Example: I want to call libffmpeg.dll in flutter-windows-app. Where should I put the libffmpeg, make it could be packed in release and debug app, so i just use ffi.DyncamicLibrary.open('libffmpeg.dll') to call the native functions ? Should i need to change the windows indrectory? and how to achieve it?
I was also digging this theme for quite a while. I was able to find following infomation:
Each platform requires different way of C/C++ dynamic/static libraries integration, thus it won't be possible to simply add '.dll'/'.so'/etc to, say, '/assets' folder
To include dynamic library in Ios and Android flutter project you have to make several changes in 'ios'/'android' folders respectively
You can try out those materials, they might help you:
Integrating C library in a Flutter app using Dart FFI
Calling Native Libraries in Flutter with Dart FFI
Related
I do have a strange behavior with a flutter package I am building. It uses FFI to integrate a custom-made c++ library.
When I run flutter run -d windows --release the code starts and I do have the window with the code running.
However, when I go to the directory where the executable is stored and I run it, the program starts but the library is not loaded. I do see also that when I run flutter test, it complains that it cannot load the library. I have checked that the dll's needed are there using dependenciesGUI.exe and it seems that everything is fine, at least on my side. I do see however that within kernel32.dll I am missing ext-ms-win-oobe-query-l1-1-0.dll.
I am using Visual Studio 2022 with the x64 configuration.
Any idea on what could be the issue? For me it is VERY puzzling to be able to run the software through flutter but not with the executable directly.
Thanks!
Yours,
Pi-r
EDIT:
I compared my package with a fresh package built with flutter. With a fresh package, the behavior is the one expected: I can have the program run normally or with flutter run.
I compared the libraries of the clean package with the ones linked in my package. They are the same (with the same missing dlls which do not seem to pose an issue).
I also checked that the exported functions I needed where present -> It is the case.
The only difference I can see is that using flutter run adds a series of libraries to the path. Has I am a Linux person, I do not know of a tool that could be used to detect what is the missing library. I am open to write a separated c++ code that would load the library if it could help me identify what is the issue... ANY tips/tricks would be greatly appreciated :)
I finally found the issue I had and it is related to a different behavior under Linux and under Windows (as you will guess, I am a Linux person).
When compiled under Linux, I can force the compiler to link multiple libraries relatively to my main library. I discovered that this is not the case under Windows. Either the dlls are in the executable folder or in the Path.
For the sake of code clarity, my package uses two different libraries. Library A, which is compiled from flutter with the ffi package, called library B. First the second library was in the asset folder and with the relative linking of Linux, it was working perfectly. But it did not work under Windows until I explicitly copied the two in the same directory of the executable.
The solution was then to ensure that both libraries are copied correctly in the directory of the flutter executable. This can be done easily if you add the dependent libraries to the bundle variable in the CMakeLists.txt of the package.
However, this doesn't work when you do the testing (flutter test). As the bundle mechanism seems to be not propagated to the test function. Therefore here, the only solution is to copy the dependent libraries to the root directory of the source code :vomiting_face:
I must point out that this is only the case under Windows, for Linux, it works out of the box...
I'm making stuff for IOS, Mac, and WatchOS - I have certain common functionality that is more about me and the way I program than about whatever it is I'm programming - helper methods etc
What I'd like is to have a "Common" framework or library in my app which is included into every other library. I understand I need a separate target for each of ios, macos, watchos, but I can't figure out how to set it up.
I can create a framework - and it comes with a target - I can duplicate that target and change stuff, but I don't seem to be able to change it from IOS to macos for instance. I can create a separate macos target, but then I can't seem to be able to change where it gets the code from.
Essentially in my source tree I want a single directory:
Common
and then have target frameworks CommonIOS, CommonMacOs, CommonWatchOS - that all just compile "Common". How do I achieve that?
You're misusing the word "framework". All you want is to keep some source code as a library that all your projects and targets, no matter what system they'll be compiled for, can use. You are describing a Swift package.
We're developing an SDK for our technology for iOS, the sdk is delivered in a static framework. Our code uses openCV and we link OpenCV into the delivered framework binary.
This normally works well but we're having an issue with a client which is indirectly using a different version of openCV in another framework.
This is causing a conflict and the clients app crashes.
Beside switching to the same version of openCV, removing our openCV dependency or switching to a dynamic library (which allows to hide open CV inside), is there an another option to fix this?
I tried to compile our lib using "Perform Single-Object Prelink and add the openCV libs in "Prelink libraries" but this produced link error when I tried to integrate it and it looks as if it ignored "Prelink libraries", maybe I'm doing something wrong here.
Any thoughts or ideas on the matter would be much appreciated.
I am starting to develop a scientific software that I hope I will be able to run on multiple platforms. My plan is to use OpenTK for the rendering of the scientific models and plots. As of the moment I have a prototype that runs on Windows using OpenTK 1.1 libraries from http://www.opentk.com/ (a simpler version just with OpenTK and a more complicated one with OpenTK + WindwosForms). I am trying to port that prototype to Android.
It seems that the syntax using by the Xamarin.Android OpenTK library is nearly identical to the one that I am currently using for Windows (with the only difference that OpenGL -> OpenGL ES and GameWindow -> AndroidGameView) so the porting shouldn't be an issue. However, I was hoping that I could avoid a copy-paste method and get a more permanent solution having a shared OpenTK code between the Windows and the Android version.
I have read trough the Xamarin documentation about the shared vs PCL methods for cross-platform development. However, I still struggle to figure out how to set-up a Visual Studio solution with an Android and Windows project and a shared code that will include OpenTK. Is that even possible and can someone give me an example of how to do it? I did explore an example I found for rendering a rotating cube using OpenTK for a shared Android/iOS project (http://developer.xamarin.com/content/TexturedCubeES30/) but in my case I need to use a different OpenTK library for the Windows and for the Android project.
I also found this Do the Android and iOS versions of OpenTK have the same API? discussion. It is very similar to what I would like to do but in my case I am trying to setup a project for Windows and Android (for now).
Can I use only one OpenTK library (which one?) that is being called from both the Android and the Windows project and what will be the right way to set-up both projects so they share the same OpenTK code. This is the first time I am dealing with writing a cross-platform code so I am a bit lost.
Edit: I was able to get a prototype running using Shared Xamarin project and compiler flags as proposed below. Code was indeed not very pretty at places but I got over 70% code re-usability between the two platforms so it was worth the effort. This is how I used the compiler flags in case someone is looking for the same thing (credit to SKall from the Xamarin forums):
#if __ANDROID__
using OpenTK.Graphics.ES11;
#else
using OpenTK.Graphics.OpenGL;
#endif
I used the #if syntax similarly where there were small differences between the syntax of the routines.
It does not seem like OpenTK has its logic inside of a PCL in the first place, so your plans on putting it there are going to get hard to achieve.
However, if you split out your code, such that most of it is contained in classes, which are not highly dependent on the underlying platform, you will be able to create a Class Library Project for each platform and link your files between the platform specific projects. Inside of the classes it contains you will use #if definitions to choose whether to use AndroidGameView or GameWindow and the same goes for other platform specific types. It will make the code ugly, but this is the alternative to PCL.
You could try to see how much of the OpenTK code compiles inside of a PCL and inject the platform specific stuff at runtime, but it will require considerably more work from you. However, it will make the code a lot more cleaner to look at.
To ease the file linking, you could make one of those Shared Projects and chuck in all of the logic in there.
Some more info about code sharing here: http://developer.xamarin.com/guides/cross-platform/application_fundamentals/building_cross_platform_applications/sharing_code_options/
Dependency injection: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_injection
I am trying install OpenGL on VS2010.
I use this tutorial.
And I get the following error:
Unable to start program 'C:\Users\s151310\Tutorial 0.3.8\frameworkD.lib'.
The specified file is an unrecognized or unsupported binary format
How can I fix this?
Actually don't have to install anything at all to start OpenGL development with Visual Studio. As long as you limit yourself to OpenGL-1.1 and core Win32 APIs everything is already in place for you.
However to get modern OpenGL features one must use the so called extension mechanism to load pointers to functions of newer versions – a tedious and uninteresting process. Hence extension loader wrappers have been developed.
Also creating a window and setting up a matching OpenGL context is laborous as well. So you want to use some framework for that two.
Extension loader wrappers and frameworks are 3rd party libraries that need to be installed separately.
Unable to start program 'C:\Users\s151310\Tutorial 0.3.8\frameworkD.lib
Why are you trying to execute a library file? This is the framework library that's supposed to be linked into your executables. So this raises the question: How did you setup your project, specifically which build options did you configure. Without that I can't give better advice.