I needed to add enum description for schema of a request in swagger, so I defined this filter :
public class EnumSchemaFilter : ISchemaFilter
{
public void Apply(OpenApiSchema model, SchemaFilterContext context)
{
if (context.Type.IsEnum)
{
model.Enum.Clear();
var names = Enum.GetNames(context.Type);
names
.ToList()
.ForEach(n => model.Enum.Add(new OpenApiString($"{n} : {(int)Enum.Parse(context.Type, n)}")));
model.Example = new OpenApiInteger((int)Enum.Parse(context.Type, names[0]));
}
}
}
However the issue here is that when I want to try that enum in a get request, I see the following option :
Is there a way to change this to only show enum integer values when user want to select ?
I could solve the issue by defining a custom ParametersFilter :
public class SchemaParametersFilter : IParameterFilter
{
public void Apply(OpenApiParameter parameter, ParameterFilterContext context)
{
var type = context.ParameterInfo?.ParameterType;
if (type == null)
return;
if (type.IsEnum && parameter.In == ParameterLocation.Query)
{
var names = Enum.GetNames(type);
parameter.Schema.Enum = names.OfType<string>().Select(p => new OpenApiInteger((int)Enum.Parse(type, p))).ToList<IOpenApiAny>();
}
}
}
Related
I tried this solution: Custom fields with FormBuilder in the Microsoft Bot Framework
But failed to get it working....The problem I encountered is that when I assign the base.Form = value, the _prompt in the _field gets a default recognizer, and it won't get overriden in the next line's SetRecognizer call, that only replaces the _field's recognizer.
However the matching process uses the _prompt's recognizer internally ( ? ).
Here is my code:
public class LuisIntentRecognizer<T> : RecognizePrimitive<T>
where T : class
{
public LuisIntentRecognizer(IField<T> field, string luisModelID, string luisSubscriptionKey)
: base(field)
{
_luisModelID = luisModelID;
_luisSubscriptionKey = luisSubscriptionKey;
}
public override DescribeAttribute ValueDescription(object value)
{
return new DescribeAttribute((string)value);
}
public override IEnumerable<string> ValidInputs(object value)
{
yield return (string)value;
}
public override TermMatch Parse(string input)
{
TermMatch result = null;
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(input))
{
var luisModel = new LuisModelAttribute(_luisModelID, _luisSubscriptionKey);
var luisService = new LuisService(luisModel);
var luisResult = luisService.QueryAsync(input).Result; // TODO refactor somehow to async
var winner = luisResult.Intents.MaxBy(i => i.Score ?? 0d);
if (winner != null && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(winner.Intent))
{
result = new TermMatch(0, winner.Intent.Length, 0.0, winner.Intent);
}
else
{
result = new TermMatch(0, input.Length, 0.0, input);
}
}
return result;
}
public override string Help(T state, object defaultValue)
{
var prompt = new Prompter<T>(_field.Template(TemplateUsage.StringHelp), _field.Form, null);
var args = HelpArgs(state, defaultValue);
return prompt.Prompt(state, _field.Name, args.ToArray()).Prompt;
}
private string _luisModelID;
private string _luisSubscriptionKey;
}
public class LuisIntentField<T> : FieldReflector<T>
where T : class
{
public LuisIntentField(string name, string luisModelID, string luisSubscriptionKey, bool ignoreAnnotations = false)
: base(name, ignoreAnnotations)
{
_luisModelID = luisModelID;
_luisSubscriptionKey = luisSubscriptionKey;
}
public override IForm<T> Form
{
set
{
base.Form = value;
base.SetRecognizer(new LuisIntentRecognizer<T>(this, _luisModelID, _luisSubscriptionKey));
}
}
private string _luisModelID;
private string _luisSubscriptionKey;
}
Could anyone get it working?
Thanks
It seems to be a bug in the framework indeed: https://github.com/Microsoft/BotBuilder/issues/879
I want to use the IsoDateTimeConverter from Newtonsoft to format the json version of my DateTime properties.
However, I cant figure out how this is done in Nest 2.x.
Here is my code:
var connectionPool = new SingleNodeConnectionPool(new Uri("http://localhost:9200"));
var settings = new ConnectionSettings(connectionPool, s => new MyJsonNetSerializer(s));
var client = new ElasticClient(settings);
public class MyJsonNetSerializer : JsonNetSerializer
{
public MyJsonNetSerializer(IConnectionSettingsValues settings) : base(settings) { }
protected override void ModifyJsonSerializerSettings(JsonSerializerSettings settings)
{
settings.NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore;
}
protected override IList<Func<Type, JsonConverter>> ContractConverters => new List<Func<Type, JsonConverter>>()
{
type => new Newtonsoft.Json.Converters.IsoDateTimeConverter()
};
}
I'm getting this exception:
message: "An error has occurred.",
exceptionMessage: "Unexpected value when converting date. Expected DateTime or DateTimeOffset, got Nest.SearchDescriptor`1[TestProject.DemoProduct].",
exceptionType: "Elasticsearch.Net.UnexpectedElasticsearchClientException"
Any help is appreciated
with the Func<Type, JsonConverter>, you need to check that the type is the right one for the converter that you want to register; if it is, return the converter instance, otherwise return null
public class MyJsonNetSerializer : JsonNetSerializer
{
public MyJsonNetSerializer(IConnectionSettingsValues settings) : base(settings) { }
protected override void ModifyJsonSerializerSettings(JsonSerializerSettings settings)
{
settings.NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore;
}
protected override IList<Func<Type, JsonConverter>> ContractConverters => new List<Func<Type, JsonConverter>>()
{
type =>
{
return type == typeof(DateTime) ||
type == typeof(DateTimeOffset) ||
type == typeof(DateTime?) ||
type == typeof(DateTimeOffset?)
? new Newtonsoft.Json.Converters.IsoDateTimeConverter()
: null;
}
};
}
NEST uses the IsoDateTimeConverter for those types by default, so you won't need to register a converter for them unless you would like to change other settings on the converter.
Trying to save selections from a CheckBoxList as a comma-separated list (string) in DB (one or more choices selected). I am using a proxy in order to save as a string because otherwise I'd have to create separate tables in the DB for a relation - the work is not worth it for this simple scenario and I was hoping that I could just convert it to a string and avoid that.
The CheckBoxList uses an enum for it's choices:
public enum Selection
{
Selection1,
Selection2,
Selection3
}
Not to be convoluted, but I use [Display(Name="Choice 1")] and an extension class to display something friendly on the UI. Not sure if I can save that string instead of just the enum, although I think if I save as enum it's not a big deal for me to "display" the friendly string on UI on some confirmation page.
This is the "Record" class that saves a string in the DB:
public virtual string MyCheckBox { get; set; }
This is the "Proxy", which is some sample I found but not directly dealing with enum, and which uses IEnumerable<string> (or should it be IEnumerable<Selection>?):
public IEnumerable<string> MyCheckBox
{
get
{
if (String.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(Record.MyCheckBox)) return new string[] { };
return Record
.MyCheckBox
.Split(new[] { ',' }, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries)
.Select(r => r.Trim())
.Where(r => !String.IsNullOrEmpty(r));
}
set
{
Record.MyCheckBox = value == null ? null : String.Join(",", value);
}
}
To save in the DB, I am trying to do this in a create class:
proxy.MyCheckBox = record.MyCheckBox; //getting error here
but am getting the error:
Cannot implicitly convert 'string' to System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable'
I don't know, if it's possible or better, to use Parse or ToString from the API for enum values.
I know that doing something like this will store whatever I put in the ("") into the DB, so it's just a matter of figuring out how to overcome the error (or, if there is an alternative):
proxy.MyCheckBox = new[] {"foo", "bar"};
I am not good with this stuff and have just been digging and digging to come up with a solution. Any help is much appreciated.
You can accomplish this using a custom user type. The example below uses an ISet<string> on the class and stores the values as a delimited string.
[Serializable]
public class CommaDelimitedSet : IUserType
{
const string delimiter = ",";
#region IUserType Members
public new bool Equals(object x, object y)
{
if (ReferenceEquals(x, y))
{
return true;
}
var xSet = x as ISet<string>;
var ySet = y as ISet<string>;
if (xSet == null || ySet == null)
{
return false;
}
// compare set contents
return xSet.Except(ySet).Count() == 0 && ySet.Except(xSet).Count() == 0;
}
public int GetHashCode(object x)
{
return x.GetHashCode();
}
public object NullSafeGet(IDataReader rs, string[] names, object owner)
{
var outValue = NHibernateUtil.String.NullSafeGet(rs, names[0]) as string;
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(outValue))
{
return new HashSet<string>();
}
else
{
var splitArray = outValue.Split(new[] {Delimiter}, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries);
return new HashSet<string>(splitArray);
}
}
public void NullSafeSet(IDbCommand cmd, object value, int index)
{
var inValue = value as ISet<string>;
object setValue = inValue == null ? null : string.Join(Delimiter, inValue);
NHibernateUtil.String.NullSafeSet(cmd, setValue, index);
}
public object DeepCopy(object value)
{
// return new ISet so that Equals can work
// see http://www.mail-archive.com/nhusers#googlegroups.com/msg11054.html
var set = value as ISet<string>;
if (set == null)
{
return null;
}
return new HashSet<string>(set);
}
public object Replace(object original, object target, object owner)
{
return original;
}
public object Assemble(object cached, object owner)
{
return DeepCopy(cached);
}
public object Disassemble(object value)
{
return DeepCopy(value);
}
public SqlType[] SqlTypes
{
get { return new[] {new SqlType(DbType.String)}; }
}
public Type ReturnedType
{
get { return typeof(ISet<string>); }
}
public bool IsMutable
{
get { return false; }
}
#endregion
}
Usage in mapping file:
Map(x => x.CheckboxValues.CustomType<CommaDelimitedSet>();
I have this list of type IEnumerable<MyBaseType> for which I am trying to create an extra where-clause to retrieve a specific item in the list. The specific value does only exist on subtype MyFirstType and MySecondType. Not on MyBaseType.
Is it possible to create an expression kind of...
MyList.Where(b => (b is MyFirstType || (b is MySecondType)) && b.SpecificValue == message.SpecificValue);
Above is not working since b is of type MyBaseType and SpecificValue does not exist there. Also note that I do have another subtype MyThirdType that neither has the SpecificValue.
What does work doing what I want is this...
foreach (dynamic u in MyList)
{
if (u is MyFirstType || u is MySecondType)
{
if (u.SpecificValue == message.SpecificValue)
{
//Extracted code goes here
break;
}
}
}
Anyone have an idea how to create an linq expression for the above scenario?
Maybe there is a better solution but as I see it, this could work well enough... If you don't mind performance.
Well then, start by declaring an interface:
public interface IMySpecialType
{
object SpecificValue {get; set;} //you didn't specify what type this is
//all your other relevant properties which first and second types have in common
}
Then, make MyFirstType and MySecondType derive from this interface:
public class MyFirstType : MyBaseType, IMySpecialType
{
//snipet
}
public class MyFirstType : MySecondType, IMySpecialType
{
//snipet
}
Then, filter and cast:
MyList
.Where(b => (b is MyFirstType) || (b is MySecondType))
.Cast<IMySpecialType>()
.Where(b => b.SpecificValue == message.SpecificValue);
//do something
The direct translation of your code to a Linq where clause is
string messageValue = "foo";
var result = baseList.Where(item =>
{
dynamic c = item;
if(item is MyFirstType || item is MySecondType)
{
if( c.SpecificValue == messageValue)
return true;
}
return false;
});
This will require testing the type of the class though and using dynamic - so you might as well cast item to either MyFirstType or MySecondType directly.
An alternative would be using reflection to check if the property exists, using this approach you are not dependent on the actual types of your items as long as they do have the property you are interested in:
string messageValue = "foo";
var result = baseList.Where( item =>
{
var prop = item.GetType().GetProperty("SpecificValue");
if (prop != null && prop.GetValue(item, null) == messageValue)
return true;
else return false;
});
If modifying the class hierarchy is an option you can have you MyFirstType or MySecondType implement an interface that holds the property, then you can use OfType() in your Linq query:
interface ISpecific
{
string SpecificValue { get; set; }
}
class MyFirstType : MyBase, ISpecific
{
public string SpecificValue { get; set; }
}
...
string messageValue = "foo";
var result = baseList.OfType<ISpecific>()
.Where(item => item.SpecificValue == messageValue);
A far more easy way to do that would be to create an interface to mark all your classes having this property SpecificValue. Then it's a child play :
static void Main(string[] args)
{
List<MyBaseType> MyList = new List<MyBaseType>();
ISpecificValue message = new MyFirstType();
MyList.OfType<ISpecificValue>().Where(b => b.SpecificValue == message.SpecificValue);
}
}
class MyBaseType { }
interface ISpecificValue { string SpecificValue { get; set; } }
class MyFirstType : MyBaseType, ISpecificValue
{
public string SpecificValue;
}
class MySecondType : MyBaseType, ISpecificValue
{
public string SpecificValue;
}
I am trying to write a Linq expression that checks against property in a derived class, but the list is made up of members from a base class. Example code below. The 2nd line of the Process method starting with 'var list' does not compile, but I am not sure what syntax I should use to make it valid?
public class Manager
{
public void Process()
{
Base[] stuff = { new Derived() { Id = "1", Name = "me" } };
var list = stuff.Where<Derived>(d => d.Name == "me");
}
}
public class Base
{
public string Id { get; set; }
}
public class Derived : Base
{
public string Name { get; set; }
}
If you know the list has only Derived, you can use the Cast<T> method:
var list = stuff.Cast<Derived>().Where(d => d.Name == "me");
If there are only some Derived, you can use OfType<T>:
var list = stuff.OfType<Derived>().Where(d => d.Name == "me");
In that case, the non-Derived objects will be skipped.