I have this class:
#ApplicationScoped
public class BookService {
public boolean doorClosed;
public boolean isDoorClosed() {
return doorClosed;
}
}
And I have this test class:
#QuarkusTest
public class BookServiceTest {
#Inject BookService bookService;
#Test
public void testBookServiceDoor() throws InterruptedException {
bookService.doorClosed=true;
assertTrue(bookService.doorClosed);
assertTrue(bookService.isDoorClosed());
}
}
I am surprised that the last test assertion fails. The first passes but the last fails. It almost seems like that the getter/setters are using different variables than the one I am accessing directly.
I did the same test with Spring Boot and got the two assertions passing:
#Service
public class BookService {
public boolean doorClosed;
public boolean isDoorClosed() {
return doorClosed;
}
}
And the test:
#SpringBootTest
public class BookServiceTest {
#Autowired BookService bookService;
#Test
public void testBookServiceDoor() throws InterruptedException {
bookService.doorClosed=true;
assertTrue(bookService.doorClosed);
assertTrue(bookService.isDoorClosed());
}
}
Using the #ApplicationScoped annotation makes the class a normal scoped bean. This means that the container never injects an actual instance of the class; instead, you get a proxy that will lookup the correct instance on each method invocation.
This is most commonly useful for example with #RequestScoped beans, where you get a single proxy, which will dispatch method invocations to instances that belong to the "current request" (typically an HTTP request). However, there are good reasons why you might want this for application scoped beans as well (e.g. when you want lazy initialization).
The rule is: never access fields directly on normal scoped beans, only call methods.
If you want, you can make the class #Singleton. That is a pseudo scope, and you get no proxy, you get the actual instance that you can work with directly.
Related
I have a Spring Boot application where I would like to ensure that a list of decorators are verified to be executed. These decorators all extend from the same Abstract class, which in turn extend from the same interface, and they are autowired into a service class as a list of decorators. I would have thought that providing the #SpyBean(MyDecorator.class) at the class level of the test would have done the trick, but I got the error specifying that the decorator is not a spy. It looks like the MockitoPostProcessor class expects that we provide the individual concrete classes in the annotation as so #SpyBean(classes = {decorator1.class,decorator2.class}). I tried the latter, and it worked.
However, the issue that I have with this is that we have to add to this list every time we create a new decorator, which is not ideal. This is why I thought it makes sense to have the interface type be checked as well. Please let me know if there is a better way of doing this, or if I missed something. A thought that crossed my mind was to define my own post processor to wrap any bean from a defined type in a mockito spy, but I would like to check here first. Here is a skeleton definition of the classes to help you understand my dilemma.
MyDecorator.java
public interface MyDecorator{
public void decorate(SomeObject obj);
}
AbstractDecorator.java
public class AbstractDecorator implements MyDecorator{
//common decorator logic
}
Decorator1.java
#Component
public class Decorator1 extends AbstractDecorator{
public void decorate(SomeObject obj){
//decoration logic
}
}
Decorator2.java
#Component
public class Decorator2 extends AbstractDecorator{
public void decorate(SomeObject obj){
//decoration logic
}
}
DecorationService.java
#Service
public class DecorationService implements Service{
#Autowired
private List<MyDecorator> decoratorList;
public void processDecorators(){
//go through list of decorators and process some object
}
}
DecoratorServiceTest.java
#Runwith(SpringRunner.class)
#SpringBootTest
#ActiveProfiles("test")
//#SpyBean(MyDecorator.class) //<-- This doesn't wrap the classes in a spy and errors out
#SpyBean(classes = {Decorator1.class, Decorator2.class}) //<-- This works
public class DecoratorServiceTest{
#Autowired
private List<MyDecorator> decoratorList;
#Test
public void testProcessDecorator(){
//verify that each decorator was processed
}
}
I posted a spring boot github issue here. Hopefully we would either see an improvement on it or we get an explanation as to why it is designed in this way.
I have a workaround in place that I'm using which is I've created a class that implements Spring's BeanPostProcessor interface, and I override the postProcessAfterInitialization method, and I check if the class is what I'm expecting, then I would wrap it in a mockito spy. Also, you would need to define the spring bean.
Here is a snippet of the class that I created.
public class SpyBeanPostProcessor<T> implements BeanPostProcessor{
/**
* The class type to spy on.
*/
private Class<T> typeToSpy;
/**
* Construct a SpyBeanPostProcessor with a class type to wrap
* as a {#link org.mockito.Spy}
* #param typeToSpy The class type to spy on.
*/
public SpyBeanPostProcessor(Class<T> typeToSpy) {
this.typeToSpy = typeToSpy;
}
#Override
public Object postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException {
if (typeToSpy.isAssignableFrom(bean.getClass())){
return Mockito.spy(bean);
}else{
return bean;
}
}
}
I also needed to create a new spring bean that loads the BeanPostProcessor as shown below.
#Bean
public static SpyBeanPostProcessor decoratorSpyBeanPostProcessor(){
return new SpyBeanPostProcessor(MyDecorator.class);
}
In an Spring mockmvc test I want to replace a bean by a mock implementation which is configured using Mockito.when() definitions. The definitions are indeed respected at the time the mock is configured, as well as at the time the mock is injected into a depending bean (a controller advice in my case) during application context startup. However, when the mock is used during a certain test, all when definitions are gone.
Why?
Some remarks:
The mock is completely new code, so it is impossible that I am not aware of any call to Mockito.reset().
the mock at the time of usage is the same as at the time of creation.
a bypassing solution to the problem is to configure the mock in a #BeforeEach method in AbstractTest. However, I want to understand why it does not work without.
Here a simplified and anonymized example
#Component
public class MyBean {
private String property;
...
public String getProperty() {
return property;
}
}
#ControllerAdvice
public class MyControllerAdvice() {
private MyBean myBean;
#Autowired
public MyControllerAdvice(MyBean myBean) {
this.myBean = myBean;
System.out.println(this.myBean.getProperty()); // --> outputs "FOOBAR"
}
#ModelAttribute
public String getMyBeanProperty() {
return myBean.getProperty(); // --> returns null
}
}
public class AbstractTest {
#Configuration
static class Config {
#Bean
public MyBean () {
MyBean myBean = Mockito.mock(MyBean.class, "I am a mock of MyBean");
when(myBean.getProperty()).thenReturn("FOOBAR");
}
}
}
That's not a problem of Mockito. I think you simplified the example a lot and we don't see the full picture, but I can say that main cause - 2 different beans MyBean: one is initialized with Spring's #Component, second is in configuration class with #Bean.
Why do you use #Component for POJO/DO?
#Bean in the configuration class is being initialized lazy so better way to use #PostConstruct
If you want to leave both beans mark MyBean in the configuration class as #Primary
I have created an interface Client with its two concrete implementations
clientA and clientB and annotated them with my custom annotation.
public interface Client{
public void dosomething();
}
#Component
#Myannotation
public class clientA implements Client {
public void doSomething(){
sysout("Client A do something");
}
}
#Component
#Myannotation
public class clientB implements Client {
public void doSomething(){
sysout("Client B do something");
}
}
Now I am calling the overriden methods of both clientA and clientB from Alien class.
#Component
class Alien{
#Autowired
private ApplicationContext context;
public void performOperation(){
Map<String, Object> beans =
context.getBeansWithAnnotation(MyAnnotation.class);
for(Map.Entry<String, Object> entry: beans.entrySet()) {
Client c = (Client)entry.getValue();
c.doSomething();
}
}
}
I am facing problem with writing test method for performOperation.
#RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
class AlienTest
{
#InjectMocks
Alien a;
#Test
public void testperformOperation(){
//how to Mock for beans
assertEquals(expected, a.performOperation());
}
}
1) How should I write testperformOperation method(allowed to change the return type of performOperation method from void to any other type)
2) Is there any better way to get list of all implementations for Client interface without creating custom annotations.
I would suggest you first refactoring Alien to make it more testable using Dependency Injection idea which its dependencies (i.e Client) can be injected from outside rather than hard coded inside a method which always get from the spring context:
#Component
public class Alien{
private List<Client> clients = new ArrayList<>();
#Autowired
public Alien(List<Client> clients) {
this.clients = clients;
}
public void performOperation(){
for(Client c: clients) {
c.doSomething();
}
}
}
If you simply want to inject all Client implementation to the Alien , you just need to #Autowired List<Client> into Alien which Spring will already help you to inject all the Client implementation to it out of the box. No need to create #Myannotation
Once you make the Alien 's dependencies injectable (i.e a list of client) , you can simply inject a mock to it and verify performOperation() really invoke all of Client 's doSomething():
#RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
class AlienTest{
#Mock
private Client mockClientA;
#Mock
private Client mockClientB;
#Test
public void testperformOperation(){
List<Client> clients = new ArrayList<>();
clients.add(mockClientA);
clients.add(mockClientB);
Alien alien = new Alien(clients);
alien.performOperation();
verify(mockClientA).doSomething();
verify(mockClientB).doSomething();
}
}
I’ll answer both parts of your question, but I believe the first approach is inferior and the second is the go-to approach.
If you want to stick with your custom annotation approach, you need to have a #Mock ApplicationContext applicationContext in your test class. In the test method (or setup method) you need to mock the call to applicationContext.getBeansWithAnnotation and return an appropriate map containing your bean (possibly also a mock)
You can easily inject all beans to a class by injecting a List of the appropriate type. In your case
get rid of #Autowired ApplicationContext
add an #Autowired List (or, preferably, use constructor injection)
This will also make the tests simpler, no need to mock ApplicationContext.
For example, see https://dzone.com/articles/load-all-implementors
I'm having an issue when trying to mock a property of a service from within a Junit test:
#ContextConfiguration("classpath:application-config.xml")
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
public class FooServiceTests {
#Autowired
private FooServiceImpl fooService;
#Test
public void testFoo() {
String str = fooService.foo();
assertEquals("Var", str);
}
#Before
public void mockFooDao() throws Exception {
FooDao mockFooDao = Mockito.mock(FooDao.class);
Mockito.when(mockFooDao.foo()).thenReturn("Var");
ReflectionTestUtils.setField(fooService, "fooDao", mockFooDao);
}
}
Mocking fooDao has no effect since the the result is not the expected. Here is the code of both the service and the dao:
#Service("fooService")
public class FooServiceImpl implements FooService {
#Autowired
protected FooDao fooDao;
#Override
public String foo() {
return fooDao.foo();
}
}
#Repository
public class FooDaoImpl implements FooDao {
#Override
public String foo() {
return "foo";
}
}
As we can see the actual service is meant to return "foo", but the test mocks the dao so the service returns "var". I know it's a CGLIB proxy related thing but I can't figure out how to make it work without using a setter for the fooDao property. Any help would be appreciated.
Regards and thanks in advance.
Short answer
You have to unwrap the proxy and set the field on the target object:
ReflectionTestUtils.setField(unwrapFooService(), "fooDao", mockFooDao);
The unwrapFooService() can be defined as follows:
private FooServiceImpl unwrapFooService() {
if(AopUtils.isAopProxy(fooService) && fooService instanceof Advised) {
Object target = ((Advised) fooService).getTargetSource().getTarget();
return (FooServiceImpl)target;
}
return null;
}
...long one
The problem is quite complex, but solvable. As you have guessed this is a side-effect of CGLIB proxies being used. In principle, Spring creates a subclass of your FooServiceImpl named similar to FooServiceImpl$EnhancerByCGLIB. This subclass contains a reference to the original FooServiceImpl as well as... all the fields FooServiceImpl has (which is understandable - this is a subclass).
So there are actually two variables: FooServiceImpl$EnhancerByCGLIB.fooDao and FooServiceImpl.fooDao. You are assigning a mock to the former but your service uses the latter... I wrote about this pitfalls some time ago.
Is possible to get the proxy of a given object in Spring? I need to call a function of a subclass. But, obviously, when I do a direct call, the aspects aren't applied. Here's an example:
public class Parent {
public doSomething() {
Parent proxyOfMe = Spring.getProxyOfMe(this); // (please)
Method method = this.class.getMethod("sayHello");
method.invoke(proxyOfMe);
}
}
public class Child extends Parent {
#Secured("president")
public void sayHello() {
System.out.println("Hello Mr. President");
}
}
I've found a way of achieving this. It works, but I think is not very elegant:
public class Parent implements BeanNameAware {
#Autowired private ApplicationContext applicationContext;
private String beanName; // Getter
public doSomething() {
Parent proxyOfMe = applicationContext.getBean(beanName, Parent.class);
Method method = this.class.getMethod("sayHello");
method.invoke(proxyOfMe);
}
}
This hack is extremely awkward, please consider refactoring your code or using AspectJ weaving. You may feel warned, here is the solution
AopContext.currentProxy()
JavaDoc. I blogged about it here and here.
AopContext.currentProxy() as suggested by Tomasz will work. A more generic solution, that will work outside of the proxied class is to cast the object to org.springframework.aop.framework.Advised and get .getTargetSource().getTarget()
The former (getting the real object from the proxied object) is something that you should not really need. On the other hand getting the target proxy might be useful in some utility class that inspects existing beans in order to add some feature.
You can use a bean post-processor to set a reference to the proxy on the target bean. It moves the Spring-specifics from your beans to a single class.
Post-Processor
import org.springframework.beans.BeansException;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.config.BeanPostProcessor;
public class SelfReferencingBeanPostProcessor implements BeanPostProcessor {
#Override
public Object postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException {
return bean;
}
#Override
public Object postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException {
if (bean instanceof SelfReferencingBean) {
((SelfReferencingBean) bean).setProxy(bean);
}
return bean;
}
}
Context
Register the post-processor in applicationContext.xml.
<bean id="srbpp" class="SelfReferencingBeanPostProcessor"/>
Beans
Each bean must implement SelfReferencingBean to tell the post-processor that it needs a reference to the proxy.
public interface SelfReferencingBean {
void setProxy(Object proxy) ;
}
Now implement setProxy in each bean that needs to call itself through its proxy.
public class MyBean implements SelfReferencingBean {
MyBean proxy;
#Override
public void setProxy(Object proxy) {
this.proxy = (MyBean) proxy;
}
}
You could put this last bit of code into a bean base class if you don't mind casting proxy to bean's type when calling methods directly on it. Since you're going through Method.invoke you wouldn't even need the cast.
With a little work I bet this could be converted to an annotation processor a la #Autowired. Come to think of it, I don't recall if I even tried adding a self-reference using #Autowired itself.
public class MyBean implements SelfReferencingBean {
#Autowired MyBean proxy;
}