In okhttp's code, connection.idleAtNs has been assigned in releaseConnectionNoEvents() method,
internal fun releaseConnectionNoEvents(): Socket? {
val connection = this.connection!!
connection.assertThreadHoldsLock()
val calls = connection.calls
val index = calls.indexOfFirst { it.get() == this#RealCall }
check(index != -1)
calls.removeAt(index)
this.connection = null
if (calls.isEmpty()) {
connection.idleAtNs = System.nanoTime()
if (connectionPool.connectionBecameIdle(connection)) {
return connection.socket()
}
}
return null
}
but why Re-assignment here
private fun pruneAndGetAllocationCount(connection: RealConnection, now: Long): Int {
connection.assertThreadHoldsLock()
val references = connection.calls
var i = 0
while (i < references.size) {
val reference = references[i]
if (reference.get() != null) {
i++
continue
}
// We've discovered a leaked call. This is an application bug.
val callReference = reference as CallReference
val message = "A connection to ${connection.route().address.url} was leaked. " +
"Did you forget to close a response body?"
Platform.get().logCloseableLeak(message, callReference.callStackTrace)
references.removeAt(i)
connection.noNewExchanges = true
// If this was the last allocation, the connection is eligible for immediate eviction.
if (references.isEmpty()) {
connection.idleAtNs = now - keepAliveDurationNs
return 0
}
}
return references.size
}
If assign a value here, it may appear that the connection is removed as soon as it becomes idle.
The pruneAndGetAllocationCount method is called as part of a cleanup task. At the point you have linked to, the code has already logged a warning about a connection leak. The code releases that connection then considders the connection to be immediately available for release.
If you have concerns about the code, consider making a test case that shows what you would propose changing the code to, it might be possible to improve it.
If it's affecting you because of leaked connections, you should instead fix the bug in the application code.
// We've discovered a leaked call. This is an application bug.
val callReference = reference as CallReference
val message = "A connection to ${connection.route().address.url} was leaked. " +
"Did you forget to close a response body?"
Related
I'm trying to update the status of a job object. I get the "success" message return but the value is not updating. Do I miss something?
#nearBindgen
export class Contract {
private jobs: PersistentVector<Job> = new PersistentVector<Job>('jobs');
......
#mutateState()
cancelJob(jobTitle: string): string {
for (let i = 0; i < this.jobs.length; i++) {
if (this.jobs[i].title == jobTitle) {
this.jobs[i].status = "Cancelled";
return "success"
}
}
return "not found";
}
And I'm calling it like that:
near call apptwo.msaudi.testnet cancelJob '{\"jobTitle\":\"title2\"}' --account-id=msaudi.testnet
It’s not enough to update entry when you fetch it. You need to update the storage on the contract as well. Write it back in so to speak.
This isn’t enough
this.jobs[i].status = "Cancelled";
You need to add it back in:
if (this.jobs[i].title == jobTitle) {
const job: Job = this.jobs[i]; // Need an intermediate object in memory
job.status = "Cancelled";
this.jobs.replace(i, job); // Update storage with the new job.
return "success"
}
I am using Linphone SDK in Xamarin.forms project for the sip calling. I am able to make the connection using following code:
var authInfo = Factory.Instance.CreateAuthInfo(username.Text,
null, password.Text, null, null,domain.Text);
LinphoneCore.AddAuthInfo(authInfo);
String proxyAddress ="sip:"+username.Text+"#192.168.1.180:5160";
var identity = Factory.Instance.CreateAddress(proxyAddress);
var proxyConfig = LinphoneCore.CreateProxyConfig();
identity.Username = username.Text;
identity.Domain = domain.Text;
identity.Transport = TransportType.Udp;
proxyConfig.Edit();
proxyConfig.IdentityAddress = identity;
proxyConfig.ServerAddr = domain.Text + ":5160;transport=udp";
proxyConfig.Route = domain.Text;
proxyConfig.RegisterEnabled = true;
proxyConfig.Done();
LinphoneCore.AddProxyConfig(proxyConfig);
LinphoneCore.DefaultProxyConfig = proxyConfig;
LinphoneCore.RefreshRegisters();
After Successful connection, I am using the code for placing the code.
if (LinphoneCore.CallsNb == 0)
{
string phoneCall = "sip:"+address.Text+ "#192.168.1.180:5160";
var addr = LinphoneCore.InterpretUrl(phoneCall);
LinphoneCore.InviteAddress(addr);
}
else
{
Call call = LinphoneCore.CurrentCall;
if (call.State == CallState.IncomingReceived)
{
LinphoneCore.AcceptCall(call);
}
else
{
LinphoneCore.TerminateAllCalls();
}
}
And the listener that is listening to call state changed event is as:
private void OnCall(Core lc, Call lcall, CallState state, stringmessage)
{
call_status.Text = "Call state changed: " + state;
if (lc.CallsNb > 0)
{
if (state == CallState.IncomingReceived)
{
call.Text = "Answer Call (" + lcall.RemoteAddressAsString + ")";
}
else
{
call.Text = "Terminate Call";
}
if (lcall.CurrentParams.VideoEnabled) {
video.Text = "Stop Video";
} else {
video.Text = "Start Video";
}
}
else
{
call.Text = "Start Call";
call_stats.Text = "";
}
}
The call status is giving 'Internal Server Error'. I am able to receive the calls using Linphone or X-lite Soft Phone in my code, But I am not able to place the calls. I don't know whether this issue is related to server or it is related to my code. Please suggest.
Internal Server Error (HTTP Status code 500) means that an unexpected error occurred on the server. So I would suspect the problem is rather there than with your app's code.
500 - A generic error message, given when an unexpected condition was encountered and no more specific message is suitable.
It could be that your request doesn't satisfy the expectations of the endpoint you are calling, but even then, the server should then respond with a more meaningful error, than crashing with 500.
version:rocketmq-all-4.1.0-incubating
We send msg 1000 QPS,sync send, but throw exception:-
[TIMEOUT_CLEAN_QUEUE] broker busy, start flow control for a while
There is the related code:
while (true) {
try {
if (!this.brokerController.getSendThreadPoolQueue().isEmpty()) {
final Runnable runnable = this.brokerController.getSendThreadPoolQueue().peek();
if (null == runnable) {
break;
}
final RequestTask rt = castRunnable(runnable);
if (rt == null || rt.isStopRun()) {
break;
}
final long behind = System.currentTimeMillis() - rt.getCreateTimestamp();
if (behind >= this.brokerController.getBrokerConfig().getWaitTimeMillsInSendQueue()) {
if (this.brokerController.getSendThreadPoolQueue().remove(runnable)) {
rt.setStopRun(true);
rt.returnResponse(RemotingSysResponseCode.SYSTEM_BUSY, String.format("[TIMEOUT_CLEAN_QUEUE]broker busy, start flow control for a while, period in queue: %sms, size of queue: %d", behind, this.brokerController.getSendThreadPoolQueue().size()));
}
} else {
break;
}
} else {
break;
}
} catch (Throwable ignored) {
}
}
}
I find broker the default value of sendMessageThreadPoolNums is 1,
/**
* thread numbers for send message thread pool, since spin lock will be used by default since 4.0.x, the default value is 1.
*/
private int sendMessageThreadPoolNums = 1; //16 + Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors() * 4;
private int pullMessageThreadPoolNums = 16 + Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors() * 2;
but the previous version isn't 1, and if I configure sendMessageThreadPoolNums = 100, can resolve this question ? It will lead to what is different with default value.
thanks
SHORT ANSWER:
you have two choices:
set sendMessageThreadPoolNums to a small number, say 1, which is the default value after version 4.1.x. And, remain the default value of useReentrantLockWhenPutMessage=false, which is introduced after 4.1.x
sendMessageThreadPoolNums=1
useReentrantLockWhenPutMessage=false
If you need to use a large numbers of threads to process sending message, you'd better use useReentrantLockWhenPutMessage=true
sendMessageThreadPoolNums=128//large thread numbers
useReentrantLockWhenPutMessage=true // indicating that do NOT use spin lock but use ReentrantLock when putting message
I'm having an issue with LinqToTwitter 4.1 where having a user stream open will eventually cause the programs memory usage to balloon out of control. This does not occur when the program starts running but only after some time, normally after a day or two.
Using the ANTS Memory Profiler I find this reference chain preventing System.Byte[] from being collected. The full profiler results can be downloaded here.
Code:
private async Task<Streaming> TwitterSteam(string trackHashTags, string twitterUserIds)
{
var stream = (from strm in TwitterCtx.Streaming.WithCancellation(CloseStreamSource.Token)
where strm.Type == StreamingType.Filter &&
strm.Track == trackHashTags
&& strm.Follow == (string.IsNullOrEmpty(twitterUserIds) ? "41553192" : twitterUserIds)
select strm).StartAsync(async strm =>
{
string message = string.IsNullOrEmpty(strm.Content) ? "Keep-Alive" : strm.Content;
if (message == "Keep-Alive")
{
IsRunning = true;
}
else
{
JsonData data = JsonMapper.ToObject(message);
Status tweet = new Status(data);
LogClient.LogInfo("Received Tweet: " + tweet.Text, null, LogType.Info, null);
ConvertToMessage(tweet);
IsRunning = true;
}
}).Result.SingleOrDefault();
return stream;
}
Can anyone provide insight as to why this is occurring and how I can prevent it?
PLEASE READ THE UPDATE #2 BELOW IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN THIS PROBLEM ;)
Say I put this code into the JS of my extension.
var reader = {
onInputStreamReady : function(input) {
var sin = Cc["#mozilla.org/scriptableinputstream;1"]
.createInstance(Ci.nsIScriptableInputStream);
sin.init(input);
sin.available();
var request = '';
while (sin.available()) {
request = request + sin.read(512);
}
console.log('Received: ' + request);
input.asyncWait(reader,0,0,null);
}
}
var listener = {
onSocketAccepted: function(serverSocket, clientSocket) {
console.log("Accepted connection on "+clientSocket.host+":"+clientSocket.port);
input = clientSocket.openInputStream(0, 0, 0).QueryInterface(Ci.nsIAsyncInputStream);
output = clientSocket.openOutputStream(Ci.nsITransport.OPEN_BLOCKING, 0, 0);
input.asyncWait(reader,0,0,null);
}
}
var serverSocket = Cc["#mozilla.org/network/server-socket;1"].
createInstance(Ci.nsIServerSocket);
serverSocket.init(-1, true, 5);
console.log("Opened socket on " + serverSocket.port);
serverSocket.asyncListen(listener);
Then I run Firefox and connect to the socket via telnet
telnet localhost PORT
I send 5 messages and they get printed out, but when I try to send 6th message I get
firefox-bin: Fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server :0.0.
Even worse, when I try to put this same code into an XPCOM component (because that's where I actually need it), after I try sending a message via telnet I get
Segmentation fault
or sometimes
GLib-ERROR **: /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.24.1/glib/gmem.c:137: failed to allocate 32 bytes
aborting...
Aborted
printed to the terminal from which I launched firefox.
This is really weird stuff.. Can you spot something wrong with the code I've pasted or is smth wrong with my firefox/system or is the nsIServerSocket interface deprecated?
I'm testing with Firefox 3.6.6.
I would really appreciate some answer. Perhaps you could point me to a good example of using Sockets within an XPCOM component. I haven't seen many of those around.
UPDATE
I just realised that it used to work so now I think that my Console
component breaks it. I have no idea how this is related. But if I
don't use this component the sockets are working fine.
Here is the code of my Console component. I will try to figure out
what's wrong and why it interferes and I'll post my findings later.
Likely I'm doing something terribly wrong here to cause Segmentation
faults with my javascript =)
Voodoo..
components/Console.js:
const Cc = Components.classes;
const Ci = Components.interfaces;
const Cr = Components.results;
Console.prototype = (function() {
var win;
var initialized = false;
var ready = false;
var _log = function(m, level, location) {
if (initialized&&ready) {
var prefix = "INFO: ";
switch (level) {
case "empty":
prefix = ""
break;
case "error":
prefix = "ERORR: "
break;
case "warning":
prefix = "WARNING: "
break;
}
win.document.getElementById(location).value =
win.document.getElementById(location).value + prefix + m + "\n";
win.focus();
} else if (initialized&&!ready) {
// Now it is time to create the timer...
var timer = Components.classes["#mozilla.org/timer;1"]
.createInstance(Components.interfaces.nsITimer);
// ... and to initialize it, we want to call
event.notify() ...
// ... one time after exactly ten second.
timer.initWithCallback(
{ notify: function() { log(m); } },
10,
Components.interfaces.nsITimer.TYPE_ONE_SHOT
);
} else {
init();
log(m);
}
}
var log = function(m, level) {
_log(m, level, 'debug');
}
var poly = function(m, level) {
_log(m, "empty", 'polyml');
}
var close = function() {
win.close();
}
var setReady = function() {
ready = true;
}
var init = function() {
initialized = true;
var ww = Components.classes["#mozilla.org/embedcomp/window-
watcher;1"]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsIWindowWatcher);
win = ww.openWindow(null, "chrome://polymlext/content/
console.xul",
"console", "chrome,centerscreen,
resizable=no", null);
win.onload = setReady;
return win;
}
return {
init: init,
log : log,
poly : poly,
}
}());
// turning Console Class into an XPCOM component
Components.utils.import("resource://gre/modules/XPCOMUtils.jsm");
function Console() {
this.wrappedJSObject = this;
}
prototype2 = {
classDescription: "A special Console for PolyML extension",
classID: Components.ID("{483aecbc-42e7-456e-b5b3-2197ea7e1fb4}"),
contractID: "#ed.ac.uk/poly/console;1",
QueryInterface: XPCOMUtils.generateQI(),
}
//add the required XPCOM glue into the Poly class
for (attr in prototype2) {
Console.prototype[attr] = prototype2[attr];
}
var components = [Console];
function NSGetModule(compMgr, fileSpec) {
return XPCOMUtils.generateModule(components);
}
I'm using this component like this:
console = Cc["#ed.ac.uk/poly/console;1"].getService().wrappedJSObject;
console.log("something");
And this breaks the sockets :-S =)
UPDATE #2
Ok, if anyone is interested in checking this thing out I would really
appreciate it + I think this is likely some kind of bug (Seg fault
from javascript shouldn't happen)
I've made a minimal version of the extension that causes the problem,
you can install it from here:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/645579/segfault.xpi
The important part is chrome/content/main.js:
http://pastebin.com/zV0e73Na
The way my friend and me can reproduce the error is by launching the
firefox, then a new window should appear saying "Opened socket on
9999". Connect using "telnet localhost 9999" and send a few messages.
After 2-6 messages you get one of the following printed out in the
terminal where firefox was launched:
1 (most common)
Segmentation fault
2 (saw multiple times)
firefox-bin: Fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on
X
server :0.0.
3 (saw a couple of times)
GLib-ERROR **: /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.24.1/glib/gmem.c:137: failed
to
allocate 32 bytes
aborting...
Aborted
4 (saw once)
firefox-bin: ../../src/xcb_io.c:249: process_responses: Assertion
`(((long) (dpy->last_request_read) - (long) (dpy->request)) <= 0)'
failed.
Aborted
If you need any more info or could point me to where to post a bug
report :-/ I'll be glad to do that.
I know this is just one of the many bugs... but perhaps you have an
idea of what should I do differently to avoid this? I would like to
use that "console" of mine in such way.
I'll try doing it with buffer/flushing/try/catch as people are suggesting, but I wonder whether try/catch will catch the Seg fault...
This is a thread problem. The callback onInputStreamReady happened to be executed in a different thread and accessing UI / DOM is only allowed from the main thread.
Solution is really simple:
change
input.asyncWait(reader,0,0,null);
to
var tm = Cc["#mozilla.org/thread-manager;1"].getService();
input.asyncWait(reader,0,0,tm.mainThread);