I have a problem trying to change to run mode when the target device is the PLC (in local mode the problem disappears). It gives me the error: AdsError: 4115 (0x1013, RTIME: system clock setup fails). I have tried to execute win8settick.bat as administrator and rebooting so many times. I have checked the Hyper-V config and BIOS visualizator too. There is nothing that works for me. Any idea? Thank you
Ive only had this problem when trying to start it locally.
But one problem might be that the PLC time is way off. One suggestion to start troubleshooting would be to check the actual time on the PLC.
You can do this by either remotely accessing it via RDP or by plugging in a monitor and keyboard.
Sounds for me like a incompatibitility between TwinCAT-Realtime-System and the hardware. More exatly the CPU. What type of hardware do you use on your target system? Is it Beckhoff-Hardware or Third-Party. If third-party, which CPU?
Another topic could be the TC-Version related with the Target OS. Can you provide more information about this.
Related
I am trying to start a twincat project on my pc in order to debug it. I've disabled the EtherCAT device and isolated a CPU on my windows 10 with an 8-core ADM processor. After trying to start the run mode, I get a fatal error on the target system. With following message:
'TwinCat System' (10000): Sending ams command >> Init4
RTime: Start Interrupt: Ticker started >> AdsWarning: 4131 (0x1023, RTIME: Intel CPU required) << failed!
I've searched the internet and am not able to find a solution to this problem. There seems to be little information about this. Anyone of you having an idea?
Answering my own question, just in case anyone else would come across the same problem: make sure when you isolate a CPU to emulate the PLC on that you also check it as the default one to be used. Just isolating isn't enough, you have to explicitly indicate the one to use.
Your answer appears to be right there in the message: Intel CPU required, but you stated you're trying to run it on an ADM (I assume AMD) processor.
I don't know where i make a mistake. I try to connect mi host pc (Windows 7) to target pc (virtual machine with Windows 7) in order to start with remote kernel debugging.
Vmware (virtual machine) serial port settings:
Windgb kernel debugging:
Boot virtual machine settings:
If I turn on or turn off virtual machine, nothing happens..
Does anyone know what I'm doing wrong? By the way, is it possible to view content of variables in a driver using LiveKd?
I changed debug port to 2 and host machine can connect to target machine, but windbg get error message "Assertion failed: Missing StreamContext Support ..." and VM hangs at the "Starting Windows" and nothing more happens..
Those settings look correct to me. Occasionally when I see the same behavior I just tell WinDbg to "Break" and that appears to finish the connection.
I've been struggling with much the same thing. It's been a while since I've spent much time kernel debugging with Windbg. I run Linux for pretty much everything, so this time I tried using two KVM/QEMU VM's managed by Libvirt. Lots of different complexity there, since the version of Libvirt I'm using doesn't provide easy "ui" methods of connecting serial ports between VMs (Libvirt hint: the XML setup for the serial ports, one system's Serial port source type must be set to "bind" and one system set to "connect", even for serial type "unix")
Finally, I was able to use Putty on both VM's and chat back and forth, confirming the COM ports I've chosen are indeed connected.
... and still Windbg on my debug host continued to say "Waiting to connect..."
Just confirming #jcopenha's answer, sending Break did just work for me (I don't have Break on my laptop kbd, so I used the Debug Menu to choose "Break").
The Target system is frozen (yes, after the target was fully booted, which was another question I couldn't remember the answer to), and !process gives me interesting info from the target system. I would Up-Vote their answer, but I am new to StackOverflow and don't have the reputation yet.
Thank you!
I've got a customer who told me that my program (simple user-land program, not a driver) is crashing his system with a Blue Screen Of Death (BSOD). He says he has never encountered that with other program and that he can reproduce it easily with mine.
The BSOD is of type CRITICAL_OBJECT_TERMINATION (0x000000F4) with object type 0x3 (process): A process or thread crucial to system operation has unexpectedly exited or been terminate.
Can a simple program be responsible for a BSOD (even on Vista...) or should he check the hardware or OS installation?
Just because your program isn't a driver doesn't mean it won't use a driver.
In theory, your code shouldn't be able to BSOD the computer. It's up to the OS to make sure that doesn't happen. By definition, that means there's a problem somewhere either in hardware or in code other than your program. That doesn't preclude there being a bug in your code as well though.
The easiest way to cause a BSOD with a user-space program is (afaik) to kill the Windows subsystem process (csrss.exe). This doesn't need faulty hardware nor a bug in the kernel or a driver, it only needs administrator privileges1.
What is your code exactly doing? The error message ("A process or thread crucial to system operation has unexpectedly exited or been terminate.") sounds like one of the essential system processes terminated. Maybe you are killing a process and unintentionally got the wrong process?
If somehow possible you could try to get a memory dump from that customer. Using the Debugging Tools for Windows you can then further analyze that dump as described here.
1Windows doesn't prevent you from doing so because it "keeps administrators in control of their computer". So this is by design and not a bug. Read Raymond's articles and you will see why.
Short answer is yes. Long answer depends on what is you program is suppose to do and how it does it?
Normally, it shouldn't. If it does, there must be either
A bug in the Windows kernel (possible but very unlikely)
A bug in a device driver (not necessarily in a device your program uses, this could get quite complicated)
A fault in the hardware
I would bet on option number two (device driver) but it would be interesting if you could get us a more detailed dump.
Well, yes it can - but for many different reasons.
That's why we test on different machines, operating systems, hardware etc..
Have you set some requirements for your program and is your user following them?
If you can't duplicate it yourself, and your program doesn't need admin to run, I'd be a bit suspicous about
The stability of that system's hardware
The virus/malware status of that system.
If you can get physical access to the client box, it might be worth running a full virus scan with an up-to-date scanner, and running a full memtest on it.
I had a system once that seemed stable, except that a certian few programs wouldn't run on it (and would sometimes crash the box). Memtest showed my RAM had some bad bits, but they were in higer sims, so they only got accessed if a program tried to use a lot of RAM.
No, and that is pretty much by definition. The worst thing that you can say is that a user-land application may have "triggered" a Windows bug or a driver bug. But a modern desktop Operating System is fully responsible for its own integrity; a BSOD is a failure of that integrity. Therefore the OS is responsible, and only the OS.
(Example of a BSOD bug that your application alone could expose: a virus scanner implemented as a driver, that crashes when executing a file from sector 0xFFFFFFFF, a sector that on this one machine just happens to contain one DLL of your application)
I had problems when exit my app without stopping all the processes and BD connections when the program ends (I crashed the entire IDE). I place the "stopping and disconnecting" code in the "Terminate" of "Form_Closed" event of my main form and the problem wa solved, I don't know it this is your situation.
Another problem can be if the user is trying to access the same resources your app is using (databases, hardware, sockets, etc). Ask him/her about what apps he/she is using when the BSOD happens.
A virus can't be discarded.
I'm stuck trying to debug a problem which only occurs on my machine. It doesn't exhibit on any of the other devs' systems, nor on our production test server. I've tried pretty much everything I can think of short of completely wiping my hard disk and starting from scratch, or sneaking into the office in the middle of the night to swap my computer with someone else's.
This brings to mind the titular question, then: short of those drastic measures, what do you do when trying to resolve issues that no one else has? I'm open to advice that's general or specific.
[Not sure if this should be CW or not.]
Have you attached a debugger to the program to find the exact point of failure? That is what I would do first.
Sometimes third party software can be the root cause of these sorts of issues. Things like Anti-virus software install low-level filesystem and network drivers that can cause random intermittent failures. You can try killing all processes that aren't base OS services and your app.
Depending on your OS there are different tools that you can use to see what's going on under the covers. E.g. on Windows you can use Process Monitor to see what Registry keys it opens, what DLLs get loaded, etc. You can run this on your machine and on the success machines and compare to see if perhaps some required module is missing .
But seriously, use a debugger. That's what they are there for.
Two things:
I start with the obvious: What's different on your box? More memory? Odball PCI card? Different Microsoft APIs or service packs?
For oddball random software and/or OS crashes:
Check your system for heat issues.
Check your RAM for bad bits.
In this situation, I would try to check out the code and cleanly rebuild it from a different directory to make sure that there are no miscellaneous files in your working directory that are causing a problem.
If you are doing work against a database, I would also try tearing down the database and reconstructing it, possibly using a dump from another developer's machine.
Check the versions of any external third party software - database version, OS version, even software patches.
Look at the configuration on someone else's machine who doesn't have the problem and compare.
Get another developer to sit at your workstation and try to reproduce the problem and also go to their workstation and try it. True story - a fellow developer had a bug that he could only reproduce on his machine...it turns out that he was doing something slightly different in the GUI that no one else was doing (tabbing to a button and then hitting enter, everyone else just hit enter). It never occurred to him that other people might just hit enter to submit, because that "didn't make sense" to him.
Does anyone know ways of partially or fully automating driver test installation?
I am new to driver development and am used to more of a test-driven approach in higher level languages, so moving to the kind of environment where I can't easily test as I go has been a step up for me. I am using Virtual PC for my test environment and currently have to reset it, open device manager, choose the device, click through a bunch of "Are you really sure you wouldn't rather install one of these system drivers" type dialogs, then finally reset the test environment while restarting WinDbg in the host machine just as the test environment is booting up... argh.
After repeating this process many, many times already, surely there has to be a be a better way of doing this? What tools/methods/tricks do commercial driver developers use to run up their driver in a test environment?
Note, this isn't about unit testing drivers, I haven't got to that stage yet or know if it is even possible. This is just about firing up a test environment with WinDbg attached to make sure that some small change I may have done is doing what I expect.
It seems to me that a virtualization software + a "mock objects" (layering) approach (as suggested by Aaron Digulla) + scripts (as suggested by Sergius) can simplify device driver development.
But if you use Visual Studio to develop user-level applications, you can use it for kernel device driver development too with VisualDDK (+ VirtualKD to debug over a named pipe, which is faster than over a virtual COM port), which addresses specifically the annoyances that you mention; from its home page:
... This project brings the simplicity and
convenience of Windows application
development to the driver development
world. No more manual creation of
build scripts, copying of driver
files, installing drivers from INFs,
switching between WinDbg and the
source editor or waiting for seconds
after each step due to the extra-slow
virtual COM port. Just create a driver
project using a convenient Driver
Wizard, select a virtual machine, and
enjoy debugging your driver directly
from Visual Studio. Want to test a
change? Just normally press Shift-F5,
modify your driver, rebuild it and
launch again. VisualDDK will unload
the old driver, install the new one
and load it automatically and quickly.
Bored with WinDbg loading symbol files
for minutes and looking up symbols for
seconds? Just let VisualDDK optimize
this for you using its own DIA-based
symbol engine. Using C++/STLPort in
your drivers? VisualDDK will natively
visualize all STL containers and
strings, as good as Visual Studio does
for user-mode applications. ...
You can write some shell scripts (using sc.exe and devcon.exe) to automate deployment tasks (no opening device manager, clicking on buttons, etc). And make snapshot of the system ready to debug (needn't wait for system boot).
Don't forget to check your driver with DriverVerifier!
Example of my own script :)
sc create FsFilter type= filesys binPath= c:\FSFilterDrv.sys
sc start FsFilter
pause
sc stop FsFilter
sc delete FsFilter
Follow the advice I gave here. Basically, test as little as possible with the real system.
In your case, I've got another tip: Virtual PC is using a virtual hard disk (that's probably a file on your real hard disk).
You don't need to install your driver, you can simply replace the new files in the virtual hard disk. This is often not possible in the running system but in a virtual system, you can open the virtual disk file and change it (since Windows isn't locking the files in it).
I'm not sure about Virtual PC but other emulators come with tools to work with virtual disk images. If VPC can't do it, check out VirtualBox.
It all depends a little on what kind of driver you are writing. But in many cases, writing an appropriate makefile (or something similar) that handles driver installation, start/stop, and launching of a test harness can already be good enough.
I also configure all of my test machines to automatically logon (AutoAdminLogon), map net drives, and launch an appropriate command prompt after startup. Running a specific test is then a matter of typing in a single command only.
One word concerning VirtualPC: VirtualPC is very handy for kernel mode development, but do not forget that it emulates a uniprocessor machine only -- so be sure to regularly test the code on a multiprocessor machine as well. That said, the VHD trick may seem handy, but it somewhat ties you to Virtual PC -- writing appropriate scripts that equally work on VirtualPC as on a real machine therefore seems a better approach to me.
Finally, consider it a shameless plug, but if you are looking for a unit testing framework for Windows kernel mode code, I have written one: cfix.
I think the DevCon utility (described in this OSR Online article) will help you. You should be able to setup batch files that do the job on one click.
It's free to sign up with osronline.com, and you'll probably have to sign up to get to that article. And if you are writing drivers, you WANT to sign up. These guys have been doing this for a long time, and there's a LOT of really good info on that web site.