Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
i am new in laravel,
i have array like
{
music : {'a' =>1, 'b'=> 2},
video :{'c' =>10, 'd'=> 20}
}
i got this by using this code
$video = ResourcesVideo::where('resource_type', 'video')->get();
$music = ResourcesVideo::where('resource_type', 'music')->get();
$response['data'] = [
"videos" => $video,
"music" => $music,
];
on this code i got above array. so my quetions is.
how can i reduce that code. because many things are similer except where condition tried many ways but no success.
You can create array of resources and loop through it.. so in case there are more resource types in future you don't need to repeat code.
$resource_types = ['video', 'music'];
foreach ($resource_types as $resource_type) {
$resources[$resource_type] = ResourcesVideo::where([
'resource_type' => $resource_type,
])->get();
}
$response['data'] = $resources ?? [];
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
First I have data and I group
A = LOAD './test.txt' USING PigStorage(' ') AS (id:int, time:int, value:float);
B = GROUP A BY time;
For example result I have structure like this.
1001 {(1,1001,0.2),(3,1001,0.3),(2,1001,0.3),(4,1001,0.6)}
1002 {(2,1002,0.5),(1,1002,0.3),(3,1002,0.1),(4,1002,0.6)}
1003 {(4,1003,0.2),(1,1003,0.8),(2,1003,0.4),(3,1003,0.5)}
But I want
1001 {(1,1001,0.2),(2,1001,0.3),(3,1001,0.3),(4,1001,0.6)}
1002 {(1,1002,0.3),(2,1002,0.5),(3,1002,0.1),(4,1002,0.6)}
1003 {(1,1003,0.8),(2,1003,0.4),(3,1003,0.5),(4,1003,0.2)}
Use NESTED FOREACH
C = FOREACH B {
sort_by_id = ORDER A BY id;
GENERATE group, sort_by_id ;
};
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Spent about 4 hours trying to figure this out without success.
IQueryable<userTOM> Infolist = userTOMs();
var rbtUserId = Infolist.Where(x => x.UserName == FormsUserName);
userTOMs <-- Does not exist.
Remade the namespace many times but will not appear.
IQueryable does not run immediately on the database. In order to run the query, one has to run functions such as .ToList(), or .Count() on the IQueryable.
Therefore, nothing in your pasted code triggers the database request, and the ID will not be retrieved. I would modify your request to this:
IQueryable<userTOM> Infolist = userTOMs();
userTOM rbtUser = Infolist.FirstOrDefault(x => x.UserName == FormsUserName);
Guid rbtUserId; //assuming this will be populated with a Guid value
if (rbtUser != null) {
rbtUserId = rbtUser.Id; //assuming "ID" is the property name
}
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Hello all I want to achieve something like the SQL Select statement with Linq to Sql. Any help will be appreciated.
SELECT SUM(Debit-Credit) AS LBalance FROM dbo.LeaveLedger
WHERE StaffId =1 AND LYEAR='2000'
Assuming Entity Framework:
Context.Table.Where(x => x.StaffId == 1 and x.LYEAR == "2000")
.Sum(y => (y.Debit - y.Credit));
Something like this?
var sum =
db.LeaveLedger
.Where(ll => ll.StaffId == 1 and ll.LYEAR == "2000")
.Sum(ll => (ll.Debit - ll.Credit))
Since Mansfield has already shown the expression syntax, I'll have a go with the classic query:
var LBalance = (from p in dbo.LeaveLedger
where p.StaffId == 1 && p.LYEAR == "2000"
select (p.Debit - p.Credit).Sum();
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
How convert SQL to LINQ
SELECT
[good_id]
,MIN([good_price]) as minPrice
,Count([distributor_id]) as distrCount
FROM [Provizor].[dbo].[PRICES] where region_id=22
GROUP BY [good_id]
ORDER BY distrCount desc
How to do this in LINQ grouping
Something like this:
var query = dbo.Prices
.Where(x => x.region_id == 22)
.GroupBy(x => x.good_id)
.Select(g => new
{
minPrice = g.Min(x => x.good_price),
distrCount = g.Count(x=> x.distributor_id!=null)
}
.OrderByDescending(x => x.distrCount);