Spring 4.1.4
Hibernate 4.2.0
JDK 1.8
My context: I have a Controller calling --> Service --> calling Dao
The business funcionality is to delete ( in 1 to many DB relation) some child ,but not all child .
Then ,after deleting some child I try to delete the Parent and offcourse I got java.sql.SQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException
But the question is why transaction is market for Rollback ? ( in other words why I don't got the deletion of some child ?)
SQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException is a checked exception and stating Spring documentation the behaviour would be the same of EJB : Note that by default, rollback happens for runtime, unchecked exceptions only. The checked exception does not trigger a rollback of the transaction.
I need to remove some child anf trying to remove the parent if possible, if not I need to commit the transaction maintaining the parent and remaining of childs
Note I tried also to specify in Service and Dao methods the Spring Annotation
#Transactional(noRollbackFor = SQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException.class)
To request explicitly the behaviour expected , but not even like this work for me
Controller code method:
public void delete() {
FacesMessage msg = new FacesMessage(FacesMessage.SEVERITY_INFO, "Data deleted.","");
try{
memoTemplateService.delete(memoTemplate);
memoTemplates.remove(memoTemplate);
}
catch (Exception e){
msg=new FacesMessage(FacesMessage.SEVERITY_WARN, "A","B");
}
reset();
FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().addMessage(null, msg);
}
Service method :
#Override
#Transactional(noRollbackFor = {SQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException.class,DBConstraintException.class})
public void delete(MemoTemplate memoTemplate)throws BusinessException {
// deleting some ,not all , child
phaseAndMemoGenerator.deleteMemosForVisibleTimeHorizon(memoTemplate);
try{// some times Template cannot be deleted
memoTemplateDao.delete(memoTemplate);
}
catch (Exception e){
throw new DBConstraintException("Partial Delete", "Template cannot be deleted, Memo in the past are present");
}
}
Dao
#Repository(value = "memoTemplateDao")
public class MemoTemplateDaoImpl extends GenericJpaDaoImpl<MemoTemplate, Long> implements MemoTemplateDao {
#Override
#Transactional(noRollbackFor = SQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException.class)
public void delete(MemoTemplate t) {
super.delete(t);
em.flush();
}
}
Just an Update : it's incredible but I can't catch neither doing the catch in Dao method ,debugger go in catch block but before this still a java.sql.SQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException is fired , incredible !
#Transactional(noRollbackFor = {SQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException.class,PersistenceException.class})
public void tryToDelete(MemoTemplate t)throws Exception {
super.delete(t);
try{
em.flush();
}
catch (Exception e){
throw new Exception("ddddd");
}
}
If there are constraints defined in DB, you won't be able to bypass them by committing without rollback.
Related
#GetMapping("trans")
#Transactional()
public String primaryTrans() {
User u1 = new User(0,"test","test#email.com");
us.save(u1);
User u2 = new User(0,"test1","test1#email.com");
us.save(u2);
secondaryTrans();
return "index";
}
#Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
private void secondaryTrans() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
User u2 = new User(0,"test2","test3#email.com".repeat(300));
us.save(u2);
}
Here i am manually raising DATA TOO LONG exception from secondary transaction, But it causes primary transaction also rolled back. How can we make sure that primary transaction to be committed irrespective of secondary transaction
In this case, since the second method is called from the same class, the second transaction is most likely not created. Springs transactional support uses AOP proxies to create transactions. The docs contain a description on why this will not work.
The simplest way is to catch the exception thrown from secondaryTrans() method, so just wrap secondaryTrans() into try-catch block:
try {
secondaryTrans();
} catch (Exception e) {
//...
}
I have the following method:
#Transactional
public Store handle(Command command) {
Store store= mapper.map(command.getStoreDto(), Store.class);
Store persistedStore = storeService.save(store);
addressService.saveStoreAddress(store, command.getEmployeeId()); //this method is not crucial, should be called independently and in another transaction, without any rollback in case of exception
return persistedStore;
}
addressService.saveStoreAddress is not crucial - when this method will throw any exception, store should be saved anyway (storeService.save(store);). What is the best solution in my case?
Use #Transactional(propagation=REQUIRES_NEW) on the saveStoreAddress() such that it will execute in a new and separate transaction.
To prevent the transaction of the handle() will be rollback because of the exception throw from saveStoreAddress() , you also have to try-catch when calling saveStoreAddress().
In the end , it looks something like:
#Service
public class AddressService {
#Transactional(propagation=REQUIRES_NEW)
public void saveStoreAdress(.....){
}
}
#Transactional
public Store handle(Command command) {
.......
try{
addressService.saveStoreAddress(store, command.getEmployeeId());
}catch (Exception ex){
/***
* handle the exception thrown from saveStoreAddress.
* If you want the current transaction not rollback just because of the
* exception throw from saveStoreAddress(), do not re-throw the exception when
* handling this exception
*/
}
return ....;
}
I try save list of entities to Oracle Db.
#Transactional
public void save() {
//logick
for (QuittanceType quittanceType : quittance) {
quittancesService.parseQuittance(quittanceType);
}
//logick
}
On each step I call this method:
#Transactional
#Override
public void parseQuittance(QuittanceType quittance) {
try {
//logick create payToChargeDb
paymentToChargeService.saveAndFlush(payToChargeDb);
} catch (Exception e) {
log.warn("Ignore.", e);
}
}
and method
#Override
public PaymentsToCharge saveAndFlushIn(PaymentsToCharge paymentsToCharge) {
return paymentToChargeRepository.saveAndFlush(paymentsToCharge);
}
When I try save entity with constraint My main transaction rollback and I get stacktrace:
Caused by: java.sql.BatchUpdateException: ORA-02290: CHECK integrity constraint violated(MYDB.PAYMENTS_TO_CHARGE_CHK1)
But I want skip not success entities and save success. I marck my method
#Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
and it look like this:
#Transactional
#Override
public void parseQuittance(QuittanceType quittance) {
try {
//logick create payToChargeDb
paymentToChargeService.saveAndFlushInNewTransaction(payToChargeDb);
} catch (Exception e) {
log.warn("Ignore.", e);
}
}
and
#Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
#Override
public PaymentsToCharge saveAndFlushInNewTransaction(PaymentsToCharge paymentsToCharge) {
return paymentToChargeRepository.saveAndFlush(paymentsToCharge);
}
But when I try save entity with constraint I not get exception and not enter to catcj block. just stop working debugging and the application continues to work. I do not get any errors. and as if rollback is happening
The proxy created by #Transactional does not intercept calls within the object.
In proxy mode (which is the default), only external method calls
coming in through the proxy are intercepted. This means that
self-invocation (in effect, a method within the target object calling
another method of the target object) does not lead to an actual
transaction at runtime even if the invoked method is marked with
#Transactional. Also, the proxy must be fully initialized to provide
the expected behavior, so you should not rely on this feature in your
initialization code (that is, #PostConstruct).
https://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/data-access.html#transaction-declarative
The same documentation recommends use of AspectJ if you want this behaviour.
I need to manage 2 Dao methods in a single transaction ,failure of either of them should rollback the other. The calling method is in the service layer. The technology used in Spring and Hibernate native sql query. Is there a way to achieve this?
Calling Method::
#Transactional(propagation= Propagation.REQUIRED)
public String save(AllowFileTypesForm formBeanObj,Hashtable global)
Called Method1::
public boolean deleteData( String strTableName,String strWhereClause) {
Session session = sessionFactory.getCurrentSession();
String strSqlQuery = null;
boolean deleted=false;
strSqlQuery = "DELETE FROM Persons where" + strWhereClause;
try {
Query query=session.createSQLQuery(strSqlQuery);
if (query.executeUpdate() <= 0) {
throw new SQLException("No row deleted from table " +strTableName);
}
else{
deleted=true;
}
}
catch(Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
}
return deleted;
}
Similar to this method there is another method which deletes data from some other table.
It will not rollback because you are catching the exceptions.
Spring's transaction management works through exceptions exiting the transaction boundary which are detected by the #Transactional AOP.
If you catch a sql exception for logging or something you must rethrow or throw a new exception to kick off rollback.
Add #Transactional on the service method from where you are calling those DAO methods. This article nicely sums up how it works.
I have a requirement where I do some operation on GUI and once I save the data in DB I need to send a http request to a webservice. But the response to GUI should not wait for result from webservice request.
For this I am using #Async , annotation of Spring.
here is my structure
MyConroller.java
calls a method
goSaveAndCreate
(not Async) in
ServiceA.java
ServiceA has a ServiceB bean injected in it. A method ,
#Async
create()
in ServiceB is annotated with Async.
Now ServiceA.goSaveAndCreate calls a method in itself , save and calls ServiceB.create() (which is Async).
I can see in logs the a new thread is created which is executing create method. But all of a sudden logs after a particular point stop and that thread seems to have got killed or comlpeted.
#Service("MarginCalculationService")
public class ServiceA implements ServiceAI {
private static final String APPROVED = "APPROVED";
public static final String SUCCESS = "SUCCESS";
....
#Autowired
ServiceB serviceB;
public List<VV> goSaveAndCreate(String[] ids,List<XX> calList) throws Exception, DataAccessException {
try {
Pair<List<VG>,List<UU>> resultList = save(ids);
vvList = resultList.getFirst();
/*
* HKAPIL - Send Message to webService callingserviceB
*/
if(resultList.getSecond() != null){
serviceB.create(resultList.getSecond());
}
} catch (DataAccessException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
logger.error("Data Access Exception thrown during - " , e);
throw e;
} catch (Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
logger.error("Exception thrown during " , e);
throw e;
}
System.out.println("Exiting the method in MCSERVICE");
return vvList;
}
private save(){
...
...
}
}
Second service
#Service("wireInstructionMessageService")
public class ServiceB implements ServiceBI {
#Async
#Override
public void create(List<Ralc> calcList) {
String threadName = Thread.currentThread().getName();
logger.info("Inside a different thread [" + threadName + " ] to send message ." );
..
...
otherMethod(Obj);
}
private otherMethod(Obj obj){
...
...
..
//tills this point logs are getting printed nothing after this
..
...
}
}
applciationContext.xml entry
<!-- Defines a ThreadPoolTaskExecutor instance with configurable pool size, queue-capacity, keep-alive,
and rejection-policy values. The id becomes the default thread name prefix -->
<task:executor id="MyMessageExecutor"
pool-size="5-25"
queue-capacity="100"/>
<task:annotation-driven executor="MyMessageExecutor"/>
Now I have two question
1) is there a way I can add some logs in some method which tell taht the new thread from MyExecutor is getting killed or MyExecutor is getting closed (the way we have in normal Java ExecutorSerrvice)
2) Am I using the Asyn in wrong way? Is it possible that as soon as method returns from Controller or ServiceA , ServiceB instance also is getting cleaned?
Thanks
HKapil