How to implement repository in Go in case of complex requests? - go

Suppose we have multiple products with next fields: id, name, type, price, weight.
I want to return products that match some complex filter, for example:
name like '%bla%' and type = 3 - return all products that contains specific substring in name and belongs to specific type
name like '%bla%' and type=4 and weight/price < 10
(name like '%bla%' and type=5) or (name like '%lala%' and type=6 and price < 200)
I don't want to implement separate method for every possible filter.
Repository fetches data from db (I use postgres).

You can do like this:
package main
import(
"fmt"
"regexp"
)
type Items struct{
_id string;
_name string;
_type int;
_price float64;
_weight float64;
}
func (i *Items) filter(bla string) []Items{
items := []Items{
Items{
_id: "i_78676758",
_name: "packet1",
_type: 4,
_price: 44.65,
_weight: 3.6,
},
Items{
_id: "i_546458",
_name: "packet2",
_type: 5,
_price: 234.65,
_weight: 123.6,
},
Items{
_id: "i_5879788",
_name: "packet2",
_type: 5,
_price: 34.65,
_weight: 13.6,
},
Items{
_id: "i_7858758",
_name: "packet3",
_type: 3,
_price: 284.65,
_weight: 23.6,
},
};
var validID = regexp.MustCompile(regexp.QuoteMeta(bla))
new_items := []Items{}
for _, item := range items{
switch{
case ((validID.MatchString(item._name)) && (item._type == 3)):
new_items = items
break;
case ((validID.MatchString(item._name)) && (item._type == 4) && (item._price < 10) && (item._weight < 10)):
new_items = append(new_items, item)
case (((validID.MatchString(item._name)) && item._type == 5) || ((validID.MatchString(item._name)) && (item._type == 6) && (item._price < 200))):
new_items = append(new_items, item)
case ((validID.MatchString(item._name)) && (item._price > 100)):
new_items = append(new_items, item)
default:
}
}
return new_items;
}
func main(){
item := &Items{
_id: "i_7858758",
_name: "packet",
_type: 4,
_price: 234.65,
_weight: 23.6,
}
items := item.filter("et2")
fmt.Println(items)
}
In the above code Items struct holds the data which has filter method which loops over items which is a []Items and filter on the basis of text which is matched by Regexp and switch case to validate other things and finally returns a []Items which holds the filtered data.

Related

Column in latest go-pg

I am updating from go-pg from 8.0.5 to 10.3.2 and I am having a problem with the columns ORM
structures:
type Item struct {
ID int `pg:"id,pk"`
Name string `pg:"name"`
Desc string `pg:"description"`
SubItems []SubItem `pg:"rel:has-many"`
}
type SubItem struct {
ID int `pg:"id,pk"`
ItemID int `pg:"item_id"`
Name string `pg:"name"`
Item Item `pg:"rel:has-one"`
}
and this is the section of the unit test that is failing
list := []test.Item{{ID: 1, Name: "first"}, {ID: 2, Name: "second"}, {ID: 3, Name: "third"}}
subItems := []test.SubItem{{ID: 1, ItemID: 1}, {ID: 2, ItemID: 3}}
_, err := dbConn.model(list).Insert()
So(err, ShouldBeNil)
_, err = dbConn.model(subItems).Insert()
So(err, ShouldBeNil)
expected := test.SubItem{
ID: 2,
ItemID: 3,
Item: test.Item{ID: 3, Name: "third"},
}
var actual test.SubItem
err = dbConn.Model(&actual).Column("item").Where("sub_item.id = 2").Select()
So(err, ShouldBeNil)
So(actual, ShouldResemble, expected)
The problem I am running into is, in v8, this selected item with a join. In v10, it's throwing a "column 'item' does not exist" error.
What is the correct way of doing this?
It is changed in v9 check changes here:
Query.Column does not accept relation name any more. Use Query.Relation instead which returns an error if relation does not exist.
Try with Relation then you get all the Item columns.
err = dbConn.Model(&actual).
Column("_").
Relation("Item").
Where("sub_item.id = 2").
Select()
There are more select options with mappings of table relations in docs: Writing queries

Relation with it self in GORM

I want to relate an entity to itself with GORM
I tried this:
type project struct {
gorm.Model
Name string
ParentID uint
projects []project `gorm:"foreignkey:ParentID,association_foreignkey:ID"`
}
db.Create(&project{Name: "parent", ParentID: 0})
db.Create(&project{Name: "child", ParentID: 1})
db.Create(&project{Name: "child1", ParentID: 1})
var project Project
var projects []Project
db.First(&project)
db.Model(&project).Related(&projects)
but this is the error:
invalid association []
My desired result is:
{Name:"parent",
projects:[
{Name:"child",projects:[]},
{Name:"child1",projects:[]}
]
}
and I want to mention that I am new with golang :)
Change your projects tag to this - gorm:"foreignkey:ParentID" and make the field itself public. To get the parent with children in it do:
p := &project{}
err := db.Where("name = 'parent'").
Preload("Projects").
First(p).Error

How to build an array of structs in Go and gRPC?

I am trying to add an array of strings into the content part of a struct with the Id as the array index. I have the code working for one element, but get various errors when I try and add the loop. Any ideas are welcome. I am using Go.
func buildRequest(s []string) []*storepb.LongStoreRequest {
// ss:= []storepb.LongStoreRequest
// int32 i =0 stringv := s[0]
// for i := 0; i < len(s); i++ {
// println(i, apps[i])
ss := []*storepb.LongStoreRequest{
&storepb.LongStoreRequest {
Msg: &storepb.StoreMessage{
Content: stringv,
Account: "trevor3",
Parent: "parentrec",
Id: 0,
},
},
} // }
return ss
}
If I understand your description correctly, you want to build an array of LongStoreRequests, where each element corresponding to an item in the string array, with Id giving the array index. If that's really what you need, something like this should work:
ss := []*storepb.LongStoreRequest{}
for i,str:=range s {
ss=append(ss,&storepb.LongStoreRequest {
Msg: &storepb.StoreMessage{
Content: str,
Account: "trevor3",
Parent: "parentrec",
Id: i,
}})
}

Golang implementing pagination on map[string]interface{} data

I have a json file (nested json) that I am unmarshalling its content into a map[string]interface. Now I have to implement pagination as the data is large. The client side will send as a query parameter the desired page, how can I slice the data I have?
This is a snippet of the data I am dealing with:
"packages":{
"pkg1": {
"meta": {
"description": "description1",
"name": "pkg1.1"
},
"name": "pkg1.1"
},
"pkg2": {
"meta": {
"description": "description2",
"name": "pkg2.2"
},
"name": "pkg2.2"
},
}
So what I did is that I recursively iterated through the data and created an array of a custom type containing the data I need (name, description) for each entry so that I can use it for pagination. Here is the code I used:
type Object struct {
name string
description string
}
func iterate(aMap map[string]interface{}, result *[]Object){
for key, val := range aMap {
switch val.(type) {
case map[string]interface{}:
if(key == "meta"){
switch reflect.TypeOf(val).Kind() {
case reflect.Map:
s := reflect.ValueOf(val)
var tmpData Object
if(s.MapIndex(reflect.ValueOf("name")).IsValid()){
tmpData.name = s.MapIndex(reflect.ValueOf("name")).Interface().(string)
}
if(s.MapIndex(reflect.ValueOf("description")).IsValid()){
tmpData.description = s.MapIndex(reflect.ValueOf("description")).Interface().(string)
}
*result = append(*result, tmpData)
}
}
iterate(val.(map[string]interface{}), result)
default: //DO NOTHING!!
}
}
}
If you're doing pagination, somewhere the data must be represented as a list instead of an object? I assume at some place in your JSON, you have a list of items, otherwise pagination doesn't make sense.
It shouldn't be very hard, something simple like this should work:
const (
itemsPerPage = 10
)
var data []map[string]interface{}
// pages start at 1, can't be 0 or less.
func GetDataPage(page int) []map[string]interface{} {
start := (page - 1) * itemsPerPage
stop := start + itemsPerPage
if start > len(data) {
return nil
}
if stop > len(data) {
stop = len(data)
}
return data[start:stop]
}
You are unmarshalling your json into a map which has no order by itself. In order to be able to paginate your results you need to order them in some way.
One way of doing it is to sort your data and then store it into an array. But in order to paginate you need to have ordered data and that is not possible with a map.

Golang Gorm one-to-many with has-one

I'm trying to learn Go and Gorm by building a little prototype order management app. The database is MySQL. With simple queries Gorm has been stellar. However, when trying to obtain a result set involving a combination one-to-many with a has-one relationship Gorm seems to fall short. No doubt, it is my lack of understanding that is actually falling short. I can't seem to find any online examples of what I am trying to accomplish. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Go Structs
// Order
type Order struct {
gorm.Model
Status string
OrderItems []OrderItem
}
// Order line item
type OrderItem struct {
gorm.Model
OrderID uint
ItemID uint
Item Item
Quantity int
}
// Product
type Item struct {
gorm.Model
ItemName string
Amount float32
}
Database tables
orders
id | status
1 | pending
order_items
id | order_id | item_id | quantity
1 | 1 | 1 | 1
2 | 1 | 2 | 4
items
id | item_name | amount
1 | Go Mug | 12.49
2 | Go Keychain | 6.95
3 | Go T-Shirt | 17.99
Current query
order := &Order
if err := db.Where("id = ? and status = ?", reqOrder.id, "pending")
.First(&order).Error; err != nil {
fmt.Printf(err.Error())
}
db.Model(&order).Association("OrderItems").Find(&order.OrderItems)
Results (gorm makes 2 db queries)
order == Order {
id: 1,
status: pending,
OrderItems[]: {
{
ID: 1,
OrderID: 1,
ItemID: 1,
Item: nil,
Quantity: 1,
},
{
ID: 2,
OrderID: 1,
ItemID: 2,
Item: nil,
Quantity: 4,
}
}
Alternative query
order := &Order
db.Where("id = ? and status = ?", reqOrder.id, "cart")
.Preload("OrderItems").Preload("OrderItems.Item").First(&order)
Results (gorm makes 3 db queries)
order == Order {
id: 1,
status: pending,
OrderItems[]: {
{
ID: 1,
OrderID: 1,
ItemID: 1,
Item: {
ID: 1,
ItemName: Go Mug,
Amount: 12.49,
}
Quantity: 1,
},
{
ID: 2,
OrderID: 1,
ItemID: 2,
Item: {
ID: 2,
ItemName: Go Keychain,
Amount: 6.95,
},
Quantity: 4,
}
}
Ideal results
The "Alternative query" above produces the ideal query results. However, Gorm makes 3 separate database queries to do so. Ideally, the same results would be accomplished with 1 (or 2) database queries.
This could be accomplished in MySQL with a couple of joins. Gorm allows for joins. But, I was hoping to take advantage of some of Gorm's relational magic.
Thanks a bunch!
As described in this issue, gorm is not designed to use joins to preload other structs values. If you would like to continue to use gorm and have the ability to use joins to load values, one must use the SQL Builder exposed in gorm, and write some code to scan the desired values.
This would become burdensome if there are numerous tables that have to be accounted for.
If xorm is available as an option, they support loading struct values. Described under the find bullet point, here.
Note: I did not scan all the fields, just enough to get the point across.
EXAMPLE:
package main
import (
"log"
"github.com/jinzhu/gorm"
_ "github.com/jinzhu/gorm/dialects/sqlite"
"github.com/kylelemons/godebug/pretty"
)
// Order
type Order struct {
gorm.Model
Status string
OrderItems []OrderItem
}
// Order line item
type OrderItem struct {
gorm.Model
OrderID uint
ItemID uint
Item Item
Quantity int
}
// Product
type Item struct {
gorm.Model
ItemName string
Amount float32
}
var (
items = []Item{
{ItemName: "Go Mug", Amount: 12.49},
{ItemName: "Go Keychain", Amount: 6.95},
{ItemName: "Go Tshirt", Amount: 17.99},
}
)
func main() {
db, err := gorm.Open("sqlite3", "/tmp/gorm.db")
db.LogMode(true)
if err != nil {
log.Panic(err)
}
defer db.Close()
// Migrate the schema
db.AutoMigrate(&OrderItem{}, &Order{}, &Item{})
// Create Items
for index := range items {
db.Create(&items[index])
}
order := Order{Status: "pending"}
db.Create(&order)
item1 := OrderItem{OrderID: order.ID, ItemID: items[0].ID, Quantity: 1}
item2 := OrderItem{OrderID: order.ID, ItemID: items[1].ID, Quantity: 4}
db.Create(&item1)
db.Create(&item2)
// Query with joins
rows, err := db.Table("orders").Where("orders.id = ? and status = ?", order.ID, "pending").
Joins("Join order_items on order_items.order_id = orders.id").
Joins("Join items on items.id = order_items.id").
Select("orders.id, orders.status, order_items.order_id, order_items.item_id, order_items.quantity" +
", items.item_name, items.amount").Rows()
if err != nil {
log.Panic(err)
}
defer rows.Close()
// Values to load into
newOrder := &Order{}
newOrder.OrderItems = make([]OrderItem, 0)
for rows.Next() {
orderItem := OrderItem{}
item := Item{}
err = rows.Scan(&newOrder.ID, &newOrder.Status, &orderItem.OrderID, &orderItem.ItemID, &orderItem.Quantity, &item.ItemName, &item.Amount)
if err != nil {
log.Panic(err)
}
orderItem.Item = item
newOrder.OrderItems = append(newOrder.OrderItems, orderItem)
}
log.Print(pretty.Sprint(newOrder))
}
Output:
/tmp/main.go.go:55)
[2018-06-18 18:33:59] [0.74ms] INSERT INTO "items" ("created_at","updated_at","deleted_at","item_name","amount") VALUES ('2018-06-18 18:33:59','2018-06-18 18:33:59',NULL,'Go Mug','12.49')
[1 rows affected or returned ]
(/tmp/main.go.go:55)
[2018-06-18 18:33:59] [0.50ms] INSERT INTO "items" ("created_at","updated_at","deleted_at","item_name","amount") VALUES ('2018-06-18 18:33:59','2018-06-18 18:33:59',NULL,'Go Keychain','6.95')
[1 rows affected or returned ]
(/tmp/main.go.go:55)
[2018-06-18 18:33:59] [0.65ms] INSERT INTO "items" ("created_at","updated_at","deleted_at","item_name","amount") VALUES ('2018-06-18 18:33:59','2018-06-18 18:33:59',NULL,'Go Tshirt','17.99')
[1 rows affected or returned ]
(/tmp/main.go.go:58)
[2018-06-18 18:33:59] [0.71ms] INSERT INTO "orders" ("created_at","updated_at","deleted_at","status") VALUES ('2018-06-18 18:33:59','2018-06-18 18:33:59',NULL,'pending')
[1 rows affected or returned ]
(/tmp/main.go.go:61)
[2018-06-18 18:33:59] [0.62ms] INSERT INTO "order_items" ("created_at","updated_at","deleted_at","order_id","item_id","quantity") VALUES ('2018-06-18 18:33:59','2018-06-18 18:33:59',NULL,'49','145','1')
[1 rows affected or returned ]
(/tmp/main.go.go:62)
[2018-06-18 18:33:59] [0.45ms] INSERT INTO "order_items" ("created_at","updated_at","deleted_at","order_id","item_id","quantity") VALUES ('2018-06-18 18:33:59','2018-06-18 18:33:59',NULL,'49','146','4')
[1 rows affected or returned ]
(/tmp/main.go.go:69)
[2018-06-18 18:33:59] [0.23ms] SELECT orders.id, orders.status, order_items.order_id, order_items.item_id, order_items.quantity, items.item_name, items.amount FROM "orders" Join order_items on order_items.order_id = orders.id Join items on items.id = order_items.id WHERE (orders.id = '49' and status = 'pending')
[0 rows affected or returned ]
--- ONLY ONE QUERY WAS USED TO FILL THE STRUCT BELOW
2018/06/18 18:33:59 {Model: {ID: 49,
CreatedAt: 0001-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 UTC,
UpdatedAt: 0001-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 UTC,
DeletedAt: nil},
Status: "pending",
OrderItems: [{Model: {ID: 0,
CreatedAt: 0001-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 UTC,
UpdatedAt: 0001-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 UTC,
DeletedAt: nil},
OrderID: 49,
ItemID: 145,
Item: {Model: {ID: 0,
CreatedAt: 0001-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 UTC,
UpdatedAt: 0001-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 UTC,
DeletedAt: nil},
ItemName: "Go Mug",
Amount: 12.489999771118164},
Quantity: 1},
{Model: {ID: 0,
CreatedAt: 0001-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 UTC,
UpdatedAt: 0001-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 UTC,
DeletedAt: nil},
OrderID: 49,
ItemID: 146,
Item: {Model: {ID: 0,
CreatedAt: 0001-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 UTC,
UpdatedAt: 0001-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 UTC,
DeletedAt: nil},
ItemName: "Go Keychain",
Amount: 6.949999809265137},
Quantity: 4}]}

Resources