This question already has answers here:
How do I use sudo to redirect output to a location I don't have permission to write to? [closed]
(15 answers)
sudo cat << EOF > File doesn't work, sudo su does [duplicate]
(5 answers)
Closed 1 year ago.
I am trying to automate the addition of a repository source in my arch's pacman.conf file but using the echo command in my shell script. However, it fails like this:-
sudo echo "[archlinuxfr]" >> /etc/pacman.conf
sudo echo "Server = http://repo.archlinux.fr/\$arch" >> /etc/pacman.conf
sudo echo " " >> /etc/pacman.conf
-bash: /etc/pacman.conf: Permission denied
If I make changes to /etc/pacman.conf manually using vim, by doing
sudo vim /etc/pacman.conf
and quiting vim with :wq, everything works fine and my pacman.conf has been manually updated without "Permission denied" complaints.
Why is this so? And how do I get sudo echo to work? (btw, I tried using sudo cat too but that failed with Permission denied as well)
As #geekosaur explained, the shell does the redirection before running the command. When you type this:
sudo foo >/some/file
Your current shell process makes a copy of itself that first tries to open /some/file for writing, then if that succeeds it makes that file descriptor its standard output, and only if that succeeds does it execute sudo. This is failing at the first step.
If you're allowed (sudoer configs often preclude running shells), you can do something like this:
sudo bash -c 'foo >/some/file'
But I find a good solution in general is to use | sudo tee instead of > and | sudo tee -a instead of >>. That's especially useful if the redirection is the only reason I need sudo in the first place; after all, needlessly running processes as root is precisely what sudo was created to avoid. And running echo as root is just silly.
echo '[archlinuxfr]' | sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
echo 'Server = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch' | sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
echo ' ' | sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
I added > /dev/null on the end because tee sends its output to both the named file and its own standard output, and I don't need to see it on my terminal. (The tee command acts like a "T" connector in a physical pipeline, which is where it gets its name.) And I switched to single quotes ('...') instead of doubles ("...") so that everything is literal and I didn't have to put a backslash in front of the $ in $arch. (Without the quotes or backslash, $arch would get replaced by the value of the shell parameter arch, which probably doesn't exist, in which case the $arch is replaced by nothing and just vanishes.)
So that takes care of writing to files as root using sudo. Now for a lengthy digression on ways to output newline-containing text in a shell script. :)
To BLUF it, as they say, my preferred solution would be to just feed a here-document into the above sudo tee command; then there is no need for cat or echo or printf or any other commands at all. The single quotation marks have moved to the sentinel introduction <<'EOF', but they have the same effect there: the body is treated as literal text, so $arch is left alone:
sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null <<'EOF'
[archlinuxfr]
Server = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch
EOF
But while that's how I'd do it, there are alternatives. Here are a few:
You can stick with one echo per line, but group all of them together in a subshell, so you only have to append to the file once:
(echo '[archlinuxfr]'
echo 'Server = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch'
echo ' ') | sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
If you add -e to the echo (and you're using a shell that supports that non-POSIX extension), you can embed newlines directly into the string using \n:
# NON-POSIX - NOT RECOMMENDED
echo -e '[archlinuxfr]\nServer = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch\n ' |
sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
But as it says above, that's not POSIX-specified behavior; your shell might just echo a literal -e followed by a string with a bunch of literal \ns instead. The POSIX way of doing that is to use printf instead of echo; it automatically treats its argument like echo -e does, but doesn't automatically append a newline at the end, so you have to stick an extra \n there, too:
printf '[archlinuxfr]\nServer = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch\n \n' |
sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
With either of those solutions, what the command gets as an argument string contains the two-character sequence \n, and it's up to the command program itself (the code inside printf or echo) to translate that into a newline. In many modern shells, you have the option of using ANSI quotes $'...', which will translate sequences like \n into literal newlines before the command program ever sees the string. That means such strings work with any command whatsoever, including plain old -e-less echo:
echo $'[archlinuxfr]\nServer = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch\n ' |
sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
But, while more portable than echo -e, ANSI quotes are still a non-POSIX extension.
And again, while those are all options, I prefer the straight tee <<EOF solution above.
The problem is that the redirection is being processed by your original shell, not by sudo. Shells are not capable of reading minds and do not know that that particular >> is meant for the sudo and not for it.
You need to:
quote the redirection ( so it is passed on to sudo)
and use sudo -s (so that sudo uses a shell to process the quoted redirection.)
http://www.innovationsts.com/blog/?p=2758
As the instructions are not that clear above I am using the instructions from that blog post. With examples so it is easier to see what you need to do.
$ sudo cat /root/example.txt | gzip > /root/example.gz
-bash: /root/example.gz: Permission denied
Notice that it’s the second command (the gzip command) in the pipeline that causes the error. That’s where our technique of using bash with the -c option comes in.
$ sudo bash -c 'cat /root/example.txt | gzip > /root/example.gz'
$ sudo ls /root/example.gz
/root/example.gz
We can see form the ls command’s output that the compressed file creation succeeded.
The second method is similar to the first in that we’re passing a command string to bash, but we’re doing it in a pipeline via sudo.
$ sudo rm /root/example.gz
$ echo "cat /root/example.txt | gzip > /root/example.gz" | sudo bash
$ sudo ls /root/example.gz
/root/example.gz
sudo bash -c 'echo "[archlinuxfr]" >> /etc/pacman.conf'
STEP 1 create a function in a bash file (write_pacman.sh)
#!/bin/bash
function write_pacman {
tee -a /etc/pacman.conf > /dev/null << 'EOF'
[archlinuxfr]
Server = http://repo.archlinux.fr/\$arch
EOF
}
'EOF' will not interpret $arch variable.
STE2 source bash file
$ source write_pacman.sh
STEP 3 execute function
$ write_pacman
append files (sudo cat):
cat <origin-file> | sudo tee -a <target-file>
append echo to file (sudo echo):
echo <origin> | sudo tee -a <target-file>
(EXTRA) disregard the ouput:
echo >origin> | sudo tee -a <target-file> >/dev/null
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 1 year ago.
The community reviewed whether to reopen this question 3 months ago and left it closed:
Original close reason(s) were not resolved
Improve this question
I've been given sudo access on one of our development RedHat linux boxes, and I seem to find myself quite often needing to redirect output to a location I don't normally have write access to.
The trouble is, this contrived example doesn't work:
sudo ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out
I just receive the response:
-bash: /root/test.out: Permission denied
How can I get this to work?
Your command does not work because the redirection is performed by your shell which does not have the permission to write to /root/test.out. The redirection of the output is not performed by sudo.
There are multiple solutions:
Run a shell with sudo and give the command to it by using the -c option:
sudo sh -c 'ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out'
Create a script with your commands and run that script with sudo:
#!/bin/sh
ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out
Run sudo ls.sh. See Steve Bennett's answer if you don't want to create a temporary file.
Launch a shell with sudo -s then run your commands:
[nobody#so]$ sudo -s
[root#so]# ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out
[root#so]# ^D
[nobody#so]$
Use sudo tee (if you have to escape a lot when using the -c option):
sudo ls -hal /root/ | sudo tee /root/test.out > /dev/null
The redirect to /dev/null is needed to stop tee from outputting to the screen. To append instead of overwriting the output file
(>>), use tee -a or tee --append (the last one is specific to GNU coreutils).
Thanks go to Jd, Adam J. Forster and Johnathan for the second, third and fourth solutions.
Someone here has just suggested sudoing tee:
sudo ls -hal /root/ | sudo tee /root/test.out > /dev/null
This could also be used to redirect any command, to a directory that you do not have access to. It works because the tee program is effectively an "echo to a file" program, and the redirect to /dev/null is to stop it also outputting to the screen to keep it the same as the original contrived example above.
A trick I figured out myself was
sudo ls -hal /root/ | sudo dd of=/root/test.out
The problem is that the command gets run under sudo, but the redirection gets run under your user. This is done by the shell and there is very little you can do about it.
sudo command > /some/file.log
`-----v-----'`-------v-------'
command redirection
The usual ways of bypassing this are:
Wrap the commands in a script which you call under sudo.
If the commands and/or log file changes, you can make the
script take these as arguments. For example:
sudo log_script command /log/file.txt
Call a shell and pass the command line as a parameter with -c
This is especially useful for one off compound commands.
For example:
sudo bash -c "{ command1 arg; command2 arg; } > /log/file.txt"
Arrange a pipe/subshell with required rights (i.e. sudo)
# Read and append to a file
cat ./'file1.txt' | sudo tee -a '/log/file.txt' > '/dev/null';
# Store both stdout and stderr streams in a file
{ command1 arg; command2 arg; } |& sudo tee -a '/log/file.txt' > '/dev/null';
Yet another variation on the theme:
sudo bash <<EOF
ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out
EOF
Or of course:
echo 'ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out' | sudo bash
They have the (tiny) advantage that you don't need to remember any arguments to sudo or sh/bash
Clarifying a bit on why the tee option is preferable
Assuming you have appropriate permission to execute the command that creates the output, if you pipe the output of your command to tee, you only need to elevate tee's privledges with sudo and direct tee to write (or append) to the file in question.
in the example given in the question that would mean:
ls -hal /root/ | sudo tee /root/test.out
for a couple more practical examples:
# kill off one source of annoying advertisements
echo 127.0.0.1 ad.doubleclick.net | sudo tee -a /etc/hosts
# configure eth4 to come up on boot, set IP and netmask (centos 6.4)
echo -e "ONBOOT=\"YES\"\nIPADDR=10.42.84.168\nPREFIX=24" | sudo tee -a /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth4
In each of these examples you are taking the output of a non-privileged command and writing to a file that is usually only writable by root, which is the origin of your question.
It is a good idea to do it this way because the command that generates the output is not executed with elevated privileges. It doesn't seem to matter here with echo but when the source command is a script that you don't completely trust, it is crucial.
Note you can use the -a option to tee to append append (like >>) to the target file rather than overwrite it (like >).
Make sudo run a shell, like this:
sudo sh -c "echo foo > ~root/out"
The way I would go about this issue is:
If you need to write/replace the file:
echo "some text" | sudo tee /path/to/file
If you need to append to the file:
echo "some text" | sudo tee -a /path/to/file
Don't mean to beat a dead horse, but there are too many answers here that use tee, which means you have to redirect stdout to /dev/null unless you want to see a copy on the screen.
A simpler solution is to just use cat like this:
sudo ls -hal /root/ | sudo bash -c "cat > /root/test.out"
Notice how the redirection is put inside quotes so that it is evaluated by a shell started by sudo instead of the one running it.
How about writing a script?
Filename: myscript
#!/bin/sh
/bin/ls -lah /root > /root/test.out
# end script
Then use sudo to run the script:
sudo ./myscript
Whenever I have to do something like this I just become root:
# sudo -s
# ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out
# exit
It's probably not the best way, but it works.
I would do it this way:
sudo su -c 'ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out'
This is based on the answer involving tee. To make things easier I wrote a small script (I call it suwrite) and put it in /usr/local/bin/ with +x permission:
#! /bin/sh
if [ $# = 0 ] ; then
echo "USAGE: <command writing to stdout> | suwrite [-a] <output file 1> ..." >&2
exit 1
fi
for arg in "$#" ; do
if [ ${arg#/dev/} != ${arg} ] ; then
echo "Found dangerous argument ‘$arg’. Will exit."
exit 2
fi
done
sudo tee "$#" > /dev/null
As shown in the USAGE in the code, all you have to do is to pipe the output to this script followed by the desired superuser-accessible filename and it will automatically prompt you for your password if needed (since it includes sudo).
echo test | suwrite /root/test.txt
Note that since this is a simple wrapper for tee, it will also accept tee's -a option to append, and also supports writing to multiple files at the same time.
echo test2 | suwrite -a /root/test.txt
echo test-multi | suwrite /root/test-a.txt /root/test-b.txt
It also has some simplistic protection against writing to /dev/ devices which was a concern mentioned in one of the comments on this page.
sudo at now
at> echo test > /tmp/test.out
at> <EOT>
job 1 at Thu Sep 21 10:49:00 2017
Maybe you been given sudo access to only some programs/paths? Then there is no way to do what you want. (unless you will hack it somehow)
If it is not the case then maybe you can write bash script:
cat > myscript.sh
#!/bin/sh
ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out
Press ctrl + d :
chmod a+x myscript.sh
sudo myscript.sh
Hope it help.
Right now I execute the following command in bash:
sudo tee /proc/acpi/nvhda <<<ON
However, I would like to use that command in fish instead of bash.
The <<< does not work in fish an throws an error.
What would be the equivalent in fish?
I tried to pipe an echo, but that throws me a permission denied.
sudo echo "ON" | /proc/acpi/nvhda
As an approach that works in fish just as effectively as it works in POSIX-family shells:
echo ON | sudo tee /proc/acpi/nvhda
There's no point to sudo echo -- echo just writes to the already-open stdout handle it inherited from its parent process; it doesn't open any files, so it doesn't need any permissions.
The point to tee is having a process external from the shell that can thus be on the other end of sudo. That works whether or not you have heredoc or herestring support in use.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 1 year ago.
The community reviewed whether to reopen this question 4 months ago and left it closed:
Original close reason(s) were not resolved
Improve this question
I've been given sudo access on one of our development RedHat linux boxes, and I seem to find myself quite often needing to redirect output to a location I don't normally have write access to.
The trouble is, this contrived example doesn't work:
sudo ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out
I just receive the response:
-bash: /root/test.out: Permission denied
How can I get this to work?
Your command does not work because the redirection is performed by your shell which does not have the permission to write to /root/test.out. The redirection of the output is not performed by sudo.
There are multiple solutions:
Run a shell with sudo and give the command to it by using the -c option:
sudo sh -c 'ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out'
Create a script with your commands and run that script with sudo:
#!/bin/sh
ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out
Run sudo ls.sh. See Steve Bennett's answer if you don't want to create a temporary file.
Launch a shell with sudo -s then run your commands:
[nobody#so]$ sudo -s
[root#so]# ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out
[root#so]# ^D
[nobody#so]$
Use sudo tee (if you have to escape a lot when using the -c option):
sudo ls -hal /root/ | sudo tee /root/test.out > /dev/null
The redirect to /dev/null is needed to stop tee from outputting to the screen. To append instead of overwriting the output file
(>>), use tee -a or tee --append (the last one is specific to GNU coreutils).
Thanks go to Jd, Adam J. Forster and Johnathan for the second, third and fourth solutions.
Someone here has just suggested sudoing tee:
sudo ls -hal /root/ | sudo tee /root/test.out > /dev/null
This could also be used to redirect any command, to a directory that you do not have access to. It works because the tee program is effectively an "echo to a file" program, and the redirect to /dev/null is to stop it also outputting to the screen to keep it the same as the original contrived example above.
A trick I figured out myself was
sudo ls -hal /root/ | sudo dd of=/root/test.out
The problem is that the command gets run under sudo, but the redirection gets run under your user. This is done by the shell and there is very little you can do about it.
sudo command > /some/file.log
`-----v-----'`-------v-------'
command redirection
The usual ways of bypassing this are:
Wrap the commands in a script which you call under sudo.
If the commands and/or log file changes, you can make the
script take these as arguments. For example:
sudo log_script command /log/file.txt
Call a shell and pass the command line as a parameter with -c
This is especially useful for one off compound commands.
For example:
sudo bash -c "{ command1 arg; command2 arg; } > /log/file.txt"
Arrange a pipe/subshell with required rights (i.e. sudo)
# Read and append to a file
cat ./'file1.txt' | sudo tee -a '/log/file.txt' > '/dev/null';
# Store both stdout and stderr streams in a file
{ command1 arg; command2 arg; } |& sudo tee -a '/log/file.txt' > '/dev/null';
Yet another variation on the theme:
sudo bash <<EOF
ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out
EOF
Or of course:
echo 'ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out' | sudo bash
They have the (tiny) advantage that you don't need to remember any arguments to sudo or sh/bash
Clarifying a bit on why the tee option is preferable
Assuming you have appropriate permission to execute the command that creates the output, if you pipe the output of your command to tee, you only need to elevate tee's privledges with sudo and direct tee to write (or append) to the file in question.
in the example given in the question that would mean:
ls -hal /root/ | sudo tee /root/test.out
for a couple more practical examples:
# kill off one source of annoying advertisements
echo 127.0.0.1 ad.doubleclick.net | sudo tee -a /etc/hosts
# configure eth4 to come up on boot, set IP and netmask (centos 6.4)
echo -e "ONBOOT=\"YES\"\nIPADDR=10.42.84.168\nPREFIX=24" | sudo tee -a /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth4
In each of these examples you are taking the output of a non-privileged command and writing to a file that is usually only writable by root, which is the origin of your question.
It is a good idea to do it this way because the command that generates the output is not executed with elevated privileges. It doesn't seem to matter here with echo but when the source command is a script that you don't completely trust, it is crucial.
Note you can use the -a option to tee to append append (like >>) to the target file rather than overwrite it (like >).
Make sudo run a shell, like this:
sudo sh -c "echo foo > ~root/out"
The way I would go about this issue is:
If you need to write/replace the file:
echo "some text" | sudo tee /path/to/file
If you need to append to the file:
echo "some text" | sudo tee -a /path/to/file
Don't mean to beat a dead horse, but there are too many answers here that use tee, which means you have to redirect stdout to /dev/null unless you want to see a copy on the screen.
A simpler solution is to just use cat like this:
sudo ls -hal /root/ | sudo bash -c "cat > /root/test.out"
Notice how the redirection is put inside quotes so that it is evaluated by a shell started by sudo instead of the one running it.
How about writing a script?
Filename: myscript
#!/bin/sh
/bin/ls -lah /root > /root/test.out
# end script
Then use sudo to run the script:
sudo ./myscript
Whenever I have to do something like this I just become root:
# sudo -s
# ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out
# exit
It's probably not the best way, but it works.
I would do it this way:
sudo su -c 'ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out'
This is based on the answer involving tee. To make things easier I wrote a small script (I call it suwrite) and put it in /usr/local/bin/ with +x permission:
#! /bin/sh
if [ $# = 0 ] ; then
echo "USAGE: <command writing to stdout> | suwrite [-a] <output file 1> ..." >&2
exit 1
fi
for arg in "$#" ; do
if [ ${arg#/dev/} != ${arg} ] ; then
echo "Found dangerous argument ‘$arg’. Will exit."
exit 2
fi
done
sudo tee "$#" > /dev/null
As shown in the USAGE in the code, all you have to do is to pipe the output to this script followed by the desired superuser-accessible filename and it will automatically prompt you for your password if needed (since it includes sudo).
echo test | suwrite /root/test.txt
Note that since this is a simple wrapper for tee, it will also accept tee's -a option to append, and also supports writing to multiple files at the same time.
echo test2 | suwrite -a /root/test.txt
echo test-multi | suwrite /root/test-a.txt /root/test-b.txt
It also has some simplistic protection against writing to /dev/ devices which was a concern mentioned in one of the comments on this page.
sudo at now
at> echo test > /tmp/test.out
at> <EOT>
job 1 at Thu Sep 21 10:49:00 2017
Maybe you been given sudo access to only some programs/paths? Then there is no way to do what you want. (unless you will hack it somehow)
If it is not the case then maybe you can write bash script:
cat > myscript.sh
#!/bin/sh
ls -hal /root/ > /root/test.out
Press ctrl + d :
chmod a+x myscript.sh
sudo myscript.sh
Hope it help.
This question already has answers here:
How do I use sudo to redirect output to a location I don't have permission to write to? [closed]
(15 answers)
sudo cat << EOF > File doesn't work, sudo su does [duplicate]
(5 answers)
Closed 1 year ago.
I am trying to automate the addition of a repository source in my arch's pacman.conf file but using the echo command in my shell script. However, it fails like this:-
sudo echo "[archlinuxfr]" >> /etc/pacman.conf
sudo echo "Server = http://repo.archlinux.fr/\$arch" >> /etc/pacman.conf
sudo echo " " >> /etc/pacman.conf
-bash: /etc/pacman.conf: Permission denied
If I make changes to /etc/pacman.conf manually using vim, by doing
sudo vim /etc/pacman.conf
and quiting vim with :wq, everything works fine and my pacman.conf has been manually updated without "Permission denied" complaints.
Why is this so? And how do I get sudo echo to work? (btw, I tried using sudo cat too but that failed with Permission denied as well)
As #geekosaur explained, the shell does the redirection before running the command. When you type this:
sudo foo >/some/file
Your current shell process makes a copy of itself that first tries to open /some/file for writing, then if that succeeds it makes that file descriptor its standard output, and only if that succeeds does it execute sudo. This is failing at the first step.
If you're allowed (sudoer configs often preclude running shells), you can do something like this:
sudo bash -c 'foo >/some/file'
But I find a good solution in general is to use | sudo tee instead of > and | sudo tee -a instead of >>. That's especially useful if the redirection is the only reason I need sudo in the first place; after all, needlessly running processes as root is precisely what sudo was created to avoid. And running echo as root is just silly.
echo '[archlinuxfr]' | sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
echo 'Server = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch' | sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
echo ' ' | sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
I added > /dev/null on the end because tee sends its output to both the named file and its own standard output, and I don't need to see it on my terminal. (The tee command acts like a "T" connector in a physical pipeline, which is where it gets its name.) And I switched to single quotes ('...') instead of doubles ("...") so that everything is literal and I didn't have to put a backslash in front of the $ in $arch. (Without the quotes or backslash, $arch would get replaced by the value of the shell parameter arch, which probably doesn't exist, in which case the $arch is replaced by nothing and just vanishes.)
So that takes care of writing to files as root using sudo. Now for a lengthy digression on ways to output newline-containing text in a shell script. :)
To BLUF it, as they say, my preferred solution would be to just feed a here-document into the above sudo tee command; then there is no need for cat or echo or printf or any other commands at all. The single quotation marks have moved to the sentinel introduction <<'EOF', but they have the same effect there: the body is treated as literal text, so $arch is left alone:
sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null <<'EOF'
[archlinuxfr]
Server = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch
EOF
But while that's how I'd do it, there are alternatives. Here are a few:
You can stick with one echo per line, but group all of them together in a subshell, so you only have to append to the file once:
(echo '[archlinuxfr]'
echo 'Server = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch'
echo ' ') | sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
If you add -e to the echo (and you're using a shell that supports that non-POSIX extension), you can embed newlines directly into the string using \n:
# NON-POSIX - NOT RECOMMENDED
echo -e '[archlinuxfr]\nServer = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch\n ' |
sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
But as it says above, that's not POSIX-specified behavior; your shell might just echo a literal -e followed by a string with a bunch of literal \ns instead. The POSIX way of doing that is to use printf instead of echo; it automatically treats its argument like echo -e does, but doesn't automatically append a newline at the end, so you have to stick an extra \n there, too:
printf '[archlinuxfr]\nServer = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch\n \n' |
sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
With either of those solutions, what the command gets as an argument string contains the two-character sequence \n, and it's up to the command program itself (the code inside printf or echo) to translate that into a newline. In many modern shells, you have the option of using ANSI quotes $'...', which will translate sequences like \n into literal newlines before the command program ever sees the string. That means such strings work with any command whatsoever, including plain old -e-less echo:
echo $'[archlinuxfr]\nServer = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch\n ' |
sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
But, while more portable than echo -e, ANSI quotes are still a non-POSIX extension.
And again, while those are all options, I prefer the straight tee <<EOF solution above.
The problem is that the redirection is being processed by your original shell, not by sudo. Shells are not capable of reading minds and do not know that that particular >> is meant for the sudo and not for it.
You need to:
quote the redirection ( so it is passed on to sudo)
and use sudo -s (so that sudo uses a shell to process the quoted redirection.)
http://www.innovationsts.com/blog/?p=2758
As the instructions are not that clear above I am using the instructions from that blog post. With examples so it is easier to see what you need to do.
$ sudo cat /root/example.txt | gzip > /root/example.gz
-bash: /root/example.gz: Permission denied
Notice that it’s the second command (the gzip command) in the pipeline that causes the error. That’s where our technique of using bash with the -c option comes in.
$ sudo bash -c 'cat /root/example.txt | gzip > /root/example.gz'
$ sudo ls /root/example.gz
/root/example.gz
We can see form the ls command’s output that the compressed file creation succeeded.
The second method is similar to the first in that we’re passing a command string to bash, but we’re doing it in a pipeline via sudo.
$ sudo rm /root/example.gz
$ echo "cat /root/example.txt | gzip > /root/example.gz" | sudo bash
$ sudo ls /root/example.gz
/root/example.gz
sudo bash -c 'echo "[archlinuxfr]" >> /etc/pacman.conf'
STEP 1 create a function in a bash file (write_pacman.sh)
#!/bin/bash
function write_pacman {
tee -a /etc/pacman.conf > /dev/null << 'EOF'
[archlinuxfr]
Server = http://repo.archlinux.fr/\$arch
EOF
}
'EOF' will not interpret $arch variable.
STE2 source bash file
$ source write_pacman.sh
STEP 3 execute function
$ write_pacman
append files (sudo cat):
cat <origin-file> | sudo tee -a <target-file>
append echo to file (sudo echo):
echo <origin> | sudo tee -a <target-file>
(EXTRA) disregard the ouput:
echo >origin> | sudo tee -a <target-file> >/dev/null
This must either be really simple or really complex, but I couldn't find anything about it... I am trying to open a new bash instance, then run a few commands inside it, and give the control back to the user inside that same instance.
I tried:
$ bash -lic "some_command"
but this executes some_command inside the new instance, then closes it. I want it to stay open.
One more detail which might affect answers: if I can get this to work I will use it in my .bashrc as alias(es), so bonus points for an alias implementation!
bash --rcfile <(echo '. ~/.bashrc; some_command')
dispenses the creation of temporary files. Question on other sites:
https://serverfault.com/questions/368054/run-an-interactive-bash-subshell-with-initial-commands-without-returning-to-the
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/123103/how-to-keep-bash-running-after-command-execution
This is a late answer, but I had the exact same problem and Google sent me to this page, so for completeness here is how I got around the problem.
As far as I can tell, bash does not have an option to do what the original poster wanted to do. The -c option will always return after the commands have been executed.
Broken solution: The simplest and obvious attempt around this is:
bash -c 'XXXX ; bash'
This partly works (albeit with an extra sub-shell layer). However, the problem is that while a sub-shell will inherit the exported environment variables, aliases and functions are not inherited. So this might work for some things but isn't a general solution.
Better: The way around this is to dynamically create a startup file and call bash with this new initialization file, making sure that your new init file calls your regular ~/.bashrc if necessary.
# Create a temporary file
TMPFILE=$(mktemp)
# Add stuff to the temporary file
echo "source ~/.bashrc" > $TMPFILE
echo "<other commands>" >> $TMPFILE
echo "rm -f $TMPFILE" >> $TMPFILE
# Start the new bash shell
bash --rcfile $TMPFILE
The nice thing is that the temporary init file will delete itself as soon as it is used, reducing the risk that it is not cleaned up correctly.
Note: I'm not sure if /etc/bashrc is usually called as part of a normal non-login shell. If so you might want to source /etc/bashrc as well as your ~/.bashrc.
You can pass --rcfile to Bash to cause it to read a file of your choice. This file will be read instead of your .bashrc. (If that's a problem, source ~/.bashrc from the other script.)
Edit: So a function to start a new shell with the stuff from ~/.more.sh would look something like:
more() { bash --rcfile ~/.more.sh ; }
... and in .more.sh you would have the commands you want to execute when the shell starts. (I suppose it would be elegant to avoid a separate startup file -- you cannot use standard input because then the shell will not be interactive, but you could create a startup file from a here document in a temporary location, then read it.)
bash -c '<some command> ; exec /bin/bash'
will avoid additional shell sublayer
You can get the functionality you want by sourcing the script instead of running it. eg:
$cat script
cmd1
cmd2
$ . script
$ at this point cmd1 and cmd2 have been run inside this shell
Append to ~/.bashrc a section like this:
if [ "$subshell" = 'true' ]
then
# commands to execute only on a subshell
date
fi
alias sub='subshell=true bash'
Then you can start the subshell with sub.
The accepted answer is really helpful! Just to add that process substitution (i.e., <(COMMAND)) is not supported in some shells (e.g., dash).
In my case, I was trying to create a custom action (basically a one-line shell script) in Thunar file manager to start a shell and activate the selected Python virtual environment. My first attempt was:
urxvt -e bash --rcfile <(echo ". $HOME/.bashrc; . %f/bin/activate;")
where %f is the path to the virtual environment handled by Thunar.
I got an error (by running Thunar from command line):
/bin/sh: 1: Syntax error: "(" unexpected
Then I realized that my sh (essentially dash) does not support process substitution.
My solution was to invoke bash at the top level to interpret the process substitution, at the expense of an extra level of shell:
bash -c 'urxvt -e bash --rcfile <(echo "source $HOME/.bashrc; source %f/bin/activate;")'
Alternatively, I tried to use here-document for dash but with no success. Something like:
echo -e " <<EOF\n. $HOME/.bashrc; . %f/bin/activate;\nEOF\n" | xargs -0 urxvt -e bash --rcfile
P.S.: I do not have enough reputation to post comments, moderators please feel free to move it to comments or remove it if not helpful with this question.
With accordance with the answer by daveraja, here is a bash script which will solve the purpose.
Consider a situation if you are using C-shell and you want to execute a command
without leaving the C-shell context/window as follows,
Command to be executed: Search exact word 'Testing' in current directory recursively only in *.h, *.c files
grep -nrs --color -w --include="*.{h,c}" Testing ./
Solution 1: Enter into bash from C-shell and execute the command
bash
grep -nrs --color -w --include="*.{h,c}" Testing ./
exit
Solution 2: Write the intended command into a text file and execute it using bash
echo 'grep -nrs --color -w --include="*.{h,c}" Testing ./' > tmp_file.txt
bash tmp_file.txt
Solution 3: Run command on the same line using bash
bash -c 'grep -nrs --color -w --include="*.{h,c}" Testing ./'
Solution 4: Create a sciprt (one-time) and use it for all future commands
alias ebash './execute_command_on_bash.sh'
ebash grep -nrs --color -w --include="*.{h,c}" Testing ./
The script is as follows,
#!/bin/bash
# =========================================================================
# References:
# https://stackoverflow.com/a/13343457/5409274
# https://stackoverflow.com/a/26733366/5409274
# https://stackoverflow.com/a/2853811/5409274
# https://stackoverflow.com/a/2853811/5409274
# https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/other-%2Anix-55/how-can-i-run-a-command-on-another-shell-without-changing-the-current-shell-794580/
# https://www.tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/internalvariables.html
# https://stackoverflow.com/a/4277753/5409274
# =========================================================================
# Enable following line to see the script commands
# getting printing along with their execution. This will help for debugging.
#set -o verbose
E_BADARGS=85
if [ ! -n "$1" ]
then
echo "Usage: `basename $0` grep -nrs --color -w --include=\"*.{h,c}\" Testing ."
echo "Usage: `basename $0` find . -name \"*.txt\""
exit $E_BADARGS
fi
# Create a temporary file
TMPFILE=$(mktemp)
# Add stuff to the temporary file
#echo "echo Hello World...." >> $TMPFILE
#initialize the variable that will contain the whole argument string
argList=""
#iterate on each argument
for arg in "$#"
do
#if an argument contains a white space, enclose it in double quotes and append to the list
#otherwise simply append the argument to the list
if echo $arg | grep -q " "; then
argList="$argList \"$arg\""
else
argList="$argList $arg"
fi
done
#remove a possible trailing space at the beginning of the list
argList=$(echo $argList | sed 's/^ *//')
# Echoing the command to be executed to tmp file
echo "$argList" >> $TMPFILE
# Note: This should be your last command
# Important last command which deletes the tmp file
last_command="rm -f $TMPFILE"
echo "$last_command" >> $TMPFILE
#echo "---------------------------------------------"
#echo "TMPFILE is $TMPFILE as follows"
#cat $TMPFILE
#echo "---------------------------------------------"
check_for_last_line=$(tail -n 1 $TMPFILE | grep -o "$last_command")
#echo $check_for_last_line
#if tail -n 1 $TMPFILE | grep -o "$last_command"
if [ "$check_for_last_line" == "$last_command" ]
then
#echo "Okay..."
bash $TMPFILE
exit 0
else
echo "Something is wrong"
echo "Last command in your tmp file should be removing itself"
echo "Aborting the process"
exit 1
fi
$ bash --init-file <(echo 'some_command')
$ bash --rcfile <(echo 'some_command')
In case you can't or don't want to use process substitution:
$ cat script
some_command
$ bash --init-file script
Another way:
$ bash -c 'some_command; exec bash'
$ sh -c 'some_command; exec sh'
sh-only way (dash, busybox):
$ ENV=script sh
Here is yet another (working) variant:
This opens a new gnome terminal, then in the new terminal it runs bash. The user's rc file is read first, then a command ls -la is sent for execution to the new shell before it turns interactive.
The last echo adds an extra newline that is needed to finish execution.
gnome-terminal -- bash -c 'bash --rcfile <( cat ~/.bashrc; echo ls -la ; echo)'
I also find it useful sometimes to decorate the terminal, e.g. with colorfor better orientation.
gnome-terminal --profile green -- bash -c 'bash --rcfile <( cat ~/.bashrc; echo ls -la ; echo)'