When the messages are extracted they are ordered in the extraction file alphabetically according to their randomly generated ids. Is there any way to prevent that and have them ordered in the exact same order in which they appear in the code instead?
E.g. now:
"AYGNrK": translation2,
"BIOgfm": translation1,
"Cqv/CV": translation3,
Wanted:
"BIOgfm": translation1,
"AYGNrK": translation2,
"Cqv/CV": translation3,
If you want to have full control over the exported message, you can use your own formating function.
formatjs extract "src/**/*.{ts,tsx,vue}" --format [path]
In this function, you can sort it i.e. by value. See this example for the general structure of a custom formatter:
https://github.com/formatjs/formatjs/blob/main/packages/cli/src/formatters/default.ts
An altnerative way is to set the custom id with a prefix instead of generating ids. But you need to be aware of naming collisions.
<FormattedMessage
id="component.title"
value="My title"
/>
Related
I am trying to select a search input using react-testing-library in the more semantic way possible.
I tagged the input with type=search, and I was expecting to be able to do something like this:
cy.findByRole('search').click().clear().type(content);
However the type fails because there is no element with the role search. Is this a limitation? Or is it supposed to be put in a different place? For example in a wrapping form? Currently the search input is just that, an isolated input that triggers search queries.
If you don't have an explicit role attribute on the element,
<input type="search">
the role to use is searchbox
cy.findByRole('searchbox').click().clear().type(content); // passes
If you want to use the command findByRole, then you have to tag your input as role="search", then the below command should work-
cy.findByRole('search').click().clear().type(content);
Someone decided to make a site as unfriendly as possible by intention so I'm trying what I can to have our scraper still get to where it should.
<div class="issueDetails">
<div class="issueTitle ng-binding" style="">FANCY UNIQUE TEXT dd.MM.yyyy</div>
<a>COMPLETELY DIFFERENT TEXT</a>
I've left out the unnecessary details here, but I'm trying to find a match within the site through XPATH (can't use anything else for this) that will find something which fulfils both conditions, FANCY UNIQUE TEXT dd.MM.yyyy *as well as COMPLETELY DIFFERENT TEXT.
I've tried my luck with //div[#class='issueDetails']/descendant::*[contains(text(), 'FANCY UNIQUE TEXT dd.MM.yyyy') and contains (text(), 'COMPLETELY DIFFERENT TEXT')]
but it contains the erroneous logic that both unique things I need are in the same thing.
The first, FANCY UNIQUE TEXT, is the unique identifier for where I want to go. The second, COMPLETELY DIFFERENT TEXT, is what I need the scraper to click on to actually head to that specific one. So an XPath that finds both despite them being different descendants is necessary.
Is this what you're looking for :
//div[#class="issueDetails"]/*[contains(.,"COMPLETELY DIFFERENT TEXT") or translate(substring(.,string-length(.)-9,10),"123456789","000000000")="00.00.0000" and contains(.,'FANCY UNIQUE TEXT')]
It will return the 2 elements respecting your conditions : div and a.
Translate, substring-length and substring functions are used to check if a date pattern is present in the div element.
EDIT : Check if the parent+child contains the text you're looking for, then get the childs with :
//div[#class='issueDetails'][contains(.,"FANCY UNIQUE TEXT dd.MM.yyyy") and contains(.,"COMPLETELY DIFFERENT TEXT")]/*[contains(.,"FANCY UNIQUE TEXT dd.MM.yyyy") or contains(.,"COMPLETELY DIFFERENT TEXT")]
I have a report card written in Word that uses an XML file for its input. In the XML file, if a student remains in the same section all three trimesters there will be one node for that class; if they change sections at the trimester they'll have one node for each section. The nodes look something like this (greatly simplified):
<ReportCardSectionFB Abs1="2" Abs2="11" CourseID="ELMATH1" CourseTitle="Math" PeriodStart="3" TeacherName="Jones, Jennifer" TermCode="Year" SectionID="ELMATH1-4" />
<ReportCardSectionFB Abs1="1.50" Abs2="6" CourseID="ELMATH1" CourseTitle="Math" PeriodStart="3" TeacherName="Smith, Tina" TermCode="Year" SectionID="ELMATH1-3" />
There is no indicator within the XML as to which trimester the node belongs to.
In the Word document, we're pulling the absence data with the following mail merge command:
{MERGEFIELD "ReportCardSectionFB[#PeriodStart='3']/ #Abs1" \# 0.# \* MERGEFORMAT }
That's not working in this situation: it only gets the absence data from the first node it comes across, i.e.: 2.0. Is there a way to get the sum of #Abs1 for all period 3 classes, i.e.: 3.5? If not, is there a way to only get the last #Abs1 for period 3, i.e.: 1.5?
I recommend you to use this 3rd party product, which can use xml as input and is capable of merging it with MS Word template. I is also much more powerful than the built-in Word's mail merge. You can see some examples here.
You could also try summing the absences in Synergy - there's a new checkbox under AttDef1, 2, etc. that adds up all the absences for the data range - Include all day data for the entire date range regardless of section enrollment or section timeframe. That way the absences should be the same for each section, if that works for your district.
You can also try the SET function in Word to nest the MERGEFIELDS as bookmarks and use the Word operator functions to then add the bookmarks.
When setting repeated content in a section in Orbeon each control is repeated and the their names are the same. How do I access the the control from the first, second...etc instance of a control from each iterated section? I'm thinking along the lines of $control-name[instance#] or something similair.
The following works, given this form:
$name[2]: return the second value
string-join($name, ', '): join all values with commas
count($name): return the number of values
See also the relevant documentation.
To access this value in "bind" section, you can use a relative path , like ../name=''.
TO access this value in "body" section, then you can use context()/../name.
If you are trying to make anything different, be more specific and this answer can be edited to be according to what you want.
I've been hacking away at this one for hours and I just can't figure it out. Using XPath to find text values is tricky and this problem has too many moving parts.
I have a webpage with a large table and a section in this table contains a list of users (assignees) that are assigned to a particular unit. There is nearly always multiple users assigned to a unit and I need to make sure a particular user is assigned to any of the units on the table. I've used XPath for nearly all of my selectors and I'm half way there on this one. I just can't seem to figure out how to use contains with text() in this context.
Here's what I have so far:
//td[#id='unit']/span [text()='asdfasdfasdfasdfasdf (Primary); asdfasdfasdfasdfasdf, asdfasdfasdfasdf; 456, 3456'; testuser]
The XPath Query above captures all text in the particular section I am looking at, which is great. However, I only need to know if testuser is in that section.
text() gets you a set of text nodes. I tend to use it more in a context of //span//text() or something.
If you are trying to check if the text inside an element contains something you should use contains on the element rather than the result of text() like this:
span[contains(., 'testuser')]
XPath is pretty good with context. If you know exactly what text a node should have you can do:
span[.='full text in this span']
But if you want to do something like regular expressions (using exslt for example) you'll need to use the string() function:
span[regexp:test(string(.), 'testuser')]