it enough.
Cheers. Any help is very much appreciated!
Related
I'm actually trying to add some materials to my Gltf objects in three js r113, but I don't know how to use correctly material parameters and the light as I see my object in three js viewer. This is What I get in Firefox
and this is what I'm dreaming about
.
I guess this is the value I need to apply to my code
This is how I add my gltf and how I try to add materials :
// Load a glTF resource of FENCE
gltfLoader.load( 'Fence.gltf', function ( gltf ) {
fenceModel = gltf.scene;
// fenceModel.traverse(function (child) {
// if (child.isMesh) {
// child.material = new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial({
// color: 0xc07341, //light Brown
// reflectivity: 0,
// dithering: true
// });
// }
// });
});
var ambientlight = new THREE.AmbientLight(0xffffff, 0.5 );
scene.add( ambientlight );
Actually my floor is only a gltf file with no materials.
Maybe I need to add some shadow porperties to my floor and then I could see the fence shadow ?
I need some help to understand how to do a better light effect on object.
Thank you, sorry for my english I'm using translator to help me.
Ps: My gltf object contain texture in it.
I have a model, a background sky and a ground surface. Texturing the surface results in no surface.
I've tried the basic approach and come to the conclusion that it is probably that the scene is being rendered before the texture has finished loading. Having searched and found various possible solutions, I have tried several of them, without really understanding how they are supposed to work. None of them has worked. One problem is that it is an old problem and most of the suggestions involve outdated versions of the three.js library.
// Ground
// create a textured Ground based on an answer in Stackoverflow.
var loader = new THREE.TextureLoader();
loader.load('Textures/Ground128.jpg',
function (texture) {
var groundGeometry = new THREE.PlaneBufferGeometry(2000, 2000, 100, 100);
const groundMaterial = new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial({map: texture});
var ground = new THREE.Mesh(groundGeometry, groundMaterial);
ground.receiveShadow = true; //Illumination addition
ground.rotation.x = -0.5 * Math.PI; // rotate into the horizontal.
scene.add(ground);
}
);
// This variation does not work either
http://lhodges.users37.interdns.co.uk/me/downloads/Aphaia/Temple.htm
http://lhodges.users37.interdns.co.uk/me/downloads/Aphaia/Temple7jsV0.15b.htm
The first of the above is the complete page in which the ground is a plain billiard table green. The second is the page containing the above code.
There appear to be no error (Last time I tried.)
By the time your texture loads and you add the ground, your scene has already rendered (and there is no other render call).
You need to call renderer.render(scene, camera); after adding the ground to the scene.
// Ground
// create a textured Ground based on an answer in Stackoverflow.
var loader = new THREE.TextureLoader();
loader.load('Textures/Ground128.jpg',
function (texture) {
var groundGeometry = new THREE.PlaneBufferGeometry(2000, 2000, 100, 100);
const groundMaterial = new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial({map: texture});
var ground = new THREE.Mesh(groundGeometry, groundMaterial);
ground.receiveShadow = true; //Illumination addition
ground.rotation.x = -0.5 * Math.PI; // rotate into the horizontal.
scene.add(ground);
renderer.render(scene, camera); // <--- add this line
}
);
as part of a project, I have to turn the camera around an object (position 0, 0,0) which remains to him still. For this, I want to know if the LookAt function is the one that is best suited , And also how does it work?
Integrating OrbitControls should be done with a few lines of code. So, the basic lines of code should be:
// init
var controls = new THREE.OrbitControls( camera, renderer.domElement );
controls.enableZoom = false; // optional
controls.enablePan = false; // optional
controls.center.set(0,0,0); // should be initially 0,0,0
controls.addEventListener( 'change', render ); // if you are not using requestAnimationFrame()
camera.position.z = 500; // should be bigger than the radius of your sphere
// render
function render() {
renderer.render(scene, camera);
}
<script src="js/controls/OrbitControls.js"></script>
Now, you should be able to rotate the camera around your sphere using your mouse.
All the other essential stuff (camera, renderer) can be found at the example: https://threejs.org/examples/#misc_controls_orbit
I've tried improving rendering time on my project by creating meshes and putting them as part of a larger geometry, and having just that single geometry as the object I add to the scene. I thought that I would still be able to manage picking of objects by having an array of the original meshes, and pass those to the raycaster. I used the following code:
var vector = new THREE.Vector3( ( loc_x / window.innerWidth ) * 2 - 1, - ( loc_y / window.innerHeight ) * 2 + 1, 0.5 );
projector.unprojectVector(vector, camera);
var raycaster = new THREE.Raycaster( camera.position, vector.sub( camera.position ).normalize() );
var objects = [];
var i = active_regions.length;
while (i--) {
objects = objects.concat(active_regions[i].mesh_entities);
}
var intersects = raycaster.intersectObjects( objects );
if ( intersects.length > 0 ) {
console.log("Intersection: " + intersects);
}
So in the above code, active_regions contains the original individual meshes, and I create an array on the fly to specify which objects I want to select from. Unfortunately intersects comes up empty.
If I modify my project slightly so that I have all those mesh_entities added to the scene individually, then the above code works and I can successfully select objects. Unfortunately, the whole scene then renders slowly.
What's a good way (or some good ways) for me to successfully check for intersection with the ray, without slowing down my rendering?
Thanks!
You need to update the Matrices for the objects not in the render scene manually as its done as part of the render process so if you are using your ghost scene, you don't need to render it, just update the matrices before doing the intersection:
scene_ghost.updateMatrixWorld(true);
I solved this by having a ghost scene. Essentially, I added all objects to the ghost scene as their individual meshes, and then when I use raycaster it works.
However, I had to use functions along these lines:
function flip_render_ghost(yes) {
if (yes == true) {
scene_ghost.add(camera);
render_ghost = true;
} else {
scene.add(camera);
render_ghost = false;
}
render();
}
function render() {
if (render_ghost == true) {
renderer.render( scene_ghost, camera );
} else {
renderer.render( scene, camera );
}
}
Whenever I am about to check for collisions, I flip to rendering ghost scene, check for hits, then flip back to normal rendering.
Edit: I have since discovered that objects cannot belong to multiple scenes (though geometries can be shared). So what I have done is created simple meshes for the picking scene. This requires more memory, but gives the option of having a simpler mesh to use for selection for faster picking. Also, it seemed to work for me to send the children of the ghost scene itself to the raycaster. You may need to, like me, add a property to each object in the ghost scene that references the main object you are trying to pick.
I am doing something similar in this and have verified that you need to render the scene to do proper raycasting. It is easy to optimize this however to just render both screens and have one clear over the other. You should be able to change your code to this, granted the second render call will clear over the first screen:
function render() {
renderer.render( scene_ghost, camera );
renderer.render( scene, camera );
}
I create a scene, add a couple of boxes and I can move the camera with the keyboard just fine.
I want to add a 3D model. In several tutorials, I saw something like:
var jsonLoader = new THREE.JSONLoader();
jsonLoader.load( "test.js", function( geometry ) { createScene( geometry) } );
function createScene( geometry ) {
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial({color: 0xbbbbbb}) );
mesh.scale.set(10, 10, 10);
mesh.position.y = -350;
mesh.position.x = -650;
group.add(mesh);
}
But for the other element I wrote something like:
MovingCube = new THREE.Mesh(MovingCubeGeom, new THREE.MeshFaceMaterial());
MovingCube.position.set(0, 25, 0);
scene.add(MovingCube);
How can I add a 3D model from a .js converted .obj at my scene?
The first one loads the model from and external file which contains a JSON representation of the geometry and sends it to the createScene function as an instance of the THREE.Geometry class when the external file has finished loading.
The second one the geometry is already in the variable MovingCubeGeom.
The second example is basically the same as what is in the createScene function of the first example.
You don't need to convert an obj to js, you can just use the THREE.OBJLoader class