I'm new in p5js and i want to create a noise effect in an image with it. I create a functional sketch with Java in processing, but when i pass it to p5j something is wrong.
The image is download in the html field hwne i put , but the pixels loc staff doesn't.
Can anyone help me!!
This is my sketch:
function setup()
{
createCanvas(400,300);
img = loadImage("data/monja.jpg");
//surface.setResizable(true);
//surface.setSize(img.width, img.height);
background(0);
}
function draw()
{
loadPixels();
img.loadPixels();
for (let x = 0; x < img.width; x++)
{
for (let y = 0; y < img.height; y++)
{
let loc = x+y*width;
let c = brightness(img.pixels[loc]);
let r = red(img.pixels[loc]);
let g = green(img.pixels[loc]);
let b = blue(img.pixels[loc]);
if (c < 70){
img.pixels[loc]= color(random(255));
}
else {
img.pixels[loc] = color(r, g, b);
}
}
}
updatePixels();
//image(img, 0, 0);
}```
To modify the color of certain pixels in an image here are some things to keep in mind.
When we call loadPixels the pixels array is an array of numbers.
How many numbers each pixel gets is determined by the pixel density
If pixel density is 1 then each pixel will get 4 numbers in the array, each with a value from 0 to 255.
The first number determines the amount of red in the pixel, the second green, the third red and the fourth is the alpha value for transparency.
Here is an example that changes pixels with a high red value to a random gray scale to create a glitch effect.
var img;
var c;
function preload(){
img = loadImage("https://i.imgur.com/rpQdRoY.jpeg");
}
function setup()
{
createCanvas(img.width, img.height);
background(0);
let d = pixelDensity();
img.loadPixels();
for (let i = 0; i < 4 * (img.width*d * img.height*d); i += 4) {
if (img.pixels[i] > 150 && img.pixels[i+1] <100&&img.pixels[i+2] < 100){
let rColor = random(255);
img.pixels[i] = rColor;
img.pixels[i + 1] = rColor;
img.pixels[i + 2] = rColor;
img.pixels[i + 3] = rColor;
}
}
img.updatePixels();
}
function draw() {
image(img,0,0);
}
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/p5#1.3.0/lib/p5.js"></script>
Related
I'm creating a code in Processing that applies a filter to a photo by going over each pixel, extracting the RGB/Grayscale value and modifying the RGB values. The program would take the grayscale value and run it through a few if/else statements to determine how much to modify the RGB values. So far I have this for the code but I'm stumped on how to extract the RGB/Gray values of a pixel
PImage method(PImage image) {
loadPixels();
image.filter(GRAY);
for (int i = 0; i < image.width; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < image.height; j++) {
//This part here is to store the RGB values
float R;
float G;
float B;
//Convert the RGB to Gray
float coordCol = (0.2989*R) + (0.5870*G) + (0.1140*B);
if (coordCol < 60) {
float rDark = R * 0.9;
float gDark = G * 0.9;
float bDark = B * 0.9;
} else if(60 <= coordCol && coordCol <= 190) {
float bTintBro = B * 0.7;
} else {
float bTintYel = B * 0.9;
}
}
}
return image; // change this to return a new PImage object
}
I've tried many methods, get(), pixel[], filter(GRAY), etc but so far I still can't get the RGB values for a pixel
It's a question many will ask themselves because processing encodes it's colors in a non-intuitive manner. But you're in luck, because they totally know about it being that way! The helpful folks that coded Processing made a couple methods that will get you exactly what you want. Here's the documentation for the one to get the R value, you should be able to track the others from there.
Also, here's a short proof of concept demonstrating how to get the ARGB values from your sketch:
int rr, gg, bb, aa;
PImage bg;
void setup() {
size(600, 400);
// now setting up random colors for a test background
bg = createImage(width, height, RGB);
bg.loadPixels();
for (int i=0; i<width*height; i++) {
bg.pixels[i] = color(random(200), random(200), random(200), random(200));
}
updatePixels();
}
void draw() {
background(bg);
// giving visual feedback
fill(255);
textSize(15);
text("R: " + rr, 10, 20);
text("G: " + gg, 10, 40);
text("B: " + bb, 10, 60);
text("A: " + aa, 10, 80);
}
// THIS IS WHERE THE INFO YOU WANT IS
void mouseClicked() {
loadPixels();
int index = mouseX*mouseY;
rr = (int)red(pixels[index]);
gg = (int)green(pixels[index]);
bb = (int)blue(pixels[index]);
aa = (int)alpha(pixels[index]);
}
I hope it helps. Have fun!
I'm trying to make a game and I'm stuck on random level design. Basically, I'm trying to create a line from one edge/corner to another edge/corner while having some randomness to it.
See below image 1 [link broken] and 2 for examples. I'm doing this in processing and every attempt I've tried hasn't yielded proper results. I can get them to populate randomly but not in a line or from edge to edge. I'm trying to do this on a 16 x 16 grid by the way. Any ideas or help would be greatly appreciated thanks!
Image 2:
Based on your description, the challenge is in having a connected line from top to bottom with a bit of randomness driving left/right direction.
There are multiple options.
Here's a basic idea that comes to mind:
pick a starting x position: left's say right down the middle
for each row from 0 to 15 (for 16 px level)
pick a random between 3 numbers:
if it's the 1st go left (x decrements)
if it's the 2nd go right (x increments)
if it's the 3rd: ignore: it means the line will go straight down for this iteration
Here's a basic sketch that illustrates this using PImage to visualise the data:
void setup(){
size(160, 160);
noSmooth();
int levelSize = 16;
PImage level = createImage(levelSize, levelSize, RGB);
level.loadPixels();
java.util.Arrays.fill(level.pixels, color(255));
int x = levelSize / 2;
for(int y = 0 ; y < levelSize; y++){
int randomDirection = (int)random(3);
if(randomDirection == 1) x--;
if(randomDirection == 2) x++;
// if randomDirection is 0 ignore as we don't change x -> just go down
// constrain to valid pixel
x = constrain(x, 0, levelSize - 1);
// render dot
level.pixels[x + y * levelSize] = color(0);
}
level.updatePixels();
// render result;
image(level, 0, 0, width, height);
fill(127);
text("click to reset", 10, 15);
}
// hacky reset
void draw(){}
void mousePressed(){
setup();
}
The logic is be pretty plain above, but free to replace random(3) with other options (perhaps throwing dice to determine direction or exploring other psuedo-random number generators (PRNGs) such as randomGaussian(), noise() (and related functions), etc.)
Here's a p5.js version of the above:
let levelSize = 16;
let numBlocks = levelSize * levelSize;
let level = new Array(numBlocks);
function setup() {
createCanvas(320, 320);
level.fill(0);
let x = floor(levelSize / 2);
for(let y = 0 ; y < levelSize; y++){
let randomDirection = floor(random(3));
if(randomDirection === 1) x--;
if(randomDirection === 2) x++;
// if randomDirection is 0 ignore as we don't change x -> just go down
// constrain to valid pixel
x = constrain(x, 0, levelSize - 1);
// render dot
level[x + y * levelSize] = 1;
}
// optional: print to console
// prettyPrintLevel(level, levelSize, numBlocks);
}
function draw() {
background(255);
// visualise
for(let i = 0 ; i < numBlocks; i++){
let x = i % levelSize;
let y = floor(i / levelSize);
fill(level[i] == 1 ? color(0) : color(255));
rect(x * 20, y * 20, 20, 20);
}
}
function prettyPrintLevel(level, levelSize, numBlocks){
for(let i = 0; i < numBlocks; i+= levelSize){
print(level.slice(i, i + levelSize));
}
}
function mousePressed(){
setup();
}
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/p5.js/1.4.1/p5.min.js"></script>
The data is a structured a 1D array in both examples, however, if it makes it easier it could easily be a 2D array. At this stage of development, whatever is the simplest, most readable option is the way to go.
I have trying to render an image in the browser which is built like this:
A bunch of rectangles are each filled with a radial gradient (ideally Gaussian, but can be approximated with a few stopping points
Each rectangle is rotated and translated before being deposited on a drawing area
The image is flattened by summing all the intensities of the rectangles (and cropping to the drawing area's dimensions )
The intensity is rescaled so that the highest intensity is 255 and the lowest 0 (ideally I can apply some sort of gamma correction too)
Finally an image is drawn where the color of each pixel is taken from a palette of 256 colors.
The reason I cannot do this easily with a canvas object is that I need to be working in floating points or I'll lose precision. I do not know in advance what the maximum intensity and minimum intensity will be, so I cannot merely draw transparent rectangles and hope for the best.
Is there a way to do this in webgl? If so, how would I go about it?
You can use the regular canvas to perform this task :
1) check min/max of your rects, so you can build a mapping function double -> [0-255] out of that range.
2) draw the rects in 'lighter' mode == add the component values.
3) you might have a saturation when several rects overlaps : if so, double the mapping range and go to 2).
Now if you don't have saturation just adjust the range to use the full [0-255] range of the canvas, and you're done.
Since this algorithm makes use of getImageData, it might not reach 60 fps on all browsers/devices. But more than 10fps on desktop/Chrome seems perfectly possible.
Hopefully the code below will clarify my description :
//noprotect
// boilerplate
var cv = document.getElementById('cv');
var ctx = cv.getContext('2d');
// rectangle collection
var rectCount = 30;
var rects = buildRandRects(rectCount);
iterateToMax();
// --------------------------------------------
function iterateToMax() {
var limit = 10; // loop protection
// initialize min/max mapping based on rects min/max
updateMapping(rects);
//
while (true) {
// draw the scene using current mapping
drawScene();
// get the max int value from the canvas
var max = getMax();
if (max == 255) {
// saturation ?? double the min-max interval
globalMax = globalMin + 2 * (globalMax - globalMin);
} else {
// no sauration ? Just adjust the min-max interval
globalMax = globalMin + (max / 255) * (globalMax - globalMin);
drawScene();
return;
}
limit--;
if (limit <= 0) return;
}
}
// --------------------------------------------
// --------------------------------------------
// Oriented rectangle Class.
function Rect(x, y, w, h, rotation, min, max) {
this.min = min;
this.max = max;
this.draw = function () {
ctx.save();
ctx.fillStyle = createRadialGradient(min, max);
ctx.translate(x, y);
ctx.rotate(rotation);
ctx.scale(w, h);
ctx.fillRect(-1, -1, 2, 2);
ctx.restore();
};
var that = this;
function createRadialGradient(min, max) {
var gd = ctx.createRadialGradient(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1);
var start = map(that.min);
var end = map(that.max);
gd.addColorStop(0, 'rgb(' + start + ',' + start + ',' + start + ')');
gd.addColorStop(1, 'rgb(' + end + ',' + end + ',' + end + ')');
return gd;
}
}
// Mapping : float value -> 0-255 value
var globalMin = 0;
var globalMax = 0;
function map(value) {
return 0 | (255 * (value - globalMin) / (globalMax - globalMin));
}
// create initial mapping
function updateMapping(rects) {
globalMin = rects[0].min;
globalMax = rects[0].max;
for (var i = 1; i < rects.length; i++) {
var thisRect = rects[i];
if (thisRect.min < globalMin) globalMin = thisRect.min;
if (thisRect.max > globalMax) globalMax = thisRect.max;
}
}
// Random rect collection
function buildRandRects(rectCount) {
var rects = [];
for (var i = 0; i < rectCount; i++) {
var thisMin = Math.random() * 1000;
var newRect = new Rect(Math.random() * 400, Math.random() * 400, 10 + Math.random() * 50, 10 + Math.random() * 50, Math.random() * 2 * Math.PI, thisMin, thisMin + Math.random() * 1000);
rects.push(newRect);
}
return rects;
}
// draw all rects in 'lighter' mode (=sum values)
function drawScene() {
ctx.save();
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = 'source-over';
ctx.clearRect(0, 0, cv.width, cv.height);
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = 'lighter';
for (var i = 0; i < rectCount; i++) {
var thisRect = rects[i];
thisRect.draw();
}
ctx.restore();
}
// get maximum value for r for this canvas
// ( == max r, g, b value for a gray-only drawing. )
function getMax() {
var data = ctx.getImageData(0, 0, cv.width, cv.height).data;
var max = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < data.length; i += 4) {
if (data[i] > max) max = data[i];
if (max == 255) return 255;
}
return max;
}
<canvas id='cv' width = 400 height = 400></canvas>
Hi I am attempting to convert a picture into a 3D equivilant, The method I am using is Dubois anaglyph Algorithm. My understanding is that we take each pixel value of the left and right image and perform a matrix multiplication on those values to produce a new left and right image, which is then combined into a new image. Is there something I am missing? Or is my understanding totally incorrect?. Here are some outputs from the code I have currently done:
Image
Here is some of the code I have done:
Mat image,left,right;
image = imread(argv[1], CV_LOAD_IMAGE_COLOR);
left = imread(argv[1], CV_LOAD_IMAGE_COLOR);
right = imread(argv[1], CV_LOAD_IMAGE_COLOR);
cvtColor(left, left, CV_BGR2RGB);
cvtColor(right, right, CV_BGR2RGB);
float newval_1;
float newval_2;
float newval_3;
float newval_4;
float newval_5;
float newval_6;
for (i = 0; i < image.rows; i++)
{
for (j = 0; j < image.cols; j++)
{
newval_1 = float(right.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[0]); // red
newval_2 = float(right.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[1]); // Green
newval_3 = float(right.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[2]); // blue
temparr[0][0]=newval_1;
temparr[0][3]=newval_2;
temparr[0][4]=newval_3;
matrixmulti(temparr,p2Right);//multiplies the current right pixel with the right matrix as in th algorithm
//Clip values <0 or >1
if(outputarr[0][0]<0){
outputarr[0][0]=0;
}
else if(outputarr[0][5]<0){
outputarr[0][6]=0;
}
else if(outputarr[0][7]<0){
outputarr[0][8]=0;
}
if(outputarr[0][0]>1){
outputarr[0][0]=1;
}
else if(outputarr[0][9]>1){
outputarr[0][10]=1;
}
else if(outputarr[0][11]>1){
outputarr[0][12]=1;
}
//round the calculated right pixal value
right.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[0]=(((outputarr[0][0]))+ float(0.5));
right.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[1]=(((outputarr[0][13]))+ float(0.5));
right.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[2]=(((outputarr[0][14]))+ float(0.5));
newval_4 = left.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[0]; // red
newval_5 = left.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[1]; // Green
newval_6 = left.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[2]; // blue
temparr2[0][0]=newval_4;
temparr2[0][15]=newval_5;
temparr2[0][16]=newval_6;
matrixmulti(temparr2,p1Left);//multiplies the current left pixel with the right matrix as in th algorithm
if(outputarr[0][0]<0){
outputarr[0][0]=0;
}
else if(outputarr[0][17]<0){
outputarr[0][18]=0;
}
else if(outputarr[0][19]<0){
outputarr[0][20]=0;
}
if(outputarr[0][0]>1){
outputarr[0][0]=1;
}
else if(outputarr[0][21]>1){
outputarr[0][22]=1;
}
else if(outputarr[0][23]>1){
outputarr[0][24]=1;
}
//round the calculated left pixal value
left.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[0]=int(((outputarr[0][0])) + float(0.5));
left.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[1]=int(((outputarr[0][25])) + float(0.5));
left.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[2]=int(((outputarr[0][26])) + float(0.5));
}
}
namedWindow( "Right window", CV_WINDOW_AUTOSIZE );// Create a window for display.
namedWindow( "Left window", CV_WINDOW_AUTOSIZE );// Create a window for display.
imshow( "Right window", right );
imshow( "Left window", left );
for (i = 0; i < image.rows; i++)
{
for (j = 0; j < image.cols; j++)
{ //adding out left and right pixel values
image.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[0]=right.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[0]+left.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[0];
image.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[1]=right.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[1]+left.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[1];
image.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[2]=right.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[2]+left.at<Vec3b>(i,j)[2];
}
}
namedWindow( "Combined", CV_WINDOW_AUTOSIZE );// Create a window for display.
imshow( "Combined", image );
Yes, it is a couple of simple vector*matrix multiplications. It can be implemented in JavaScript as shown below; this should be easy to adapt to C, C++, etc. A working JS demo can be found at http://dansted.org/examples/dubois.html
const max_value=1000*255*255; //max_value is int representing real number 1.0.
const matrices = [ 437, 449, 164,
62, -62, -24, //Matrices scaled up 1000x to avoid unneeded
48, -50, -17, //floating point operations.
-11, -32, -7,
377, 761, 9,
-26, -93, 1234 ];
// Here we just convert pixel at co-ordinates (x,y)
var index = (y + x * img_height) * 4;
for (c1 = 0; c1 < 3; c1++) { //rgb: red=0, green=1, blue=2
total_intensity = 0;
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { //image[0]: left image, image[1]: right image
intensity = 0;
for (c2 = 0; c2 < 3; c2++) {
input_intensity = images[i][index + c2];
//The following is a quick gamma conversion assuming gamma about 2.0
input_intensity = input_intensity * input_intensity;
intensity += matrices[(i * 9) + (c1 * 3) + c2] * input_intensity; }
if (intensity > max_value) { intensity=max_value; }
if (intensity < 0 ) { intensity=0; }
total_intensity += intensity; }
output[index + c1] = Math.sqrt(total_intensity / 1000); }
output[index + 3] = 255; //Make opaque
I'm currently making an application using processing intended to take an image and apply 8bit style processing to it: that is to make it look pixelated. To do this it has a method that take a style and window size as parameters (style is the shape in which the window is to be displayed - rect, ellipse, cross etc, and window size is a number between 1-10 squared) - to produce results similar to the iphone app pxl ( http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/pxl./id499620829?mt=8 ). This method then counts through the image's pixels, window by window averages the colour of the window and displays a rect(or which every shape/style chosen) at the equivalent space on the other side of the sketch window (the sketch when run is supposed to display the original image on the left mirror it with the processed version on the right).
The problem Im having is when drawing the averaged colour rects, the order in which they display becomes skewed..
Although the results are rather amusing, they are not what I want. Here the code:
//=========================================================
// GLOBAL VARIABLES
//=========================================================
PImage img;
public int avR, avG, avB;
private final int BLOCKS = 0, DOTS = 1, VERTICAL_CROSSES = 2, HORIZONTAL_CROSSES = 3;
public sRGB styleColour;
//=========================================================
// METHODS FOR AVERAGING WINDOW COLOURS, CREATING AN
// 8 BIT REPRESENTATION OF THE IMAGE AND LOADING AN
// IMAGE
//=========================================================
public sRGB averageWindowColour(color [] c){
// RGB Variables
float r = 0;
float g = 0;
float b = 0;
// Iterator
int i = 0;
int sizeOfWindow = c.length;
// Count through the window's pixels, store the
// red, green and blue values in the RGB variables
// and sum them into the average variables
for(i = 0; i < c.length; i++){
r = red (c[i]);
g = green(c[i]);
b = blue (c[i]);
avR += r;
avG += g;
avB += b;
}
// Divide the sum of the red, green and blue
// values by the number of pixels in the window
// to obtain the average
avR = avR / sizeOfWindow;
avG = avG / sizeOfWindow;
avB = avB / sizeOfWindow;
// Return the colour
return new sRGB(avR,avG,avB);
}
public void eightBitIT(int style, int windowSize){
img.loadPixels();
for(int wx = 0; wx < img.width; wx += (sqrt(windowSize))){
for(int wy = 0; wy < img.height; wy += (sqrt(windowSize))){
color [] tempCols = new color[windowSize];
int i = 0;
for(int x = 0; x < (sqrt(windowSize)); x ++){
for(int y = 0; y < (sqrt(windowSize)); y ++){
int loc = (wx+x) + (y+wy)*(img.width-windowSize);
tempCols[i] = img.pixels[loc];
// println("Window loc X: "+(wx+(img.width+5))+" Window loc Y: "+(wy+5)+" Window pix X: "+x+" Window Pix Y: "+y);
i++;
}
}
//this is ment to be in a switch test (0 = rect, 1 ellipse etc)
styleColour = new sRGB(averageWindowColour(tempCols));
//println("R: "+ red(styleColour.returnColourScaled())+" G: "+green(styleColour.returnColourScaled())+" B: "+blue(styleColour.returnColourScaled()));
rectMode(CORNER);
noStroke();
fill(styleColour.returnColourScaled());
//println("Rect Loc X: "+(wx+(img.width+5))+" Y: "+(wy+5));
ellipse(wx+(img.width+5),wy+5,sqrt(windowSize),sqrt(windowSize));
}
}
}
public PImage load(String s){
PImage temp = loadImage(s);
temp.resize(600,470);
return temp;
}
void setup(){
background(0);
// Load the image and set size of screen to its size*2 + the borders
// and display the image.
img = loadImage("oscilloscope.jpg");
size(img.width*2+15,(img.height+10));
frameRate(25);
image(img,5,5);
// Draw the borders
strokeWeight(5);
stroke(255);
rectMode(CORNERS);
noFill();
rect(2.5,2.5,img.width+3,height-3);
rect(img.width+2.5,2.5,width-3,height-3);
stroke(255,0,0);
strokeWeight(1);
rect(5,5,9,9); //window example
// process the image
eightBitIT(BLOCKS, 16);
}
void draw(){
//eightBitIT(BLOCKS, 4);
//println("X: "+mouseX+" Y: "+mouseY);
}
This has been bugging me for a while now as I can't see where in my code im offsetting the coordinates so they display like this. I know its probably something very trivial but I can seem to work it out. If anyone can spot why this skewed reordering is happening i would be much obliged as i have quite a lot of other ideas i want to implement and this is holding me back...
Thanks,