I have the following modules with the top one depending on the next depending on the next ( These links have VERY SIMPLE build.gradle and settings.gradle files)
https://github.com/deanhiller/webpieces/tree/master/core/core-ssl
https://github.com/deanhiller/webpieces/tree/master/core/core-datawrapper
https://github.com/deanhiller/webpieces/tree/master/core/core-util
https://github.com/deanhiller/webpieces/tree/master/core/core-logging
I temporarily added an throw new RuntimeException to a test in core-datawrapper and core-util and built the project core-ssl (in the repo, ../../gradlew build)
The settings of core-ssl (found in above link and pasted here) is
includeBuild '../core-datawrapper'
includeBuild '../core-mock'
The settings of core-datawrapper (again in above links)
includeBuild '../core-util'
I clear out core-util/build and I see these targets run
> Task :core-util:compileJava
> Task :core-util:classes
> Task :core-util:jar
That is it. Why is the tests not running? I thought build depended on assemble and test separately?
The same for ../../gradlew clean and ../../gradlew publish
Ideally, I want my target to affect all transitive projects as well. As developers add projects, I don't want to have to add code to each gradle project in the transitive deps list either.
Yes, that’s correct.
This is most probably due to the original use-case of composite builds.
You have some binary dependency on some library, and then you want to change something in the library and test it in your project before even committing or publishing the library.
So the composite build result replaces the binary dependeny and only as much work as really necessary is done, meaning the jar is built.
If you use composite builds as normal structuring element, you either need to wire the lifecycle tasks you want to have wired yourself or search for a plugin that maybe does it.
As developers add projects, I don't want to have to add code to each gradle project in the transitive deps list either.
You can programmatically iterate through the included builds using gradle.includedBuilds, so you can do the wiring in a generic way.
Related
I know you can access different modules (included using include) in a project via org.gradle.api.Project#getSubprojects(), and I know you can get the name and directories of separate builds that have been included (using includeBuild) via org.gradle.api.invocation.Gradle#getIncludedBuilds().
But how can my plugin get information such as the locations of Java source files and class files for projects included using includeBuild?
My goal here is to determine which files have changed in the current git branch (which I can do), and then collect their corresponding class files into a jar file that's used for our patching mechanism that inserts the patch jars at the front of the classpath rather than redeploying the whole application.
I don’t think it is a goal of Gradle to provide including builds with detailed information on included builds. Currently, the Gradle docs basically only state two goals for such composite builds:
combine builds that are usually developed independently, […]
decompose a large multi-project build into smaller, more isolated chunks […]
Actually, isolation between the involved builds seems to be an important theme in general:
Included builds do not share any configuration with the composite build, or the other included builds. Each included build is configured and executed in isolation.
For that reason, it also doesn’t seem to be possible or even desired to let an including build consume any build configurations (like task outputs) of an included build. That would only couple the builds and hence thwart the isolation goal.
Included builds interact with other builds only via dependency substitution:
If any build in the composite has a dependency that can be satisfied by the included build, then that dependency will be replaced by a project dependency on the included build.
So, if you’d like to consume specific parts of an included build from the including build, then you have to do multiple things:
Have a configuration in the included build which produces these “specific parts” as an artifact.
Have a configuration in the including build which consumes the artifact as a dependency.
Make sure that both configurations are compatible wrt. their capabilities so that dependency substitution works.
Let some task in the including build use the dependency artifact in whatever way you need.
Those things happen kind of automatically when you have a simple dependency between two Gradle projects, like a Java application depending on a Java library. But you can define your own kinds of dependencies, too.
The question is: would that really be worth the effort? Can’t you maybe solve your goal more easily or at least without relying on programmatically retrieved information on included builds? For example: if you know that your included build produces class files under build/classes/java/main, then maybe just take the classes of interest from there via org.gradle.api.initialization.IncludedBuild#getProjectDir().
I know, this may not be the answer you had hoped to get. I still hope it’s useful.
We have a directory structure like so
java
build/build.gradle (This does NOT exist yet, but we want this)
servers
server1/build.gradle
server2/build.gradle
libraries
lib1/build.gradle
lib2/build.gradle
We have 11 servers and 14 libraries with varying uses of dependencies. EACH server is a composite build ONLY depending on libraries (we don’t allow servers to depend on each other). In this way, as our mono-repo grows, opening up server1 does NOT get slower and slower as more and more gradle code is added(ie. gradle only loads server1 and all it’s libraries and none of the other libraries OR servers are loaded keeping things FAST).
Ok, so one problem we are running into is duplication now which is why we need build/build.gradle file AND we want EVERY module in our mono repo to include that somehow for a few goals(each goal may need a different solution)
GOAL 1: To have an ext { … } section containing a Map of Strings to gradle dependencies much like so
deps = [
'web-webserver': "org.webpieces:http-webserver:${webpiecesVersion}",
'web-webserver-test': "org.webpieces:http-webserver-test:${webpiecesVersion}",
'web-devrouter': "org.webpieces:http-router-dev:${webpiecesVersion}"
]
In this way, we want ALL our projects to them import dependencies like so
compile deps['web-webserver']
GOAL 2: We want to 'include' a standard list of plugins so we are versioning all gradle plugins the same across the repo. While the above configures all jars to avoid jar hell in a mono-repo, we would like to do the same with just this section
plugins {
id 'com.github.sherter.google-java-format' version '0.9'
}
Of course, it each project may also want to add a few more plugins OR even not depend on this section(in case of an emergency and trying to just get the job done).
GOAL 3: We want checkstyle configuration (or any plugin config) to be defined the SAME for all projects (eventually!!!). We would like the checkstyle gradle to live in a common area but have all libraries somehow pull it in. Again, it would be nice for it to be optional in that, I can pull the gradle section into my build.gradle OR can create a new one in case of emergencies so I don't have to fix all projects in the monorepo right away.
IDEALLY, perhaps I kind of want configuration injection where when I run server1/build.gradle, it actually runs java/build/build.grade as it’s parent somehow but with overrides (IF I declare 'extends xxx.gradle' maybe) then all libraries it uses also use java/build/build.gradle as their parent. I am not sure this is possible or feasible. I am pretty sure 'extends xxx' doesn't exist in gradle.
Are any of these GOALS possible?
thanks,
Dean
I have been working on a monorepo with the exact same requirement as you, using gradle composite builds as well. The way we have solved this problem is by using pre compiled plugins
You need to do a new gradle project with only the code you want to share. This will create a plugin, that you can just add as a composite build and apply to the other projects.
I'm a bit confused by why you don't just use a "standard" gradle top level build file and compose the others as subprojects.
This solves all 3 of your goals
If you are concerned by build speed, you can target each server individually simply by running
./gradlew :server1:build
But if you are not able to do this for some reason you can use the apply from: syntax as described here
I have the following Java projects structure:
Util
|
-- Core
|
-- Services
|
-- Tools
The projects: Tools and Services references to Core and Util projects, the thing is that I ended up writing the same dependency over each project, there must be a better way to inherit the dependencies of the referenced projects and add new ones if needed.
I know about multi projects in Gradle, but this is not like a multi project, since I can basically take the Core library, compile it (which will then contain Core + Util libs) and use it in another project.
I wonder what would be the best way to approach this?
Repeating the same dependencies in every project is usually reasonable because in a bigger project you'll never know when they become different, and you don't want to deal with compilation/runtime problems when someone changes common dependencies list.
I believe that it is more pragmatic to add dependency analyser plugin to your build. It will help you to remove unnecessary dependencies and explicitly add transitive dependencies. And if you add this plugin to your build chain, it will help you to keep your dependencies healthy in the future. Pick this plugin here gradle-dependency-analyze, or maybe there is a better fork or equivalent somewhere.
You are actually out of options in your case because there are only two kinds of dependencies: (1) external (some other jar artefact) or (2) internal (another module in a multimodule build).
2.1 When you use an external maven-like dependency it will come to you with own dependencies (they are named "transitive dependencies"). It means that if you do compile 'yourgroup:Core:1.0' then you will get Util as a transitive dependency. But as I mentioned above, it is better to list transitive dependencies explicitly if they are used during compilation or to prevent them from being accidentally removed and crash your application in runtime.
2.2. If your projects live in the same version control repository and usually change and build together, then the multimodule layout is your best choice. In this case, you will refer to Core dependency like compile project(':Util:Core') and it will grab Util as a transitive dependency as well. And you will be able to do what you asked for and define dependencies for Services and Tools once - inside subprojects {} closure in the Core/build.gradle.
Having multimodule built doesn't limit you from using Core library elsewhere. No matter if it is a multimodule build or not, you can always add maven-publish plugin to Core/build.gradle, execute publishToMavenLocal task and reference to Core.jar from another project the same way you do for external dependencies.
You can always put your common code (like the one which will add common dependencies) in the external gradle file or custom plugin and apply it in Services and Tools.
Background
(Please keep in mind I've simplified the problem for purposes of discussion here)
I've got a set of applications and dependent libraries, something like this (each with a src/ directory and build.gradle):
appa/
appb/
libx/
liby/
libz/
In build.gradle, the dependencies are currently declared like this:
appa/build.gradle:
compile "com.asdf:libx:1.0"
compile "com.asdf:liby:1.0"
appb/build.gradle:
compile "com.asdf:liby:1.0"
liby/build.gradle:
compile "com.asdf:libz:1.0"
What problem am I trying to solve
Say I'm working on appa, and I need to make changes to libx. I need to do multiple steps:
Pull libx from source control and make changes locally
Rebuild and push changes to some repo (not prod!)
Rebuild appa (pulling the recently updated libx from repo)
If my testing reveals a bug in libx, I've got to repeat that over again.
This is super-annoying when working in IDEs like Eclipse, where even though my projects are logically using other projects, I've got to still use the artifacts as dependencies.
Wouldn't it be great if I can just pull the project locally, and projects that logically depend on it will automatically use the source project instead of artifact for building?
What I've done so far
I've written a small gradle plugin (referenced in each project's build.gradle) that identifies com.asdf dependencies, and uses dependency substitution to replace the artifact dependency with a project dependency if that project exists locally.
configurations.all {
resolutionStrategy.dependencySubstitution {
all { DependencySubstitution dependency ->
if (dependency.requested instanceof ModuleComponentSelector && dependency.requested.group == 'com.asdf') {
def targetProject = findProject(":${dependency.requested.module}")
if (targetProject != null) {
dependency.useTarget targetProject
}
}
}
}
}
Yay! With a few modifications to settings.gradle (see below), I've accomplished my goal... Except...
Where I'm stuck
I need to modify settings.gradle to include lines like this for every dependency (otherwise findProject doesn't resolve the dependent project during build):
include ':libx'
project(':libx').projectDir = new File(settingsDir, '../libx')
While it's possible to go through all the settings.gradle files and do this (I've done it for a handful as my proof-of-concept), it's ugly, repetitive, and is logically the same information that is being passed to compile arguments for the build.gradle dependencies.
It's also error-prone when someone adds a new dependency but doesn't update settings.gradle, or introduces a typo between them.
I've also tried making settings.gradle just define projects for all directories it finds at that level, but then building any project turns into a mega-build of all projects.
(I've tried several other things, but my question is getting long in the tooth already)
My question
What's a better way to do this, without duplicating information between settings.gradle and build.gradle? I want to make it so adding new dependencies is still just as easy as adding the compile reference in build.gradle, without touching settings.gradle...
I'm still rather new to groovy/gradle, so maybe I'm missing something that's obvious to the more experienced gradle master?
I believe your use-case is the motivation for Composite Builds.
I have a demo here, which writes to a jars folder as a mock publishing of artifacts. Be sure to check-out the README.md as the demo is a mini-laboratory for trying out the use-case before and after composite builds.
In the demo mainBuild is appa; utils is libx. The key syntax in mainBuild/settings.gradle (here) is:
includeBuild '../utils'
This tells Gradle to use the local codebase instead of the published artifact. Of course, one would not commit this line to source-control.
I am using gradle and its local repository is at \.gradle\caches\modules-2\files-2.1 which has all the downloaded jar but not my modules.Is there any specific place I should be searching it for ?
I need it as is in settings.gradle I am having a dependency path specified like :
include ':model'
project (':model').projectDir = new File(settingsDir, './model')
in a new project. Also I don't want to give path in that way because if I have a dependency from multiple projects on this project then mentioning path will be difficult and weird.
How can I make gradle search it from local maven or gradle repositories.
I'm still not sure what is being asked here, and I suspect there is some confusion over how multi-project builds work. So I'm going to attempt to provide a general-purpose answer.
The first question you need to answer is whether you're interested in dependencies between projects that are part of the same build — as in part of a multi-project build — or in separate builds.
Project dependencies (multi-project builds)
Project dependencies are covered in the user manual and only apply to multi-project builds. They use a logical path, using colons as 'path' separators, to specify the location of the target module, like so:
dependencies {
implementation project(":model")
}
At this point, Gradle needs to know where ":model" exists on the file system. There's no getting around that. You have a few options:
Follow the convention of directory structure matching the logical path structure, i.e. have a MyBigProject/model directory containing the ":model" child project
Specify the file path of ":model" in settings.gradle, e.g. with project(":model").projectDir = new File(rootDir, "unusual/path/to/model")
Automate the discovery of projects
The most common approach is the first one. The second is not unusual, particularly if you want to put child projects into a separate directory, like subprojects — something the build of Gradle itself does. I haven't seen the last option done, and I don't know whether it runs into problems.
For the sake of completeness, and at your own risk if you use something like it, here's an example of automatic discovery of projects in the settings.gradle file:
rootDir.eachDir { File dir ->
if ("build.gradle" in dir.listFiles()*.name) {
include dir.name
}
}
This fragment basically looks for directories within the root project folder that have a build.gradle file in them and adds them as child projects. The child projects' directory names become the projects' names.
It's not particularly clever, and you should really use different names for the build files, but it may give you some ideas to work with.
Non-project dependencies
As with project dependencies, Gradle needs to know where to get the corresponding JAR or other form of artifact for a specified module. You normally specify Maven Central or something similar for this, but there are other useful, but less common, options:
Copy a project's artifacts into the local Maven repository — both the Maven Plugin and Maven Publish Plugin support this
Publish to a Maven-compatible repository using a file:// URL rather than an HTTP/HTTPS one, which protects your projects from corruption of Maven Local
Worth noting is that Gradle supports composite builds that allow you to substitute a normal dependency with (effectively) a project dependency from another build. So if model were part of a separate build but you had the source code and build locally, you could make changes and immediately test them in another build's project without going through the whole "install" intermediate step that's common in the Maven world (and Gradle pre-composite-builds).
Hope all this makes sense.