I have several models chained by 1:N relationships:
User (1 -> N) Asignatura (1 -> N) Clase (1 -> N) Asiento
I want to obtain a collection of Asiento models, containing all the Asientos of a User.
I tried the "obvious"
$user->asignaturas->clases->asientos;
but as $user->asignaturas is a collection, ->clases is not recognized as a valid method (all due relationships, asignaturas(), clases() and asientos() has been created in their respective models)
So I did the following to solve the problem:
$user = User::findorFail(Auth::user()->id);
$asignaturasArr = $user->asignaturas->pluck('id')->toArray();
$clases = Clase::whereIn('asignatura_id', $asignaturasArr)->get();
$clasesArr = $clases->pluck('id')->toArray();
$asientos = Asiento::whereIn('clase_id', $clasesArr)->get();
but I suspect that Laravel should have a less verbose way to do the work, and I am not being able to find it.
I will be grateful to have any advice from any expert.
Thank you very much in advance and best regards.
$user->asignaturas->clases->asientos; will not work as asignaturas is a collection, so you would have to do this to work: $user->asignaturas->first()->clases->first()->asientos; but you would have to iterate over each asignaturas and clases and that is for surely not ideal.
So, you could try using hasManyThrough but that would also not work 100%, as it only allows 3 level deep, it would only work for User -> Asignaturas -> Clases (so you get all User's Clases but you would still need to iterate each Clase to get every Asientos), or it would only work for Asignaturas -> Clases -> Asientos (but you would have to write this in Asignatura model, not in user, I still think this would work for you).
So, if we use the last one I mentioned, your Asignatura model should have this:
class Asignatura extends Model
{
public function asientos()
{
return $this->hasManyThrough(Asiento::class, Clase::class);
}
}
Have in mind that this must follow a standard convention, read the documentation about it, and if it is not working, share your models and tables' names so we can help you make it work.
Then, in your User model:
class User extends Model
{
public function asientos()
{
$asientos = collect();
$this->asignaturas->each(function ($asignatura) use ($asientos) {
$asignatura->asientos->each(function ($asiento) use ($asientos) {
$asientos->push($asiento);
});
});
return $asientos;
}
}
But, that code is not 100% good, as you are looping a lot, still will work.
Other solution will be to just do a normal query (manually joining) and get the data that way, but I will not do it here as I have no idea what your tables' names are, you can find good tutorials about this, you will have to join tables, really simple to do.
Other possible solution you could try using, but I have never used, is using a package that someone created because of this exact problem, it is called staudenmeir/eloquent-has-many-deep. It can handle "infinite" levels instead of just 3. This is the SO question related to it.
Al last, I think that I found the Eloquent (elegant) solution to the problem. Is the following:
$asientos = $user->asignaturas->map->clases->unique()->flatten()->map->asientos->unique()->flatten();
Using map and unique()->flatten() (and, of course, the necessary relationships in the models), you can chain as much relationships levels as you want.
Related
I have a query in which I have eagar loaded two models using with function like this:
ModelA::with(['relationB', 'relationC.relationC.A'])->where(condition)->get();
So, ModelA has two relations like this:
public function B(){ return $this->blongsTo(B::class);}
public function C(){ return $this->blongsTo(C::class);}
Now, my requirement is that I want to add a condition in B() function like this:
public function C() {
if($this->B->status) {
return $this->blongsTo(C::class)->withTrashed();
}
return $this->blongsTo(C::class);
}
But it return null on line this statement:
if($this->B->status)
Here is the error message
Trying to get property 'status' of non-object
My ultimate requirement is that using one relation function I want to fetch deleted records and non deleted based on the condition, but somehow it is not working.
My laravel application version is 7.30.4.
A relational function (such as your public function C()) works a bit of magic under the hood. This is because really it is designed to be called in a query way like you show already with the ::with(['relationB', ...]).
However, because of this, if you were to eager load C, then $this is not yet loaded as the full model, and therefore B is not defined (this is assuming that modelA always has a B relation). If you were to dd($this) while performing your query, you'd see that the result would be a model without any attributes.
Getting this to work from within a relational function (with the goal of eager loading) is very difficult. You're probably better off doing the logic elsewhere, with a second query for example. This is because within the relational function, there is no way to know who or what the potential target is. However, if you only use it after modelA is loaded, then it works without issues.
You can do some things with a whereHas, but then you'd still have to do 2 queries, or you can try and see if you can get it done with an SQL IF statement, but that will not result in a relation.
I'm working on my first laravel project: a family tree. I have 4 branches of the family, each with people/families/images/stories/etc. A given user on the website will have access to everything for 1, 2, or 4 of these branches of the family (I don't want to show a cousin stuff for people they're not related to).
So on various pages I want the collections from the controller to contain stuff based on the given user's permissions. Merge seems like the right way to do this.
I have scopes to get people from each branch of the family, and in the following example I also have a scope for people with a birthday this month. In order to show the right set of birthdays for this user, I can get this by merging each group individually if they have access.
Here's what my function would look like if I showed everyone in all 4 family branches:
public function get_birthday_people()
{
$user = \Auth::user();
$jones_birthdays = Person::birthdays()->jones()->get();
$smith_birthdays = Person::birthdays()->smith()->get();
$lee_birthdays = Person::birthdays()->lee()->get();
$brandt_birthdays = Person::birthdays()->brandt()->get();
$birthday_people = $jones_birthdays
->merge($smith_birthdays)
->merge($lee_birthdays )
->merge($brandt_birthdays );
return $birthday_people;
My challenge: I'd like to modify it so that I check the user's access and only add each group of people accordingly. I'm imagining something where it's all the same as above except I add conditionals like this:
if($user->jones_access) {
$jones_birthdays = Person::birthdays()->jones()->get();
}
else{
$jones_birthdays =NULL;
}
But that throws an error for users without access because I can't call merge on NULL (or an empty array, or the other versions of 'nothing' that I tried).
What's a good way to do something like this?
if($user->jones_access) {
$jones_birthdays = Person::birthdays()->jones()->get();
}
else{
$jones_birthdays = new Collection;
}
Better yet, do the merge in the condition, no else required.
$birthday_people = new Collection;
if($user->jones_access) {
$birthday_people->merge(Person::birthdays()->jones()->get());
}
You are going to want your Eloquent query to only return the relevant data for the user requesting it. It doesn't make sense to query Lee birthdays when a Jones person is accessing that page.
So what you will wind up doing is something like
$birthdays = App\Person::where('family', $user->family)->get();
This pulls in Persons where their family property is equal to the family of the current user.
This probably does not match the way you have your relationships right now, but hopefully it will get you on the right track to getting them sorted out.
If you really want to go ahead with a bunch of queries and checking for authorization, read up on the authorization features of Laravel. It will give let you assign abilities to users and check them easily.
I have 3 tables:
Users - for storing users
User_point - for associacion between users and points(has only user_id and point_id)
Points for description of points(id, amount, description)
How do I define a relation between these? I tried
public function points(){
return $this->belongsToMany('\App\Point', 'user_point');
}
but when I do
return $user->points()->sum('amount');
it returns just one
Edit:
At first I tried making it like this as it makes more sense:
public function points(){
return $this->hasMany('\App\Point');
}
But it wouldn't work
SUM is an aggregate function and so it should only return one row.
$user->points will be a collection of points attached to that user.
$user->points() is a query that you can do additional work against (i.e. $user->points()->whereSomething(true)->get()).
As user ceejayoz pointed out, using user->points() is going to return a builder which you can do additional work on. I believe using sum() on that will look at the first row returned which is what you indicated is actually happening.
Likely, what you really want to do is $user->points->sum('amount');
That will get the sum of that column for the entire collection.
I'm working in Laravel 4, and I have a Child model with multiple EducationProfiles:
class Child extends EloquentVersioned
{
public function educationProfiles()
{
return $this->hasMany('EducationProfile');
}
}
If I wanted to get all the EducationProfiles for each kid under age 10 it would be easy:
Child::where('date_of_birth','>','2004-03-27')->with('educationProfiles')->all();
But say (as I do) that I would like to use with() to grab a calculated value for the Education Profiles of each of those kids, something like:
SELECT `education_profiles`.`child_id`, GROUP_CONCAT(`education_profiles`.`district`) as `district_list`
In theory with() only works with relationships, so do I have any options for associating the district_list fields to my Child models?
EDIT: Actually, I was wondering whether with('educationProfiles') generates SQL equivalent to:
EducationProfile::whereIn('id',array(1,2,3,4))
or whether it's actually equivalent to
DB::table('education_profiles')->whereIn('id',array(1,2,3,4))
The reason I ask is that in the former I'm getting models, if it's the latter I'm getting unmodeled data, and thus I can probably mess it up as much as I want. I assume with() generates an additional set models, though. Anybody care to correct or confirm?
Ok, I think I've cracked this nut. No, it is NOT possible to eager load arbitrary queries. However, the tools have been provided by the Fluent query builder to make it relatively easy to replicate eager loading manually.
First, we leverage the original query:
$query = Child::where('date_of_birth','>','2004-03-27')->with('educationProfiles');
$children = $query->get();
$eagerIds = $query->lists('id');
Next, use the $eagerIds to filterDB::table('education_profile') in the same way that with('educationProfiles') would filter EducationProfile::...
$query2 = DB::table('education_profile')->whereIn('child_id',$eagerIds)->select('child_id', 'GROUP_CONCAT(`education_profiles`.`district`) as `district_list`')->groupBy('child_id');
$educationProfiles = $query2->lists('district_list','child_id');
Now we can iterate through $children and just look up the $educationProfiles[$children->id] values for each entry.
Ok, yes, it's an obvious construction, but I haven't seen it laid out explicitly anywhere before as a means of eager loading arbitrary calculations.
You can add a where clause to your hasMany() call like this:
public function educationProfilesUnderTen() {
$ten_years_ago = (new DateTime('10 years ago'))->format('Y-m-d');
return $this->hasMany('EducationProfile')->where('date_of_birth', '>', $ten_years_ago)
}
Let's say we have 3 domain classes: 2 classes related with each other through a 3rd class.
Ok, some code:
class A {
String subject
String description
static hasMany = [cs: C]
static transients = ['numberOfCs']
Long getNumberOfCs() {
return cs.size()
}
}
class B {
String title
}
class C {
A objectA
B objectB
static belongsTo = [a: A]
}
Pretty clear? I hope so. This work perfectly with my domain.
You can see the transient property numberOfCs, which is used to calculate the number of C instances related to my A object. And it works just fine.
The problem: listing all my A objects, I want to sort them by the number of relationships with C objects, but the transient property numberOfCs cannot be used for the scope.
How can I handle the situation? How can I tell GORM to sort the As list by numberOfCs as it would be a regular (non transient) field?
Thanks in advance.
I'm not sure that Grails' criteria do support this, as you need both to select the A object itself and aggregate by a child objects (C). That means grouping by all the A's fields, which is not done automatically.
If you only need some fields from A, you can group by them:
def instances = A.withCriteria {
projections {
groupProperty('subject')
count('cs', 'cCount')
}
order 'cCount'
}
otherwise you'll need to retrieve only ids and make a second query, like in this question.
Another way is to use derived properties like described here (not sure it will work though):
class A {
static mapping = {
numberOfCs formula: 'select count(*) from C where c.b_id = id'
}
}
I wouldn't consider your Problem GORM related but rather general Hibernate or even SQL related.
Take a look at the HQL Docu they are a lot of examples.
check the following HQL this pretty close what you are asking.
select mySortedAs from A mySortedAs left join mySortedAs.cs myCsOfA order by
count(myCsOfA)
I think I saw somewhere that you also can do something like this myCsOfA.length or myCsOfA.size