I'm getting an error using Laravel PayPal billing agreement. I received HTTP response code 400 when accessing https://api.sandbox.paypal.com/v1/payments/billing-agreements/. I'm
getting this error once I try to complete the agreement process.
$id = my_created_plan_id
protected function agreement($id)
{
$agreement = new Agreement();
$agreement->setName('Base Agreement')->setDescription('Basic Agreement')
// ->setStartDate(date("Y-m-d").'T9:45:04Z'); ->setStartDate('2021-07-05T9:45:04Z');
$agreement->setPlan($this->Plan($id));
$agreement->setPayer($this->payer());
$agreement->setShippingAddress($this->shippingAddress());
$agreement = $agreement->create($this->apiContext);
return $agreement->getApprovalLink();
}
protected function Plan($id)
{
$plan = new Plan();
$plan->setId($id);
return $plan;
}
protected function payer()
{
$payer = new Payer();
$payer->setPaymentMethod('paypal');
return $payer;
}
protected function shippingAddress()
{
$shippingAddress = new ShippingAddress();
$shippingAddress->setLine1('111 First Street')
->setCity('Saratoga')
->setState('CA')
->setPostalCode('95070')
->setCountryCode('US');
return $shippingAddress;
}
You are using a deprecated SDK that does not support the current version of PayPal Subscriptions, for which there is no SDK.
Change your integration to not use that old SDK. The new Subscribe button itself is JavaScript. Use direct HTTPS calls with curl or similar when you need to call an API to create Products and Plans or administer Subscriptions.
(You can also do so in your account's web interface, rather than via API)
Sandbox: https://www.sandbox.paypal.com/billing/
Live: https://www.paypal.com/billing/
protected function agreement($id)
{
$agreement = new Agreement();
$agreement->setName('Base Agreement')->setDescription('Basic Agreement')
// ->setStartDate(date("Y-m-d").'T9:45:04Z'); ->setStartDate('2021-07-05T9:45:04Z');
//Replace above line with below line
//->setStartDate(gmdate("Y-m-d\TH:i:s\Z", time()+60));
$agreement->setPlan($this->Plan($id));
$agreement->setPayer($this->payer());
$agreement->setShippingAddress($this->shippingAddress());
$agreement = $agreement->create($this->apiContext);
return $agreement->getApprovalLink();
}
You cannot comment on the start date of the agreement.
you must provide the start date of agreement and the error occurred due to this issue.
Related
I was able to receive push notifications some months ago, a day ago i started to work again on the app now the issue is it's not able to receive push notification. It does provide FCM token but onMessageReceived never gets called also if i try with Postman it gives an error of Mismatchsender ID, but the scenario here is a bit confusing. If i change the package name (after creating new project on console and added new goole-service.json file) it doesn't let me register for FCM token. i've stuck in this situation from last day. can anybody please help? what i'm doing wrong.
Here is implementaion of FCMToken
[Service]
[IntentFilter(new[] { "com.google.firebase.INSTANCE_ID_EVENT" })]
public class MyFirebaseIIDService : FirebaseInstanceIdService
{
const string TAG = "MyFirebaseIIDService";
public override void OnTokenRefresh()
{
var refreshedToken = FirebaseInstanceId.Instance.Token;
Log.Debug(TAG, "Refreshed token: " + refreshedToken);
SendRegistrationToServer(refreshedToken);
}
void SendRegistrationToServer(string token)
{
// Add custom implementation, as needed.
}
}
Here it gives me error if i change my package name to any other,
Error: Java.Lang.IllegalStateException: Default FirebaseApp is not
initialized in this process
try
{
var refreshedToken = FirebaseInstanceId.Instance.Token;
// PushNotificationManager.Initialize(this, false);
} catch(Exception ee)
{
}
I've solved my issue with with customization of FirebaseInitialize after creating new project on Firebase here is my code. But one bad thing is here that when new token gets initialized it never gets called on FirebaseInstanceIdReceiver.
var options = new FirebaseOptions.Builder()
.SetApplicationId("<AppID>")
.SetApiKey("<ApiKey>")
.SetDatabaseUrl("<DBURl>")
.SetStorageBucket("<StorageBucket>")
.SetGcmSenderId("<SenderID>").Build();
var fapp = FirebaseApp.InitializeApp(this, options);
How to set via in controller
If one user want notification on mail and second user not want to notification in mail
So how to setup that one user notification send on mail and second user notification not send on mail
$newinvoice = New NewInvoice('create a new invoice',$invoice->id);
$newinvoice->via(['database','broadcast','mail']);
Notification::send($sendToUser, $newinvoice);
when I run this code give me error
InvalidArgumentException in Manager.php line 90: Driver [1] not supported.
Thank's in advance
You could provide the channel as another argument to your notifications constructor
$newinvoice = New NewInvoice('create a new invoice',$invoice->id, 'mail');
You can also provide an array of channels
$newinvoice = New NewInvoice('create a new invoice',$invoice->id, ['mail', 'broadcast']);
Create a property in your notifiable class
protected $_channel = null;
Your constructor can save the channels to this property
public function __construct($description, $invoiceId, $notificationChannel)
{
$this->_channel = $notificationChannel;
}
Your via() method could do things like this
public function via($notifiable)
{
if (!$this->_channel)
{
throw new \Exception('Sending a message failed. No channel provided.');
}
return is_array($this->_channel) ? $this->_channel : [$this->_channel];
}
I have a web api in my organization built with aspnet core. We want to publish that api to be consumed by an android app, a mvc5 app and an aspnet core mvc6 app. How can I configure the web api in azure so that the apps that consume it don't ask to login. The web apps, are already protected with azure, but when I protect the web api with azure I get a 401 when I make a request to it. I don't know how to configure the app in azure or the code I must configure in the api. I've read a lot but I don't find a way to acomplish this. All I want is to login in my web app, and the web app starts to ask data to the web api through ajax. I should send in the ajax request some sort of bareer token, but i don`t know what config i must do in azure and in the apps. I hope you can help me.
After you protected the web API with Azure AD, we need to send to access token with request for the web API for authorization. And we can get the access token when the users call the web API from web app. Here is the code to acquire the token in the web app for your reference:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index()
{
AuthenticationResult result = null;
List<TodoItem> itemList = new List<TodoItem>();
try
{
string userObjectID = (User.FindFirst("http://schemas.microsoft.com/identity/claims/objectidentifier"))?.Value;
AuthenticationContext authContext = new AuthenticationContext(Startup.Authority, new NaiveSessionCache(userObjectID, HttpContext.Session));
ClientCredential credential = new ClientCredential(Startup.ClientId, Startup.ClientSecret);
result = await authContext.AcquireTokenSilentAsync(Startup.TodoListResourceId, credential, new UserIdentifier(userObjectID, UserIdentifierType.UniqueId));
//
// Retrieve the user's To Do List.
//
HttpClient client = new HttpClient();
HttpRequestMessage request = new HttpRequestMessage(HttpMethod.Get, TodoListBaseAddress + "/api/todolist");
request.Headers.Authorization = new AuthenticationHeaderValue("Bearer", result.AccessToken);
HttpResponseMessage response = await client.SendAsync(request);
//
// Return the To Do List in the view.
//
if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
{
List<Dictionary<String, String>> responseElements = new List<Dictionary<String, String>>();
JsonSerializerSettings settings = new JsonSerializerSettings();
String responseString = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
responseElements = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<List<Dictionary<String, String>>>(responseString, settings);
foreach (Dictionary<String, String> responseElement in responseElements)
{
TodoItem newItem = new TodoItem();
newItem.Title = responseElement["title"];
newItem.Owner = responseElement["owner"];
itemList.Add(newItem);
}
return View(itemList);
}
else
{
//
// If the call failed with access denied, then drop the current access token from the cache,
// and show the user an error indicating they might need to sign-in again.
//
if (response.StatusCode == System.Net.HttpStatusCode.Unauthorized)
{
var todoTokens = authContext.TokenCache.ReadItems().Where(a => a.Resource == Startup.TodoListResourceId);
foreach (TokenCacheItem tci in todoTokens)
authContext.TokenCache.DeleteItem(tci);
ViewBag.ErrorMessage = "UnexpectedError";
TodoItem newItem = new TodoItem();
newItem.Title = "(No items in list)";
itemList.Add(newItem);
return View(itemList);
}
}
}
catch (Exception ee)
{
if (HttpContext.Request.Query["reauth"] == "True")
{
//
// Send an OpenID Connect sign-in request to get a new set of tokens.
// If the user still has a valid session with Azure AD, they will not be prompted for their credentials.
// The OpenID Connect middleware will return to this controller after the sign-in response has been handled.
//
return new ChallengeResult(OpenIdConnectDefaults.AuthenticationScheme);
}
//
// The user needs to re-authorize. Show them a message to that effect.
//
TodoItem newItem = new TodoItem();
newItem.Title = "(Sign-in required to view to do list.)";
itemList.Add(newItem);
ViewBag.ErrorMessage = "AuthorizationRequired";
return View(itemList);
}
//
// If the call failed for any other reason, show the user an error.
//
return View("Error");
}
And below is the code sample which use JwtBearerAppBuilderExtensions to add OpenIdConnect Bearer authentication capabilities to an HTTP application pipeline for the web API to verify the token:
public class Startup
{
// This method gets called by the runtime. Use this method to configure the HTTP request pipeline.
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IHostingEnvironment env, ILoggerFactory loggerFactory)
{
// Add the console logger.
loggerFactory.AddConsole(LogLevel.Debug);
// Configure the app to use Jwt Bearer Authentication
app.UseJwtBearerAuthentication(new JwtBearerOptions
{
AutomaticAuthenticate = true,
AutomaticChallenge = true,
Authority = String.Format(Configuration["AzureAd:AadInstance"], Configuration["AzureAD:Tenant"]),
Audience = Configuration["AzureAd:Audience"],
});
}
}
The full code sample you can refer here.
Note: to run this sample successfully, we need to modify the Title and Owner to lowercase title, owner in the ToDoController of web app:
foreach (Dictionary<String, String> responseElement in responseElements)
{
TodoItem newItem = new TodoItem();
newItem.Title = responseElement["title"];
newItem.Owner = responseElement["owner"];
itemList.Add(newItem);
}
You can use Azure OpenIdConnect for federated authentication. A good article from microsoft below -
Calling a web API in a web app using Azure AD and OpenID Connect
I am trying to write an activity in Google+ using the dotnet-client. The issue is that I can't seem to get the configuration of my client app correctly. According to the Google+ Sign-In configuration and this SO question we need to add the requestvisibleactions parameter. I did that but it did not work. I am using the scope https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login and I even added the scope https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.moments.write but the insert still did not work.
This is what my request url looks like:
https://accounts.google.com/ServiceLogin?service=lso&passive=1209600&continue=https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth?scope%3Dhttps://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login%2Bhttps://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.moments.write%26response_type%3Dcode%26redirect_uri%3Dhttp://localhost/%26state%3D%26requestvisibleactions%3Dhttp://schemas.google.com/AddActivity%26client_id%3D000.apps.googleusercontent.com%26request_visible_actions%3Dhttp://schemas.google.com/AddActivity%26hl%3Den%26from_login%3D1%26as%3D-1fbe06f1c6120f4d<mpl=popup&shdf=Cm4LEhF0aGlyZFBhcnR5TG9nb1VybBoADAsSFXRoaXJkUGFydHlEaXNwbGF5TmFtZRoHQ2hpa3V0bwwLEgZkb21haW4aB0NoaWt1dG8MCxIVdGhpcmRQYXJ0eURpc3BsYXlUeXBlGgdERUZBVUxUDBIDbHNvIhTeWybcoJ9pXSeN2t-k8A4SUbfhsygBMhQivAmfNSs_LkjXXZ7bPxilXgjMsQ&scc=1
As you can see from there that there is a request_visible_actions and I even added one that has no underscore in case I got the parameter wrong (requestvisibleactions).
Let me say that my app is being authenticated successfully by the API. I can get the user's profile after being authenticated and it is on the "insert moment" part that my app fails. My insert code:
var body = new Moment();
var target = new ItemScope();
target.Id = referenceId;
target.Image = image;
target.Type = "http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity";
target.Description = description;
target.Name = caption;
body.Target = target;
body.Type = "http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity";
var insert =
new MomentsResource.InsertRequest(
// this is a valid service instance as I am using this to query the user's profile
_plusService,
body,
id,
MomentsResource.Collection.Vault);
Moment result = null;
try
{
result = insert.Fetch();
}
catch (ThreadAbortException)
{
// User was not yet authenticated and is being forwarded to the authorization page.
throw;
}
catch (Google.GoogleApiRequestException requestEx)
{
// here I get a 401 Unauthorized error
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
} `
For the OAuth flow, there are two issues with your request:
request_visible_actions is what is passed to the OAuth v2 server (don't pass requestvisibleactions)
plus.moments.write is a deprecated scope, you only need to pass in plus.login
Make sure your project references the latest version of the Google+ .NET client library from here:
https://developers.google.com/resources/api-libraries/download/stable/plus/v1/csharp
I have created a project on GitHub showing a full server-side flow here:
https://github.com/gguuss/gplus_csharp_ssflow
As Brettj said, you should be using the Google+ Sign-in Button as demonstrated in the latest Google+ samples from here:
https://github.com/googleplus/gplus-quickstart-csharp
First, ensure you are requesting all of the activity types you're writing. You will know this is working because the authorization dialog will show "Make your app activity available via Google, visible to you and: [...]" below the text that starts with "This app would like to". I know you checked this but I'm 90% sure this is why you are getting the 401 error code. The following markup shows how to render the Google+ Sign-In button requesting access to Add activities.
<div id="gConnect">
<button class="g-signin"
data-scope="https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login"
data-requestvisibleactions="http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity"
data-clientId="YOUR_CLIENT_ID"
data-accesstype="offline"
data-callback="onSignInCallback"
data-theme="dark"
data-cookiepolicy="single_host_origin">
</button>
Assuming you have a PlusService object with the correct activity type set in data-requestvisibleactions, the following code, which you should be able to copy/paste to see it work, concisely demonstrates writing moments using the .NET client and has been tested to work:
Moment body = new Moment();
ItemScope target = new ItemScope();
target.Id = "replacewithuniqueforaddtarget";
target.Image = "http://www.google.com/s2/static/images/GoogleyEyes.png";
target.Type = "";
target.Description = "The description for the activity";
target.Name = "An example of add activity";
body.Target = target;
body.Type = "http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity";
MomentsResource.InsertRequest insert =
new MomentsResource.InsertRequest(
_plusService,
body,
"me",
MomentsResource.Collection.Vault);
Moment wrote = insert.Fetch();
Note, I'm including Google.Apis.Plus.v1.Data for convenience.
Ah it's that simple! Maybe not? I am answering my own question and consequently accept it as the answer (after a few days of course) so others having the same issue may be guided. But I will definitely up-vote Gus' answer for it led me to the fix for my code.
So according to #class answer written above and as explained on his blog the key to successfully creating a moment is adding the request_visible_actions parameter. I did that but my request still failed and it is because I was missing an important thing. You need to add one more parameter and that is the access_type and it should be set to offline. The OAuth request, at a minimum, should look like: https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth?scope=https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login&response_type=code&redirect_uri=http://localhost/&request_visible_actions=http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity&access_type=offline.
For the complete and correct client code you can get Gus' example here or download the entire dotnet client library including the source and sample and add what I added below. The most important thing that you should remember is modifying your AuthorizationServerDescription for the Google API. Here's my version of the authenticator:
public static OAuth2Authenticator<WebServerClient> CreateAuthenticator(
string clientId, string clientSecret)
{
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(clientId))
throw new ArgumentException("clientId cannot be empty");
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(clientSecret))
throw new ArgumentException("clientSecret cannot be empty");
var description = GoogleAuthenticationServer.Description;
var uri = description.AuthorizationEndpoint.AbsoluteUri;
// This is the one that has been documented on Gus' blog site
// and over at Google's (https://developers.google.com/+/web/signin/)
// This is not in the dotnetclient sample by the way
// and you need to understand how OAuth and DNOA works.
// I had this already, see my original post,
// I thought it will make my day.
if (uri.IndexOf("request_visible_actions") < 1)
{
var param = (uri.IndexOf('?') > 0) ? "&" : "?";
description.AuthorizationEndpoint = new Uri(
uri + param +
"request_visible_actions=http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity");
}
// This is what I have been missing!
// They forgot to tell us about this or did I just miss this somewhere?
uri = description.AuthorizationEndpoint.AbsoluteUri;
if (uri.IndexOf("offline") < 1)
{
var param = (uri.IndexOf('?') > 0) ? "&" : "?";
description.AuthorizationEndpoint =
new Uri(uri + param + "access_type=offline");
}
// Register the authenticator.
var provider = new WebServerClient(description)
{
ClientIdentifier = clientId,
ClientSecret = clientSecret,
};
var authenticator =
new OAuth2Authenticator<WebServerClient>(provider, GetAuthorization)
{ NoCaching = true };
return authenticator;
}
Without the access_type=offline my code never worked and it will never work. Now I wonder why? It would be good to have some explanation.
I have a fairly simple site which allow users to connect via facebook.
I am using C# facebook sdk MVC.
At first i didn't need any specific permission so there were no problems for users to connect. my code looked like this
public class FacebookController : BaseController
{
public FacebookSession FacebookSession
{
get { return (new CanvasAuthorizer().Session); }
}
public ActionResult Profile()
{
var client = new FacebookClient(this.FacebookSession.AccessToken);
dynamic me = client.Get("me");
ViewBag.Name = me.name;
ViewBag.Id = me.id;
return View();
}
}
and on my webconfig
<facebookSettings appId="XXXXXXXXXXXXXX" appSecret="XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"/>
After a while I needed more specific permissions so I added CanvasAuthorize to my action - as so
[CanvasAuthorize(Permissions = "user_about_me,user_relationships,email,publish_stream")]
public ActionResult Profile()
That got me this exception:
Exception Details: System.Exception: CanvasUrl is null or empty
So I added to my Webconfig the canvasUrl which got me the same error with out the canvasPage So now my web config has all 4
<facebookSettings appId="XXXXXXXXXX" appSecret="XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx" canvasUrl = "http://localhost:60606/" canvasPage = "https://apps.facebook.com/XXXXXXXXXXXX/"/>
So now my user can log in via facebook, my problem is that when he does log in he is getting redirect to my Facebook app (http://apps.facebook.com/XXXXXXXXX/facebook/profile)
instead back to my site(http://localhost:60606/facebook/profile)
How can I get the Permissions that i need and redirect my user back to my site after he logs in?
Thanks
Well, My bad
CanvasAuthorize is just as it sounds, authorization for canvas.
So you cannot use it without an app canvas on facebook.
What I should have done is use the FacebookOAuthClient
var oAuthClient = new FacebookOAuthClient(FacebookApplication.Current);
oAuthClient.RedirectUri = new Uri("XXXXXXXXXXXXXX");
var loginUri = oAuthClient.GetLoginUrl(new Dictionary<string, object> { { "state", null }, { "scope", "user_about_me,user_relationships,email" } });
return Redirect(loginUri.AbsoluteUri);