In the docs here I can see that there are test nonces.
I want to create cards on file that will be declined when charging payments.
I've tried all these nonces and none seem to work.
What am I doing wrong?
Both requests below fail.
squareClient.customersApi.createCustomerCard(
createCustomer,
CreateCustomerCardRequest.Builder("cnon:card-nonce-declined").build()
)
squareClient.customersApi.createCustomerCard(
createCustomer,
CreateCustomerCardRequest.Builder("ccof:customer-card-id-declined").build()
)
There is not a way to save a card on file that will later fail in the sandbox environment, since CreateCustomerCard, by design, authorizes the card upon creation. So if the card is going to fail, it won't be able to save and fail later.
Related
I'm integrating Square payment gateway into our system. And want it to support SCA.
In their dev docs it says that I should call verifyBuyer each time I want to charge CoF. Also, "If a challenge is required, Square automatically displays the challenge to the buyer". It's ok for on-session payments. But what about off-session payments, like cars rental service does - without customer online (automatically)?
In their dev docs it says nothing or I'm missing something.
Did anybody face with such case?
Our docs state:
Important
The SCA flow must not be initiated for a card on file transaction where the buyer is not present. In this scenario, do not call the verifyBuyer function. You can still charge the card but be prepared to handle the CARD_DECLINED_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED error.
Basically, don't call verifyBuyer, and don't pass a token to the payment endpoint. The payment could still technically fail, so you should build functionality to handle that.
https://developer.squareup.com/docs/payment-form/cookbook/verify-buyer-on-cof
I want to create something in Slack that sends a message (starting by calling someone with '#') to a channel when specific users login. I've checked ifttt and zapier. I also checked the slack api to create something myself, but I couldn't really find anything usefull.
Anyone has any ideas?
Slack does not track user login or logoff in a traditional sense. Instead, users are always always "logged in" and available to receive messages once they have joined a team / channel.
There also is the concept of "presence", which is related, but not the same thing. User presence can change multiple times during a few minutes, e.g. if the user is on a mobile. I am guessing you would not want to send the user your message that often.
Still you can poll the presence information of a user with the API users.getPresence , which could be used to implement a script that polls this information on a regular basis and send your message. You also want to filter out presence changes below a certain duration threshold.
Keep in mind though that the rate limit for API methods is 1 per second. So depending on how many users you have in your workspace there will be a significant delay between the user becoming "present" and your script being able to send the message.
There is a workaround for that to have a google sheet as a database for the users and you can trigger by day once and timestamp it.
So the best trigger is a private message or public and you can use filter when mentioning or signin or signout it depends on the trigger word then you pass the filter since zapier won't count your zaps if you used fiter as a second step.
edit:
tl;dr: you can't.
You have to create a payment method in order to verify it. Creating a sale does NOT invoke verification, even if verification is enabled globally.
original:
I'm reading about credit card verification, which apparently isn't done automatically during Braintree_Transaction::sale(), but I don't see any options to enable verification on calling sale().
Do I really have to implement (at least) two separate API transactions just to verify a credit card?
Ideally I would like to use a single call to ::sale() to perform validation, authorization, and capture.
I have already enabled verification through my control panel, and I'm using test credit card number 4000111111111115 which, is supposed to be declined, but i'm getting successful transactions with it.
Do I have to create a payment method separately in order to perform validation, even if I have global validation enabled?
Full disclosure: I work at Braintree. If you have any further questions, feel free to contact support.
To test card verification results, please adjust the amount of your transaction. Because these cards are not linked to real accounts, Braintree cannot make the small authorization charges that are made in production, and instead the API must rely on the amount of the test transaction to dictate the expected response.
In a Production environment, Card verification is triggered by the creation of payment methods, not by transactions. To enable verification, either enable it across all payment methods, or add the verifyCard option to your PaymentMethod::Create call. The response to PaymentMethod::Create in either of these cases will contain a creditCardVerification object if the verification fails for any reason, allowing you to stop the transaction before sale is called.
I have configured Paypal Pay-flow Pro, and live mode is set, but when I use test card details for any card type then it accepts it and successfully checks out.
When I have set Payment Action -Authorization in admin payment settings then it works fine, but not when Payment action will be Sale.
CC.php from model file of payment has been overwritten and changes are below :
$info->setCcCidEnc($info->encrypt($info->getCcCid()));
This line is uncommented in prepareSave() function.
What is the exact issue here, I am unable to trace it!
I have got response from paypal support team and they had an issue whereby some of the processed transaction is not appearing in their PayPal account.
their developers fixed it and it's working properly now.
I am posting answer so it may help someone in future.
Goal: Only have successful purchases show up on a customer's billing statement. I don't want declined authorizations showing up on their billing statement (as seen in an online banking system) as pending. A customer often will accidentally input an incorrect billing address, for example, followed by a correct one. Together, the two attempts, one successful and one not both show up on their billing statement as pending prior to settlement. This can scare the customer as it looks potentially like they will be charged twice.
Details: When I do an AUTH_CAPTURE (via ActiveMerchant's purchase) or an AUTH (via ActiveMerchant's authorize) which is declined and subsequently want to void that authorization (via ActiveMerchant's void) so as not to have it appear on a customer's billing statement as pending (even though it will settle out after a few days), the gateway can't find the transaction to void using the authorization code returned from the authorization or capture method calls on the gateway.
This is specific to the authorize.net AIM gateway.
Please advise.
Thanks!
If I understand your question correctly, I'm not sure there is a way to do what you want.
This is a limitation of the gateway / merchant account system.
I just stayed at a hotel this past weekend, and when I checked in I was warned that an 'authorization charge' would appear on my card and then go away. The hotel situation is similar to what you are dealing with, and I don't think there is a way around it. Gas stations do it, restaurants, hotels, etc.
It's so common that I wouldn't worry about customers being alarmed. You might put a statement on your payment form saying something about an authorization charge - I've done that in the past on projects.
And for the auth.net specifics - I'm pretty sure you cannot void an auth, thus the error you are getting. The auth code returned is used later on to capture the amount, if needed.