I am using elasticsearch 7.11 and have implemented parent child relation on of the base reason was my updates were very frequent and time a new child could be added under 1 parent,
My project is something managing all the computers in the network all the activity related to the endpoints should be logged for the analytics purpose so.
My mapping is some thing.
PcInformation -> User
Now Pc has its own information the main thing to note is the activationTime and the user has its Department, username, role etc.
Now I want to get the top departments w.r.t to PC and its time.
Say I want to know which departments have most number of PC in 2020.
What I am currently doing is first get all the PC using the user relationship using hasChild query is below.
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"filter": [
{
"has_child": {
"type": "user",
"query": {
"nested": {
"path": "user",
"query": {
"match_all": {}
}
}
}
}
},
{
"range": {
"regDate": {
"gte": "2020-04-11",
"lte": "2022-04-31"
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
This would return me all the PC in specific time.
And then I am performing aggregation first on user than sub aggregation on pcConnection data for the time based aggragation now I want to know the name of the department but this is not in the the pc information.
One thing is to put user information in the pc but I would lost for what I am using parent child model.
Is there anyway to do so ?
Updated
The Sample Mapping
{
"pcinformation": {
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"_class": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"user": {
"type": "nested",
"properties": {
"userGroup": {
"type": "keyword"
},
"userTeam": {
"type": "keyword"
},
"userCode": {
"type": "long"
},
"userName": {
"type": "keyword"
}
}
},
"antivirus": {
"type": "nested",
"properties": {
"datetime": {
"type": "date"
},
"name": {
"type": "keyword"
}
}
},
"cpuId": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"domainName": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"firewall": {
"type": "nested",
"properties": {
"datetime": {
"type": "date"
},
"status": {
"type": "keyword"
}
}
},
"friendlyName": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"activationDate": {
"type": "date"
},
"macId": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"name": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"osArch": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"osType": {
"type": "keyword"
},
"osVersion": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"pcSignature": {
"type": "text"
},
"pcSignatureHash": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"relation": {
"type": "join",
"eager_global_ordinals": true,
"relations": {
"infection": [
"user"
]
}
},
"userName": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"vm": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
So I got two records as this is parent child the one is
{
"_index": "pcInformation",
"_type": "_doc",
"_id": "abcd",
"_version": 1,
"_score": 1,
"_source": {
"_class": "stor.doc.pcInformation",
"pcSignatureHash": "abcd",
"pcSignature": "dddd",
"name": "DESKTOP8JGBPB9",
"userName": "Win1064",
"osType": "Windows.10.Enterprise",
"domainName": "DESKTOP8JGBPB9",
"cpuId": "NOCPUID",
"osVersion": "10.0.19042",
"osArch": "32",
"macId": "0800278A763D",
"activationDate": "2021-05-25T08:46:30.510Z",
"vm": "No VM",
"friendlyName": "Windows Defender",
"relation": {
"name": "pcInformation"
}
}
}
The other one is user information.
{
"_index": "pcInformation",
"_type": "_doc",
"_id": "Qw60onkBDTnt1BMJOeq0",
"_version": 1,
"_score": 1,
"_routing": "abcd",
"_source": {
"_class": "stor.doc.pcInformation",
"agent": {
"userCode": 1,
"userGroup":"admin",
"userRole":"manager"
},
"relation": {
"name": "user",
"parent": "abcd"
}
}
}
Related
When I do
PUT /vehicles/_doc/123
{
"make" : "Honda Civic",
"color" : "Blue",
"from": "Japan",
"size": "Big",
"comment": "deja vu",
"HP" : 250,
"milage" : 24000,
"price": 19300.97
}
It automatically generate the index definition below:
{
"vehicles": {
"aliases": {},
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"HP": {
"type": "long"
},
"color": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"comment": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"from": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"make": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"milage": {
"type": "long"
},
"price": {
"type": "float"
},
"size": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
},
"settings": {
"index": {
"routing": {
"allocation": {
"include": {
"_tier_preference": "data_content"
}
}
},
"number_of_shards": "1",
"provided_name": "vehicles",
"creation_date": "1670864230815",
"number_of_replicas": "1",
"uuid": "etLFicsvSXCpeuFiYCiT0g",
"version": {
"created": "8050299"
}
}
}
}
}
In the index, say color, it has type text, and there is a field keyword, how do we use and query the keyword field?
You just need to use color.keyword in your query when you want to query the keyword field, if you want to just query the text part, you simply use the color in field name.
text and keyword fields are tokenised and stored differently and used in different scenario, this answer will be useful for understand the difference.
I tried to do search following query :
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"match": {
"education.degree": "Bachelor"
}
},
{
"range": {
"education.graduatedDate": {
"lte": "2020-01-01"
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
Result :
{
"took": 2,
"timed_out": false,
"_shards": {
"total": 1,
"successful": 1,
"skipped": 0,
"failed": 0
},
"hits": {
"total": {
"value": 1,
"relation": "eq"
},
"max_score": 1.0757437,
"hits": [
{
"_index": "cv",
"_type": "_doc",
"_id": "e9a4aed8-8e01-45a6-90f8-43ffb25f32fd",
"_score": 1.0757437,
"_source": {
"_class": "com.example.elasticsearchmodule.documents.CVDetails",
"id": "e9a4aed8-8e01-45a6-90f8-43ffb25f32fd",
"user": {
"id": 101,
"username": "rajesh1234",
"email": "applicant123#gmail.com",
"role": "APPLICANT",
"activeStatus": "ACTIVE",
"phoneNumber": "9842826455",
"location": "Biratnagar",
"gender": "MALE",
"dateOfBirth": "2000-01-04",
"cvURI": "localhost:8080\\applicant\\cv\\cv_101_employeetask.txt"
},
"experience": [],
"education": [
{
"id": 1,
"degree": "Bachelor",
"instituteName": "The British College",
"marksSecured": "4.0 GPA",
"graduatedDate": "2022-01-02"
},
{
"id": 2,
"degree": "+2",
"instituteName": "The Softwarica College",
"marksSecured": "4.0 GPA",
"graduatedDate": "2018-01-02"
},
{
"id": 3,
"degree": "SLC",
"instituteName": "The Test College",
"marksSecured": "4.0 GPA",
"graduatedDate": "2016-01-02"
}
]
}
}
]
}
}
This will return the result of this. But I want to search something like, give me a match result of the user having degree Bachelor and graduatedDate of that particular data should be less than or equal to 2020-01-01 but the data with Bachelor has graduatedDate of 2022-01-02.
Here is the mapping.
{
"cv": {
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"_class": {
"type": "keyword",
"index": false,
"doc_values": false
},
"education": {
"properties": {
"degree": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"graduatedDate": {
"type": "date"
},
"id": {
"type": "long"
},
"instituteName": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"marksSecured": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
},
"experience": {
"properties": {
"description": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"endDate": {
"type": "date"
},
"id": {
"type": "long"
},
"jobLocation": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"jobTitle": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"organizationName": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
},
"id": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"user": {
"properties": {
"activeStatus": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"cvURI": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"dateOfBirth": {
"type": "date"
},
"email": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"gender": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"id": {
"type": "long"
},
"location": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"phoneNumber": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"role": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"username": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
I have below document been added in ElasticSearch 7.9.2 version.
{
"EmployeeID": 222,
"EmpName": "Lisa jay",
"Age": 33,
"Address": [{
"AddressNo": 1290,
"Street": "Park flower road",
"ZIPCODE": 700
}]
}
I tried without adding .txt but it throws query_shard_exception, however after adding it, it doesn't show the correct result.
GET school/_search
{
"query": {
"query_string": {
"fields": ["EmployeeID.text","Address.ZIPCODE.text"],
"query": "222 700",
"default_operator":"OR"
}
}
}
Please see the image .
For array elements .text is working fine . Any answer or comment is appreciated and won't be down voted by me . Thank you .
Output of GET school/
{
"school": {
"aliases": {},
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"Address": {
"properties": {
"AddressNo": {
"type": "long"
},
"Street": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"ZIPCODE": {
"type": "long"
}
}
},
"Age": {
"type": "long"
},
"EmpName": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"EmployeeID": {
"type": "long"
},
"query": {
"properties": {
"match": {
"properties": {
"phrase": {
"properties": {
"ZIPCODE": {
"type": "long"
}
}
}
}
}
}
},
"t1": {
"properties": {
"properties": {
"properties": {
"address": {
"properties": {
"type": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
},
"age": {
"properties": {
"type": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
},
"id": {
"properties": {
"type": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
},
"name": {
"properties": {
"type": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
},
"partime": {
"properties": {
"type": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
},
"settings": {
"index": {
"creation_date": "1602337657007",
"number_of_shards": "1",
"number_of_replicas": "1",
"uuid": "9RNUa1gOQ7WrpNoK_KifLA",
"version": {
"created": "7090299"
},
"provided_name": "school"
}
}
}
}
I've searched for this and haven't found anything that says whether this is or is not supported. According to Elastic documentation:
"Inner hits can be used by defining an inner_hits definition on a
nested, has_child or has_parent query and filter. "
I want to use inner_hits on a has_parent, nested object. I've tried it as illustrated in the example below. Does anyone know if this is possible?
Example Scenario (I've simplified the data and properties for the purpose of this post)
We store task title & description translations as a nested object in
the parent task. Each nested title has an iso code and a translated
title & description. We distribute child tasks to, in some cases,
thousands of users so it didn't make sense replicating the
title/description into each child object.
Parent Task Example
{
"_id": "parenttask_177448",
"startDate": "2020-05-01T00:00:00",
"endDate": "2020-05-05T00:00:00",
"type": "task",
"taskjoin" : "parenttask",
"priorityId": 1,
"translations": [
{
"title": "This is a test task",
"description": "test",
"localeIsoCode": [
"en-US"
]
},
{
"description": "tester",
"title": "Ceci est une tâche de test",
"localeIsoCode": [
"fr-FR"
]
}
]
}
Children Task(s) Example
{
"_id": "childtask_12345",
"taskSubType": "distributed",
"subtasks": [],
"startDate": "2020-03-19T00:00:00",
"endDate": "2020-03-19T00:00:00",
"taskJoinField": {
"name": "childtask",
"parent": "parenttask_177448"
},
"assignedUserId": 12345,
"assignedUserName": "Bob Jones"
}
Relevant part of the query I'm running that brings back no inner hits results
{
"has_parent": {
"ignore_unmapped": true,
"parent_type": "parenttask",
"query": {
"nested": {
"ignore_unmapped": true,
"inner_hits": {
"name": "innerhits_task",
"_source": {
"includes": [
"title"
]
}
},
"path": "translations",
"query": {
"term": {
"translations.localeIsoCode.keyword": {
"value": "fr-FR"
}
}
},
"boost": 1.1,
"_name": "nested_isocode"
}
},
"score": true,
"boost": 1.1,
"_name": "parent_isocode"
}
}
Relevant Mapping
{
"thinktime_dev_7003_tasks": {
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"assignedUserId": {
"type": "long"
},
"assignedUserName": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"taskJoinField": {
"type": "join",
"eager_global_ordinals": true,
"relations": {
"parenttask": "childtask"
}
},
"localeIsoCode": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"locationId": {
"type": "long"
},
"title": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"translations": {
"type": "nested",
"properties": {
"description": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"image": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"isPrimary": {
"type": "long"
},
"localeIsoCode": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
},
"url": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
},
"title": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
I'm getting results back from the child tasks but no inner hits matches. If I move the inner hits to the has_parent, I get all the translations back.
My question is whether doing a parent nested inner hits is possible in Elastic? I'm surprised I didn't find anyone else trying to do this or examples on the Internet. This seems like a pretty common use case.
Thanks for your help.
I currently have a nested object interest_scores in ES that looks like this:
[{
username: 'Somebody',
interest_scores: [
{ name: 'Running', score: 10 }
{ name: 'Food and drinks', score: 21 }
]
},
{
username: 'SomebodyElse',
interest_scores: [
{ name: 'Running', score: 7 }
{ name: 'Food and drinks', score: 29 }
]
}]
When I enter the search term Running I would like the user with the highest score for Running to get returned first.
I know the way to do this is to use a Function Score Query but I am not sure how to use the matching search term in the function / script. What I think is that the query will return all documents that have the interest "Running" and then I could use something like interest_scores.{match}.score to add to or multiply by the document score.
Any help with this would be greatly appreciated!
As requested, here is the mapping:
{
"influencers": {
"mappings": {
"influencer": {
"properties": {
"email": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"gender": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"geo": {
"type": "geo_point"
},
"hashtags": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"id": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"interest_scores": {
"type": "nested",
"properties": {
"name": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"score": {
"type": "long"
}
}
},
"interests": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"language": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"location": {
"properties": {
"city": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"country": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"country_code": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"lat": {
"type": "float"
},
"lng": {
"type": "float"
},
"state_code": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"subdivision": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
},
"network_data": {
"properties": {
"facebook": {
"properties": {
"url": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"username": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
},
"instagram": {
"properties": {
"bio": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"engagement": {
"type": "float"
},
"id": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"picture": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"reach": {
"type": "long"
},
"url": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"username": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
},
"pinterest": {
"properties": {
"url": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"username": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
},
"twitter": {
"properties": {
"bio": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"engagement": {
"type": "float"
},
"id": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"picture": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"reach": {
"type": "long"
},
"url": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"username": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
},
"youtube": {
"properties": {
"bio": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"engagement": {
"type": "float"
},
"id": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"picture": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"reach": {
"type": "long"
},
"url": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"username": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"videos": {
"type": "long"
},
"views": {
"type": "long"
},
"views_per_video": {
"type": "float"
}
}
}
}
},
"networks": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"picture": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"total_reach": {
"type": "long"
},
"username": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
I do not have a function score query yet, I am only testing in the Dev Tools of Kibana - I do have all of the other filters working correctly though. I am just looking to say "If the search term matches a interest_scores.name then sort the hits by the interest_scores.score of that interest_scores.name
Update
The following seems to be working when I test it in Kibana dev tools:
{
"query": {
"nested": {
"path": "interest_scores",
"score_mode": "sum",
"query": {
"function_score": {
"query": {
"match": { "interest_scores.name": "Running" }
},
"script_score": {
"script": "_score + doc['interest_scores.score'].value"
}
}
}
}
}
}
I have tested it with a few different search terms and it always returns the highest score first, but what is weird is that I get the same results when I remove the script_score function. Can anyone tell me if this is a good solution, or why it works without the script_score?
As described here, you can sort by nested fields:
{
"_source": false, # for inner hits - you can remove it
"query": {
"nested": {
"path": "interest_scores",
"filter": {
"range": {
"interest_scores.score": {
"gte": "0"
}
}
},
"inner_hits": {} # for inner hits - you can remove it
}
},
"sort": {
"interest_scores.score": {
"order": "desc",
"mode": "max",
"nested_filter": {
"range": {
"interest_scores.score": {
"gte": "0"
}
}
}
}
}
}
*Pay attention that, you can use the inner_hits ability to show only relevant nested documents. If all inner hits documents are relevant - please remove the marked lines.
**Use the filter on score field or on any other field (e.g: name you would like to filter by).
EDIT 1:
If you want to get the sorted scores of specific name, try:
{
"_source": false,
"query": {
"nested": {
"path": "interest_scores",
"filter": {
"term": {
"interest_scores.name": "SCORE_NAME"
}
},
"inner_hits": {}
}
},
"sort": {
"interest_scores.score": {
"order": "desc",
"mode": "max",
"nested_filter": {
"range": {
"interest_scores.score": {
"gte": "0"
}
}
}
}
}
}
Put the desired score name instead SCORE_NAME.