At $DAYJOB, I am trying to implement reproducible builds to make debugging released software where we no longer have the full debug versions on our build servers easier, using the tips from reproducible-builds.org.
Using the -ffile-prefix-map=/path/to/build=src option in GCC to avoid leaking internal file paths does help making some error messages cleaner, but does produce problems when using GDB. I am in /path/to/build/some/binary/ and hitting a breakpoint in /path/to/build/lib/cclib/:
Breakpoint 1, [...]
at src/lib/cclib/eventloop.cc:154
154 src/lib/cclib/eventloop.cc: No such file or directory.
(gdb)
As a workaround, I can symlink src to the root of the build tree, but is there a better way to make sure gdb understands the mapping?
GDB has a few configuration commands to direct the way it searches for source code. In your case, where you have a tree of source code and you need to change a path prefix, set substitute-path DWARF-compilation-dir actual-dir should be all you need to do.
set substitute-path src /path/to/build
Related
I'm looking to compile OCCT 7.5 in Windows 10 (x64 via VS2019) for use with FreeCAD, to enable exporting glTF files, which requires RapidJSON support (in OCCT). I've checked out OCCT 7.5.3 and RapidJSON 1.1.0 from their git repos, then grabbed the FreeCAD libpack 12.5.2 (for OCCT 7.5). I started from FreeCAD's build docs, then attempted to follow OCCT's build docs.
When configuring the OCCT project in CMake-GUI, I've been able to find what I think are correct values for some variables (e.g. those regarding FREETYPE) within the FreeCAD libpack, as well as RapidJSON, but still get some errors in the config, seemingly no matter what values I try:
Could not find headers of used third-party products:
3RDPARTY_TCL_INCLUDE_DIR 3RDPARTY_TK_INCLUDE_DIR
...
Could not find DLLs of used third-party products: 3RDPARTY_TCL_DLL_DIR
3RDPARTY_TK_DLL_DIR
I've tried using *.lib, *.h and *.dll files found within the FreeCAD Libpack (and their corresponding directories) for *_LIBRARY/INCLUDE/DLL variables, but nothing is found. I see
Info: TCL is used by OCCT
Could NOT find Tclsh (missing: TCL_TCLSH)
even though tclsh86t.exe exists in the libpack/bin directory.
What should the 3RDPARTY_TCL_* & 3RDPARTY_TK_* CMake variables be set to, to use the FreeCAD libpack?
The problem was my lack of familiarity with CMake and Cmake-gui: the gui opened a dialog for a FILEPATH when specifying a PATH variable. I naively thought, "I don't know CMake, so I'll trust the gui". Totally wrong.
I manually edited the 3RDPARTY_* variable entries to point to the correct directories (or libs, when needed) in the FreeCAD libpack, using the variable name and description/hint for each to determine what the variable's value should be. Below are my entries, for reference:
I did need to check "Advanced", to edit the FREETYPE_LIBRARY_DEBUG & FREETYPE_LIBRARY_RELEASE variables (CMake set them to separate libs found in a jdk directory, presumably because it was added to the system path at some point).
Introduction
I have a do_install task in a BitBake recipe which I've written for a driver where I execute a custom install script. The task fails because the installation script cannot find kernel source header files within <the image rootfs>/usr/src/kernel. This script runs fine on the generated OS.
What's Happening
Here's the relevant part of my recipe:
SRC_URI += "file://${TOPDIR}/example"
DEPENDS += " virtual/kernel linux-libc-headers "
do_install () {
( cd ${TOPDIR}/example/Install ; ./install )
}
Here's a relevant portion of the install script:
if [ ! -d "/usr/src/kernel/include" ]; then
echo ERROR: Linux kernel source include directory not found.
exit 1
fi
cd /usr/src/kernel
make scripts
...
./install_drv pci ${DRV_ARGS}
I checked changing to if [ ! -d "/usr/src/kernel" ], which also failed. install passes different options to install_drv, which I have a relevant portion of below:
cd ${DRV_PATH}/pci
make NO_SYSFS=${ARG_NO_SYSFS} NO_INSTALL=${ARG_NO_INSTALL} ${ARGS_HWINT}
if [ ${ARG_NO_INSTALL} == 0 ]; then
if [ `/sbin/lsmod | grep -ci "uceipci"` -eq 1 ]; then
./unload_pci
fi
./load_pci DEBUG=${ARG_DEBUG}
fi
The make target build: within ${DRV_PATH}/pci is essentially this:
make -C /usr/src/kernel SUBDIRS=${PWD} modules
My Research
I found these comments within linux-libc-headers.inc relevant:
# You're probably looking here thinking you need to create some new copy
# of linux-libc-headers since you have your own custom kernel. To put
# this simply, you DO NOT.
#
# Why? These headers are used to build the libc. If you customise the
# headers you are customising the libc and the libc becomes machine
# specific. Most people do not add custom libc extensions to the kernel
# and have a machine specific libc.
#
# But you have some kernel headers you need for some driver? That is fine
# but get them from STAGING_KERNEL_DIR where the kernel installs itself.
# This will make the package using them machine specific but this is much
# better than having a machine specific C library. This does mean your
# recipe needs a DEPENDS += "virtual/kernel" but again, that is fine and
# makes total sense.
#
# There can also be a case where your kernel extremely old and you want
# an older libc ABI for that old kernel. The headers installed by this
# recipe should still be a standard mainline kernel, not your own custom
# one.
I'm a bit unclear if I can 'get' the headers from the STAGING_KERNEL_DIR properly since I'm not using make.
Within kernel.bbclass provided in the meta/classes directory, there is this variable assigment:
# Define where the kernel headers are installed on the target as well as where
# they are staged.
KERNEL_SRC_PATH = "/usr/src/kernel"
This path is then packaged later within that .bbclass file here:
PACKAGES = "kernel kernel-base kernel-vmlinux kernel-image kernel-dev kernel-modules"
...
FILES_kernel-dev = "/boot/System.map* /boot/Module.symvers* /boot/config* ${KERNEL_SRC_PATH} /lib/modules/${KERNEL_VERSION}/build"
Update (1/21):
A suggestion on the yocto IRC channel was to use the following line:
do_configure[depends] += "virtual/kernel:do_shared_workdir"
which is corroborated by the Yocto Project Reference Manual, which states that in version 1.8, there was the following change:
The kernel build process was changed to place the source in a common shared work area and to place build artifacts separately in the source code tree. In theory, migration paths have been provided for most common usages in kernel recipes but this might not work in all cases. In particular, users need to ensure that ${S} (source files) and ${B} (build artifacts) are used correctly in functions such as do_configure and do_install. For kernel recipes that do not inherit from kernel-yocto or include linux-yocto.inc, you might wish to refer to the linux.inc file in the meta-oe layer for the kinds of changes you need to make. For reference, here is the commit where the linux.inc file in meta-oewas updated.
Recipes that rely on the kernel source code and do not inherit the module classes might need to add explicit dependencies on the do_shared_workdir kernel task, for example:
do_configure[depends] += "virtual/kernel:do_shared_workdir"
But I'm having difficulties applying this to my recipe. From what I understand, I should be able to change the above line to:
do_install[depends] += "virtual/kernel:do_shared_workdir"
Which would mean that the do_install task now must be run after do_shared_workdir task of the virtual/kernel recipe, which means that I should be able to work with the shared workdir (see Question 3 below), but I still have the same missing kernel header issue.
My Questions
I'm using a custom linux kernel (v3.14) from git.kernel.org. which inherits the kernel class. Here are some of my questions:
Shouldn't the package kernel-dev be a part of any recipe which inherits the kernel class? (this section of the variables glossary)
If I add the virtual/kernel to the DEPENDS variable, wouldn't that mean that the kernel-dev would be brought in?
If kernel-dev is part of the dependencies of my recipe, wouldn't I be able to point to the /usr/src/kernel directory from my recipe? According to this reply on the Yocto mailing list, I think I should.
How can I properly reference the kernel source header files, preferably without changing the installation script?
Consider your Environment
Remember that there are different environments within the the build time environment, consisting of:
sysroots
in the case of kernels, a shared work directory
target packages
kernel-dev is a target package, which you'd install into the rootfs of the target system for certain things like kernel symbol maps which are needed by profiling tools like perf/oprofile. It is not present at build time although some of its contents are available in the sysroots or shared workdir.
Point to the Correct Directories
Your do_install runs at build time so this is within the build directory structures of the build system, not the target one. In particular, /usr/src/ won't be correct, it would need to be some path within your build directory. The virtual/kernel do_shared_workdir task populates ${STAGING_DIR_KERNEL} so you would want to change to that directory in your script.
Adding a Task Dependency
The:
do_install[depends] += "virtual/kernel:do_shared_workdir
dependency like looks correct for your use case, assuming nothing in do_configure or do_compile accesses the data there.
Reconsider the module BitBake class
The other answers are correct in the recommendation to look at module.bbclass, since this illustrates how common kernel modules can be built. If you want to use custom functions or make commands, this is fine, you can just override them. If you really don't want to use that class, I would suggest taking inspiration from it though.
Task Dependencies
Adding virtual/kernel to DEPENDS means virtual/kernel:do_populate_sysroot must run before our do_configure task. Since you need a dependency for do_shared_workdir here, a DEPENDS on virtual/kernel is not enough.
Answer to Question 3
The kernel-dev package would be built, however it would then need to be installed into your target image and used at runtime on a real target. You need this at build time so kernel-dev is not appropriate.
Other Suggestions
You'd likely want the kernel-devsrc package for what you're doing, not the kernel-dev package.
I don't think anyone can properly answer that last question here. You are using a non-standard install method: we can't know how to interact with it...
That said, take a look at what meta/classes/module.bbclass does. It sets several related variables for make: KERNEL_SRC=${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}, KERNEL_PATH=${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}, O=${STAGING_KERNEL_BUILDDIR}. Maybe your installer supports some of these environment variables and you could set them in your recipe?
I am trying to port a new module into my project. The module has its own make file. I have no background or experience with the make build system, so I decided to use the following command:
make -f Makefile -f ../newmodule/tbt/makefile
But I get the following errors:
../newmodule/tbt/makefile:14: make/macros.mk: No such file or
directory
../newmodule/tbt/makefile:66: *** target file `all' has both : and :: entries. Stop.
Please correct me if I am wrong; it is my understanding that my first error is because I issued make from my main project, and I need to somehow configure it to look into the directory of ../newmodule/tbt/make to find macros.mk. Would anyone be able to suggest an effective way of addressing this issue? What is the best way to include the contents of ../newmodule/tbt/make folder?
My 2nd error seems to be exactly what make complains about, which is having : and :: in the two make files for the target "all". I can not follow the 2nd make file very closely, but there is not much to the lines that have this target. I am thinking of changing it to My_all, and configure this new variable as the default target of the new module. I am not even sure if my terminology is correct. "all" is called the default target for make right? I have reviewed most of the make file document, but it is 5 am, and I do not recall some things.
I came across this error during compilation of some package under OpenWrt. The problem was in the VERSION declaration in the Makefile.
So, check if you have declared anything with unnecessary spaces or comments after some variable.
Removing the comment or space after variables should work.
Try running two separate make -f myMakefile commands, one from each module directory so that the relative paths work out properly as you have already observed that you current directory when executing make may be part of the problem.
I seem to successfully build a kernel image, but I can not generate all the modules I expect. I expect more modules since I see them enabled in the gconfig window. Here is a copy of my make session. Seems like make goes into the devices directories. I can not figure out why it is not create the .ko files. I expect to see .ko files. I have checked the Makefile in /drivers directory, and I can see that it is configured with a number of lines like
obj-$(CONFIG_PCI) += pci/
Which directs make to build the pci module for instance. I think this implies that I should see a number .ko files. But I do not. I have seen just one .ko file for scsi module. I like to be able to build all of modules selected.
I also verified that a number of mudules are enabled when I issued:
make VARIANT_DEFCONFIG=msm8974_sec_hlte_spr_defconfig msm8974_sec_defconfig SELINUX_DEFCONFIG=selinux_defconfig gconfig
But as I said, I do not see any of them. What am I missing please?
#Subin - Thanks. I just tried make modules_install. I have to mention that I am cross compiling this for an arm target. I believe modules_install is for the purpose of installing the driver for the machine you are on? I got a message about needing to be in root, and I did not proceed. I have been wondering when I need to run it. What does it do exactly please?
Re: the make modules; I have run it before. I'll run it again and post the result. Since I got one .ko file I figured the issue is something different between that one module, and every other one enabled in my config. Here is what I got when I ran make modules:
sansari#ubuntu:~/WORKING_DIRECTORY$ make modules
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
make[1]: `include/generated/mach-types.h' is up to date.
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 1 modules
Re: your comment on the location of .ko files, I am doing a find to see if perhaps I am not looking at the right place, it only finds the one which was built. Not the other ones. Here is the output:
sansari#ubuntu:~/WORKING_DIRECTORY$ find . -type f -name "*.ko"
./drivers/scsi/scsi_wait_scan.ko
sansari#ubuntu:~/WORKING_DIRECTORY$
Should I perhaps run make v=1, in verbose mode that is? Would that provide more information on why the other modules are not built?
#Gil Hamilton - Thanks. You are right. Here is an excerpt of the .config file:
#
# SCSI support type (disk, tape, CD-ROM)
#
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD=y
# CONFIG_CHR_DEV_ST is not set
# CONFIG_CHR_DEV_OSST is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SR is not set
CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SG=y
CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SCH=y
CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN=y
CONFIG_SCSI_CONSTANTS=y
CONFIG_SCSI_LOGGING=y
CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC=y
CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=m
This entry is the only one set to 'm'.
Most device driver modules in the linux kernel build system use a tristate (3-valued) configuration setting. The options are
'n' (don't build at all),
'y' (build and link statically into the main kernel object), and
'm' (build as module for dynamic loading).
The values are determined by the content of .config. The values in .config are usually generated from an existing config file (look in arch/<ARCH>/configs for your <ARCH>). Also check the output of 'make help' for interesting configuration targets.
If you're not seeing the .ko files being created, that indicates the corresponding configuration variable is either set to 'y' or 'n'.
Is there a way to control the Fujitsu Softune debugger with an other application(e.g. Eclipse)? I think about sending the command mentioned in the documentation of Softune and parse the output, but also other approaches are welcome.
There is pluging for eclipse; file name is "FujitsuF2MC16_1.0.1.jar", look for it on this page:
http://www.mikrocontroller.net/topic/70413
Complile en debug in eclipse.
Hope this helps.
What do you mean by controlling the Fujitsu Softune debugger?
If what you want to do is to start a debugging session with your freshly-compiled .abs file, you can do the following.
In the Eclipse environment add a button or shortcut to call the make utility to make a debug:. Your makefile would have an entry like:
debug: $(make_vars)
# start debugger
make -f$(make_vars) -f$(make_dir)/$(cfg) cfg="$(cfg)" debug_session
In the make entry for debug_session you put something like:
echo UPDATING SOFTUNE-3 PROJECT FOR DEBUGGING;\
$(subst \,/,$(DIR_SOFTUNE_WORKBENCH))/bin/Fs907s.exe softune/E7x_proj.wsp 2>/dev/null;
I hope this was useful.