I know there are similar questions on the SO but many of the suggestions have not worked for me. I'm running Docker Desktop for Mac and I startup a docker container I've built that has ssh configured and running (I use these to connect to AWS, Azure etc). I startup the container with something like (the ubc/jlbase/jlbase image has ssh configure... and the following all works on a linux machine with docker0 network in place)
docker run -P --name test -d ubc/jlbase/jlbase
docker inspect test |grep IP
ping -c *the_ip_from_above*
does not connect. From what I can find, this is a known issue with Docker on Mac... but the help and links I've found don't seem to solve the problem. Can someone tell me what I've missed?
You can say that this is a know feature of Docker on Mac, not an issue. Docker on Mac is running on a virtual machine inside macOS, so the IP address you receive is the IP of the container inside the VM, not on macOS.
To address the two issues from the question:
How to enable ssh
To be able to ssh on your container, you will need to have the sshd running in the container and to publish the port 22. Check here to see how you can try this with a container that is already prepared
How to ping
Since the docker is running inside a VM, to be able to route traffic to the containers, you will need to setup the network layer to route the traffic. One approach is to create a tunnel between the VM and the machine.
This is much more complex setup and will require a help of a CNF (Conteinerized Network Function). One of the simplest CNF that was created just for this problem is soctun which creates a tunnel between the host and the docker network layer.
Related
Hi what I am actually trying is to connect remotly from a MySQL Client in Windows Subsystem for Linux mysql -h 172.18.0.2 -P 3306 -u root -p and before that I started the Docker Container as follows: docker container run --name testdb --network testnetwork -p 3306:3306 -e MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD=mysqlRootPassword -e MYSQL_DATABASE=localtestdb -d mariadb/server.
The purpose why I put the container in a own network, is because I also have a dockerized Spring Boot Application (GraphQL-Server) which shall communicated with this db. But always when I try to connect from my built-in mysql client, in my Windows Subsystem for Linux, with the above shown command. I got the error message: ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to MySQL server on '172.18.0.2' (115).
What I already tried, to solve the problem on my own is, look up whether the configuration file line (bind-address) is commented out. But it wont work. Interestingly it already worked to set up a docker container with MariaDB and connect from the outside, but now when I try exactly the same, only with the difference that I now put the container in a own existing network, it wont work.
Hopefully there some one out there which is able to help me with this annonying problem.
Thanks!
So far,
Daniel
//edit:
Now I tried the solution advice from a guy from this topic: How to configure containers in one network to connect to each other (server -> mysql)?. Futhermore I linked my Spring Boot (server) application with the "--link databaseContainerName" parameter to the MariaDB container.
Now I am able to start both containers without any error, but I am still not able to connect remotly to the MariaDB container. Which is now running in a virtual docker network with his own subnet.
I explored this recently - this is by design - container isolation. Usually only main (service httpd) host is accessible externally, hiding internal connections (hosts it communicates to deliver response).
Container created in own network is not accessible from external adresses, even from containers in the same bridge but other network (172.19.0.0/16).
Your container should be accessible on docker host address (127.0.0.1 if run locally) and mapped ("-p 3306:3306") port - 3306. But of course it won't work if many running db containers have the same mapping to the same host port.
Isolation is done using firewall - iptables. You can list rules (iptables -L) to see that - from docker host level.
You can modify firewall to allow external access to internal networks. I used this rule:
iptables -A DOCKER -d 172.16.0.0/12 -j ACCEPT
After that your MySQL containerized engine should be accessible using internal address 172.18.0.2 and source (not mapped) port 3306.
Warnings
it disables all isolation, dont't use it on production;
you have to run this after every docker start - rules created/modified by docker on the fly
not every docker container will respond on ping, check it from docker host (linux subsystem in this case) first, from windows cmd later
I used this option (in docker.service) to make rule permanent:
ExecStartPost=/bin/sh -c '/etc/iptables/accept172_16.sh'
For docker on external(shared in lan) host you should use route add (or hosts file on your machine or router) to forward 172.x.x.x addresses into lan docker host.
Hint: use portainer project (with restart policy - always) to manage docker containers. It's easier to see config errors, too.
I have docker (docker for windows server) and jenkins both running on a windows server 2019 and I am trying to add Docker Host URI in Jenkins but I ran into timeout error or connection refused error all time and cannot connect to docker host.
I tried the following urls:
tcp://:2375 (or 2376),
tcp://localhost:2375 (or 2376),
tcp://127.0.0.1:2375 (or 2376)
Do I have to configure anything else on docker or jenkins?. I cannot move forward in this issue. it would really help me if any one can provide some guidance to solve this.
I was facing similar issue. You need to expose your docker demon at port 2375. I did it via docker desktop.
Then added HOST URl as tcp://127.0.0.1:2375
I am using Docker Quickstart Terminal to run a docker container. The container should work on port 8088 of localhost:
docker run -it --name myContainer -p 8088:8088
However, when I go to localhost:8088 or 127.0.0.1:8088 I can't find any process running.
This works on OSX.
Why is this not working on Windows?
I'm assuming you're using VirtualBox, since that's what is integrated with the Quickstart terminal.
The reason it doesn't work is that Windows isn't running your (Linux) containers natively, it's running them in a separate Linux-based VM. This VM is available under a different ip address than your "physical" machine, usually printed when you start the quickstart terminal:
This is the ip address you need to use in order to connect to published container ports.
One possibility is the kind of VM you are using : HyperV (Docker For Windows) or VirtualBox (Docker Toolbox).
If it is the later (which seems probable since you are using the Docker Quickstart Terminal), you need to port forward 8088 in order for your PC (localhost) to see it.
See "How do I configure docker compose to expose ports correctly?" as an example when using VirtualBox.
If localhost does not work, a docker-machine ip will show you the ip of the VM being executed.
In my job I working with docker and the option --net=host working like a charm forwarding the docker container ports to the machine. This allows me to adding grunt tasks that use certain ports by example:
A taks for serving my coverage report in a port 9001
A local deployed version of my app served in the port 9000
A watch live reload the port 35729
For Unit testing runner use the 9876 port
When I begin to use Docker in Mac, the first problem that i had was: The option --net=host don't work anymore.
I researched and I understand why this is not possible (Docker in Mac runs in a own virtual machine) and my momentary solution it's use the -p option for expose the ports, but this limit to me to add more and more task that use ports because i need run the explicit -p command for each port that i need expose.
Anyone with this same problem? How to dealing with this ?
Your issue is most probably that you are using dockertoolbox or dhingy/dlite or anything else providing a full-fledged linux VM, which then hosts docker to run your container inside this VM. This VM has, of course, its own network stack and own IP on the host, and thats were your tools will have issues with. The exposed ports of the container are not exposed to OSX host localhost, but rather OSX Docker-VM-ip.
To solve those issues elegantly
Expose ports to OSX localhost from the container
First, use/install docker-for-mac https://docs.docker.com/engine/installation/mac/ instead of dockertoolbox or others. Its based on a special xhyve stack which reuses your hosts network stack
when you now do docker run -p 3306:3306 percona it will bind 3306 on the osx-host-localhost, thus every other osx-tool trying to attach to localhost:3306 will work ( very useful ) just as you have been used to it when you installed mysql using brew install mysql or likewise
If you experience performance issues with code shares on OSX with docker containers, check http://docker-sync.io - it is compatible with docker-for-mac ( hint: i am biased on this one )
Export ports from the OSX-host to a containter
You do not really export anything in particular, you rather make them accessable as a whole from all containers ( all ports of the OSX-host-localhost)
If you want to attach to a port you offered on the OSX host, from within a container, e.g. during a xdebug session were your IDE listens on port 9000 on the OSX-host-localhost and the container running FPM/PHP should attach to this osx-localhost:9000 on the mac, you need to do this: https://gist.github.com/EugenMayer/3019516e5a3b3a01b6eac88190327e7c
So you create a dummy loopback ip, so you can access your OSX-host ports from without containers using 10.254.254.254:9000 - this is portable and basically gives you all you need to develop like you have used to
So one gives you the connectivity to container-exposed ports to apps running on the mac and trying to connect to localhost:port
And the second the inverse, if something in the container wants to attach to a port on the host.
One workaround, mentioned in "Bind container ports to the host" would be to use -P:
(or --publish-all=true|false) to docker run which is a blanket operation that identifies every port with an EXPOSE line in the image’s Dockerfile or --expose <port> commandline flag and maps it to a host port somewhere within an ephemeral port range.
The docker port command then needs to be used to inspect created mapping.
So if your app can use docker port <CONTAINER> to retrieve the mapped port, you can add as many containers as you want and get the mapped ports that way (without needed an "explicit -p command for each port").
Not sure if docker for mac can support bi-directional connection later https://forums.docker.com/t/will-docker-for-mac-support-bi-directional-connection-between-host-and-container-in-the-future/19871
I have two solution:
you can write a simple wrapper script and pass the port you want to expose to the script
use vagrant to start a virtual machine with network under control.
I'm new to Docker, and I can't seem to connect to any containers.
I installed Docker Toolbox. Now I'm trying to get Shipyard to work. I followed the steps inside of a Docker Quickstart Terminal. The instructions say:
Once deployed, the script will output the URL to connect along with credential information.
The Shipyard installer ended with:
Shipyard available at http://10.0.2.15:8080
Username: [elided] Password: [elided]
However, I went to http://10.0.2.15:8080 on my browser and it didn't connect.
In another Docker Quickstart Terminal, I did a docker ps to see what the container was and to get its IP Address and I got:
$ docker inspect a4755 | grep IPAddress
"SecondaryIPAddresses": null,
"IPAddress": "172.17.0.8",
"IPAddress": "172.17.0.8",
I'm not sure why the IP was different, but I tried to connect to http://172.17.0.8:8080 and this didn't work either. http://localhost:8080 also failed.
This also happened when I tried to run docker-gunicorn-nginx - everything started, but I couldn't connect to the machine.
What gives?
If you read through Docker's Installation on Mac OS X you'll see that on OSX, Docker containers don't run on the host machine itself:
In a Docker installation on Linux, your physical machine is both the localhost and the Docker host. In networking, localhost means your computer. The Docker host is the computer on which the containers run.
On a typical Linux installation, the Docker client, the Docker daemon, and any containers run directly on your localhost. This means you can address ports on a Docker container using standard localhost addressing such as localhost:8000 or 0.0.0.0:8376.
[...]
In an OS X installation, the docker daemon is running inside a Linux VM called default. The default is a lightweight Linux VM made specifically to run the Docker daemon on Mac OS X. The VM runs completely from RAM, is a small ~24MB download, and boots in approximately 5s.
In OS X, the Docker host address is the address of the Linux VM. When you start the VM with docker-machine it is assigned an IP address. When you start a container, the ports on a container map to ports on the VM. To see this in practice, work through the exercises on this page.
Indeed, opening a new Docker Quickstart Terminal, I see:
docker is configured to use the default machine with IP 192.168.99.100
And, opening http://192.168.99.100:8080 takes me to Shipyard. Success!
You can try and execute this command:
docker-machine ip default
it will return some thing like:
192.168.99.100
To get port number:
docker ps
Example output (scroll right to see port mapping):
CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
113346425f20 springio/spring1 "sh -c 'java $JAVA_OP" 34 minutes ago Up 34 minutes 0.0.0.0:8080->8080/tcp pensive_kirch
To verify if it is working do:
curl 192.168.99.100:8080