I need to subscribe to a topic(topic is a channel) before publishing to a topic, but when creating a thread I need to run go Func to keep listening to channels to process messages (for example from publish or subscribe a new subscribe )
the test works (but not every time), sometimes when I run the test it ends up posting a message on the channel (topic) before I'm listening to the topic (channel)
i have this test:
func Test_useCase_publish(t *testing.T) {
for _, tt := range tests {
tt := tt
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
tt.fields.storage = &RepositoryMock{
GetTopicFunc: func(ctx context.Context, topicName vos.TopicName) (entities.Topic, error) {
return tt.fields.topic, nil
},
}
useCase := New(tt.fields.storage)
subscribed := make(chan struct{})
go func() {
tt.fields.topic.Activate()
ch, _, err := useCase.Subscribe(tt.args.ctx, tt.args.message.TopicName)
require.NoError(t, err)
close(subscribed)
msg, ok := <-ch
if ok {
fmt.Println("msg", msg)
assert.Equal(t, tt.want, msg)
}
}()
<-subscribed
err := useCase.Publish(tt.args.ctx, tt.args.message)
assert.ErrorIs(t, err, tt.wantErr)
})
}
}
topic :
func (t Topic) Activate() {
go t.listenForSubscriptions()
go t.listenForMessages()
go t.listenForKills()
}
func (t *Topic) listenForSubscriptions() {
for newSubCh := range t.newSubCh {
t.Subscribers.Store(newSubCh.GetID(), newSubCh)
}
}
func (t *Topic) listenForKills() {
for subscriberID := range t.killSubCh {
t.Subscribers.Delete(subscriberID)
}
}
func (t *Topic) listenForMessages() {
for msg := range t.newMessageCh {
m := msg
t.Subscribers.Range(func(key, value interface{}) bool {
if key == nil || value == nil {
return false
}
if subscriber, ok := value.(Subscriber); ok {
subscriber.ReceiveMessage(m)
}
return true
})
}
func (t Topic) Dispatch(message vos.Message) {
t.newMessageCh <- message
}
func (t *Topic) listenForMessages() {
for msg := range t.newMessageCh {
m := msg
t.Subscribers.Range(func(key, value interface{}) bool {
if key == nil || value == nil {
return false
}
if subscriber, ok := value.(Subscriber); ok {
subscriber.ReceiveMessage(m)
}
return true
})
}
}
subscribe:
func (u useCase) Subscribe(ctx context.Context, topicName vos.TopicName) (chan vos.Message, vos.SubscriberID, error) {
if err := topicName.Validate(); err != nil {
return nil, "", err
}
topic, err := u.storage.GetTopic(ctx, topicName)
if err != nil {
if !errors.Is(err, entities.ErrTopicNotFound) {
return nil, "", err
}
topic, err = u.createTopic(ctx, topicName)
if err != nil {
return nil, "", err
}
subscriber := entities.NewSubscriber(topic)
subscriptionCh, id := subscriber.Subscribe()
return subscriptionCh, id, nil
}
subscriber := entities.NewSubscriber(topic)
subscriptionCh, id := subscriber.Subscribe()
return subscriptionCh, id, nil
}
func (s Subscriber) Subscribe() (chan vos.Message, vos.SubscriberID) {
s.topic.addSubscriber(s)
return s.subscriptionCh, s.GetID()
}
func (s Subscriber) ReceiveMessage(msg vos.Message) {
s.subscriptionCh <- msg
}
publisher :
func (u useCase) Publish(ctx context.Context, message vos.Message) error {
if err := message.Validate(); err != nil {
return err
}
topic, err := u.storage.GetTopic(ctx, message.TopicName)
if err != nil {
return err
}
topic.Dispatch(message)
return nil
}
when I call subscribe (I send a message to a subscribe to channel and add a subscribe to my thread) when I post a message to a topic I send a message to topic channel
Some points are missing from the code you show, such as the code for .Subscribe() and .Publish(), or how the channels are instanciated (are they buffered/unbuffered ?).
One point can be said, though :
from the looks of (t *Topic) listenForSubscriptions() : this subscribing method does not send any signal to the subscriber that it has been registered.
So my guess is : your useCase.Subscribe(...) call has the information that the created channel has been written on newSubCH, but it hasn't got the inforamtion that t.Subcribers.Store(...) has completed.
So, depending on how the goroutines are scheduled, the message sending in your test function can occur before the channel has actually been registered.
To fix this, you add something that will send a signal back to the caller. One possible way :
type subscribeReq struct{
ch chan Message
done chan struct{}
}
// turn Topic.newSubCh into a chan *subscribeReq
func (t *Topic) listenForSubscriptions() {
for req := range t.newSubCh {
t.Subscribers.Store(newSubCh.GetID(), req.ch)
close(req.done)
}
}
Another point : your test function does not check if the goroutine spun with your go func(){ ... }() call completes at all, so your unit test process may also exit before the goroutine has had the chance to execute fmt.Println(msg).
A common way to check this is to use a sync.WaitGroup :
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
...
useCase := New(tt.fields.storage)
subscribed := make(chan struct{})
wg := &sync.WaitGroup{} // create a *sync.WaitGroup
wg.Add(1) // increment by 1 (you start only 1 goroutine)
go func() {
defer wg.Done() // have the goroutine call wg.Done() when returning
...
}()
// send message, check that no error occurs
wg.Wait() // block here until the goroutine has completed
})
Related
For the following code, get Message via RPC, why its Done field is nil?
Could not chan pass through RPC?
type Message struct {
Text string
Done chan bool
}
type (
GetArgs struct {
Key string
}
GetReply struct {
Message *Message
}
)
// Client
func connect() *rpc.Client {
client, err := rpc.Dial("tcp", ":1234")
if err != nil {
log.Fatal("dialing:", err)
}
return client
}
func get(key string) *Message {
client := connect()
args := GetArgs{key}
reply := GetReply{}
err := client.Call("KV.Get", &args, &reply)
if err != nil {
log.Fatal("error:", err)
}
client.Close()
return reply.Message
}
// Server
type KV struct {
mu sync.Mutex
messages map[string]*Message
}
func server() {
kv := new(KV)
kv.messages = map[string]*Message{}
done := make(chan bool)
kv.messages["Jan"] = &Message{Text: "hello", Done: done}
rpcs := rpc.NewServer()
rpcs.Register(kv)
l, err := net.Listen("tcp", ":1234")
if err != nil {
log.Fatal("error:", err)
}
go func() {
for {
conn, err := l.Accept()
if err == nil {
go rpcs.ServeConn(conn)
} else {
break
}
}
l.Close()
}()
}
func (kv *KV) Get(args *GetArgs, reply *GetReply) error {
kv.mu.Lock()
defer kv.mu.Unlock()
val, ok := kv.messages[args.Key]
if ok {
reply.Message = val
}
return nil
}
func main() {
server()
fmt.Printf("get() -> %v\n", get("Jan"))
// Output:
// get() -> &{hello <nil>}
}
No. RPC arguments can only be those that are serializable by encoding/gob, and chans are not one of them
Functions and channels will not be sent in a gob. Attempting to encode such a value at the top level will fail. A struct field of chan or func type is treated exactly like an unexported field and is ignored.
I'm trying to adapt code from the consumer group example for github.com/Shopify/sarama, and am struggling to add a unit test which tests the functionality of session.MarkMessage() in the ConsumeClaim method (https://github.com/Shopify/sarama/blob/5466b37850a38f4ed6d04b94c6f058bd75032c2a/examples/consumergroup/main.go#L160).
Here is my adapted code with a consume() function:
package main
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"log"
"os"
"os/signal"
"sync"
"syscall"
"github.com/Shopify/sarama"
)
var (
addrs = []string{"localhost:9092"}
topic = "my-topic"
)
func main() {
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
defer cancel()
var wg sync.WaitGroup
defer wg.Wait()
consumer := &Consumer{ready: make(chan bool)}
close := consume(ctx, &wg, consumer)
defer close()
<-consumer.ready
log.Println("Sarama consumer up and running!")
sigterm := make(chan os.Signal, 1)
signal.Notify(sigterm, syscall.SIGINT, syscall.SIGTERM)
select {
case <-ctx.Done():
log.Println("terminating: context cancelled")
case <-sigterm:
log.Println("terminating: via signal")
}
}
func consume(ctx context.Context, wg *sync.WaitGroup, consumer *Consumer) (close func()) {
config := sarama.NewConfig()
config.Version = sarama.V0_11_0_2 // The version has to be at least V0_10_2_0 to support consumer groups
config.Consumer.Offsets.Initial = sarama.OffsetOldest
consumerGroup, err := sarama.NewConsumerGroup(addrs, "my-group", config)
if err != nil {
log.Fatalf("NewConsumerGroup: %v", err)
}
wg.Add(1)
go func() {
defer wg.Done()
for {
if err := consumerGroup.Consume(ctx, []string{topic}, consumer); err != nil {
log.Panicf("Consume: %v", err)
}
if ctx.Err() != nil {
return
}
consumer.ready = make(chan bool)
}
}()
close = func() {
if err := consumerGroup.Close(); err != nil {
log.Panicf("Close: %v", err)
}
}
return
}
// Consumer represents a Sarama consumer group consumer
type Consumer struct {
ready chan bool
handle func([]byte) error
}
// Setup is run at the beginning of a new session, before ConsumeClaim
func (consumer *Consumer) Setup(sarama.ConsumerGroupSession) error {
// Mark the consumer as ready
close(consumer.ready)
return nil
}
// Cleanup is run at the end of a session, once all ConsumeClaim goroutines have exited
func (consumer *Consumer) Cleanup(sarama.ConsumerGroupSession) error {
return nil
}
// ConsumeClaim must start a consumer loop of ConsumerGroupClaim's Messages().
func (consumer *Consumer) ConsumeClaim(session sarama.ConsumerGroupSession, claim sarama.ConsumerGroupClaim) error {
for message := range claim.Messages() {
log.Printf("Message claimed: value = %s, timestamp = %v, topic = %s", message.Value, message.Timestamp, message.Topic)
if consumer.handle != nil {
if err := consumer.handle(message.Value); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("handle message %s: %v", message.Value, err)
}
}
session.MarkMessage(message, "")
}
return nil
}
Here are a couple of unit tests I've written for it:
package main
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"log"
"sync"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/Shopify/sarama"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
"gotest.tools/assert"
)
func TestConsume(t *testing.T) {
config := sarama.NewConfig()
config.Producer.Return.Successes = true
producer, err := sarama.NewSyncProducer(addrs, config)
require.NoError(t, err)
partition, offset, err := producer.SendMessage(&sarama.ProducerMessage{
Topic: topic,
Value: sarama.ByteEncoder([]byte("foobar")),
})
require.NoError(t, err)
t.Logf("Sent message to partition %d with offset %d", partition, offset)
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
var wg sync.WaitGroup
consumer := &Consumer{ready: make(chan bool)}
close := consume(ctx, &wg, consumer)
<-consumer.ready
log.Println("Sarama consumer up and running!")
time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
cancel()
wg.Wait()
close()
}
func TestConsumeTwice(t *testing.T) {
config := sarama.NewConfig()
config.Producer.Return.Successes = true
producer, err := sarama.NewSyncProducer(addrs, config)
require.NoError(t, err)
data1, data2 := "foobar1", "foobar2"
for _, data := range []string{data1, data2} {
partition, offset, err := producer.SendMessage(&sarama.ProducerMessage{
Topic: topic,
Key: sarama.StringEncoder("foobar"),
Value: sarama.StringEncoder(data),
})
require.NoError(t, err)
t.Logf("Sent message to partition %d with offset %d", partition, offset)
}
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
var wg sync.WaitGroup
messageReceived := make(chan []byte)
consumer := &Consumer{
ready: make(chan bool),
handle: func(data []byte) error {
messageReceived <- data
fmt.Printf("Received message: %s\n", data)
return nil
},
}
close := consume(ctx, &wg, consumer)
<-consumer.ready
log.Println("Sarama consumer up and running!")
for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
data := <-messageReceived
switch i {
case 0:
assert.Equal(t, data1, string(data))
case 1:
assert.Equal(t, data2, string(data))
}
}
cancel()
wg.Wait()
close()
}
The tests can be run after running Kafka and Zookeeper in a Docker container such as johnnypark/kafka-zookeeper like so:
docker run -p 2181:2181 -p 9092:9092 -e ADVERTISED_HOST=127.0.0.1 -e NUM_PARTITIONS=10 johnnypark/kafka-zookeeper
What I'm struggling with is the following: if I comment out the line
session.MarkMessage(message, "")
the tests still pass. According to https://godoc.org/github.com/Shopify/sarama#ConsumerGroupSession, MarkMessage marks a message as consumed, but how would I test this in a unit test?
sarama.ConsumerGroupSession.MarkMessage calls sarama.PartitionOffsetManager.MarkOffset, and in the method comment they said: "Note: calling MarkOffset does not necessarily commit the offset to the backend store immediately for efficiency reasons, and it may never be committed if your application crashes. This means that you may end up processing the same message twice."
So in unit tests, MarkMessage does not commit offset fast enough. I faced the same problem and Google brought me here. Sleeping for a second at the end of test functions can be a workaround.
I have a simple kafka consumer for which I have created a handle and trying to read it using a go routine:
func process(ctx context.Context){
consumer := queueHandle.Consume(topic_ops_req, consumerHandler)
// Get signal for finish
doneCh := make(chan struct{})
go func(consumer chan *sarama.ConsumerMessage, ctx context.Context) {
for {
select {
case msg, ok := <-consumer:
if !ok {
logger.Info("Channel has been closed")
doneCh <- struct{}{}
return
}
var request queue.Request
err := json.Unmarshal(msg.Value, &request)
if err != nil {
logger.Error("consumer unmarshal err", err)
panic(err)
}
res, err := new_process(ctx, request, service) // call another func
if err != nil {
//TODO
}
result = res
doneCh <- struct{}{}
case <-ctx.Done():
logger.Info(fmt.Sprintf("Context ended with err : %s", ctx.Err()))
doneCh <- struct{}{}
}
}
}(consumer, ctx)
<-doneCh
}
The issue I am seeing is that once I introduce the "case <-ctx.Done()", the go routine does not enter the "case msg, ok := <-consumer" and always returns that the context ended. How do I my go func work with both consumer channel and ctx.Done() ?
I have the code:
go s.addItemSync(ch, cs.ResponseQueue, user)
This calls the func:
func (s *Services) addItemSync(ch types.ChannelInsertion, statusQueueName, user string) {
//func body here
}
I would however like to do this:
if ok, err := go s.addItemSync(ch, cs.ResponseQueue, user); !ok {
if err != nil {
log.Log.Error("Error adding channel", zap.Error(err))
return
}
Which would change the other func to this
func (s *Services) addItemSync(ch types.ChannelInsertion, statusQueueName, user string) (bool, error) {
}
As in, I would like to be able to declare a go func but this errors out every time. Any idea how you can declare a variable while able to call the go func ability for synchronous calls? as seen in the if ok, err := go s.addItemSync(ch, cs.ResponseQueue, user); !ok { line?
If you want to wait until a go-routine has completed, you need to return results in a channel. The basic pattern, without complicating with wait groups, etc. is:
func myFunc() {
// make a channel to receive errors
errChan := make(chan error)
// launch a go routine
go doSomething(myVar, errChan)
// block until something received on the error channel
if err := <- errChan; err != nil {
// something bad happened
}
}
// your async funciton
func doSomething(myVar interface{}, errChan chan error) {
// Do stuff
if something, err := someOtherFunc(myVar); err != nil {
errChan <- err
return
}
// all good - send nil to the error channel
errChan <- nil
}
In your case if you just want to fire off a go-routine and log if an error happens, you can use an anonymous function:
go func() {
if ok, err := s.addItemSync(ch, cs.ResponseQueue, user); !ok {
if err != nil {
log.Log.Error("Error adding channel", zap.Error(err))
}
}
}()
Or if you want to wait for the result:
errChan := make(chan error)
go func() {
if ok, err := s.addItemSync(ch, cs.ResponseQueue, user); !ok {
if err != nil {
errChan <- err
return
}
}
errChan <- nil
}()
// do some other stuff while we wait...
// block until go routine returns
if err := <- errChan; err != nil {
log.Log.Error("Error adding channel", zap.Error(err))
}
Note:
Your code as written, may have unexpected results if it is possible that a response where ok == false would not return an error. If this is a concern, I would suggest creating and returning a new error for cases where !ok && err == nil
I have the following interface and struct
type PiplineStep interface {
Do(ctx context.Context, in <-chan Message) (<-chan Message, <-chan error, error)
}
type Pipline struct {
Steps []core.PiplineStep
}
Now I am trying to daisy the interfaces to create a pipeline like the following
for _, step := range p.Steps {
out, errc, err := step.Do(ctx, out)
errcList = append(errcList, errc)
if err != nil {
errc <- err
return
}
select {
case outer <- msg:
case <-ctx.Done():
return
}
}
But the compiler says no is this possible?
I get the following Error 'out declared and not used' i have attempted following but it appears that all steps are receiving the same chan
for _, step := range p.Steps {
var tmpOut <-chan core.Message
tmpOut = out
tmpOut, errcTmp, err := step.Do(ctx, tmpOut)
errcList = append(errcList, errcTmp)
if err != nil {
errc <- err
return
}
select {
case out <- msg:
case <-ctx.Done():
return
}
}
You have to declare your channel variable outside the loop if you want to re-use it in each iteration (errors and context omitted for brevity):
package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
var pipeline Pipeline
pipeline.Steps = append(pipeline.Steps,
AddBang{},
AddBang{},
AddBang{},
)
src := make(chan Message)
pipe := src
for _, s := range pipeline.Steps {
pipe = s.Do(pipe)
}
go func() {
src <- "msg 1"
src <- "msg 2"
src <- "msg 3"
}()
fmt.Println(<-pipe)
fmt.Println(<-pipe)
fmt.Println(<-pipe)
}
type Message string
type Pipeline struct {
Steps []PipelineStep
}
type PipelineStep interface {
Do(in chan Message) chan Message
}
type AddBang struct{}
func (AddBang) Do(in chan Message) chan Message {
out := make(chan Message)
go func() {
defer close(out)
for m := range in {
out <- m + "!"
}
}()
return out
}
Try it on the playground: https://play.golang.org/p/ItVLUBRpNA1